Home
Hullo world! I am still trying to catch up with my mammoth backlog, and this is complicated by the fact that I have taken the plunge with Dreamwidth. So you all still know I am alive etc., have some linkies:And now I must go watch more Batman with my Small Person. Oh the trials of motherhood...
 
 
Current Mood: busy
 
 

Advertisement

 
10 March 2009 @ 10:16 pm
What I did on my Holidays by [info]miss_s_b aged 31 and 1/4. Part 4: Training Sessions  
Saturday Morning was spent in dull grey rooms being trained on a couple of aspects of Lib Demmery which I felt I ought to brush up on.

web campaigning and raising your profile as a girlie )
 
 
Current Mood: busy
 
 
10 March 2009 @ 07:12 pm
What I did on my Holidays by [info]miss_s_b aged 31 and 1/4. Part 2: The Wimmin's Thing  
The first big bit of interesting stuff was the Consultation on Women's Policy. I had already made my feelings clear on the titling of the thing and thus went in with the hope of constructive discussion. In this regard, it helped that I was sat next to Jo Crispy-Strips, with whom I have had many disagreements about feministy things, but am in broad agreement with about MOST feministy things, and whom I know to be rational and sensible with regard to things like basing her arguments on evidence, rather than just emotion.

This turned out to be a very good thing... )
 
 
Current Mood: busy
 
 
05 March 2009 @ 09:18 am
You may remember me, and many others, enjoying Charlie Brooker's column about how he's just HAD IT with this government. Well, everyone's favourite fluffy grey elephant enjoyed it too. But doesn't think rants, even excellent ones, are enough.

And you know what? He's right. Especially when he says:
If you say all politicians are the same, that ANYONE who goes into politics is therefore the same… then no one is going to go into politics to CHANGE things. And that only helps the BAD ones.
I've said it before, and I'll probably say it again: we Brits are RUBBISH at violent revolution, but we're really reallly good at stubborn refusal to obey officious rules. Which doesn't relly bode well for the Summer of Rage that lots of people are trying to stoke up. But it DOES bode well for (for example) mass refusal to sign up for ID cards... Our Glorious Leader has promised to do that, you know.

Politicians aren't all the same, because, when you get down to it, we are ALL politicians. It's just that most people are too embarrassed to admit it. But think what change we could make if we all just stopped being embarrassed? We could kick this useless shower out on their arses for starters...
 
 
Current Mood: sleepy
 
 
02 March 2009 @ 01:40 pm
I wish I could work up the level of righteous anger Charlie Brooker has in his column today. I really do. And he's (at least partially) right, when he says
The politicians have finally shut us out of their game for good and we have nowhere left to turn. We're not part of their world any more. We don't even speak the same language. We're the ants in their garden. The bacteria in their stools. They have nothing but contempt for us. They snivel and lie and duck questions on torture - on torture, for Christ's sake - while demanding we respect their authority. They monitor our every belch and fart, and insist it's all for our own good.
...although I suspect it only applies to politicians who have power, or some prospect of it. I am uncomfortably reminded of Our Glorious Leader's behaviour towards the Lower Orders at conference: I don't think any one party has immunity to this syndrome. But I think we have less of it than the other two main parties, if only because our MPs have higher satisfaction ratings, which must mean that they pay SOME attention to their constituents.

The thing is, it's hard to work up righteous anger when you've got Simon and Garfunkel in your head. Thanks to the First Lady, I can't stop singing this:



And thus, the best I can manage is a sort of weary, folkish melancholia when faced with the truth about our political system. So will a summer of weary melancholia and folk songs do, Charlie? You can rage if you like...
 
