Home
Progressive News' Journal [entries|friends|calendar]
Progressive News

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ calendar | livejournal calendar ]

Your friend dying of an overdose? Don't save them! You'll only get arrested! [04 Jul 2008|11:37pm]

rinfang
This is probably totally off topic for this community- but I figure the members of this community can help me out.

Right now there is a girl on trial for controlled-substances homicide. I have been following this since a few weeks after the event, and I think that it has spiralled out of control.

This article, here, it one of the most unbiased I have found. I have went to the Local News sites, and they are terribly one sided.

I think that this is wrong. I want people to know about this. I want people to care. It seems to me like these parents are angry and just want someone to pay for their daughter's death, and they've decided it should be this girl. But why is this girl any more guilty than their daughter was?

The victim's parents have a website, called Friends Don't Let Friends Die. (It can be found here) I find it very sad. It seems to me like a bunch of angry people trying to find someone to blame.

Can someone tell me where I go with this? I really want to help- or at least let others know what is going on. What do I do?
7 comments|post comment

Wars of Attrition - [01 Jul 2008|09:03pm]

ankh_f_n_khonsu
[ mood | busy ]

There is an initiative in the works that could end up on the November ballot that allows for marijuana to be sold to anyone, and anywhere that already sells alcohol. Its being called The Inalienable Rights Enforcement Initiative. From the full text of the measure:


This initiative will amend the Constitution of California to defend and safeguard the inalienable rights of the People against infringement by governments and corporations, providing for the lawful growth, sale, and possession of marijuana. Marijuana will be taxed through a system of stamps and licenses--a $5 stamp will be required for the sale of an eighth ounce of marijuana and a $50 annual license will be required for the growth of one marijuana plant. To protect participants and encourage participation in the system, such licenses and stamps will be available anonymously in stores where marijuana is sold.

[...]

We also hold these truths to be self-evident-That, as an intoxicant, marijuana is far less harmful to the health and safety of the People than alcohol--That, as a smoking substance, marijuana is far less addictive or harmful to the health of the People than tobacco--That, even though alcohol is harmful to the health and safety of the People, the prohibition of alcohol from 1920 to 1933 only increased the harms associated with alcohol use: criminals seized control of the alcohol market, crime and violence increased greatly, and poverty, unemployment, and corruption flourished, while otherwise lawful alcohol drinkers were treated as "criminals" subject to detention, arrest, and incarceration, even though they had not harmed the rights of anyone--That, as with alcohol prohibition, the prohibition of marijuana has only increased the harms associated with the use of marijuana: criminals control a multi-billion dollar market, crime and violence have increased greatly, and poverty, unemployment, and corruption flourish, while otherwise law-abiding marijuana smokers are treated as "criminals" subject to detention, arrest, and incarceration, even though they have not harmed the rights of anyone-That the history of marijuana prohibition is a history of repeated injuries and infringements upon the inalienable rights, powers, and best interests of the People. (link)

See also: here for the full text of the proposed amendment and here for more on the "Inalienable Rights Enforcement Initiative".

Apparently they need 694,354 signatures by September, 5, 2008, but I think that a trivial formality.



Let's be clear: the work of science has nothing whatever to do with consensus. Consensus is the business of politics. Science, on the contrary, requires only one investigator who happens to be right, which means that he or she has results that are verifiable by reference to the real world. In science consensus is irrelevant. What is relevant is reproducible results. The greatest scientists in history are great precisely because they broke with the consensus. - Michael Crichton

Another prominent ongoing war of attrition being waged for the hearts and minds of liberals and compassionate people across the world is the fraud surrounding 'environmentalism'. Through clever marketing campaigns, well-meaning, intelligent people have been duped into believing all sorts of stupid things, but when it comes to global warming, we get downright insidious. I think many of us have some inkling that Al Gore's 'documentary', "An Inconvenient Truth", was a bit of a snowjob. Although it may not be explicit, we intuitively recognize the implicit dishonesty... somewhere. The BBC documentary, "The Great Global Warming Swindle", received a great deal of criticism from various media outlets. Given the gravity of some of the criticisms, it's pretty clear the opposing agenda isn't entirely honest either.

