- Firstly, my beloved explains why Dreamwidth is so awesome and why we are both so stoked about it. Another clue is in their diversity statement, which reads like the preamble to the constitution to me...
- We are having a Beltane Beer Festival at work, and you're all invited, if you can get to it!
- Perse posts a nice discursive post about the writing of New Who in
dw_academy. Also, Daddies Richard and Alex might want to nosey at this post ;) - Mr Quist strikes again in his puncturing of government.
- And finally, Lidl's most tempting offer yet - via
huskyteer. Suspect
hairygit will be especially interested in that one.
( web campaigning and raising your profile as a girlie )
( This turned out to be a very good thing... )
And you know what? He's right. Especially when he says:
If you say all politicians are the same, that ANYONE who goes into politics is therefore the same… then no one is going to go into politics to CHANGE things. And that only helps the BAD ones.I've said it before, and I'll probably say it again: we Brits are RUBBISH at violent revolution, but we're really reallly good at stubborn refusal to obey officious rules. Which doesn't relly bode well for the Summer of Rage that lots of people are trying to stoke up. But it DOES bode well for (for example) mass refusal to sign up for ID cards... Our Glorious Leader has promised to do that, you know.
Politicians aren't all the same, because, when you get down to it, we are ALL politicians. It's just that most people are too embarrassed to admit it. But think what change we could make if we all just stopped being embarrassed? We could kick this useless shower out on their arses for starters...
The politicians have finally shut us out of their game for good and we have nowhere left to turn. We're not part of their world any more. We don't even speak the same language. We're the ants in their garden. The bacteria in their stools. They have nothing but contempt for us. They snivel and lie and duck questions on torture - on torture, for Christ's sake - while demanding we respect their authority. They monitor our every belch and fart, and insist it's all for our own good....although I suspect it only applies to politicians who have power, or some prospect of it. I am uncomfortably reminded of Our Glorious Leader's behaviour towards the Lower Orders at conference: I don't think any one party has immunity to this syndrome. But I think we have less of it than the other two main parties, if only because our MPs have higher satisfaction ratings, which must mean that they pay SOME attention to their constituents.
The thing is, it's hard to work up righteous anger when you've got Simon and Garfunkel in your head. Thanks to the First Lady, I can't stop singing this:
And thus, the best I can manage is a sort of weary, folkish melancholia when faced with the truth about our political system. So will a summer of weary melancholia and folk songs do, Charlie? You can rage if you like...
- Chris Huhne launches the Freedom Bill, with the comment that Nineteen Eighty-Four was a warning, not a blueprint.
Our first draft of the freedom bill contains 20 measures to restore the fundamental rights that have been stripped away in recent years. We would:
I agree with everything in it bar 1: 14 days detention without charge is far too long. There's lots more I would like to put in it as well, though. For instance, I think the first bullet needs "and the attendant database" inserting. How about you? What would you add?
• Scrap ID cards for everyone, including foreign nationals.
• Ensure that there are no restrictions in the right to trial by jury for serious offences including fraud.
• Restore the right to protest in Parliament Square, at the heart of our democracy.
• Abolish the flawed control orders regime.
• Renegotiate the unfair extradition treaty with the United States.
• Restore the right to public assembly for more than two people.
• Scrap the ContactPoint database of all children in Britain.
• Strengthen freedom of information by giving greater powers to the information commissioner and reducing exemptions.
• Stop criminalising trespass.
• Restore the public interest defence for whistleblowers.
• Prevent allegations of "bad character" from being used in court.
• Restore the right to silence when accused in court.
• Prevent bailiffs from using force.
• Restrict the use of surveillance powers to the investigation of serious crimes and stop councils snooping.
• Restore the principle of double jeopardy in UK law.
• Remove innocent people from the DNA database.
• Reduce the maximum period of pre-charge detention to 14 days.
• Scrap the ministerial veto that allowed the government to block the release of cabinet minutes relating to the Iraq war.
• Require explicit parental consent for biometric information to be taken from children.
• Regulate CCTV following a Royal Commission on cameras. - Ground Zero. Use googlemaps to see what would happen if you dropped various sizes and styles of nuke on your house, or your workplace, or the houses of parliament
Food was excellent, and Liz's home-made salsa went in about ten seconds. Most importantly, we made a little bit of money, and might now be able to afford to pay Brendan to print us leaflets for about a third of the area our local party covers... So only two more events and we might be able to afford a whole Focus! LOL.
If you have any exciting money-making ideas, or just want to give us some money, do come to the next Liberal Drinks *plugplug* you don't have to be a party member or anything.
