In Bruges

« previous entry | next entry »
Feb. 27th, 2008 | 02:10 pm
posted by: [info]lucius_t in [info]theinferior4

News on Diabolo Cody's (Juno) script in progress: it concerns a demonic cheerleader. Jesus. The Anti-Buffy. And now we have years of this shit to look forward to. It may appear I'm being especially hard on her, but she's just the poster child for what strikes me a disturbing trend in the industry, i,e., stuffing characters full of lines they are unlikely to say in order to allow the scriptwriter to get off (or attempt to get off) a few zingers. Another recent film that does this is In Bruges, starring Colin Farrell and Brendan Gleeson, which I just saw this afternoon. It's supposed to be a black comedy about two hit men hiding out in Bruges, Belgium, but like Juno tries way too hard to be hip and hilarious. Though there are some good things in the movie--for one, Farrell's performance almost makes me forgive him for Alexander, and Gleeson is, as always, solid, but saying that is like praising a flatulent for dropping an odorless fart. The director, ex-playwright Martin McDonagh, has nothing even marginally original to say. He offers us yet another odd-couple hitman team who are on temporary vacation in Bruges, ordered to do so because of a botched hit in London, and are forced to shit out one-liners and monologues so as to display McDonagh's wit and etc. Some of his wit involves midgets and dwarves--there are at least half-a-dozen references to Herve Villechaise--and overweight Americans and pansy Canadians. Some of it hits the mark and McDonagh is glib to a fault, but it's all so tired and done-before (like Juno's I'm a planet line, not to mention many other Cody lines). Ralph Fiennes, their hit-boss, who alternates between doing Mamet and doing a Ben Kingsley-in-Sexy Beast impression, breaks up the funfest by ordering Gleeson to off Farrell and, of course, a warm father-son relationship then develops between the two. Then there's the alternation between ultraviolence and shits-and-giggles that Tarantino popularized, then wore out...and then the imitators had their way with the trope. And hey, why not throw in a dream sequence with a dwarf--everyone knows dwarves are not only damn funny, they're symbols of...well, whatever you want them to be. Like with David Lynch. McDonagh attempts to inject a moral into his story by laying on some Christian symbolism and making an attempt to redeem Farrell's character, but the character is so vile you don't want him redeemed. This is the cinematic equivalent of a guy who tells fag jokes to illustrate society's insensivity to gays. It's got a lot of style and swagger, and that makes it easy to mistake for an engaging film; but it's all show and no substance. I'm thinking its main value is as a test-mention it and if people say they like it, excuse yourself and walk quickly away. Black comedy? If this is black comedy, so is cleaning out a sewer.

Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

Comments {6}

Okrzyki, przyjaciel!

(no subject)

from: [info]chaircrusher
date: Feb. 28th, 2008 06:52 pm (UTC)
Link

I'm so glad I saw Juno before the backlash. I enjoyed it, partly because Ellen Page is so attractive in a not-a-blank-blonde way. The dialog didn't seem as forced to me as it obviously has others, because my kids are just past high school, and they and their friends are hyper-verbal.

But whatever. Diablo Cody I haven't paid enough attention to be annoyed by her yet. I know there are really gifted screenwriters in the world, and she may not be one of them, but it's hard for me to work up an animus against her.

Reply | Thread

(no subject)

from: [info]lucius_t
date: Feb. 28th, 2008 07:07 pm (UTC)
Link

I saw Juno at a writer's guild screening in December last year, which I suppose makes me part of the frontlash. I found the movie a pathetic exercise in preciousness, essentially an R-rated sitcom of the sort that has been in vogue lately, in the obnoxious tradition of Sideways and Little Miss Sunshine. To my mind, unconvincing on any level.

Ellen Page was much better in Hard Candy.

Them's my feelings, anyway...

Reply | Parent | Thread

Ron Drummond

(no subject)

from: [info]ron_drummond
date: Feb. 29th, 2008 01:07 am (UTC)
Link

… but saying that is like praising a flatulent for dropping an odorless fart.

That’s got to be one of your all-time classic put-downs, and given the context perfectly apt.

Have you read or seen any of the plays that made McDonagh famous? I’d be curious to know how you think this latest effort (which I believe is his first after a long dry spell – the writing, that is, not the directing) compares to them.

Reply | Thread

(no subject)

from: [info]lucius_t
date: Feb. 29th, 2008 01:36 am (UTC)
Link

McDonagh's plays were coherent works of art, this was just show-offy BS...

Reply | Parent | Thread

John Crowley

(no subject)

from: [info]crowleycrow
date: Feb. 29th, 2008 01:32 am (UTC)
Link

So I understand your animus against Juno -- the unlikelihood of a character being able to produce that many funny lines in that short a time -- but how does that relate to the classic funny patter of say Preston Sturges movies, or at a different remove Phillip Barry, or Lubitsch. The only differences I can perceive are 1) in those movies, everybody gets funny lines, not just one character; 2) we now perceive them as happening in some other world where who knows how people might speak, whereas movies like Juno are purportedly realistic -- this'll do, but actually Preston Sturges movies were for their time "realistic" enough; 3) the funny lines of older movies tended to be character-based -- caharacters said the funny things their characters and not other characters might say.

But still. I thought the funny lines in Juno were worth the price.

Reply | Thread

(no subject)

from: [info]lucius_t
date: Feb. 29th, 2008 01:59 am (UTC)
Link

I didn't find many of the lines funny, because either I'd heard them before in one form or another, and I hated the movie because of the reasons you cite, and because this type of screenwriting is threatening to become endemic, and I have a deep concern that people who have not seen good movies will see Juno and In Bruges and mistake them for good movies and want more, and Hollywood will give us more of these psuedo-farces, and so on, thus lowering the standard for "good movies" even lower than it is...

I didn't pay to see Juno, and I thought the cost too high. I usually set aside morality when viewing a film, but in this instance I found myself wondering how many additional lives will be ruined by the perky Juno and her loving, accepting sitcom family. To me, it was so wrongheaded...oh well. Other than that, I liked it fine.

Reply | Parent | Thread