Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

I thought that you might be curious as to what has been going on with the scheduled trial between God's Girls and SG Services (Suicide Girls). That trial had been scheduled to commence on April 21, 2008. A little over one week before the trial was supposed to start, SG requested that the Court continue the trial based on SG's claim that Sean Suhl had injured two of his fingers, and that his injury prevented him from participating in the trial. The Court decided to continue the case to October 2008.

In consideration of the girls who had agreed to take off work and travel to Los Angeles to testify at the trial in April, our lawyer asked the Court NOT to delay the trial. This is what Paul Loving stated to the Court in response: "You [the Court] said this case may be trailing; but if it does trail, that means witnesses will have to stay so their schedule will be disrupted already. In a decision -- we are not talking about nobel peace prize traveling women from around the world. We are talking about strippers and nude models. Not being prejudice. Just being honest.

God's Girls and its lawyers believe that Loving's comments about the girls were completely inappropriate. The Judge agreed that the comments were not appropriate.

How empowering!!!!!

Comments

[info]cliodna wrote:
Apr. 23rd, 2008 11:58 pm (UTC)
Whoa, that's fucked up. So just because you take your clothes off for a living -- or even just as a side gig or because you're an exhibitionist -- you're not "Nobel Peace Prize" material? And that means that it doesn't matter that your schedule is interrupted? Eff that.

I'll be sure to thank Paul when I end up winning a Pulitzer.
[info]lizzelizzel wrote:
Apr. 24th, 2008 12:05 am (UTC)
He's an ass.
So poor Sean can't come to trial because he hurt his widdle fingers? The hell? The only reason I can see that making it hard on him is because he won't be able to pull strings on his puppets as easily.
[info]shutyrfacejerk wrote:
Apr. 24th, 2008 01:58 am (UTC)
I've always had an image of him as a whiny little shithead and this only comfirms it.
(no subject) - [info]rotten_candi - Apr. 24th, 2008 07:36 am (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]rockabillyvixen - Apr. 24th, 2008 12:12 pm (UTC)
[info]contrary_wise wrote:
Apr. 24th, 2008 12:08 am (UTC)
Ugh. Yeah, he represents a porn company and he thinks the models are so much trash?

Is that quote posted online somewhere? I'd love to see the rest of the transcript...
[info]faux_glock wrote:
Apr. 24th, 2008 12:12 am (UTC)
it's public information.
[info]cliodna wrote:
Apr. 24th, 2008 12:15 am (UTC)
That's a really good question. I Googled a few things I could think of, but it seems that all the official information is locked. (Of course, I didn't really try very hard to find it...)
[info]2blwanabasi wrote:
Apr. 24th, 2008 12:33 am (UTC)
probably got the 21rst confused with the 31rst.
doesn't matter who's stripping or winning pulitzers. it's fucked up behavior. please keep accounts if you can manage a counter.
[info]faux_glock wrote:
Apr. 24th, 2008 12:35 am (UTC)
trial was scheduled to begin on the 21st. i find your post confusing.
(no subject) - [info]2blwanabasi - Apr. 24th, 2008 02:20 am (UTC)
[info]cliodna wrote:
Apr. 24th, 2008 12:44 am (UTC)
Your post is really confusing since there's no 31ST of April.
(no subject) - [info]delilahbrat - Apr. 24th, 2008 01:11 am (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]cliodna - Apr. 24th, 2008 01:13 am (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]gtrwolf - Apr. 25th, 2008 01:30 am (UTC)
[info]delilahbrat wrote:
Apr. 24th, 2008 01:09 am (UTC)
Thank you for making me spit water all over my monitor and keyboard.
(no subject) - [info]faux_glock - Apr. 24th, 2008 01:11 am (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]delilahbrat - Apr. 24th, 2008 01:18 am (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]faux_glock - Apr. 24th, 2008 01:21 am (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]delilahbrat - Apr. 24th, 2008 01:33 am (UTC)
[info]lookinfoareason wrote:
Apr. 24th, 2008 01:16 am (UTC)
oh for fuck's sake. what next, sg? what fucking next?!

douche bags.
[info]my_papertrail wrote:
Apr. 24th, 2008 01:32 am (UTC)
but seriously guys
Truth of the matter is no SG models have thus far won a Nobel Prize. It is unlikely that any ever will.

Many are strippers.
All are nude models.
In the past I have known these types of individuals to ahve more frexible schedules than say criminal lawyers, business owners, or even personal banking assistants.

Also, it is pronounced/typed prejudiceD...

Unless ebonics is what you are going for.
In which case you may want to reconsider
your court tactics.
Frontin' won't help you now.