I now have to get ready for work - 8 hours today AND tomorrow WOE - and maybe take a few pictures of things to sell on ebay. Although that might have to wait until after work tomorrow, looking at the clock. Life is very very busy at the moment, so apple-ogies to those of you who aren't getting as much attention as usual. It's not that I don't love you all, it's just that I am clinging on by my fingernails to a roller-coaster at the mo. Hopefully things should be a bit less frantic after conference. Only a couple of weeks to go...
One thing that's for sure. People in the party get it, and people not in the party think it's weird. I have tried several times to write an article for Liberal Conspiracy about why it's a good idea to have public arguments when the other two parties are so strong on unity, and I keep ending up with a draft with a couple of sentences in it. And then I read
Lib Dems disagree with each other openly, and put forward the evidence for their positions, and sometimes even change each other's minds. This sort of open communication is the political equivalent of the scientific method, and is the only way to get close to 'truth' in a political sense.... and I thought
YES! Yes, that's it!The Lib Dem approach to politics mirrors the scientific method. People come up with new ideas, and they are tested, and subjected to analysis, and peer reviewed... This is why there are so many sci-fi geeks in the party. This is, in a nutshell, what we are. And yet... Say that to the average person, especially one brought up with modern British journalism with its abominable scientific standards, and you then have to spend half an hour explaining to them what The Scientific Method is...
Oh well, back to the drawing board.
( click for more than you ever wanted to know about Doctor Who, Motherhood, Feminism, Dogs, Bartending, Liberalism, Multicoloured hair, and my bottom )
And now I go to help Small Person tidy her room, and put up her solar system thing at long last, and then make buns.
I have just listened to Jo Swinson being awesome on Any Questions, and am wrapping Mat's anniversary present for tomorrow and hoping that it's not been built up into anything too huge in his head, because it's only a small cheap thing, given the state of our finances.
And then all I have to do is find time for food, and work an eight hour shift from four till midnight.
I am so glad Sunday is my Day off.
- Mat trying to start a fight with the local branch of CAMRA (who had
pinchedgot our room by virtue of there being more of them) - The gorgeous and Libertarian-esque Charlotte Gore turning up and being herself
- A very exciting and interesting legal discussion between myself and Hywel which did not result in everyone else turning away and discussing other stuff at all
- The local CAMRA leaving a large quantity of buffet (which they paid for and we ate)
- lots of lovely BEER
- ... and a rather nice single malt
(but honestly, the 15 year old Dalwhinnie was YUMMY!)
Same time next month then, I reckon :D
What I found interesting about this were the detailed results (of which there are three pages). The graph has two left/right axes, which is slightly confusing, but I think we can cope. They've basically classified issues along traditional old labour/tory lines. What's interesting is that on the "important" axis, people who classify themselves as left wing tend to actually be centrist, while right wingers tend to self-classify correctly. I think this shows how far politics as a whole has shifted right under New Labour.
What's more interesting is the comparisons with people who vote for each of the major parties, which show that Lib Dems are significantly to the left of Labour, on average, and, indeed, only the Greens are even slightly to the left of us. Admittedly I am miles to the left of pretty much everybody, but... ;)
Still you keep pushing that
Lib Dems have lurched to the rightbollocks, mainstream media and bloggers for other parties...
Thank you, president BarryO. You rock.
Anyway, I might write more about this later when the feminist rage has subsided a bit. In the meantime, I have three links for you:
- Lady Mark writes an incredibly good post about discrimination.
- TheyWorkForYou. Yes, I know I linked to this yesterday, but Brown just upped the stakes. PLEASE contact your MP, especially if they are Labour. Also, this advert on the subject is awesome.
- A very important poll.
Cancelling Labour party membership (re: #MPexpenses). Screw you guys, I'm joining the Lib Dems.Tee hee hee. Come to the Lib Dem side! We have cookies!
* Possibly the reason I like the name such much is because of this.
Well, you note down the poll number at the top of the poll, and then you post an entry in which you type, somewhere (for example) <lj-poll-1331922>
This would get you the following result:
Poll #1331922 Ricardo Montalbán
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All
Fantasy Island
Watched (some) on original broadcast![]()
![]()
17 (24.6%)
Watched (some) repeats![]()
![]()
9 (13.0%)
Watched a recording![]()
![]()
1 (1.4%)
Have heard of but never watched![]()
![]()
29 (42.0%)
Fantasy Island?![]()
![]()
17 (24.6%)
The Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad!