 
Current Mood: melancholy
 
 
26 February 2009 @ 11:25 pm
  1. Chris Huhne launches the Freedom Bill, with the comment that Nineteen Eighty-Four was a warning, not a blueprint.
    Our first draft of the freedom bill contains 20 measures to restore the fundamental rights that have been stripped away in recent years. We would:

    • Scrap ID cards for everyone, including foreign nationals.
    • Ensure that there are no restrictions in the right to trial by jury for serious offences including fraud.
    • Restore the right to protest in Parliament Square, at the heart of our democracy.
    • Abolish the flawed control orders regime.
    • Renegotiate the unfair extradition treaty with the United States.
    • Restore the right to public assembly for more than two people.
    • Scrap the ContactPoint database of all children in Britain.
    • Strengthen freedom of information by giving greater powers to the information commissioner and reducing exemptions.
    • Stop criminalising trespass.
    • Restore the public interest defence for whistleblowers.
    • Prevent allegations of "bad character" from being used in court.
    • Restore the right to silence when accused in court.
    • Prevent bailiffs from using force.
    • Restrict the use of surveillance powers to the investigation of serious crimes and stop councils snooping.
    • Restore the principle of double jeopardy in UK law.
    • Remove innocent people from the DNA database.
    • Reduce the maximum period of pre-charge detention to 14 days.
    • Scrap the ministerial veto that allowed the government to block the release of cabinet minutes relating to the Iraq war.
    • Require explicit parental consent for biometric information to be taken from children.
    • Regulate CCTV following a Royal Commission on cameras.
    I agree with everything in it bar 1: 14 days detention without charge is far too long. There's lots more I would like to put in it as well, though. For instance, I think the first bullet needs "and the attendant database" inserting. How about you? What would you add?

  2. Ground Zero. Use googlemaps to see what would happen if you dropped various sizes and styles of nuke on your house, or your workplace, or the houses of parliament
 
 
Current Mood: busy
 
 
21 February 2009 @ 01:52 pm
Lib Dem Quiz night last night (which was nearly attended by the party President and the First Lady) went pretty well. Finally met the elusive pimpernell Diane, got (jokingly) threatened by Charlotte Gore, had a good giggle, and was unsurprised when Hilary and Jim won the quiz.

Food was excellent, and Liz's home-made salsa went in about ten seconds. Most importantly, we made a little bit of money, and might now be able to afford to pay Brendan to print us leaflets for about a third of the area our local party covers... So only two more events and we might be able to afford a whole Focus! LOL.

If you have any exciting money-making ideas, or just want to give us some money, do come to the next Liberal Drinks *plugplug* you don't have to be a party member or anything.

I now have to get ready for work - 8 hours today AND tomorrow WOE - and maybe take a few pictures of things to sell on ebay. Although that might have to wait until after work tomorrow, looking at the clock. Life is very very busy at the moment, so apple-ogies to those of you who aren't getting as much attention as usual. It's not that I don't love you all, it's just that I am clinging on by my fingernails to a roller-coaster at the mo. Hopefully things should be a bit less frantic after conference. Only a couple of weeks to go...
 
 
Current Location: in bed
Current Mood: busy
Current Music: Any Answers on the Radio
 
 

Advertisement

 
19 February 2009 @ 11:34 pm
It's well known that if you put two Lib Dems in a room and ask them to define the party's policies in one sentence they'll argue forever and you'll end up with a minimum of three paragraphs. There's something about the party that's just not easy to put into words, although I think the preamble to the constitution comes close. Of course, the main reason for this is that if there's one thing ALL Lib Dems have in common is that we really like a good argument, and can often be found vehemently and stridently agreeing with each other...

One thing that's for sure. People in the party get it, and people not in the party think it's weird. I have tried several times to write an article for Liberal Conspiracy about why it's a good idea to have public arguments when the other two parties are so strong on unity, and I keep ending up with a draft with a couple of sentences in it. And then I read [info]andrewhickey's entry from earlier this evening in which he said:
Lib Dems disagree with each other openly, and put forward the evidence for their positions, and sometimes even change each other's minds. This sort of open communication is the political equivalent of the scientific method, and is the only way to get close to 'truth' in a political sense.
... and I thought YES! Yes, that's it! The Lib Dem approach to politics mirrors the scientific method. People come up with new ideas, and they are tested, and subjected to analysis, and peer reviewed... This is why there are so many sci-fi geeks in the party. This is, in a nutshell, what we are. And yet... Say that to the average person, especially one brought up with modern British journalism with its abominable scientific standards, and you then have to spend half an hour explaining to them what The Scientific Method is...

