Home
26 March 2009 @ 08:45 pm
So, Mat and I have been re-watching Andromeda Season 1 on Virgin Central (Hurrah for free TV on demand!), partly because it's basically an updated Trek, and therefore cool by definition; and partly because I lust after Tyr Anasazi.

Small person was watching with us tonight. The opening credits started. Keith Hamilton Cobb appeared on screen, and Small Person immediately exclaimed Ooooh! I like him!

* so proud *
Tags:
 
 
Current Mood: amused
 
 

Advertisement

 
15 March 2009 @ 11:43 am

The savage irony of being a character from the one show in the Trek franchise I didn't like is not lost on me....

Your result for the Which Starship Captain Are You? test...

You are the Emissary of the Prophets, Benjamin Lafayette Sisko!

46% Benjamin_Sisko, 21% Kathryn_Janeway, 4% Jean-Luc_Picard, 13% Johnathan_Archer, 14% William_Adama and 27% James_T_Kirk!

As far as this test is concerned, you got the best result. This man was my favorite captain, and by far. There is no one else out there capable of as much. The man was a great father, a noble religious icon (and one worth his salt, which is rare in that field of expertise), an expert battlefield commander, the most respected human figure in Klingon culture, and a damned good captain. Oh, and he was a god. That's pretty significant by itself. It helps that he was also one of the best actors for the job. His character arc was easily the best in the entire smorgasboard of different Star Trek spinoffs for many reasons.

Take the Which Starship Captain Are You? test at HelloQuizzy

 
 
Current Mood: rushed
 
 
11 March 2009 @ 11:19 am
Those of you waiting with bated breath for my report of the Ros Scott interview will have to wait a little longer, as I'm not going to get it finished before I go to work. But what I AM going to do is clear down some of the tabs I have open as "interesting stuff to link to":
  1. Star Trek Perfume. Is anyone else really disappointed that they didn't get BPAL to do these?

  2. The Gallileoscope! $15 for a working replica of Gallileo's telescope? Hot damn! This International Year of Astronomy isn't half throwing up some interestingness.

  3. Fellow Calderdale Lib Dem Nader Fekri's anti-Faith-School amendment might have been defeated, just, at conference, but that doesn't mean those of us who are against the state-funded religious indoctrination of children are giving up. Give the BHA some money, go on. For those who are not clear on this: I don't mind religious people having schools for their children if they want. But if that's what they really want, they can fund them for themselves. State funding for faith schools must end, IMHO. My views on this have really hardened since I have seen it happen to my daughter.

  4. El Presidente thinks that the bloggers who interviewed her were "really nice, actually". Oh that's NOT helping... LOL
Oh well. See you after my nice eight hour shift...
 
 
Current Mood: busy
 
 
So the Being Human Finale is online now, if you can't wait until this evening.

Here are my reactions at the points where I could bear to tear my eyes away from the screen long enough to type:

no spoilers really, but you never know who will whinge )

It are can be neckst series noaw pls?
Tags:
 
 
Current Mood: intrigued
 
 
28 February 2009 @ 01:38 pm
Firstly, I urge you all to watch Being Human, and add [info]beinghumanblog to your f-lists. The show certainly puts all my problems about being a bit of a weirdo into perspective, and if you use the iPlayer to catch up on previous episodes today, you'll only have a few hours to wait until the final episode of the series - it's on at 9 o'clock tomorrow night - and the horrible cliffhanger at the end of episode five won't be torturing you the way it has me.

I love this show because it shows Russell T Davies and the writers of Demons what a British Buffy would really look like - i.e. completely different from Buffy in tone and content, while somehow evoking the same vibe - and, specifically, knocks the bag of arse that is Crotchw00t into a cocked hat. [info]Grumpy McSnugglebutt thinks George is a bit annoying, which I can kind of see, but I have grown to love him, and Mitchell is gorgeous, which always helps. But the best character? The best character is Annie, whose slightly stereotyped writing is overcome by the fantastic performance of the actress. I can't WAIT for tomorrow to see her SPOILER! ) and I will be cheering her on with gusto. Good on BBC3 for already commissioning the next series!