In April of 07 a 'philanthropic' group in Canada, The Tides Canada Foundation, "donated DVDs of Al Gore's Oscar-winning documentary 'An Inconvenient Truth' as an educational resource to all 477 public highschools and 60 school boards in British Columbia, reaching potentially 278,000 students." Not to be outdone, Michael Chernoff, Director of EnCana Corporation, one of the largest independently owned oil and gas companies in the world [Which also has a 'strong position' in the Gulf of Mexico] - "offered schools copies of the film 'The Great Global Warming Swindle.' If our schools get reduced to battlefields - where propaganda competes for saints, holy warriors and martyrs - we're in deep trouble. [I say this rhetorically, of course, thinking full-well that we're already in deep trouble.] Both sides present themselves as authoritative and legitimate, and schools do not teach any method of rhetoric or logic, so today's youth are ill-prepared to weigh out statements like this:

The debate over the science of climate change is well and truly over. We now need to focus on how to respond to the challenge of global warming in innovative and positive ways. The film "An Inconvenient Truth" helps all viewers - students, teachers, and parents - think about the long-term implications of our lifestyles and what we need to do to build a sustainable Canada.

So if this 'philanthropic' group thinks "An Inconvenient Truth" is such a great documentary, why did London's High Court strike a ruling against it?

In October 2007 the High Court in London had identified nine “errors” in the Al Gore movie An Inconvenient Truth. The judge had stated that, if the UK Government had not agreed to send to every secondary school in England a corrected guidance note making clear the mainstream scientific position on these nine “errors”, he would have made a finding that the Government’s distribution of the film and the first draft of the guidance note earlier in 2007 to all English secondary schools had been an unlawful contravention of an Act of Parliament prohibiting the political indoctrination of children. (link)

Generally speaking, I think the 'political indoctrination of children' is something to be avoided - or at least strictly monitored. When education = scholasticism = indoctrination, there can be no edification. In the absence of this depth, we find ourselves in a very surreal situation. Much like in the movie "The Matrix":

The Matrix is a system, Neo. That system is our enemy. But when you're inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters. The very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of that system and that makes them our enemy. You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inert, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it.



This film expounds upon the nine 'errors' found by the High Court in London, and adds in several more for good measure:



Part 2 behind the cut:Read more... )
post comment

[06 May 2008|07:21pm]

bluegreen_lens
FOR ANYONE NOT TOO FAR FROM HOUSTON:


more info also at: http://www.houstonclimateprotection.org
post comment

Got Anon? [23 Apr 2008|12:01pm]

ankh_f_n_khonsu
[ mood | busy ]

I'm curious. Where's [info]progressivenews on the issue of Anonymous?

1 comment|post comment

News [01 Mar 2008|04:59pm]

newsoftoday
 
Americans are asking for Political Asylum...Why don't we hear about it?  
There is no country in the world that understands propaganda more than the United States. Billions are spent at the Pentagon on what you hear and repeat. The mainstream news is a psychotronic parade as the democrats bumble and the reporters comment as though they are on the Bush administration payroll. 

The truth is not reported. The public responds as a story of importance makes breaking news only to see it squahed in the next 72 hours. Americans are asking for political asylum and you are not hearing about it. 

The government is torturing American citizens who are Whistleblowers-  myspace Darren Gelbard, youtube Monarch Katherine Moore, and DIA Topoff to see electronic warfare torturing a U.S. citizen in 2007. Or, for those of you who think these victims are conspiracy theorists, there are the ADS military tests on youtube, 60 Minutes, and CNN. People being hit out of thin air by a ray beam. For real!

Weapons that can harm or kill you from a distance, without leaving marks if the operator so desires, are being used on people in their homes. There are interviews with U.S. citizens who are victims and with a Baghdad surgeon in which he states there are bodies in Iraq he and his team of ten Doctors have seen that are being killed by..."No bullets, no shots..arms cut straight off...we don't know what kind of weapon it is." A Baghdad Orchestra player also stated he saw bodies where..."Only the face was burned, no eyes..and the teeth. The rest of the body was untouched.