Watched in the cinema on release![]()
![]()
11 (16.4%)
Watched in the cinema on re-release/special showing![]()
![]()
1 (1.5%)
Watched a TV showing![]()
![]()
34 (50.7%)
Watched a recording![]()
![]()
18 (26.9%)
Heard of but never watched![]()
![]()
16 (23.9%)
The Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad!![]()
![]()
9 (13.4%)
Start Trek: Space Seed
Watched the episode on original broadcast![]()
![]()
2 (2.9%)
Watched a repeat![]()
![]()
40 (58.0%)
Watched a recording![]()
![]()
15 (21.7%)
Heard of but never watched![]()
![]()
8 (11.6%)
Space Seed?![]()
![]()
21 (30.4%)
Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan
Watched in the cinema on release![]()
![]()
19 (27.5%)
Watched in the cinema on re-release/special showing![]()
![]()
11 (15.9%)
Watched a TV showing![]()
![]()
46 (66.7%)
Watched a recording![]()
![]()
30 (43.5%)
Heard of but never watched![]()
![]()
12 (17.4%)
Own the DVD![]()
![]()
19 (27.5%)
Own two copies of the DVD (
miss_s_b)![]()
![]()
3 (4.3%)
Coming to Bradford in June to watch the 70mm print as part of the Fantastic Films Weekend![]()
![]()
6 (8.7%)
Wrath of Khan?![]()
![]()
0 (0.0%)
You can name the character Ricardo Montalbán played in:
Fantasy Island![]()
![]()
13 (21.7%)
The Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad!![]()
![]()
2 (3.3%)
Start Trek: Space Seed![]()
![]()
39 (65.0%)
Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan![]()
![]()
58 (96.7%)
Ricardo Montalbán was best known for playing:
Why, no, I am not poking gentle fun at my dear friend, the Honourable Lady Mark. Not in the slightest.
sexual orientation, abuse, maternity, Relationships, work/life balance, carers, family and body imageas women's issues does more harm than good? I mean, the fact that the Women's Policy Group is examining these issues implies that the party thinks that they are nothing whatsoever to do with men. This has a number of effects.
- It reinforces the idea that men don't need to worry about these issues, when in fact, they do
- It makes sure that these issues are sidelined as unimportant in a party and a parliament which is still dominated by men, albeit mostly the kind of men who are quite open to
women's issues
- It gives the party's implicit approval to the classification of parenting and caring as
women's work
- especially in the use of the termmaternity
rather than parenting
Now, I'm not saying I don't want these issues to be examined, or that I don't think that they are important. I think that they are very important. I think that they should be front and centre of party policy, not shunted off into some gender-segregated sideline, so that the men can ignore them and get on with the important stuff like blowing people up and building railways. We're never going to achieve equality of opportunity when things which are perceived as
women's issues(like domestic violence) are sidelined as things which don't affect humanity as a whole, when things which disproportionately affect men (muggings, for example) are considered general things which we ALL need to be concerned about.
There's no such thing as an issue which solely affects women, and I think that by separating ourselves out, all we do is perpetuate the perception of women as other, different, abnormal, lesser.
Issues which affect human beings affect us all. For every woman who is denied meaningful employment or equal pay, there is a man who must bear full financial responsibility for another human being, etc. The sooner we all realise that sexism hurts ALL of us, and that we need to act together as humans to end senseless discrimination, and not see each other as an enemy to be conquered, the better off we will all be.
Anyway, I am going to be good and save it for two days' time.
James Graham posted something that made me giggle, too:

Tee hee hee.
a bit gay.
ZOMG gay man calls teenager gay shocker!
Now, happy as I am to see people laying into the self-appointed blogmeister, it does strike me as a bit rich that everyone I have seen doing it is a member of my own party. Yes, the party that came up with the stellar slogan
Homophobia is gayis having a go at a gay man for calling someone gay. I know I should take normalisation of discriminatory abuse seriously, but really, in this instance, I just can't. I'm finding it all very very funny.
It's enough to make one glad to be bi...
What has reminded me of these things today? James Graham's peevishness at the title of this blog...
* giggle *
The Now Show was gigglesome indeed this week, and I share with Mitch the urge to prevent the X-Factor butchery getting the Christmas number one spot. If you want to join in on this, now is the time to join in the world's biggest RickRoll. Go forth and buy Rick Astley before the end of today. Fly, my brave f-list! Fly to iTunes!
ETA: as Mat points out in the comments, buying Jeff Buckley, as noble as that may seem, still contributes money to the Cowellmeister, because he owns the rights. Buy Rick! I have! You know it makes sense:
7DIGITAL
(Remember to click track#1 ONLY)
http://www.7digital.com/artists/rick-as
OR text TRACK to 78789. You will receive a 7digital voucher code - enter this in the voucher area below the basket on this page.
iTUNES
(you'll need iTunes installed on your computer - click BUY SONG on track#1)
http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZSt
PLAY.COM
(tick track#1 in the orange section)
http://www.play.com/Music/MP3-Downl
TESCO DIGITAL
(Again, click on track#1)
http://www.tescodigital.com/Store/P
TUNETRIBE
(it's WMA but 49p - BE CAREFUL it's not the first track?)
http://www.tunetribe.com/product/in







