Jensica ([info]robertsbox_xo) wrote in [info]ohnotheydidnt,
@ 2009-11-04 18:39:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Entry tags:film, megan fox

REVISED Cover For Jennifer's Body
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Just a day after they released the DVD cover for "Jennifer's Body," FOX has revised the cover and released it in HQ. The DVD is set to be released December 29th, 2009.







Jennifer's Body revolves around the character Jennifer (Megan Fox), a mean-girl cheerleader possessed by a demon who begins feeding off the boys in a Minnesota farming town. It is then up to her "plain Jane" best friend Needy (Amanda Seyfried) to kill Jennifer, escape from a correctional facility and go after lead singer Nikolai (Adam Brody) and his Satan-worshiping rock band responsible for the transformation.

ETA: original cover


Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(73 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]jesustolemybike
2009-11-05 01:33 am UTC (link)
The original looks better...?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]rooo2184
2009-11-05 01:42 am UTC (link)
rofl it does not

(Reply to this) (Parent)

[info]cherrule
2009-11-05 01:33 am UTC (link)
didnt this flop? can't act for shit, enjoy your one good movie etc

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)

[info]robertsbox_xo
2009-11-05 01:48 am UTC (link)
it didn't do well but it didn't flop. it made it's budget back.

(Reply to this) (Parent)
(no subject) - [info]rootwalla, 2009-11-05 02:09 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]cherrule, 2009-11-05 02:28 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]3mcoopandmaxie, 2009-11-05 02:18 am UTC (Expand)

[info]ptizzy
2009-11-05 01:34 am UTC (link)
Sexy either way, albeit, I prefer the unrated version's cover.

(Reply to this)


[info]runlalyrun
2009-11-05 01:35 am UTC (link)
i like the revised cover better

(Reply to this)


[info]prismboy
2009-11-05 01:38 am UTC (link)
The revised cover captures the concept of the movie better.

However, I liked the original cover better.

(Reply to this)


[info]starlight_wings
2009-11-05 01:39 am UTC (link)
The original - BETTER

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]rooo2184
2009-11-05 01:43 am UTC (link)
wtf you guys are crazy. the original cover sucks.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)
(no subject) - [info]ms_firecrotch, 2009-11-05 03:00 am UTC (Expand)

[info]childish
2009-11-05 01:39 am UTC (link)
The cover makes it looked like a movie you'd find in a five dollar bin at Walmart.

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)

[info]sassydash
2009-11-05 02:06 am UTC (link)
MTE

(Reply to this) (Parent)
(no subject) - [info]bellebass, 2009-11-05 02:47 am UTC (Expand)

[info]niiiiiikole
2009-11-05 01:41 am UTC (link)
HELL YEAH, LESS CLOTHES, MORE BOOBZ

(Reply to this)


[info]rooo2184
2009-11-05 01:42 am UTC (link)
I WATCHED THIS LAST NIGHT LOL AND ITS GOOD

people who say its bad are stupid. yeah it's supposed to be slightly campy. there were flaws in it though, some of the things were so unrealistic that it was distracting (the fire for example) and yeah it wasn't perfect or amazing, but it was pretty solid and entertaining, and i know this sounds lame, but amanda seyfried should be considered for a best supporting actress because, despite the fact this is an entirely non-oscar film, her performance was pretty amazing, she has a whole range, developed a character, and is a great actress.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]senorita__
2009-11-05 02:15 am UTC (link)
i think a lot of why people (specifically, non ontd ppl) disliked it is because they expected it to be an actual horror film and not a dark comedy. when i told my sister i wanted to see it she was like LOL WHY and i told her and she thought it was supposed to be a "scary movie" and thats why she didnt want to see it.


tl;dr i never saw it anyway haha

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)
(no subject) - [info]rooo2184, 2009-11-05 09:18 am UTC (Expand)

[info]ruby_chick
2009-11-05 01:43 am UTC (link)
I liked the original better.