The Washington Post released an article called Mind Games in which the victims of psychotronics and V2K described what it was like to have someone mentally and physically torture you using communications and electronic warfare from a distance. And Russia is trying to ban Space weapons after Congress changed the bill that would have banned psychotronics years ago. This is the most dangerous game. Weapons that no individual can defend themselves against. Weapons that manipulate people.
post comment

George Bush Doesn't Care About Americans [23 Jan 2008|10:09pm]

japanesecowboy
Many Conservatives believe that Liberals are rooting for the war in Iraq to fail so that we will be vindicated in our Bush-bashing. Well, I can't argue that there aren't some liberals like that, as I've read comments from some who virtually say so, but most of us Liberals truly wish the best possible outcome for Iraq, and especially for our soldiers there. (Read More).
post comment

March on Jena - January 21st [14 Jan 2008|02:20pm]

bluegreen_lens
January 21st: Oppose the Lynch Mob Racists! No to Nooses! Free the Jena Six! We Want a Better World!

White Supremacists plan to march in Jena on Martin Luther King Day in 2008. On Martin Luther King day of all days, the one day that is supposed to be about the struggle of Black people, they are coming to march with Nooses! This is a call to people everywhere: On Monday January 21st, get to Jena! OPPOSE THE LYNCH MOB RACISTS!

Displaying nooses is a hateful and terrorizing message. These racists want to take us back to the days of lynch mobs murdering Black people in this country. Nooses are INTOLERABLE. Bring a sign, hang a poster, make a banner, get to Jena, SAY NO TO NOOSES!

The Jena High students said no to nooses hung at their school when they protested by standing underneath the “white only tree”. Then on September 20th, 2007 tens of thousands of people stood up, marching in Jena and around the country. People said Enough is Enough to the injustice in punishing Black youth who take a stand against racism. The white supremacists call Black youth criminals and thugs, they say, “Jail the Jena Six”. Let's say it loud again in Jena: FREE THE JENA SIX!

It is in response to September 20th and what that day achieved that white supremacists are lashing out, with a message that takes us back to the horrors of lynch mobs and segregation. When racism rears its ugly head, it is up to people everywhere white and Black, people of all nationalities, to take a stand. If you are against injustice and inequality, if you want racism to end... its up to you to voice it! If we don't speak up and stand up, this horrific message will go unopposed. If not us who? If not now when?

Protest in Jena on January 21st. Join people everywhere in politically opposing white supremacy and drowning out their message of hate with the message that WE WANT A BETTER WORLD.

January 21st Committee

Initial signatories:

* A group of 14 Jena residents Black and white, young and old, including two parents of the Jena Six
* Reverend Raymond Brown Community Activist, New Orleans
* William Winters, Baton Rouge Activist
* Student Organizers from University of California, PA and Howard University
* Alice Woodward and Hank Brown, Jena, LA correspondents for Revolution
* Herb Boyd, The Black World Today, NY,NY
* Don Rojas, The Black World Today, NY,NY
* Miky Espinal, NY organizer for Health & Hospital Workers Union 1199*
* Thomas Kleven, Professor of Law, Thurgood Marshall School of Law
* Idress Stelley Foundation
* Education Not Incarceration (SanFransisco Chapter)
* San Fransisco Bayview Free The Jena Six Task Force
* San Fransisco Village Voice Community Radio, 105.5 FM
* San Fransisco Bay view Campaign to End the Death Penalty
* Sess 4-5 Nuthin But Fire Records, New Orleans
* Cindy Sheehan, Candidate for Congress, California's 8th district, mother of KIA soldier Casey Sheehan
* 60 residents of Cabrini Green, Chicago
* C3 (Community, Concern, Compassion)/Hands Off Iberville, New Orleans
* Mayday New Orleans
* Don Paul, writer, musician, Housing is a Human Right, New Orleans

*For identification purposes only

Join us! This call is still in progress and we invite organizations, student groups, Jena residents and others to endorse.

Spread the word! Get out this call far and wide, support and build for January 21st!

Contact the committee: january21injenacomm@yahoo.com 318.312.1297
post comment

Edwards Finds A Message [17 Dec 2007|11:21pm]

quebedox
And it's a doozy.
Finally!