Oh well, back to the drawing board.
 
 
Current Mood: contemplative
 
 
16 February 2009 @ 01:42 pm
I have been rememed! Damn you, [info]innerbrat and [info]pmoodie!  
Because I commented on their entries, they rememed me! Luckily some of the things were things they both mentioned, so here are eight more things for that five things meme:

click for more than you ever wanted to know about Doctor Who, Motherhood, Feminism, Dogs, Bartending, Liberalism, Multicoloured hair, and my bottom )

And now I go to help Small Person tidy her room, and put up her solar system thing at long last, and then make buns.
 
 
Current Mood: busy
 
 
14 February 2009 @ 01:56 pm
Have spent an informative and interesting morning on the streets of Brighouse Lib Demming with Mat and Hilary, which has resulted in at least one recruit and a nice letter to be sent to the local paper about Important Things (once Mat has proofread it).

I have just listened to Jo Swinson being awesome on Any Questions, and am wrapping Mat's anniversary present for tomorrow and hoping that it's not been built up into anything too huge in his head, because it's only a small cheap thing, given the state of our finances.

And then all I have to do is find time for food, and work an eight hour shift from four till midnight.

I am so glad Sunday is my Day off.
 
 
Current Mood: busy
 
 
06 February 2009 @ 12:51 am
This is what those of you who didn't come missed:
  • Mat trying to start a fight with the local branch of CAMRA (who had pinched got our room by virtue of there being more of them)
  • The gorgeous and Libertarian-esque Charlotte Gore turning up and being herself
  • A very exciting and interesting legal discussion between myself and Hywel which did not result in everyone else turning away and discussing other stuff at all
  • The local CAMRA leaving a large quantity of buffet (which they paid for and we ate)
  • lots of lovely BEER
  • ... and a rather nice single malt
Er... yes. I may have consumed a moderate quantity of alcohol. Oh well. I only have to work eight hours tomorrow, it'll be FINE!

(but honestly, the 15 year old Dalwhinnie was YUMMY!)

Same time next month then, I reckon :D
Tags:
 
 
Current Mood: mildly inebriated
Current Music: the shipping forecast
 
 
This one is via [info]pickwick and [info]nwhyte:



What I found interesting about this were the detailed results (of which there are three pages). The graph has two left/right axes, which is slightly confusing, but I think we can cope. They've basically classified issues along traditional old labour/tory lines. What's interesting is that on the "important" axis, people who classify themselves as left wing tend to actually be centrist, while right wingers tend to self-classify correctly. I think this shows how far politics as a whole has shifted right under New Labour.

What's more interesting is the comparisons with people who vote for each of the major parties, which show that Lib Dems are significantly to the left of Labour, on average, and, indeed, only the Greens are even slightly to the left of us. Admittedly I am miles to the left of pretty much everybody, but... ;)

Still you keep pushing that Lib Dems have lurched to the right bollocks, mainstream media and bloggers for other parties...



Thank you, president BarryO. You rock.
 
 
Current Mood: awake
 
 
21 January 2009 @ 10:22 am
So they are having a discussion on Woman's Hour about feminism, and whether it is still relevant in the 21st century. And who are they asking? MEN! FFS. Still, one of them is the very sexy Richard Reeves, so I'll forgive them a bit. Especially given the points he is making, which I agree with completely so far.

Anyway, I might write more about this later when the feminist rage has subsided a bit. In the meantime, I have three links for you:

- Lady Mark writes an incredibly good post about discrimination.

- TheyWorkForYou. Yes, I know I linked to this yesterday, but Brown just upped the stakes. PLEASE contact your MP, especially if they are Labour. Also, this advert on the subject is awesome.

- A very important poll.
 
 
Current Mood: busy
 
 
20 January 2009 @ 10:40 pm
From the wonderfully-named LordOfMisrule*:
Cancelling Labour party membership (re: #MPexpenses). Screw you guys, I'm joining the Lib Dems.
Tee hee hee. Come to the Lib Dem side! We have cookies!