Secondly, witness Nemi's reaction to Cyan's boyfriend's sexism:



I ♥ Nemi. You can add her to your LJ f-list at [info]daily_nemi

Thirdly, via Amused Cynicism ([info]cabalamat2), a cartoon about the impending doom of the entertainment industry:



Bwahahahahahahahaha!

...

I blog about all this to distract myself from the incoherent rage that reading this made well up inside me (hat-tip Chicky Yog). David Milliband and Jacqui Smith? I detest you both, and the sooner you are both in the dole queue, the happier I will be, you venal, corrupt, evil, scumbags.
 
 
18 February 2009 @ 01:20 pm
  1. Does anyone localish fancy dogsitting while we are at Spring Conference? This would be from the morning of the 6th of March to the evening of the 8th of March. We actually arranged a dogsitter for Conference well before Christmas, but due to a shotgun wedding in (I think) Suffolk it's all gone horribly awry. I reserve the right to reject volunteers out of hand, but the fact of volunteering will be much appreciated. Volunteer Obtained!

  2. Does anyone else here feel sick to their stomachs about this? Because there seems to be a BIT of fuss being made, but not much. Our government is complicit in torture, people. TORTURE. Why are we not throwing these bastards out on their ears? I just don't get it.

  3. Does anyone have a gateau from a chateau? Because, given the way the wax has run when it has dribbled, we now have a candle with a handle, and I can do a passable impression of the Fallen Madonna with the Big Boobies by Van Klomp...
In other news, Mitch Benn has been musing about the age of Radio Four listeners. I think it's possible that the average age of radio four listeners is 55, but that the standard deviation is very big indeed. But still, straw poll is strawy:

Poll #1351338 Radio Four Listeners
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All, participants: 42

Do you listen to Radio Four?

View Answers

Yes!
37 (88.1%)

No, because I am not able to - I am a furriner, or I don't have a radio
3 (7.1%)

No, because it sucks.
2 (4.8%)

If you answered yes, above, what age bracket do you fall into?

View Answers

I said no.
1 (2.6%)

under 18
0 (0.0%)

18 - 25
7 (17.9%)

26 - 35
20 (51.3%)

36 - 45
8 (20.5%)

46 - 55
3 (7.7%)

56 - 65
0 (0.0%)

65 +
0 (0.0%)

 
 
Current Mood: geeky
 
 
14 February 2009 @ 12:51 am
Because I am all blogged out after the Carnival, and I still have this stinking cold, and my brain says NOOOOOOOOOOO to seriousness, I am doing a meme. I think this is fairly likely to end up long and rambling, and may end up having shocking revelations in it.
Association Meme: Comment to this post and I will give you 5 subjects/things I associate you with. Then post this in your LJ and elaborate on the subjects given.
[info]puddingcat gave me:
  1. James May.

    I have always watched Top Gear. I remember it having Noel Edmonds on it. I remember Clarkson as a young upstart. I remember Kate Humble in a huge great Humvee-type thing. I used to love Quentin Willson. When they cancelled it I was a bit miffed, and I was really chuffed when they brought it back... but even though I love new TG, there are bits of the old TG I miss. I miss the inclusiveness of it. I miss the silliness of it - not in the huge, over-the-top silly of the Clarkson, but in the gentle, eccentric, English silly.

    James is the closest to that vibe you get in the new show.

    And he's a geek, and he loves old toys, and Proper Beer, and is willing to try new things, and is happy to not follow the crowd, and he keeps his tools in alphabetical order although the rest of his house is a tip. He's clearly the only one of the three of them with an ounce of sense. And I LOVED Big Ideas. I love men who can geek about science.

  2. Hammer Horror.

    Hammer Horror films are awesome! And yet, a lot of the archetypal Hammer Horror films, or at least the films that everyone thinks of as Hammer, aren't. They are Amicus or Tigon or any of a number of other small British production houses. Or even American, if you think of the Corman/Price/Poe films.

    I love them all. I have loved them since I was tiny. I saw Taste the Blood of Dracula which had been taped by one of my brothers from the Friday night horror slot as a small child, and then made my dad tape Legend of the Seven Golden Vampires for me, and then whatever was on the week after, and the week after, and the week after that...