Took you long enough, politics.
2 comments|post comment

[27 Nov 2007|09:23am]

thedr9wningman
Co-authors: Randy White & Cedric Justice

Financial choirs around the world are finally singing that the US is in a recession. If you operate a business, you didn't need to wait to hear that, you already knew it. It arrives every month in the form of rising bills and smaller profits. As your operational expenses keep rising, you find yourself wondering how many more payrolls you can tolerate in these financial conditions.

Here's the good news: You can quickly trim some fat right now without cutting or gutting your employees. Here are five fast ways to save your business thousands of dollars a month during the recession:

1) SOURCE LOCALLY
Sourcing local products and services improves implicit costs, such as delays in business, transportation costs, and depending on the industry, freshness. The sustainability benefit is three-fold: economically it potentially saves your organization money; socially, it improves dollar velocity, improving the local economy. This improves the potential work pool your organization can draw from as well as the local infrastructure and ability for local customers to afford your product or service. Environmentally, it shortens supply chains, which uses less fossil fuels in transportation of goods.

TIP: Small businesses can barter with one another. Big Box stores do not have as much luxury in that department.

2) DITCH THE WASTERS
Here are three common wasters you can cut immediately:

Water coolers refrigerate your water and also heat up the water. It is a redundant system that is an expensive luxury that is unnecessary. In areas like Portland, OR, the tap water is some of the best in the country. At worst, one can buy a Brita filter and have a pitcher of cold water in the refrigerator. Hot water can be obtained through the microwave or the coffeemaker. Additionally, office water heaters are available for purchase or subscription, whereby the service of hot/cold filtered water is sold to you, and the cost of the water is usually absorbed by the building. One client was spending $130/mo on bottled water and now spends $35 for the service of the water heater/cooler (Buying one of these units is about $600 with $35 for filters that need to be changed every 9-24 months depending on the model). It has saved them time, money, resources, and real estate. Environmentally, producing plastic and shipping water in trucks makes little sense, especially when our society has plumbing as a fundamental infrastructure. Water purchased in bottles is in the dollars per gallon order of magnitude, water that runs through plumbing is in the cents (less than $0.10) per gallon cost. Additionally, it takes out the element of employee passive-agressivism prevalent in offices where employees get upset because someone didn't change the water bottle out.

Turn out the lights when you leave and turn down the thermostat:
"Are you trying to heat the neighborhood?" "Didn't anyone tell you to turn the lights out when you leave the room?" These are utterances from a grandfather (that and "I walked to school uphill in the snow both ways"), but they came from a time of scarcity. Heating a room that isn't being used and lighting a building with no one in it simply doesn't make any sense. In fact, I've worked in a building where there was a small break room with the light on and it was locked from the outside. What's the point of that? If you use less energy, chances are, the lease terms you have next period aren't going to have an energy premium set on them. In fact, why not work with building management to give you a share of the savings you implement? Set policies that encourage and enable people, don't be an authoritarian or make people feel guilty, it doesn't work.

TIP: Get a double-side printer and use recycled paper:
Many companies have a double-sided printer, but it isn't set to default. Have your IT staff set the printer to default to double-side printing and you can save up to half of your paper costs. If you don't have a double-sided printer, you can also set up a second tray of leftover paper to print to the back side of drafts you've already used. The idea here is to default to what is least resource intensive, and have the super-white virgin paper be a premium, not a default. Recycled paper is currently more expensive than virgin paper, but that's due to the market and to externalities. If you demand recycled paper, it will become cheaper as more demand it... economies of scale. Plus, if you're using leftover paper scraps, you've cut your budget for paper by nearly 50%, so you can afford a 20-30% surcharge. Paper creation is an energy intensive process that pollutes the environment with nasty chemicals (plus, paper mills stink!). Using recycled paper cuts the emissions for these chemicals as well as energy.