Not even your haircut can save you now.
-vee
[info]faux_glock wrote:
Apr. 24th, 2008 01:42 am (UTC)
Re: but seriously guys
that quote is from a court transcript. those are paul lovings words not mine.

there's nothing wrong with being a stripper but to clarify-- only one girl, that i know of, who is involved in this case is a stripper. some might consider his assumption rude.
Re: but seriously guys - [info]my_papertrail - Apr. 25th, 2008 06:54 am (UTC)
Re: but seriously guys - meekamic - Apr. 25th, 2008 10:11 pm (UTC)
Re: but seriously guys - [info]faux_glock - Apr. 25th, 2008 10:17 pm (UTC)
Re: but seriously guys - meekamic - Apr. 25th, 2008 10:23 pm (UTC)
Re: but seriously guys - [info]bluefiredragon - Apr. 24th, 2008 01:42 am (UTC)
Re: but seriously guys - [info]flame2fire - Apr. 24th, 2008 02:21 am (UTC)
Re: but seriously guys - [info]zofia_szeretlek - Apr. 24th, 2008 04:26 am (UTC)
Re: but seriously guys - [info]voiceless_song - Apr. 24th, 2008 06:53 pm (UTC)
Re: but seriously guys - [info]2blwanabasi - Apr. 24th, 2008 03:16 am (UTC)
Re: but seriously guys - [info]my_papertrail - Apr. 25th, 2008 06:58 am (UTC)
Re: but seriously guys - [info]2blwanabasi - Apr. 25th, 2008 07:28 am (UTC)
Re: but seriously guys - [info]sister_anne - Apr. 24th, 2008 05:55 pm (UTC)
Re: but seriously guys - [info]holycowman - Apr. 28th, 2008 04:39 pm (UTC)
[info]zildjian7blu wrote:
Apr. 24th, 2008 01:54 am (UTC)
Man this all just baffles me right from the start when SG tried to copyright the color pink.
This is ridiculous.
(no subject) - [info]gusterrhoid - Apr. 24th, 2008 02:22 am (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]zildjian7blu - Apr. 24th, 2008 05:04 am (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]electrocircuit - Apr. 25th, 2008 02:34 pm (UTC)
[info]shutyrfacejerk wrote:
Apr. 24th, 2008 01:57 am (UTC)
As if this man couldn't make himself look like any more of a creep...

Anyway, good luck as always to you Annaliese and Gods Girls. I'm indifferent to Gods Girls as a website but on a scale of alt porn assholes SG is obviously at the very top and Sean & Co. deserve whatever misery they end up with.
CREEP - [info]luvyerlilwebsit - Apr. 24th, 2008 08:08 am (UTC)
[info]this_repetition wrote:
Apr. 24th, 2008 03:20 am (UTC)
As if SuicideGirls models aren't ever nude, or don't also strip.
sp? - [info]xoxo_missy - Apr. 24th, 2008 06:35 am (UTC)
Re: sp? - [info]faux_glock - Apr. 24th, 2008 07:25 am (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]shutyrfacejerk - Apr. 24th, 2008 03:19 pm (UTC)
[info]luvyerlilwebsit wrote:
Apr. 24th, 2008 04:14 am (UTC)
Paul Loving
Is this the same Paul Loving that tried to bribe Stormy by offering her money to testify against GG during a booth dance he purchased from her at a strip club?

The same Paul Loving the frequents the strip clubs of Portland?

If so I don't image he'll be having a very warm reception the next time he steps foot in Dantes/Devils Point/Lucky Devil/etc etc

Has anyone thought of reporting him to the Oregon bar Association?

Or at the very least the Darwin Awards?
Re: Paul Loving - [info]zofia_szeretlek - Apr. 24th, 2008 04:27 am (UTC)
Re: Paul Loving - [info]deviancie - Apr. 24th, 2008 06:38 am (UTC)
[info]ilikebuttholes wrote:
Apr. 24th, 2008 05:56 am (UTC)
His "fingers" were just a cover. Don't ask me how I know but Sean is having issues with his HIV lately.
(no subject) - [info]flame2fire - Apr. 24th, 2008 12:35 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]blue_budgie - Apr. 24th, 2008 12:47 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]flame2fire - Apr. 24th, 2008 02:39 pm (UTC)
[info]sister_anne wrote:
Apr. 24th, 2008 05:59 pm (UTC)
how does breaking a couple of fingers prevent you from participating in a trial that's held in the area you live in?

besides, it's not like we're talking about a nobel peace prize winning man. we're talking about a local smut peddler. not being prejudiced. just being honest.
(no subject) - [info]faux_glock - Apr. 24th, 2008 09:12 pm (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]shutyrfacejerk - Apr. 25th, 2008 12:24 am (UTC)
(no subject) - meekamic - Apr. 25th, 2008 06:10 am (UTC)
(no subject) - [info]faux_glock - Apr. 25th, 2008 06:19 am (UTC)
oh the irony - [info]my_papertrail - Apr. 25th, 2008 07:03 am (UTC)
[info]digital_geisha wrote:
Apr. 25th, 2008 09:22 pm (UTC)
I wonder if the girls of SG know the VP thinks they are trash. By his words he has no respect or sees any worth in these ladies presence. GG or SG they all take their clothes off and take pictures.

this guy is a real POS. I am hoping he dies in a fire.
[info]danny9000 wrote:
Apr. 25th, 2008 09:38 pm (UTC)
I thougt their lawsuit against GG was over and GG won? Is there another suit?

Anyways, Mr. Loving has good security with SG since they're always suing several people at the same time.
[info]my_papertrail wrote:
Apr. 29th, 2008 02:35 am (UTC)
oh yes absolutely.
i make sense to other to.
here:

www.myspace.com/explodinkittinz

luv ya
[info]funkychik02 wrote:
May. 1st, 2008 11:53 pm (UTC)
It's good those comments were not taken lightly. Best of luck during the trial!

Profile

[info]sgirls
tales from the dark site

Latest Month

August 2008
S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31