Standards...? ([info]peopleareshapes) wrote in [info]theoffice_us,
@ 2007-03-21 14:50:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Jenna Fischer in Wired Magazine



Note: The suit picture is a transparency that covered the other one. That's why the alignment is off.

One, two, three, four.

Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]endless_reader
2007-03-21 09:55 pm UTC (link)
Look at Jenna go!

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]peopleareshapes
2007-03-21 09:59 pm UTC (link)
Yes, apparently she's going to rule the world naked.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)
(no subject) - [info]endless_reader, 2007-03-21 10:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]presently, 2007-03-21 10:09 pm UTC

[info]sundancekid
2007-03-21 09:55 pm UTC (link)
Yay, thanks for posting this!

(Reply to this)


[info]icamon
2007-03-21 09:59 pm UTC (link)
adorable!

(Reply to this)


[info]__aftercrash
2007-03-21 10:03 pm UTC (link)
she is gorgeous!

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]aggiegurl22
2007-03-21 11:25 pm UTC (link)
Ahahaha! Your icon is amazing!

(Reply to this) (Parent)

[info]littlestarletta
2007-03-21 10:04 pm UTC (link)
WTF WHY IS SHE NAKIE?!

Why is this necessary???

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]traceace
2007-03-21 10:10 pm UTC (link)
Because she's hot as hell? :D

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)
(no subject) - [info]michellek, 2007-03-21 10:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]traceace, 2007-03-21 10:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]drewcypher, 2007-03-21 10:26 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]thelastsong, 2007-03-21 10:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]peopleareshapes, 2007-03-21 10:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]presently, 2007-03-21 10:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hearthisvoice, 2007-03-21 10:31 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]presently, 2007-03-21 10:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]traceace, 2007-03-21 10:37 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]presently, 2007-03-21 10:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlestarletta, 2007-03-21 11:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]esthetic, 2007-03-21 11:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]marmar627, 2007-03-22 03:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]maniaclove, 2007-03-22 07:39 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlestarletta, 2007-03-22 07:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]maniaclove, 2007-03-22 07:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlestarletta, 2007-03-22 08:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]maniaclove, 2007-03-22 08:19 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]littlestarletta, 2007-03-22 08:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]somefantastic, 2007-03-23 05:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]finefinemusic, 2007-03-23 09:40 pm UTC

[info]cedricstyle
2007-03-21 10:06 pm UTC (link)
she is go pretty! guh

(Reply to this)


[info]spaced_oddity
2007-03-21 10:09 pm UTC (link)
:O

(Reply to this)


[info]sonmi
2007-03-21 10:13 pm UTC (link)
what the... they didn't do a very good job of photoshopping that suit on her... you can still see her shoulders and arms behind it. these images confuse me.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]peopleareshapes
2007-03-21 10:15 pm UTC (link)
Oh no, the suit version is a transparent slip of paper and when I went to scan the image, it was mis-aligned.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)
(no subject) - [info]sonmi, 2007-03-21 10:18 pm UTC

[info]bagelofdeath
2007-03-21 10:19 pm UTC (link)
She looks 50 in that make-up.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]esthetic
2007-03-21 11:15 pm UTC (link)
Makeup*

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)
(no subject) - [info]bagelofdeath, 2007-03-21 11:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]peopleareshapes, 2007-03-21 11:43 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bagelofdeath, 2007-03-21 11:46 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]zulkey, 2007-03-22 07:46 pm UTC

[info]bubbly
2007-03-21 10:20 pm UTC (link)
Jenna Fischer: Making MORE Straight Girls Question Their Sexuality Since 2006



(I totally stole that from someone else about Rashida Jones. I swear, I will so go gay for the girls of The Office. XD)

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]over_thefreeway
2007-03-21 11:13 pm UTC (link)
hahahaha.
seriously.

(Reply to this) (Parent)
(no subject) - [info]timfreakingunn, 2007-03-22 07:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]bubbly, 2007-03-22 09:51 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]timfreakingunn, 2007-03-22 10:16 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2007-03-22 07:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]laughing_lovers, 2007-03-23 12:58 am UTC

[info]bufffy6
2007-03-21 10:22 pm UTC (link)
aw, the article barely even mentions her...

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]peopleareshapes
2007-03-21 10:26 pm UTC (link)
I know, right! There's just a tiny blurb with her name, I think? And a very minor reference to Jim/Pam. Very odd article all around. Publicity for anyone on the show is WEE, but it seems that the whole cast should've been on the cover or something.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)
(no subject) - [info]bufffy6, 2007-03-21 10:27 pm UTC

[info]semby
2007-03-21 10:28 pm UTC (link)
I found the article a little weird itself, but Jenna's looking fabulous!

(Reply to this)


[info]thelastsong
2007-03-21 10:28 pm UTC (link)
She can rule MY world naked...

