FREE CONCERT!
LOS LOBOS
Please join Mayor Rocky Anderson and thousands of others this Saturday, April 14th at STEP IT UP
Condoms in Green Ads on UK Campuses.
ok, I couldnt’ resist posting on this. Condoms were put over tailpipes and smokestacks

Published on Friday, January 19, 2007 by the Toronto Star | |
| Landmark UN Study Backs Climate Theory 2,000 scientists all but end the debate: Human activity causes global warming | |
| by Peter Gorrie | |
| A major new United Nations report shows global scientists are more convinced than ever that human activity is causing climate change, the Toronto Star has learned. The rate of warming between now and 2030 is likely to be twice that of the previous century, it says. The report, to be released in Paris Feb. 2, should all but end any debate on climate change and compel governments and industries to take urgent measures to deal with it, scientists say. "It is very likely that (man-made) greenhouse gas increases caused most of the globally average temperature increases since the mid-20th century," states the report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In the clinical language of science, it paints a stark picture of the effects of greenhouse gas emissions: ( Read more... ) |
Published on Wednesday, January 17, 2007 by the Toronto Star | |
| Doomsday Clock Reset for an Alarming World Global warming, new nuclear perils shift symbolic hand | |
| by Olivia Ward | |
Be afraid. Be more afraid.
The clock – a symbol of the perils facing the human race – is expected to shift two minutes, from the current seven minutes to midnight to five, a figure the Bulletin would not confirm before its news conference today. "This is a sober and highly alarming judgment by a group of people who are knowledgeable and experienced," said Nobel laureate John Polanyi, a faculty member in the University of Toronto's chemistry department. "The most immediate hazard we face is also the most easily addressed, namely the thousands of nuclear-armed weapons aimed at Russia and the United States, and left pointlessly in a state of high alert. The fact that they are is an appalling failure to step back from the brink." The clock, which hangs in the University of Chicago, was first set 60 years ago to focus on the danger of nuclear weapons. But for the first time it will take into account the perils posed by global warming, which has sparked renewed interest in building nuclear power plants. The Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists was founded by former Manhattan Project scientists who turned against nuclear weapons after developing the first atomic bomb. "The major new step reflects growing concerns about a `Second Nuclear Age' marked by grave threats, including: nuclear ambitions in Iran and North Korea, unsecured nuclear materials in Russia and elsewhere, the continuing launch-ready status of 2,000 of the 25,000 nuclear weapons held by the U.S. and Russia, escalating terrorism and new pressure from climate change for expanded civilian nuclear power that could increase proliferation risks," said a statement released before a news conference today. |
by Jeremy Lovell
This year is set to be the hottest on record worldwide due to global warming and the El Nino weather phenomenon, Britain's Meteorological Office said on Thursday.
The Met Office said the combination of factors would likely push average temperatures this year above the record set in 1998. 2006 is set to be the sixth warmest on record globally.
"This new information represents another warning that climate change is happening around the world," said Met Office scientist Katie Hopkins.
( Read more... )
Published on Thursday, December 21, 2006 by the Independent / UK | |
| Climate Change vs Mother Nature: Scientists Reveal That Bears Have Stopped Hibernating | |
| by Geneviève Roberts | |
| Bears have stopped hibernating in the mountains of northern Spain, scientists revealed yesterday, in what may be one of the strongest signals yet of how much climate change is affecting the natural world. In a December in which bumblebees, butterflies and even swallows have been on the wing in Britain, European brown bears have been lumbering through the forests of Spain's Cantabrian mountains, when normally they would already be in their long, annual sleep.
But many of the 130 bears in Spain's northern cordillera - which have a slightly different genetic identity from bear populations elsewhere in the world - have remained active throughout recent winters, naturalists from Spain's Brown Bear Foundation (La Fundación Oso Pardo - FOP) said yesterday. ( Read more... ) |
For immediate release
For more information:
Dec. 12, 2006
Ted Glick or Anne Havemann
301-891-6844, 973-460-1458
Two activists who climbed onto a ledge 25 feet over the main entrance to the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) in Silver Spring, Md. were sentenced
today for their action.
Paul Burman, 24, and Ted Glick 57, were arrested by police on October 23rd four
hours after they had unfurled a banner over the NOAA entrance which read, “Bush:
Let NOAA Tell the Truth!” For close to a year media reports have disclosed a policy
of political censorship at NOAA by Bush top-level political appointees of scientists
whose research showed a connection between global warming and more frequent and
destructive extreme weather events like hurricanes and droughts.( Read more... )
On Tuesday morning, December 12th, climate activists Paul Burman, 23 and Ted Glick, 57, will appear in court to face charges stemming from an October 23rd demonstration at the headquarters in Silver Spring of NOAA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The demonstration was
organized by the U.S. Climate Emergency Council
(www.climateemergency.org).
On the morning of October 23rd Glick and Burman carried a 32-foot extension ladder to the building's main entrance. They ascended the ladder, climbed onto a ledge over the
entrance and unfurled a banner saying, "Bush: Let NOAA Tell the Truth!" This was in reference to the suppression by Bush political appointees of scientists at NOAA and other federal
agencies whose research shows a connection between global warming and more destructive hurricanes, droughts, wildfires and other extreme weather events.
( Read more... )
Senators to Exxon: Shut up, and pay up.