    I'm not so fond of modern horror films. They tend to rely too much on jumpy scares, and not having proper scripts, and things. Slasher movies are vaguely interesting - after all, I love Agatha Christie and PD James, too, and Slasher films are basically whodunnits - and I love the Nightmare on Elm Street series, mainly because they are so silly - but I can't be bothered with the vast majority of modern horrors. Show me a DVD box that says "made in 1973 on a budget of 20p and a bit of chewing gum", though, and I'll crawl over broken glass to watch it. Especially if it has Christopher Lee in it. Or dear old Vinny P.

  3. Alan Rickman.

    The first thing I saw Alan in was Robin Hood, Prince of Thieves. Which I love, despite it having the worst Robin in history, because it still has Mike McShane and Brian Blessed and improbable Morgan Freeman and ZOMG Alan is amazing in it. Seriously, is there a person in existence who DOESN'T shout out "you cheating bastard!!" when Costner stabs him? George SO should have taken him in that fight...

    * cough *

    Anyway. Alan. Alan is awesome. He's fantastic in Dogma. His Snape turned JKR's greasy geekboy that we are supposed to hate* into a sex God, and gave me the internet pseudonym I still have in lots of places. Oh yes, and he's on The List. In fact, The List started off as The Alan Rickman List.**

  4. Circulus!

    LOL Circulus are simultaneously the worst and the best band ever. They are one of those things which are fabulous precisely because they are so improbably bad, like lots of hammer Horror films. The lead singer (and lead lute!) looks like a Geography teacher and they write songs with titles like Power to the Pixies. I mean, look at them! They seem to have gone very quiet since That Difficult Second Album, and the last time I saw them live (with [info]puddingcat) they appeared to have lost their lady singer, which is a shame.

    I think the reason Jenny associates them with me is that when we went to see them we arrived somewhat early, got rather tipsy on Kreik, played pool incredibly badly, and got chatted up by two members of the support band, Gentleman's Pistols (who I also very much recommend, for those into time travel with their music, except that Gentleman's Pistols are more 1972, when Circulus are 1472.) Seriously, GP are worth seeing for the singer alone, who has a beard that would make Andrew Hickey green with envy. You could hide a whole nest of badgers, and probably lots of mushrooms and a snake in it.

  5. Alice Cooper.

    Alice is... I actually find it quite difficult to talk about Alice, because I think I sound like a complete pillock when I geek about him. And somehow it's more acceptable to geek about Hammer Horror films or Alan Rickman than it is about Alice... And yet... Alice is the guy who other bands pinch ideas off and make incredible successes out of them. Like Kiss, with the make up. Like Michael frigging Jackson, with the Vincent Price voice over and the theatricality. Alice is extraordinarily literate, creative, prolific, talented, and has the wickedest sense of humour in rock. Alice is not afraid to take the piss out of himself. He's perceptive and intelligent, and can capture complex concepts in throwaway, singalong rock songs like nobody else. He does love songs and war songs and politics songs and silly songs and serious songs and rebellion songs. He does albums full of pop cheese, and proggy concept albums. He covered SunArise by Rolf Harris, FFS, more than twenty years before anyone else even thought of Rolf as cool and Glastonbury headliner material! The man is a God.

    If you think Poison and School's Out are the only songs he did, you need some serious re-education (neither of those is even in my top 100 Alice songs). If you think he hasn't done anything worth listening to since 1974 then you missed out on Go to Hell and The Song That Didn't Rhyme and You're My Temptation and Burning Our Bed and literally hundreds of other great songs... He's a man who can write songs you can hum to your mother about necrophilia, and make a Christian allegory that CS Lewis would be proud of and cast himself as the devil in it.

    And now I want to turn the lights off and listen to Love it to Death and I can't because I haven't got the turntable plugged in. :(


* no, don't get me started on some of the messages sent out by HP. Really, don't.