3) PROMOTE ALTERNATIVE COMMUTING OPTIONS

Telecommuting may not work for everyone, but it may work for some. A lot of productivity is lost when people have to leave early to get their kids from school and it could be a cost center for them to have their kids in daycare. Besides the child angle, people who don't commute in grinding traffic for 1-2 hours today will be much more amiable and rested when coming to work. Paying for a parking spot is about the worst thing you can do for productivity, for the environment, for reducing taxes, and for your bottom line. Instead, give your employees options: some companies are starting to give employees a transit budget. To qualify, they have to take an alternative form of transportation. The incentive pays for public transit, and if the employee bikes to work, they keep the allowance. It is a taxable expense to the company (check with your accountant before going through with it, as laws are different everywhere) in optimal situations. This reduces your carbon footprint (which, if you could track, you could sell the carbon credits), increases employee health (less stress, more exercise), and increases productivity. Additionally, goodwill is extended to your labour, which pays off in innumerable ways: employee retention, corporate knowledge, productivity gains, decreased utility costs and real estate pressures (if you only have 200 employees in the office instead of 1000, you're probably going to need fewer desks, square footage, and heating/lighting). You may even be able to pay less because your employees won't be saddled with the costs of commuting in time, energy, and fuel costs, they can accept a bit less. Bicycles are much cheaper than cars to maintain, and usually the cost of one car payment to buy; daycare is the cost of most one-bedroom apartments. Making your employees aware of this can create some huge gains, both for you and for them.

TIP: Your employees can set up a carpool right now for free at www.carpoolcrew.com

4) GO LEED (OR BEYOND)
Green buildings have been shown to increase employee productivity, reduce energy inputs, cost less to maintain, and benefit society as a whole. Holistic systems tend to work when they're thought of together, and the added costs, if any, will definitely pay off in the decrease in risk exposure you have to spikes in energy prices, fuel costs, political strife in faraway lands, etc. Your employees are the most expensive part of the building per square foot. Ask your employees what you can do together to spruce up the work place while making the space greener. And make sure you measure it. Metrics are everything. If you know how much energy your cell phone charger uses by being plugged in or how much your computer uses by not being on standby, then you can make the conscious decision to unplug or turn off. But you need the data first. Consulting firms and electronic gadgets can help you with this, measuring everything from waste outputs to energy consumption to carbon emissions. Most people care, but without having any numbers, they can't make informed decisions. Get your bean counters involved; but remember productivity is by far the most bang for your buck.

5) TAP INTO YOUR INNER LEADER
Companies who employ the golden rule and who create inspired teams or tribes have a real advantage over hierarchical, authoritarian, 'draining' workplaces. One of the simplest things you can do to save money is treat others well. Re-read Dale Carnegie's "The Leader in You". If your employees hate working for you, they'll do everything in their power to exploit the benefits you give them. If they love their job, it will show in the work that they do, and it will show in your organization's bottom line. People who love their job don't call in sick as often, which means that you can depend on your teammates and that meeting you call will be fully staffed with the expert you need to make the sale. Inverting your management structure is instrumental to doing this. Managers are support staff for production people. Once that mentality is implemented, there's a grassroots shift in how the company operates. Drama, strife, and other interpersonal relations are smoothed. Asking your employees what they want/need will help you to better meet your clients' needs, as anyone 'under' you is closer to the front lines than you are.

With the arrival of Peak Oil and a fast warming climate, we are entering a hard period of time. As the dollar continues to decline in value and consumers struggle to pay their debts, it is imperative your business be stunning. Now is your time to shine, and if you adopt these five practices, you will see improvements in your bottom line, employee attitudes, and general business health.

Randy White is a Peak Oil analyst with Green Mind Marketing, a firm focused on helping businesses maintain profits using post-petroleum marketing tactics. randy@greenmindmarketing.com

Cedric Justice is a business analyst and management consultant with Colourless Green Ideas, a firm focused on global business and sustainability (the yin/yang of our modern economy) colourlessgreen@gmail.com
2 comments|post comment

The Century of Self, Episode 1: Happiness Machines [03 Nov 2007|09:36pm]

ankh_f_n_khonsu
[ mood | busy ]

This ***** documentary chronicles the rise of public relations. Everyone should watch it. Literally. Even blind people. Especially blind people...



Adam Curtis' acclaimed series examines the rise of the all-consuming self against the backdrop of the Freud dynasty.

To many in both politics and business, the triumph of the self is the ultimate expression of democracy, where power has finally moved to the people. Certainly the people may feel they are in charge, but are they really? The Century of the Self tells the untold and sometimes controversial story of the growth of the mass-consumer society in Britain and the United States. How was the all-consuming self created, by whom, and in whose interests?

