Two cash four exchange ([info]freakytigger) wrote in [info]poptimists,
@ 2006-04-11 11:11:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Marketing News (I)
Saatchis turns to disposable pop as it creates girl band
by Suzanne Bidlake Brand Republic 10 Apr 2006

LONDON – Saatchi & Saatchi is touting a manufactured girl band, created by the agency, as its latest ad weapon in the battle to reach young consumers.

Marketers will be able to hire the as-yet-unnamed group to promote their brands in their songs, their clothing and what they eat and drink.

Already a drinks company, a consumer goods marketer, an entertainment business and car manufacturers are said to be lining up for the chance to align their products with what appears to be the most disposable incarnation of pop in a post reality-TV world.

Created by Saatchi youth division Gum, the idea aims to surmount the problem of ad clutter by taking brands into a fresh medium.

The agency is understood to be planning to roll out the concept further to a rock band and a comedian if selling pop as a marketing vehicle is successful.

Any similarities between existing brands and the girl band members' stage names -- Mercedes, Chanel, S-Jay and Rockwell -- is said to be merely coincidental.

The girls all hold down day jobs and are being groomed into pop stars with singing and choreography training and styling. It is estimated that the agency might have to send over £200,000 a year to develop the band.

The girl group will make its public debut next month in a "mobisoap" -- a series of minute-long soap opera-style films reflecting their real lives relayed via mobile phones.

Established music talent has already moved closer to marketing brands. Kanye West and four other rappers mentioned Seagram's gin in songs in 2004, and hip-hop acts such as Busta Rhymes and P Diddy lifted cognac sales with the 'Pass the Courvoisier' hit two years earlier.

The idea of manufacturing bands is hardly new with The Spice Girls, Boyzone and S Club 7 all blazing an early trail, which has been followed by reality TV groups Hearsay and Liberty X.

But creating them specifically as a marketing tool is likely to make some wince and question if it is not a step too far.

Whether brand owners will be tempted by the Saatchi girls' entreaty in an early track -- "Anything you want me to be baby, I'll play the part" -- remains to be seen.



(Post a new comment)


[info]carsmilesteve
2006-04-11 10:23 am UTC (link)
truly, we are living in the future...

(Reply to this)


[info]friedslice
2006-04-11 10:26 am UTC (link)
"...manufacturing bands is hardly new with The Spice Girls, Boyzone and S Club 7 all blazing an early trail" !!!!

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]carsmilesteve
2006-04-11 10:28 am UTC (link)
what are these "mon-keees" of which you speak?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]dubdobdee
2006-04-11 10:35 am UTC (link)
where is beatles band?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]alexmacpherson
2006-04-11 10:32 am UTC (link)
possibility of success = close to zero. i think mcdonald's offered rappers $$$ at some point last year to mention them in their songs and the idea flopped spectacularly.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]sbp
2006-04-11 10:41 am UTC (link)
Although it got a few laffs in Boondocks.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]carsmilesteve
2006-04-11 10:37 am UTC (link)
the "mobisoap" is kind of more interesting than the pop group bit, perhaps. soap operas returning to their original function?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]sbp
2006-04-11 10:41 am UTC (link)
Well there's a series of behind-the-scenes things on Gurls Aloud on E4 starting tonight.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]sbp
2006-04-11 10:47 am UTC (link)
Ironic that they are saying "ooh, Mercedes-the-girl has nothing to do with the brand", when the brand was named after a girl called Mercedes in the first place.

Chanel is a surname though. And according to Goggle "Rockwell International is a mainstay of the nuclear weapons industry." So they probably didn't pick that one on purpose....

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]freakytigger
2006-04-11 10:49 am UTC (link)
My wife teaches someone called Chanel (first name).

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]awesomewells
2006-04-11 10:57 am UTC (link)
This won't work - it'll be riven with conflicts of interest, half the media (and therefore teh kids of today) won't want to go near them. Ergo kiss of death for any brand.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]freakytigger
2006-04-11 10:59 am UTC (link)
Yes but the question isn't "will it work", it's "will companies pay for it" - as the forthcoming Marketing News (II) will demonstrate...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]awesomewells
2006-04-11 11:02 am UTC (link)
That's my point - why would any self-respecting Marketing Director pay for a completely unknown band to flog, I dunno, Tizer? And more importantly, why would anyone in their right mind pay for them after they've already been closely associated with another brand (ie whoever their first campaign is for)?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]julietk
2006-04-11 12:25 pm UTC (link)
This sounds like it comes from the Onion.

(Reply to this)


[info]genie22
2006-04-11 02:09 pm UTC (link)
Whatever Charlie S throws money at tends to end up a success right?

We've only got half a dead cow to thank him for.

Go back to eating cereal Charles :P

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…