** Most of you will know that Mat and I are non-exclusive, and both rate somewhere between 2 and 3 on the Kinsey scale. The Alan Rickman List is a list of people whom, should the unlikely event ever arise, neither of us is allowed to do anything with unless the other is present. With Alan, I think it's his voice. I don't think there are any other men on the list. None that I can recall, anyway. The others that are springing to mind are Shami Chakrabarti, Sue Perkins, and everyone's favourite GILF Annette Crosbie. This are meaning I get Steve Harris all to myself YAY ;)
 
 
Current Mood: nostalgic
 
 

Advertisement

 
04 February 2009 @ 11:16 pm
Lay Scientist has done some interesting research into that nurse who got "suspended" for offering to pray for a patient. I'll just mention a couple of the things he has uncovered: she wasn't suspended, and her lawyers have links with Nadine Dorries.



Are you interested in photography? Photographs, eh? Nudge nudge grin grin snap snap wink wink end up in jail? Yup, that's right, you have less than eight days left to practise free photography. From February the 12th taking pictures of a member of the armed forces, intelligence services, or police without prior consent could land you in prison for up to ten years.

Anyone else see the immediate problems with this?

Consider a protest. It's in an inconvenient place for the government. The police wade in, with batons. Some shocked bystander takes pictures of the police brutality... And what about intelligence officers? How in the hell are we supposed to know whether or not we've taken a photo of one? The whole POINT of them is that you don't know who they are, FFS!

Still, if you've done nothing wrong, you've nothing to fear, right?



Dave Godfrey is awesome. Witness his awesome, as he skewers an idiot creationist, line by line.



And if Dave isn't enough awesome for you, consider this (via [info]moviegrrl):



Bruce Campbell is making Old Spice cool. That shouldn't even be possible.
 
 
Current Mood: cold
 
 
31 January 2009 @ 12:49 pm
I hope it's not just me who is really happy that everyone is going on about the awesome that is the ArethaHat. The lady who wore it is pretty damn awesome too, and this should not be forgotten in the flurry of praise for the Hat. Apparently a lot of the people who are professing love for The Hat are doing so mockingly. This saddens me. Awesome Hats should be encouraged, not mocked.

Tomorrow is Imbolc Eve, and a traditional time for Spring Cleaning. Hopefully this will spur me into action... And then Monday is Imbolc. I like Imbolc. Imbolc is a day for pancakes and cheese and cream and dairy-based food (any similarities with Shrove Tuesday might be because, as with Yule and Lammas and Samhain, the Christians know a good festival when they see one and think it's better to appropriate than oppress). We have white candles and cinnamon incense in the house anyway, so celebration is going to be easy.

I suspect that some of you might be wondering why I do this sort of thing when I don't believe in any Gods. It reminds me of that belief that some religious people have that you can't be a moral person if you don't believe in God/Goddess/Pantheon (because someone who does the right thing out of fear of punishment from a SkyFather or whatever is clearly more objectively good than someone who does it out of their own free will), or that you can't experience love without religion... Just because I'm not religious doesn't mean I don't value life, and appreciate the wonders of nature, and it also doesn't mean that I don't want to give the year structure, and remind myself of these things at set times. Also, I have a great love of history and tradition. It's interesting to me to see how festivals of various religions interact with each other, and how many of them are so closely tied to agriculture and so on and so forth.

I know and mourn the fact that some people who are seriously pagan get offended by attitudes like mine. I'm sorry for that, and I'm sorry for them too. Religion of any kind, when you get down to it, is all about people coming together and celebrating the fact that they are alive. I don't think that this kind of celebration should be restricted to the religious, or to those who are entirely serious. One of the best things about being human is our capacity for fun, and if that's not a reason to celebrate (with or without pancakes), I don't know what is.
 
 
Current Mood: busy
 
 
I took an "ideal career" test once, and it told me motorcycle mechanic, followed by race car mechanic, followed by lots of other vehicle-mending-type jobs. Of the top ten jobs it said were ideal for me, nine of them were some kind of mechanic - the other was motoring journalist.

Last time I took a Star Trek personality test, it gave me Chief O'Brien. This time?

take a wild guess before you click the cut... )

ETA: Mat is answering the questions and just said: 'Do you have a good relationship with authority figures?' Well it rather depends on the authority figure, doesn't it? to which my reply was You mean 'if it's Ros, yes; if it's any other authority figure, no', don't you?