The Freud dynasty is at the heart of this compelling social history. Sigmund Freud, founder of psychoanalysis; Edward Bernays, who invented public relations; Anna Freud, Sigmund's devoted daughter; and present-day PR guru and Sigmund's great grandson, Matthew Freud.

Sigmund Freud's work into the bubbling and murky world of the subconscious changed the world. By introducing a technique to probe the unconscious mind, Freud provided useful tools for understanding the secret desires of the masses. Unwittingly, his work served as the precursor to a world full of political spin doctors, marketing moguls, and society's belief that the pursuit of satisfaction and happiness is man's ultimate goal.

Episode One: Happiness Machines

The story of the relationship between Sigmund Freud and his American nephew, Edward Bernays. Bernays invented the public relations profession in the 1920s and was the first person to take Freud's ideas to manipulate the masses. He showed American corporations how they could make people want things they didn't need by systematically linking mass-produced goods to their unconscious desires.

Bernays was one of the main architects of the modern techniques of mass-consumer persuasion, using every trick in the book, from celebrity endorsement and outrageous PR stunts, to eroticizing the motorcar. His most notorious coup was breaking the taboo on women smoking by persuading them that cigarettes were a symbol of independence and freedom. But Bernays was convinced that this was more than just a way of selling consumer goods. It was a new political idea of how to control the masses. By satisfying the inner irrational desires that his uncle had identified, people could be made happy and thus docile.

It was the start of the all-consuming self which has come to dominate today's world.



Although I've embedded a Google Video link, I'd like to draw attention to where I found this FANTASTIC documentary from - Free Documentaries.org. They have the other episodes, and tons more.

Cross-posted to [info]ankh_f_n_khonsu and [info]guerillanews.
4 comments|post comment

Draft Gore movement's web traffic pulls ahead of the major candidates. [14 Oct 2007|07:05pm]

insomnia



A weekly snapshot of draftgore.com in comparison to hillaryclinton.com and barackobama.com, taken today from the Alexa.com website.

Draftgore.com now has over 200,000 people who have signed their petition, supporting Al Gore's entry into the presidential race.

post comment

Draft Gore movement takes off with a vengeance! [12 Oct 2007|10:40pm]

insomnia

Two days ago, on October 10th, a petition hosted on draftgore.com to convince Al Gore to enter the race, had 135,000 signatures.

On Wednesday, the supporters of draftgore.com released a full-page ad in the New York Times, encouraging Al Gore to seek run for office again.

Since Wednesday, site traffic for draftgore.com has climbed like crazy... increasing even further after the initial date of the ad, to the point that the site's web traffic stats are rapidly approaching that of hillaryclinton.com.

Tonight, on the day of his Nobel Peace Prize win, the petition to encourage Al Gore to enter the race is about to top 200,000 people.

If you're amongst the millions of Democrats who believe that the best choice of the available candidates is "none of the above", or if you simply want to show your support for Al Gore and all of his efforts on behalf of the world's people, please visit http://draftgore.com, Take the time to sign the petition, add your voice, and help put him over the top.

Al Gore *CAN* beat Hillary Clinton to be the nominee, and he can be the next President... but if you are unsure of that fact, please consider this -- the time for showing your loud, vocal, open support for Al Gore to run for President is NOW, while he's got the world's attention and while he still has time to enter the race and raise funds. Not tomorrow. Not next week. NOW.

Every signature he receives will be a loud message to the rest of the Democratic Party that the era of Democratic complicity in rubber-stamping undeclared wars while leading the earth towards environmental destruction is over, and will no longer be tolerated by the voters. Even if Al Gore politely refuses to enter the race, you can at least feel sure that you've helped to advance the causes he is fighting for every day -- peace, ecological stability, and economic justice. The very threat that he might enter the race will help force leading Democratic candidates to put forward more aggressive proposals to protect the environment.

Support him now. Visit http://draftgore.com and sign the petition to add your voice to those who have already done so. Take the time to post about DraftGore on your site and let others know. (Feel free to copy and edit my post if you wish.) If you have a bit of free time, offer to volunteer. If you can spare a few bucks, please send them a donation. (It's as easy and painless as paying for an LJ account. You can even use PayPal!)

Al Gore was right about Iraq. He is right about the threat of global warming. And, best of all, he's not just content to be right, but he's out there fighting the good fight each and every day, while other Democratic candidates have compromised this country's strength, its Constitution, its economy, and ultimately, its future.

