bawling ([info]bawling) wrote in [info]sg_ljers,
@ 2008-11-18 11:09:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Budget deficit (may be) 3 times more (S$2.4b)
http://www.straitstimes.com/Breaking%2BNews/Singapore/Story/STIStory_303670.html

SINGAPORE'S budget deficit for this fiscal year is expected to be more than three times larger than the earlier estimated $800 million due to higher expenditures, additional spending and more payouts to the people, said Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam.

But he said the Government would not reduce this deficit, either by trimming its expenditures or raising additional revenues.

'The larger deficit is an appropriate fiscal stance in the context of an economy that has entered a slowdown,' said Mr Tharman in his written reply on Monday to a question in Parliament from Nominated MP Gautam Banerjee, who had asked whether the 2008 budget should be re-examined in light of the global financial crisis and its impact on the Singapore economy.

'We have in fact raised expenditures over the course of the year, so as to allow for a more expansionary budget in the current economic environment. We will be able to fund the larger deficit from the surpluses we accumulated in FY07, when we had unexpectedly higher revenues.'

(truncated)

***

In budget 2007, it was announced that the estimated budget is a deficit of S$690 million (http://www.mof.gov.sg/budget_2007/budget_speech/downloads/FY2007_Budget_Highlights.pdf - p10 / table 2.1). Later it turned out to be a surplus of S$6450 million (http://www.mof.gov.sg/budget_2008/speech_toc/downloads/FY2008_Budget_Highlights.pdf - p4 / table 1.1).

In budget 2008, it was announced that the estimated budget is a deficit of S$800 million and this news article above reported that it might be a deficit of S$2400 million or more due to the economy downturn and lower than estimated growth figures.

I would like to adopt a wait-and-see approach to the budget 2009 (which might be announced in Jan 2009 instead of Feb 2009) to know the official announced figure.

Comments?




(Post a new comment)


[info]dnwq
2008-11-18 03:34 am UTC (link)
Well, it's not like Singapore's government is going to run out of money either way. And they're unlikely to alter policy to recoup the deficit, anyway.

(Reply to this)


[info]mortichro
2008-11-18 03:36 am UTC (link)
well.. for a start.. stop spending on luxuries and start spending on needs

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]xiaogou
2008-11-18 04:43 am UTC (link)
eg. the rebranding exercise for marina bay bridge and marina bay art park.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]invainity
2008-11-18 12:03 pm UTC (link)
agree,

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]birdiie
2008-11-18 05:43 am UTC (link)
interesting how they credit the deficit to "due to higher expenditures, additional spending and more payouts to the people" and skirt the issue of the govt's expenditures on the IR/Casino thing.
bad decisions? i think so.
if the IR/Casino idea tanks (as it is already threatening to), good luck to the PAP heh.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]kalium_kx
2008-11-18 10:36 am UTC (link)
Agreed..they're putting too much broken dreams and hopes..time and money IMHO..

(Reply to this) (Parent)


(Anonymous)
2008-11-20 03:19 am UTC (link)
2007
reported = -690mil
result = +6450mil

2008
reported= -800mil
expected result = (6450/-690)*(-800) = +7478mil

so dun worry.. they know wat to do.. are you the gahmen?? they are the gahmen u know!

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]bawling
2008-11-20 03:45 am UTC (link)
Steady la. I like your calculation! unfortunately, the "surplus" only filters down as less than a thousand dollars for us docile citizens

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…