* Possibly the reason I like the name such much is because of this.
Tags:
 
 
Current Mood: amused
 
 

Advertisement

 
16 January 2009 @ 01:08 am
Say someone posts a poll you like the look of on LJ. You'd like to post the same poll on YOUR LJ, but you can't be bothered coding it. How do you resolve this?

Well, you note down the poll number at the top of the poll, and then you post an entry in which you type, somewhere (for example) <lj-poll-1331922>

This would get you the following result:

Poll #1331922 Ricardo Montalbán
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All

Fantasy Island

View Answers

Watched (some) on original broadcast
17 (24.6%)

Watched (some) repeats
9 (13.0%)

Watched a recording
1 (1.4%)

Have heard of but never watched
29 (42.0%)

Fantasy Island?
17 (24.6%)

The Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad!

View Answers

Watched in the cinema on release
11 (16.4%)

Watched in the cinema on re-release/special showing
1 (1.5%)

Watched a TV showing
34 (50.7%)

Watched a recording
18 (26.9%)

Heard of but never watched
16 (23.9%)

The Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad!
9 (13.4%)

Start Trek: Space Seed

View Answers

Watched the episode on original broadcast
2 (2.9%)

Watched a repeat
40 (58.0%)

Watched a recording
15 (21.7%)

Heard of but never watched
8 (11.6%)

Space Seed?
21 (30.4%)

Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan

View Answers

Watched in the cinema on release
19 (27.5%)

Watched in the cinema on re-release/special showing
11 (15.9%)

Watched a TV showing
46 (66.7%)

Watched a recording
30 (43.5%)

Heard of but never watched
12 (17.4%)

Own the DVD
19 (27.5%)

Own two copies of the DVD ([info]miss_s_b)
3 (4.3%)

Coming to Bradford in June to watch the 70mm print as part of the Fantastic Films Weekend
6 (8.7%)

Wrath of Khan?
0 (0.0%)

You can name the character Ricardo Montalbán played in:

View Answers

Fantasy Island
13 (21.7%)

The Naked Gun: From the Files of Police Squad!
2 (3.3%)

Start Trek: Space Seed
39 (65.0%)

Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan
58 (96.7%)

Ricardo Montalbán was best known for playing:

View Answers

Mr Roarke
9 (15.0%)

Vincent Ludwig
0 (0.0%)

Khan Noonien Singh
51 (85.0%)



Why, no, I am not poking gentle fun at my dear friend, the Honourable Lady Mark. Not in the slightest.
 
 
Current Mood: amused
 
 
12 January 2009 @ 06:07 pm
... or does anyone else think that the Liberal Democrats' classification of sexual orientation, abuse, maternity, Relationships, work/life balance, carers, family and body image as women's issues does more harm than good? I mean, the fact that the Women's Policy Group is examining these issues implies that the party thinks that they are nothing whatsoever to do with men. This has a number of effects.
  1. It reinforces the idea that men don't need to worry about these issues, when in fact, they do

  2. It makes sure that these issues are sidelined as unimportant in a party and a parliament which is still dominated by men, albeit mostly the kind of men who are quite open to women's issues

  3. It gives the party's implicit approval to the classification of parenting and caring as women's work - especially in the use of the term maternity rather than parenting

Now, I'm not saying I don't want these issues to be examined, or that I don't think that they are important. I think that they are very important. I think that they should be front and centre of party policy, not shunted off into some gender-segregated sideline, so that the men can ignore them and get on with the important stuff like blowing people up and building railways. We're never going to achieve equality of opportunity when things which are perceived as women's issues (like domestic violence) are sidelined as things which don't affect humanity as a whole, when things which disproportionately affect men (muggings, for example) are considered general things which we ALL need to be concerned about.

There's no such thing as an issue which solely affects women, and I think that by separating ourselves out, all we do is perpetuate the perception of women as other, different, abnormal, lesser.

Issues which affect human beings affect us all. For every woman who is denied meaningful employment or equal pay, there is a man who must bear full financial responsibility for another human being, etc. The sooner we all realise that sexism hurts ALL of us, and that we need to act together as humans to end senseless discrimination, and not see each other as an enemy to be conquered, the better off we will all be.
 