* smug mode *

Got him there... ;)
 
 
Current Mood: amused
 
 
21 January 2009 @ 10:22 am
So they are having a discussion on Woman's Hour about feminism, and whether it is still relevant in the 21st century. And who are they asking? MEN! FFS. Still, one of them is the very sexy Richard Reeves, so I'll forgive them a bit. Especially given the points he is making, which I agree with completely so far.

Anyway, I might write more about this later when the feminist rage has subsided a bit. In the meantime, I have three links for you:

- Lady Mark writes an incredibly good post about discrimination.

- TheyWorkForYou. Yes, I know I linked to this yesterday, but Brown just upped the stakes. PLEASE contact your MP, especially if they are Labour. Also, this advert on the subject is awesome.

- A very important poll.
 
 
Current Mood: busy
 
 
19 January 2009 @ 11:31 pm
It's CARNIVAL TIME! YAY! Husky-Voiced Lust Object James Graham is ringmastering (no sniggering at the back there, you filthy perverts!) The Carnival on Modern Liberty.

He has many suggestions for things you can do to encourage people to think about Liberty, but one of them is to encourage five bloggers who normally don't go on about such things to do a post on what Liberty means to them. He suggests:
* Girl With A One Track Mind
* London Underground
* Neil Gaiman
* Bad Science
* New Humanist
I reckon GNeil is a bit of a cheat, given how much he's been blogging about the CBLDF recently, but... Anyway, I'll probably be doing something actionny at some point, but for right now? I can tag people in a meme, fur shizzle.

So consider yourselves tagged to blog about what Liberty means to you [info]lonemagpie, Mitch Benn, [info]caseytalk, [info]j_rentoul, [info]rhodri.



Forbidden Planet sent me a sale brochure, and I am weak. HOWEVER! I only spent £7.50, and for that I got two Sarah Janes (plus ancillary figures - one for Small Person and one for the menagerie on top of the telly) and a Judge Death. Soon our telly will collapse from the weight of all the action figures... When young Sidney arrives, I shall take a picture.



January the 19th would have been Edgar Allen Poe's 200th birthday. Have a bit of Vinny P to celebrate:





There. That's a cheery thing, isn't it?

We're watching The Devil Rides Out tonight. There's nothing quite like seeing Jim Hacker being forced to perform magical rituals... >:D Good old Charles Gray.
 
 
Current Mood: busy
 
 
18 January 2009 @ 10:24 pm
I am watching John Mortimer night on BBC4. We have had Rumpole, and are currently enjoying Larry's masterful performance in A Voyage Around My Father. I'd encourage all of you to watch as much of it as you possibly can. However, if all you can spare is an hour, and if you have the tiniest Liberal bone in your body, please, please, PLEASE watch John Mortimer: A Life in Words.

It might give you a little inkling of why I love him so much.
 
 
Current Music: Halleluiah I'm a Bum
 
 
22 December 2008 @ 04:33 am
... and you've already discussed Belgian politics with your also-insomniac other half? Why, you look up on the internet the actor who was in the thing you watched on telly, to see why he looked so familiar...

The thing we watched was the first disc of season 2 of Life on Mars (still prefer Ashes, sorry).
The character was Harry Woolf and we watched the credits for long enough to get the actor's name, so I fired up the laptop and looked at IMDB.
Kevin McNally. The reason he looks familiar is that he's been in EVERYTHING.
People who have been to the cinema in the last five years will know him as the superstitious drunkard one from Pirates of the Carribean.
Fandommy folk will know him as the Lang dude from The Twin Dilemma.

Political types?

Well, you might be interested to know that he'll be playing Ken Clarke in the Fall of Maggie thing that's in post production right now. Lindsay Duncan is going to be Maggie in it. Now there's an interesting bit of casting...
 
 
Current Mood: awake
 
 

Advertisement

 
19 December 2008 @ 10:22 am
Happy Posting is suspended for this post. Actress, producer and feminist SF icon Majel Barrett has passed away. She put a hell of a lot of herself into science fiction, and was rewarded by being forever overshadowed by her husband. They'd bloody well better dedicate the new Trek film to her, since it will be her epitaph.