(Reply to this)


[info]mizmalice
2009-11-05 01:43 am UTC (link)
She looks hot there.

(Reply to this)


[info]hokeyparfait
2009-11-05 01:48 am UTC (link)
Is it just me or does the 'Chemistry 101' binding look very badly photoshopped? Actually both books look weird.

(Reply to this)


[info]jackiemust_die
2009-11-05 01:55 am UTC (link)
the fake perfect line of blood coming out of the corner of her mouth is annoying me. like more than the True Blood cover does.
idk why it annoys me, it just does

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]milkradio
2009-11-05 02:36 am UTC (link)
That was my first thought too. I was like "Uhhhh, blood wouldn't drip down her face that way, but whateverrrrrr..."

(Reply to this) (Parent)

[info]cathartic_prose
2009-11-05 02:01 am UTC (link)
the original is gorgeous, they should have stuck with that.

(Reply to this)

lol haters
[info]worldtown
2009-11-05 02:02 am UTC (link)
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)
Re: lol haters
[info]oldpolaroid
2009-11-05 02:06 am UTC (link)
give me MORE!!!!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)
im werkin on more ;) - [info]worldtown, 2009-11-05 02:33 am UTC (Expand)
Re: im werkin on more ;) - [info]3mcoopandmaxie, 2009-11-05 02:40 am UTC (Expand)
Re: im werkin on more ;) - [info]lovetake_over, 2009-11-05 02:52 am UTC (Expand)
Re: im werkin on more ;) - [info]ms_firecrotch, 2009-11-05 02:57 am UTC (Expand)
Re: im werkin on more ;) - [info]lovetake_over, 2009-11-05 02:58 am UTC (Expand)
Re: im werkin on more ;) - [info]evilfuckinbitch, 2009-11-05 07:08 am UTC (Expand)
Re: lol haters - [info]fifthmorn, 2009-11-05 02:07 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]worldtown, 2009-11-05 02:33 am UTC (Expand)
Re: lol haters - [info]3mcoopandmaxie, 2009-11-05 02:17 am UTC (Expand)
Re: lol haters - [info]worldtown, 2009-11-05 03:27 am UTC (Expand)
Re: lol haters - [info]oldpolaroid, 2009-11-05 02:34 am UTC (Expand)
Re: lol haters - [info]ptizzy, 2009-11-05 03:11 am UTC (Expand)

[info]carazon
2009-11-05 02:03 am UTC (link)
I like the original one better. The fake blood line and the fucking hand coming out of the desk are so damn annoying. However it isn't a bad cover.

(Reply to this)


[info]christianeee
2009-11-05 02:05 am UTC (link)
unrated would feature................. ?

(Reply to this)


[info]loveissuicide87
2009-11-05 02:05 am UTC (link)
I like the new cover better. The first isn't so bad, I just prefer the new one because I really liked this poster.

(Reply to this)


[info]crownless__
2009-11-05 02:06 am UTC (link)
i thought it was funny, but i wouldn't buy the dvd to be honest

(Reply to this)


[info]fifthmorn
2009-11-05 02:06 am UTC (link)
I still think this movie is fabulously hilarious.

(Reply to this)


[info]listenlouder
2009-11-05 02:12 am UTC (link)
What's the original cover?

(Reply to this)


[info]_katttttt_
2009-11-05 02:15 am UTC (link)
I thought it said URINATED

(Reply to this)


[info]3mcoopandmaxie
2009-11-05 02:17 am UTC (link)
i like the original cover better

(Reply to this)

Anybody read Darkplaces?
[info]piscesvstaurus
2009-11-05 02:27 am UTC (link)
I am almost done, but I think Megan should play Diondra in the movie version?

(Reply to this)


[info]ohsoglamours
2009-11-05 02:39 am UTC (link)
i think the new cover is better but that photoshopped blood coming from her mouth is so poorly done, it irratates me. i feel like some random kid online could have done it.

(Reply to this)

(73 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…