 
Current Location: my sofa
Current Mood: annoyed
Current Music: David Vine's obituary on Radio 4
 
 
23 December 2008 @ 05:27 pm
I has a mystery package! It came from amazon, and is from "David M". I assume that this is the lovely Mr Matthewman, I can't think of any other David Ms of the top of my head, but if I am wrong do let me know.

Anyway, I am going to be good and save it for two days' time.

James Graham posted something that made me giggle, too:



Tee hee hee.
 
 
Current Mood: amused
 
 
No, not the REAL Iain Dale (who sent us a very lovely Christmas card - thank you sweetie). That Tory Blogger. See, apparently, he was being interviewed for the telleh (nice work if you can get it) and some teenagers started being disruptive. This apparently involved having a burping contest. Instead of being sensible and joining in (c'mon Iain, I bet there's a nice resonant capability in that barrel chest), attempts were made to get the teenagers to shut up. There was a bit of verbal to-and-fro (in which it sounds to me like the reporter was a pompous twat) and it ended up with Dale telling one of the teenagers his tracksuit made him look a bit gay.

ZOMG gay man calls teenager gay shocker!

Now, happy as I am to see people laying into the self-appointed blogmeister, it does strike me as a bit rich that everyone I have seen doing it is a member of my own party. Yes, the party that came up with the stellar slogan Homophobia is gay is having a go at a gay man for calling someone gay. I know I should take normalisation of discriminatory abuse seriously, but really, in this instance, I just can't. I'm finding it all very very funny.

It's enough to make one glad to be bi...
 
 
Current Mood: amused
 
 
21 December 2008 @ 03:37 pm
When I was first properly internet active, I hung around a lot in Harry Potter fandom. My username was (still is, in lots of places) SnapesBabe. I recall several occasions on which some newb would pop up with a name like snapesbabe01, and be rounded on by the community. Or the time when I got barred by the WB for talking about being pregnant (because that's not an appropriate subject for people under the age of 13, apparently), and forty-odd people registered variants of the name and posted relentlessly in my support till I was reinstated. Happy, happy memories.

What has reminded me of these things today? James Graham's peevishness at the title of this blog...

* giggle *
 
 
Current Mood: amused
 
 
Happy birthday to one of my longest-standing and most thoughtful friends, [info]veritasema (hope you get lots of snuggles from the young ones today); and also to our eternally youthful Youth and Equalities Spokesman Lynne Featherstone. I often look at the picture of Lynne on her blog and wonder what the portrait in the attic must look like...



The Now Show was gigglesome indeed this week, and I share with Mitch the urge to prevent the X-Factor butchery getting the Christmas number one spot. If you want to join in on this, now is the time to join in the world's biggest RickRoll. Go forth and buy Rick Astley before the end of today. Fly, my brave f-list! Fly to iTunes!

ETA: as Mat points out in the comments, buying Jeff Buckley, as noble as that may seem, still contributes money to the Cowellmeister, because he owns the rights. Buy Rick! I have! You know it makes sense:

7DIGITAL
(Remember to click track#1 ONLY)
http://www.7digital.com/artists/rick-astley/whenever-you-need-somebody/
OR text TRACK to 78789. You will receive a 7digital voucher code - enter this in the voucher area below the basket on this page.


iTUNES
(you'll need iTunes installed on your computer - click BUY SONG on track#1)
http://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewAlbum?i=255991760&id=255991758&s=143444


PLAY.COM
(tick track#1 in the orange section)
http://www.play.com/Music/MP3-Download-Album/4-/8065711/3-Originals/Product.html

TESCO DIGITAL
(Again, click on track#1)
http://www.tescodigital.com/Store/Pages/ProductDetail.aspx?mode=Albums&product=2%3a2900355

TUNETRIBE
(it's WMA but 49p - BE CAREFUL it's not the first track?)
http://www.tunetribe.com/product/index.html?id=245580
 
 
Current Mood: happy