Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

I thought that tattoo looked familiar...

  • May. 4th, 2008 at 10:48 PM





Since when do Suicide Girls model for DeviantART? 
In all fairness, DA could be considered a greater threat to SG than Apnea's website, for example... 
PLENTY of professional models and photographers have profiles on the site and display their work, not to mention- *sell* it via DeviantART. The site displays so many photos of non-SG alt models, and Lithium Picnic for one conducts his fight against the cruel ways of SG through his profile on the site.

So, WTF??
Apnea's personal website in a no-no but an online art community which many of its members quite openly oppose SG is okay? Get your figures straight, Missy. And get Sash a brain transplant while you're at it.

Comments

Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
[info]tylerdurdenmiko wrote:
May. 4th, 2008 08:25 pm (UTC)
thats almost as dumb as the look on her face in the 2nd picture...I mean, really? Who thought that picture was attractive?
[info]my_papertrail wrote:
May. 4th, 2008 08:27 pm (UTC)
seeing as to how the mandate of deviant art
is to promote artists of various kinds,
not just photogs shooting the ladies of nakeds...

and seeing as to how apnea's site
has the manadate of promoting a naked girl.
i could see how apneatic.com would be more compatative than deviantart.

with that said, to me it is still not competative as its a single girl site and I think plenty of ex-sgs have gone on to do something that that but have no been as successful, not being as awesome as apneat and pucnic are. viva.

sash looks like a labotomy on the second photos.

here's to a depleting gene/talent pool dipshits.
-vee
[info]caleidhsaad wrote:
May. 4th, 2008 08:33 pm (UTC)
What are you expecting from a site that pulls its rules/beliefs and morals out of its own asshole whenever they see fit?
[info]gtrwolf wrote:
May. 4th, 2008 08:36 pm (UTC)
I like Sash, but in the second picture it looks like she's about to say "BBBBBRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAIIIIIINNNNNNNNSSSSSSSS!!!!!"

Good money says that there's some "deal" going on between SG and DA to have 2 SGs modeling for them.
[info]cardboardrabbit wrote:
May. 4th, 2008 08:38 pm (UTC)
Since we're on the subject of DA....Theres a SG wallpaper contest on DA at the moment. I wonder if DA has some connections to SG. Link
(no subject) - [info]suicide_bracket - May. 4th, 2008 09:39 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]cardboardrabbit - May. 4th, 2008 09:55 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]this_repetition - May. 5th, 2008 02:43 am (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]suicide_bracket - May. 5th, 2008 08:18 am (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]zildjian7blu - May. 5th, 2008 05:32 am (UTC)
[info]caleidhsaad wrote:
May. 4th, 2008 08:54 pm (UTC)


I heard from a girlfriend of one of the VF admin, and I guess SG might be teaming up with that site too, which seriously makes me want to throw up. I've been trying to tell her to talk them out of it, and she sent the vampirefreaks admin a few things I told her to show them, and I haven't heard anything else about it since

I personally think DA is a sketchy site anyway, there are too many rules to posting your own "artwork" there, and they basically own everything you post.
Fuck, no wonder they are teaming up with SG, their morals on art/photography are pretty similarly fucked up.
(no subject) - [info]zildjian7blu - May. 5th, 2008 05:34 am (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]sisteradore - May. 5th, 2008 04:15 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]madamedoktor - May. 7th, 2008 03:37 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]caleidhsaad - May. 9th, 2008 08:56 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]madamedoktor - May. 9th, 2008 10:14 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]trinket08 - May. 9th, 2008 07:06 pm (UTC)
[info]deviancie wrote:
May. 4th, 2008 09:01 pm (UTC)
I've never seen nudes on DA. But even if there are a few, it isn't a porn site and it doesn't charge members to access porn shots. Apneatic however would be considered a porn site, and it does charge for membership. There are also quite a few galleries on apneatic that feature photos of other women with Apnea. So SG, and their dream of world domination, see it as a threat. But I imagine this is also about revenge, which explains why it is so silly. When people allow their emotions to dictate logic, their actions often look retarded to those who are watching from the outside.

And who is the model on the right of Sash? She's a cutie..
(no subject) - [info]shutyrfacejerk - May. 5th, 2008 12:52 am (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]zildjian7blu - May. 5th, 2008 05:33 am (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]atari_yeager - May. 5th, 2008 12:28 pm (UTC)
[info]conceptualpete wrote:
May. 4th, 2008 09:11 pm (UTC)
are you retarded?