Al Gore deserves our support, and we all need a President like Al Gore.

post comment

[06 Apr 2007|01:19pm]

gregorysparr
With a keyboard on loan from God, I am the Independent Blogger of the Office of the Independent Blogger. Allow me to introduce you to my site if you haven't heard of it before. I do hope you visit and stay -- add it to a Feed, bookmark it.

My latest post is a satire of Mitt Romney, who is more Elmer Fudd than John Wayne, more Michael Dukakis than George H.W. Bush. It's a look at his -- and his state's -- Looney Toon Politics.

Earlier today, I wrote about Disney recognizing gay relationships, which is good news, and Florida law forbidding people from feeding homeless people, which makes even a sane man wish himself Libertarian!

A couple of days ago I looked at Newt Gingrich's comments about bilingual education and the whole ugly matter of textbooks being censored or neglecting portions of history.

For those of you interested in Congressional politics, I looked at portions of the Democratic agenda and outline the potential pitfalls and my own opinions on these ideas. A small excerpt, in response to Price's warning of the price Democrats might pay for going too far with certain things: "I’ll buy that. If the Democrats, say, pass a bill legalizing gay marriage and pledge to give money to terrorists, they’d be homosexual Ronald Reagans — and out of work come 2008." And then I took a serious look at their agenda. The Democratic Agenda.

Here I chide Bush's chief policy strategist in 2004 for now saying Bush is wrong. (Of course he's wrong -- my argument is that Dowd is not someone to appreciate in any sense of the term because his whole behavior suggests he's an idiot.)

Here, at OkayStupid, I Got It! we've got a look at Online Politics and the recent announcement that Barack Obama raised more money than Hillary did...on the Internet, and the dishonest, ridiculous manner the whole situation was covered in by the media and on the Internets. (And here we've got a deep apology to Barack Obama's intern...who I told that I was a Republican because I can't possibly donate to his campaign on principal or prudence.)</a> (And here, on a final note on the matter, we've got a better look at the media's coverage of Obama/Clinton and a casual look at billionaires v. government when it comes to newspapers.)

A short post here, pithy, that would be longer in summary than whole!

Small post here, too, about Thompson's Presidential announcement. An excerpt:

I didn’t know that the Department of Health and Human Services was a launchpad for Presidential ambitions, but I suppose it is now with Tommy Thompson’s announcement that he’s running for President. I, for one, am not sure what to make of it. He’s angling himself as a reliable Conservative but that’s what Senator Brownback is in the race for. Perhaps he’ll catch fire if Brownback’s big mouth catches up to him, but otherwise I don’t think he’s got much of a chance to make waves.

Of course, there are hundreds of posts beyond that, and I update daily. I'd like to think I have a good idea what I'm talking about and an excellent sense of humor, but I'll leave that up to you, and I hope you agree to stay at the Office of the Independent Blogger, open daily for business!
post comment

Washington Peace Rally (An FYI) [27 Jan 2007|03:06am]

discreet_chaos
C-SPAN is scheduled to cover today's anti-war rally, live starting at approximately 11:15 AM (Eastern). The event is supposed to run for about an hour and forty-five minutes and the coverage will take place on regular C-SPAN which is on cable, satellite and is always simulcast via their website.

The featured speakers include;
  • Fonda, Jane (Actress)

  • Waters, Maxine (U.S. Representative, D-CA)

  • Woolsey, Lynn (U.S. Representative, D-CA)

  • Glover, Danny (Actor)

  • Botean, John Michael Bishop, (Catholic Church, Eparchy of Saint George's in Canton (OH), Romanian)

  • Kucinich, Dennis (U.S. Representative, D-OH)

  • Jackson, Jesse (Founder and President, Rainbow/PUSH Coalition)

  • Lee, Barbara (U.S. Representative, D-CA)
Also, one of the organizers is scheduled to be guest on C-SPAN's Washington Journal from 8:30 AM to 9:15 AM (Eastern).
post comment

Street kids raid poverty summit [24 Jan 2007|08:35pm]

saint_gachnar
Dozens of street children have invaded a five-star hotel food tent and feasted on meals meant for sale at the World Social Forum in Kenya's capital.