I think that after work this evening I shall watch the episode of Animated Trek where Christine Chapel saves the men's arses after they all get sirenned in her honour, and raise a glass to the first, the original, Enterprise crew Number One.
Tags: ,
 
 
Current Mood: sad
 
 
17 December 2008 @ 10:02 am
Various people are committing themselves to doing happy posts for various lengths of time and various reasons at the moment.

I figure I have been whining enough recently, what with the dentist and stuff, so I am going to do a whole week of posting positively on this blog. So, without further ado, here are the things which have made me smile this morning:

That'll do for day one, I think. Now I just have to restrain myself from making any negative posts...

Anyone like to start a sweep on how long I'll actually manage it for? And I might make a start on those drawings/drabbles tonight. Any other takers for that, BTW? Only two of the five spaces taken so far...
 
 
Current Mood: cheerful
 
 
14 December 2008 @ 04:31 pm
Over the last week or so I have been having a conversation over email with the very lovely [info]alex_wilcock. It's ranged over many topics, but as you would possibly expect between he and I, a lot of it has been about Doctor Who (Alex is, of course, the author of the much-vaunted "How Doctor Who Made Me a Liberal"). A lot of the discussion has ranged around liberalism and sex and money, as well, but mainly, it's been Who.

A large part of what we've talked about is which is our favourite incarnation of the Doctor and why, and which eras of the show we like best and why (at the risk of annoying the good folks at the Indy - scroll down to "middle-aged Doctor Who fans" - this is not always the same thing). Inevitably, this has involved discussion of which are our least favourites, too. And while I can agree that the first season of McCoy was rubbish, and that Pip and Jane Baker were mostly awful (not necessarily positions Alex has advanced, but ones that are prevalent in fandom), both of those had more redeeming features, in my eyes, than the era of Who which started with Christopher Eccleston declaring he was going to wipe every last stinking dalek out of the sky to save his girlfriend. The final Christopher Eccleston episode was the tipping point, for me.

Doctor Who is probably the nearest thing to a religion I have. It's shaped my mind from a very early age, and I believe in it's core values and worship regularly. My first memory of anything is of Tom Baker turning into Peter Davison. Alex says that Doctor Who fostered a free spirit, encouraged me to start reading, instilled a passionate internationalism, made me think about ecology, and give me a lasting hatred of prejudice; green scaly rubber people are people too. And, of course, it made me want to change the world, and believe that an individual can make a difference, and I couldn't agree with that more. It's always been a show with a moral message, and that message is an essentially Liberal one - even if the world IS a horrible scary place full of fascistic monsters, one person can change that by doggedly doing the right thing, and this is what the right thing is.

It's ironic, then, that my first major issue with this era of Who is the Lonely God schtick. The Doctor isn't, shouldn't be, can't be a God. He's a hero because of his fallibility and weakness, not in spite of it. He's a hero because throughout time and space he tries to do the right thing; not always succeeding, but always trying. Think Tom Baker's Have I the right? discussion with Sarah-Jane Smith in Genesis of the Daleks. Think Jon Pertwee patiently explaining to UNIT that actually, Silurians and Sea Devils have as much right to live on this planet as we do. Think Colin Baker's monologue in The Two Doctors about how Peri is too focussed on humanity, and that other species are important too. Think Christopher Eccleston trying to negotiate with the Nestene Consciousness. My Doctor would not have flushed the Racnoss down the plughole without a second glance. My Doctor would not have committed genocide against even the daleks, especially not when he had been shown a mere six episodes earlier that daleks can be redeemed (and yes, I am awake of Sylvester McCoy's actions with the Hand of Omega. I think that's an aberration too). You can't imagine Tennant asking if he has the right, can you? He is the no-second-chances Doctor. The Doctor who can't see shades of grey. The Doctor who doesn't allow for the possibility of rehabilitation - just look at his eternal punishment meted out at the end of Human Nature/Family of Blood. He has appointed himself judge, jury and executioner to the whole of the universe like The Inquisitor in Red Dwarf, even though he KNOWS that there are mechanisms in place to do this via the rule of law. He believes in his own Godhood, and takes on the mantle willingly. My Doctor might have been an arrogant son of a bitch, but he knew he was mortal.