[info]letsrockbaby wrote:
May. 4th, 2008 09:47 pm (UTC)
Sash is getting whored out a lot
(no subject) - [info]anonymissity - May. 4th, 2008 09:56 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]wetwork - May. 5th, 2008 01:53 am (UTC)
[info]lolichan wrote:
May. 4th, 2008 10:32 pm (UTC)
Uh, what's with her tits in the first one? it looks like the right one is really poorly shopped or something
(no subject) - [info]triplescience - May. 4th, 2008 10:40 pm (UTC)
[info]clarinetblower wrote:
May. 4th, 2008 10:46 pm (UTC)
Modeling Freely
In all honesty I don’t see why the girls are not permitted to model for multiple sites. I’m so sick of the blatant greed of some of these sites with their contractual agreements. The longevity of youth is so short and these girls should be allowed to make as much money as they can, while they can. Each site has something to offer, and in my opinion no individual site would collapse if the girls were allowed for model freely.
Re: Modeling Freely - [info]xsiberian_wolfx - May. 6th, 2008 11:00 am (UTC)
[info]arielost wrote:
May. 4th, 2008 11:02 pm (UTC)
I'm pretty sure there has to be nudity for it to be competition. At least that's what I assume since Amina said she's going into clothing modeling and they have yet to sue anyone for doing non-nude modeling, as far as I know.

Also, Sash has great tits.
dude are you tripping??? - [info]thrilkil_kitten - May. 8th, 2008 02:56 pm (UTC)
Re: dude are you tripping??? - [info]arielost - May. 8th, 2008 03:51 pm (UTC)
Re: dude are you tripping??? - [info]thrilkil_kitten - May. 9th, 2008 10:15 am (UTC)
[info]voiceless_song wrote:
May. 5th, 2008 12:11 am (UTC)
I know this is kinda off-topic, but I don't get it. I seriously don't get it. I mean, I don't have access to SG, but I'm guessing Sash must have a great body. Because hell, her face looks like a chipmunk.

I mean, I'm not perfect, but every time I see her photos up here I want to know when the swelling from her wisdom teeth surgery is going to go away.
Sash - [info]clarinetblower - May. 5th, 2008 12:47 am (UTC)
Re: Sash - [info]voiceless_song - May. 5th, 2008 12:49 am (UTC)
Re: Sash - [info]whywhyzee - May. 5th, 2008 01:22 am (UTC)
Re: Sash - [info]whywhyzee - May. 5th, 2008 01:24 am (UTC)
Re: Sash - [info]holycowman - May. 7th, 2008 08:01 pm (UTC)
[info]acidzoo wrote:
May. 5th, 2008 12:19 am (UTC)
Zoli must also need a brain transplant too. That is her on the right side of Sash, aint it?
[info]this_repetition wrote:
May. 5th, 2008 01:09 am (UTC)
I saw this forever ago. I'm sure they got permission to do this, dA wouldn't be that stupid.

Sometimes I think this community tries to make controversy out of things that aren't.
[info]wetwork wrote:
May. 5th, 2008 01:55 am (UTC)
both of those girls look cracked the fuck out.

is that hot now? cracked out hooker types?
(no subject) - [info]jesskaface - May. 5th, 2008 04:24 am (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]wetwork - May. 5th, 2008 05:45 am (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]r3d_lost - May. 5th, 2008 06:49 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]wetwork - May. 5th, 2008 06:55 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]r3d_lost - May. 5th, 2008 07:23 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]wetwork - May. 5th, 2008 07:27 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]r3d_lost - May. 5th, 2008 07:50 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]wetwork - May. 5th, 2008 08:35 pm (UTC)
[info]zildjian7blu wrote:
May. 5th, 2008 05:29 am (UTC)
Holy shit, they've flooded into my personal space! haha
[info]human_disorder wrote:
May. 5th, 2008 06:00 am (UTC)
I thought the same thing when I saw this. My mind went into 'WTF' mode.
[info]anonymissity wrote:
May. 5th, 2008 06:05 am (UTC)
She's like the new Quinne I guess: big eyes, the same empty facial expression and gigantic tits.
I guess boobies really can salvage just about anything.
[info]deadpupetshow wrote:
May. 5th, 2008 12:07 pm (UTC)
Is it just me or aren't most of the DA clothing images submitted like a buyers booth - showing what you have purchased.
[info]lookinfoareason wrote:
May. 5th, 2008 05:45 pm (UTC)
that bitch in the black t-shirt is wicked hot.
(no subject) - [info]shutyrfacejerk - May. 5th, 2008 06:05 pm (UTC)
[info]belle_belette wrote:
May. 5th, 2008 07:42 pm (UTC)
yeah I've noticed these photos a while ago on DA, and it really made me sick.
I can't stand Sash's face anymore, her pout is so annoying
[info]nitrite wrote:
May. 6th, 2008 12:13 am (UTC)
seriously, i think sash is one of the most unappealing people i've ever seen in my life. my god.
[info]mischief9 wrote:
May. 6th, 2008 03:40 am (UTC)
She looks like there should be a thin thread of drool hanging from that lower lip. And a spit bubble.
[info]voiceless_song wrote:
May. 6th, 2008 05:17 am (UTC)
Its definatly not a random chance thing that SG and DA are together.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the SG girls are the only ones whos names are mentioned, let alone linked to any other site, even their own DA account within the description of the item.
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

Profile

[info]sgirls
tales from the dark site

Latest Month

October 2008
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031