Monday, December 4, 2006 12:01 a.m. EST
Washington has no shortage of bullies, but even we can't quite believe an October 27 letter that Senators Jay Rockefeller and Olympia Snowe sent to ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson. Its message: Start toeing the Senators' line on climate change, or else.
We reprint the full text of the letter here, so readers can see for themselves. But its essential point is that the two Senators believe global warming is a fact, and therefore all debate about the issue must stop and ExxonMobil should "end its dangerous support of the [global warming] 'deniers.' " Not only that, the company "should repudiate its climate change denial campaign and make public its funding history." And in extra penance for being "one of the world's largest carbon emitters," Exxon should spend that money on "global remediation efforts."
The Senators aren't dumb enough to risk an ethics inquiry by threatening specific consequences if Mr. Tillerson declines this offer he can't refuse. But in case the CEO doesn't understand his company's jeopardy, they add that "ExxonMobil and its partners in denial have manufactured controversy, sown doubt, and impeded progress with strategies all-too reminiscent of those used by the tobacco industry for so many years." (Our emphasis.) The Senators also graciously copied the Exxon board on their missive.
This is amazing stuff. On the one hand, the Senators say that everyone agrees on the facts and consequences of climate change. But at the same time they are so afraid of debate that they want Exxon to stop financing a doughty band of dissenters who can barely get their name in the paper. We respect the folks at the Competitive Enterprise Institute, but we didn't know until reading the Rockefeller-Snowe letter that they ran U.S. climate policy and led the mainstream media around by the nose, too. Congratulations.
![]()
Climate change deniers irrelevant
That's the underlying message from two remarkable stories published this weekend in the Washington Post.
On Saturday, Steven Mufson and Juliet Eilperin reported that "top executives at many of the nation's largest energy companies have accepted the scientific consensus about climate change and see federal regulation to cut greenhouse gas emissions as inevitable."
They include a great quote from Duke Energy executive John Stowell:
If we had our druthers, we'd already have carbon legislation passed. Our viewpoint is that it's going to happen. There's scientific evidence of climate change. We'd like to know what legislation will be put together so that, when we figure out how to increase our load, we know exactly what to expect.
On Sunday, Blaire Harden and Juliet Eilperin reported:
With the issue of a warming planet shifting rapidly from scientific projection to on-the-ground reality, animals and plants are being compelled, along with businesses and bureaucracies, to take action aimed at self-preservation. They are doing so even as the Bush administration eschews regulations, laws or international treaties that would require limits on carbon dioxide emissions, which scientists say are the main cause of global warming.
The story ticked off many examples: butterflies abandoning Europe for Finland; ski-lift operators in Montana seeking land at higher elevations; pest species surviving winter at increased rates; and power planners in the Northwest brainstorming on how to continue to send electrical power to California during the summer, despite reduced hydroelectric generation caused by earlier snowmelts.
No one expects action from the Bush administration, which supports vague voluntary measures that would allow Texas-based TXU Corp. to build 11 new coal plants in the next few years. According to the story, this would "more than double the company's carbon dioxide emissions, from 55 million tons to 133 million tons a year. That increase in emissions is more than the total carbon dioxide pollution emitted in all of Maryland or by 10 million Cadillac Escalade sport-utility vehicles."
But losing much of corporate America, which needs to compete across the nation (in regions such as California and the East Coast, which are putting together regulations on their own) and in Europe, is a huge loss for the climate change deniers. Even right-wingers will have difficulty dismissing the likes of Shell Oil executive John Hofmeister, who was quoted at a National Press Club function saying:
We have to deal with greenhouse gases. From Shell's point of view, the debate is over. When 98 percent of scientists agree, who is Shell to say, 'Let's debate the science'?
12-Step Plan for Climate Action
by Alisa Gravitz
With the movie “An Inconvenient Truth” drawing record audiences, and groups as diverse as the Evangelical Climate Initiative and the Pentagon sounding the alarm on the coming climate catastrophe, our country could be on the cusp of taking real action on a very real danger.
But how large a scale of action for a solution is needed to match the enormous scale of the problem? Based on the data -- such as rapidly melting polar icecaps -- showing that climate change is happening faster than anyone thought, it is increasingly clear: Baby steps won’t do it. We need a bold proposal that can beef up corporate, government, community, and household plans to reduce greenhouse gas emissions – especially carbon emissions -- to lower levels we can live with. Scientists at the Princeton’s Carbon Mitigation Initiative (CMI) have taken up this challenge, and propose stabilizing carbon emissions by dividing this huge task into smaller, doable action “wedges” of equal size—each with the capacity to reduce those emissions by 1 billion tons per year by 2054. CMI lists 15 possible “wedges,” out of which we need to achieve just seven to reach equilibrium.
At my organization, Co-op America, we added our own filters to this building-block approach. We screened out measures that are too dangerous, costly, and slow (like nuclear power plants, synfuels, and “clean” coal), and we beefed up those that are safe and cost-effective. (Wind energy is cost-competitive at utility scale, and has beaten natural gas in certain markets. Solar energy will be cost-competitive within five years.) With these filters, we developed a plan that uses current technologies; is safe, clean, and cost-effective; and is big enough to meet the climate challenge—12 “wedges” when we only need seven. Each of the following could reduce dreaded emissions by at least 1 billion tons per year by 2054:
Here’s our 12-step scheme:
( Read more... )