My second major issue with Tennant-Era Who is the racism. Not skin colour racism. Species racism. All the of aliens are bad guys. All of them. Even in Eccleston era, we get Jabe the tree-lady (who, although her species originates on earth, is definitely not human). In Tennant Era, like a dyed-in-the-wool Dacre-ite, The Doctor believes that humanity is the only race worth bothering with; and even then, not all of them. The Ood were a ham-fisted attempt at a not-evil alien, but even they are counted as Other, as disposable, by the show, and by their second appearance has become monster-of-the-week. Contrast this with earlier incarnations of Who, even up to and including Eccleston.

My third major issue with Tennant Era Who is Rose. In Eccleston's time, I liked Rose. I could identify with her. She was a ballsy, confident young woman with an enquiring mind and an adventurous spirit. Sure, she wasn't well-educated, but that didn't mean she wasn't intelligent. Yes, Eccleston!Doctor was a bit clingy to her, but you could understand that. She was the first person he had allowed himself to care about since the Time War. When he turned into Tennant, though, it all became a bit more worrying. She lost her independence and her adventuring spirit. She fell in love with him, and he with her. This led to a series of things which were completely unforgiveable, in my eyes. He endangered the universe, just to say goodbye to her. Contrast this with how he has behaved to the departures of other companions, even his own granddaughter, and you realise that it's a dramatic change in the nature of the character. On top of this, even after Rose had gone, he showed favouritism, something he has never EVER done before. He treated Martha Jones abominably, because he was still hung up on Rose. You might say that this is simply realism; showing the Doctor's humanity. But he's NOT HUMAN. He's an ALIEN. He treated Donna pretty shabbily too, twice over. And why is it that every female (and gay/bi/omni male) character in the show now has to make goo-goo eyes at him? He's not Captain Kirk! He's not sexually irresistible. Hell, I fancy him a hell of a lot less now than I did when he was a snuggly bloke with a blonde afro and a technicolour dreamcoat. A LOT less.

My fourth issue is the actor himself. I realise that this is a personal foible that not many will agree with, but I don't think David Tennant is all that. I didn't think much of him in Blackpool, I detested his Casanova, and I wanted to beat his head against a wall when he was Daft Jamie in Medicinal Purposes. I find his gurning and shouting annoying, and his flared nostrils Rimmeresque. I'm shallow enough that I would forgive this if I thought he was sexy, but sadly, I don't. It's a shame, really, because when he's NOT acting, he's lovely. In interviews, he is intelligent, considered, and attentive to detail. He's also very clearly a Who fanboy. It's just his acting is not to my taste at all (in this sense, he is the anti-Christopher Lee, whom I adore as an actor, but detest as an arrogant cock in real life).

So yes, all in all, the most recent era of Who has been my least favourite, and the current incumbent is my least favourite Doctor. I haven't even watched all of the last series. I'd say that perhaps this is a sign that I am growing up, and putting aside childish things, if I thought that was any way to proceed. But I don't, and if I did, I wouldn't be as glued to SJA as I have been.

You see, in the the Sarah-Jane Adventures, I see a lot of the things I miss about Who. Sarah-Jane has the moral centre which the modern Doctor seems to lack. She has more than one person in the "companion" role, and although one of these is her adopted son, she doesn't play favourites. She makes mistakes, but she owns up to them and faces up to them. There's no sexual tension, and there doesn't need to be because (and you can laugh at hearing this from a randy bisexual in an open relationship if you must) not everything in life is about sex. And, I must confess, the feminist in me loves watching (and sharing with my daughter) a science fiction show in which the lead character is a strong, capable, yet emotionally centred woman, and in which every single episode passes the Bechdel test. Which makes it a double crying shame that when The Grand Moff Sexist takes over the showrunner role in Who next year, Sarah-Jane's future is in doubt. You see, despite the fact that the show is the highest rated show CBBC has ever produced, if there's nobody to take over Rusty's role, the show will be axed...