...uhm. I mean, for being a technology magazine, they sure do fail at Photoshop (the suit mishap, and the way she looks absolutely positively airbrushed). Then again, Photoshop is mad hard, to quote a friend of mine.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]riney
2007-03-21 10:44 pm UTC (link)
Agreed. We got this magazine at work today and every time someone looked at her cover photo I couldn't help buy comment at how airbrushed she looks! She's beautiful! She doesn't have to be made into a plastic doll!

(Reply to this) (Parent)
(no subject) - [info]keepyourguns, 2007-03-21 10:50 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]thelastsong, 2007-03-21 11:10 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]evil_holls, 2007-03-24 01:08 am UTC

[info]strawberrymelon
2007-03-21 10:30 pm UTC (link)
jenna is georgous as herself, not necessarily as a photoshopped barbie.

but who else could make post its look hot?

you go girl

(Reply to this) (Thread)
Agreement
[info]riney
2007-03-21 10:44 pm UTC (link)
"jenna is georgous as herself, not necessarily as a photoshopped barbie."

I just said that above. Maybe I should read all the comments before I start posting my own!

(Reply to this) (Parent)
(no subject) - [info]shesnotasecret_, 2007-03-21 11:21 pm UTC

(Reply from suspended user)

[info]hearthisvoice
2007-03-21 10:32 pm UTC (link)
omg! Naked!Jenna broke my brain!

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]themightybee
2007-03-22 02:00 am UTC (link)
We can piece our mangled brains together to form a Super Brain. :O

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)
(no subject) - [info]hearthisvoice, 2007-03-22 08:01 pm UTC

[info]hearthisvoice
2007-03-21 10:33 pm UTC (link)
And OT but Kenneth icon FTW!

(Reply to this)


[info]yourmomroxxs
2007-03-21 10:38 pm UTC (link)
Not to detract for the Jenna discussion but the article is hilarious. I wonder when this was 'done' in the timeline of things?

(Reply to this)


[info]keepyourguns
2007-03-21 10:45 pm UTC (link)
she looks cute.

I never imagined her doing this though, she seems shy??

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]coloredgreens
2007-03-22 01:50 am UTC (link)
agreed, that's what I thought too until I ran across this picture
 a few days ago for the first time lol

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)
(no subject) - [info]keepyourguns, 2007-03-22 01:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]coloredgreens, 2007-03-22 04:59 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dabble_boy, 2007-03-22 02:13 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]steph313, 2007-03-22 03:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]misscrystal, 2007-03-22 08:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]moireach, 2007-03-23 01:32 am UTC

[info]yourmomroxxs
2007-03-21 10:49 pm UTC (link)
So if the article is an interview with the characters and under the guise that it's a real company etc. Are these "Pam" pictures? FNB indeed ;)

(Reply to this)


[info]tinker19bell
2007-03-21 10:50 pm UTC (link)
I. Love. Her.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

(Anonymous)
2007-04-27 05:53 am UTC (link)
ditto!

(Reply to this) (Parent)

[info]slickgothgurl
2007-03-21 11:11 pm UTC (link)
they totally air brushed her bewbs

(Reply to this) (Thread)

(Anonymous)
2007-03-22 09:50 am UTC (link)
I am seriously having a hard time typing because I'm laughing so hard.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

[info]esthetic
2007-03-21 11:15 pm UTC (link)
Cuute. She's awesome.

(Reply to this)


[info]strangelittlex
2007-03-21 11:36 pm UTC (link)
It doesn't even look like her.

(Reply to this)


[info]cosmic_autumn
2007-03-21 11:42 pm UTC (link)
ahh, maybe they wanted it to look like a paper dress up doll? i doubt they actually would make such an obvious mistake.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]leahbiabsu
2007-03-22 07:48 pm UTC (link)
i love your icon! lol

(Reply to this) (Parent)

[info]ahedonia
2007-03-21 11:45 pm UTC (link)
Okay, if you compare the two shots, the faces in both are absolutely identical, yes? Which means, exact same photo of face used on both. Which makes me wonder, which picture did they get the face from and which one got it pasted on to the body? Was the clothed shot the "real" one or was it the naked one? Were they both genuinely taken of her or is one of those not her body, or are BOTH of those not her body?

I've gone to some seminars that show exactly how much Photoshop trouble magazine folks go to to make exactly the shot they want--the seminar broke down some current-at-the-time advertising (Tom Cruise's MI:III movie poster, magazine ads, etc.) and showed us exactly how many dozens of layers and body doubles and combined shots and general futzing went into pictures we all just accept as having happened in real life. Now I tend to doubt anything I see in the press can be accepted at face value. So I'm really wondering...is there anything in that photo that's actually Jenna's besides her face?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]clarajane
2007-03-22 01:05 am UTC (link)
"radical transparency" perhaps?

(Reply to this) (Parent)
(no subject) - [info]falulatonks, 2007-03-22 01:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]falulatonks, 2007-03-22 01:44 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]sschmitt, 2007-03-22 10:13 pm UTC

Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…