The hungry urchins were joined by other participants who complained that the food was too expensive at the annual anti-capitalist get together.

The police, caught unawares, were unable to stop the free-for-all that saw the food containers swept clean.

The gathering in Nairobi is discussing social problems, including poverty.

A plate of food at the tent being operated by the prestigious Windsor Hotel was selling for $7 in a country where many live on less than $2 a day.

'Hawkers allowed'

The children, who had been begging for food, launched the raid after being told they would have to pay for the food.

The hotel management declined to comment on the incident.

Two days ago, World Social Forum organisers were forced to waive entry fees for participants after Nairobi slum dwellers staged a demonstration against the charges.

Participants were originally being asked to pay a 500 Kenyan shillings ($7) accreditation fee.

"We are now not charging anybody, the event is free so that many people can participate," Boniface Beti, the event's media officer, told the BBC.

Mr Beti also said hawkers had recently been allowed in to sell cheap food to participants as up until a few days ago five-star catering firms had dominated business.

Tens of thousands of people are attending the World Social Forum, which is being held at the same time as the World Economic Forum - hosted in the Swiss town of Davos.

At Davos, the world's largest corporations are discussing business and hammering out trade deals, while the Kenyan event is addressing a wide spectrum of the world's social problems - including poverty.
Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/africa/6295633.stm

Published: 2007/01/24 16:31:09 GMT

© BBC MMVII
2 comments|post comment

Wal-Mart hosts Communist Party [28 Dec 2006|07:08pm]

taeaux
http://english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/21BE3634-536A-477F-A812-6AEC9A148E80.htm

US retail giant Wal-Mart has set up a new branch of the Communist Party at its China headquarters after allowing unions to operate in its stores earlier this year.

Wal-Mart Stores Inc, known for it's anti-union stance in other countries, opened the new branch at its head office in the southern city of Shenzhen.

The move come as Chinese authorities look to expand the presence of the communist party and state-controlled labour groups in foreign companies operating in China.

One local party official told the People's Daily newspaper the branch opening was a "breakthrough" for the company.

Chinese law makes it compulsory for any company or institution with 25 or more staff to set up its own trade union if staff request one.

The first Wal-Mart trade union in China was set up in mid-2006 and a union office recently opened at the company's HQ.

None of Wal-Mart's stores in the US has a union.

Wal-Mart, which is the world's largest retailer, opened its first Chinese store in 1996 and now employs more than 35,000 people in its China operations.

In March this year, it announced plans hire an additional 150,000 staff as part of a major expansion.

Wal-Mart has opened more than 60 stores in 34 cities across China and plans to open dozens more as it seeks to tap China's fast-growing retail market.
1 comment|post comment

[11 Dec 2006|03:49pm]

thedr9wningman
Don't know what to do to make the world a better place? Check out Kiva to invest in a human being, rather than a megacorporation.
3 comments|post comment

Oppose Billion More for War! [28 Nov 2006|01:55pm]

paddymac
From Just Foreign Policy. Take action here: http://www.justforeignpolicy.org/involved/iraq.html

USA Today and Congressional Quarterly report that the Bush administration will ask Congress for a record amount of war money in 2007 - perhaps as high as $160 billion. That would be in addition to the $435 billion in military spending Congress already authorized for 2007.

That would mean one out of every five of our taxpayer dollars next year would go to military spending, and that's not even counting $17 billion on US nuclear weapons.

Money spent on the military and war is money that will not be available for pressing domestic needs, like health care, schools and combating poverty. Senator Kent Conrad, the Democrat who will oversee the Senate budget next year, told USA Today the high military price tag "is going to increasingly become an issue." He said it could restrict the availability of money to expand Medicare's prescription drug coverage.

We set up a web page that makes it easy to write a letter to your senators and representatives asking them not to pour more money into a failed and destructive policy in Iraq. More money means more young American soldiers will die and be horribly injured in this needless war and more Iraqi civilians will die at the hands of our troops.

Our suggested talking points also ask senators and representatives to place conditions on any money that is appropriated, setting a firm deadline for the withdrawal of all troops and requiring the administration to directly engage Iraq's neighbors, especially Iran and Syria.
post comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]