At which point, a very small but very determined spawn of mine will be leading the protests.
 
 
Current Mood: nostalgic
 
 
14 December 2008 @ 03:54 pm
I have two srs bznss posts brewing in my head - one for here about Doctor Who and Liberalism, and one for LC about how it's vitally important for the liberal left NOT to present a united front at all costs. I also have to nag Mat to post his post about Brian Coleman. And I have to go to my mum's. So, obviously, I am participating in a fandom meme (via [info]lizbee):
The first five people to comment in this post get to request a sketch of a character/drabble/icon of a pairing or character(s) of their choosing from me. In return, they have to post this in their journal, regardless of their drawing/fic-writing ability level.
Obviously I would prefer it if they are characters I am familiar with, especially if you're requesting a drabble. I think, however, that you're probably more likely to ask to see my meagre drawing skills, aren't you?

Anyone for McGruder/Judge Death pr0n?

Oh, and the net is casted. Castees today include [info]el_staplador, [info]j_rentoul, and everyone's favourite gravelly-voiced Sexpot. Do add [info]jennier_lc_feed to your f-lists; if you're on mine and you post publicly in interesting ways it's likely you'll be featured every so often.
 
 
14 December 2008 @ 01:56 am
Work was up and down today. Started with a run-in with Mr Racist - least said about that the better, I think - but ended well, with a few people who haven't been in for ages, and some good times all round. Turns out that one of the guys who used to be a regular before he moved to Sheffield is big mates with one of our local Lib Dem councillors, so that was pretty cool.

Anyway, the title promises two cool things, so here they are. The first is from The Council of Ex-Muslims. Now, I don't agree with everything they have to say, and there is a hint of revolutionary zeal about them, but given the fact that the punishment for apostasy is death in Islam (and large numbers of British muslims think that this is perfectly reasonable) I think it's pretty brave of them to put their heads on the block with a manifesto like this:
1. Universal rights and equal citizenship for all. We are opposed to cultural relativism and the tolerance of inhuman beliefs, discrimination and abuse in the name of respecting religion or culture.
2. Freedom to criticise religion. Prohibition of restrictions on unconditional freedom of criticism and expression using so-called religious 'sanctities'.
3. Freedom of religion and atheism.
4. Separation of religion from the state and legal and educational system.
5. Prohibition of religious customs, rules, ceremonies or activities that are incompatible with or infringe people's rights and freedoms.
6. Abolition of all restrictive and repressive cultural and religious customs which hinder and contradict woman's independence, free will and equality. Prohibition of segregation of sexes.
7. Prohibition of interference by any authority, family members or relatives, or official authorities in the private lives of women and men and their personal, emotional and sexual relationships and sexuality.
8. Protection of children from manipulation and abuse by religion and religious institutions.
9. Prohibition of any kind of financial, material or moral support by the state or state institutions to religion and religious activities and institutions.
10. Prohibition of all forms of religious intimidation and threats.
(hat-tip [info]mle292)

The second cool thing? You may well know my disdain for that well-known internet phenomenon, the LOLcat. I reckon maybe one in a hundred is actually funny, and just don't get the fascination. Well, today, thanks to [info]lonemagpie, I saw one that actually made me laugh aloud:



Thanks for challenging my prejudices, David ;)
 
 
12 December 2008 @ 02:38 am
Why do they not release DVDs? The swines! One of the shows that Small Person loves is Robotboy. I approve of this - it's sci-fi; it is liberal-leaning without being po-faced; it's a British/French coproduction and therefore fosters international relations; it's very very silly; and it has a bad guy in it that reminds me of Karate from Batfink and gives me a warm nostalgic glow.

Can you get a DVD of it? Or books? Or Games? Can you buggery! You can get a poster, or a heejusly expensive (and probably phlate-filled) toy off some dodgy geezer on ebay, and THAT'S IT.

Have Cartoon Networks only heard of merchandising when it comes to Ben bloody Ten?

The bastards!

(this post brought to you by insomnia and motherly panicking about Christmas)
 
 
Current Mood: frustrated