there's always room for one more mistake ([info]vampiric02) wrote in [info]ohnotheydidnt,
@ 2009-07-03 14:37:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
Entry tags:legal / lawsuit, x-men

Fired Fox News writer seeks $5 million in suit



Former Fox News entertainment writer Roger Friedman is suing his old bosses for more than $5 million after he was fired for reviewing a leaked copy of Fox's "X-Men Origins: Wolverine."

Friedman is seeking damages for libel and legal fees in a suit that names Fox as well as News Corp. and its chairman, Rupert Murdoch, as defendants.

He is accusing Fox of violating his contract with the firing, which came after his April 2 review of "Wolverine" appeared on Fox's Web site. Friedman wrote the piece based on a version he found on the Internet before its official release.

Fox News said it has not been served with the suit. A spokeswoman declined to comment any further on the case.

In the filing, Friedman claims he contacted an in-house attorney at Fox to get the column cleared but that she never responded. He said none of his editors raised objections.

Friedman said he contacted his editor after the review was removed from the site April 3 and was told Murdoch had ordered the story taken down but that he shouldn't worry about his job.

News Corp. nevertheless fired Friedman April 4. Friedman said John Moody, the executive vice president of Fox News, told him to "remain quiet over the weekend" until a meeting Monday to "repair the situation."

But News Corp. released a public statement the same day saying the company has "zero tolerance for any action that encourages and promotes piracy."

Friedman argues Murdoch "invalidated" the policy by inadvertently allowing the film to end up online and fired him to cover up the misstep.


He said company's public statements amounted to libel for "willfully, recklessly, intentionally and maliciously" defaming him.

Friedman, who had worked at Fox for 10 years and earned an annual salary of $250,000, is looking for $5 million in damages plus $180,000 in legal fees.



source

Whatever, you don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out publishing a review of a pirated movie is a Bad Idea.


(22 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]cakebot_san
2009-07-03 07:28 pm UTC (link)
Lol. Is he retarded?


In other news: the first time i saw Wolverine i was so excited, because i was pacified by Hugh Jackman in those jeans and plaid shirt (HELL YA).


But then when i watched it again, it wasn't very good. :( But he was still fine as hell so whatev.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]catherish312
2009-07-03 07:29 pm UTC (link)
i was so excited to and i didn't end up seeing it in theaters, but everyone else who did was like "IT SUCKED."

whatever, i enjoyed it at the time :D

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]groovylilkitten
2009-07-03 11:43 pm UTC (link)
Wolverine was always my favorite, and Hugh Jackman just made him hot to me. But then they made Sabretooth hot, and I was all like, oh no which one should I root for?

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]shia_labeouf
2009-07-03 07:28 pm UTC (link)
what a MORON.

(Reply to this)


[info]catherish312
2009-07-03 07:28 pm UTC (link)
meanwhile, my coworkers at the tv station where i work gladly accept pirated dvds i loan them... ;)

(Reply to this)


[info]andbetty
2009-07-03 07:38 pm UTC (link)
God, this guy is so stupid.

(Reply to this)


[info]so_pseudogoth
2009-07-03 07:41 pm UTC (link)
I wish I made $250k a year writing stupid reviews.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]seishin
2009-07-03 08:55 pm UTC (link)
truth.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]frickinawesome7
2009-07-04 02:58 am UTC (link)
I know! That would be fucking great just 2 get paid 2 judge shit.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]fletcherism
2009-07-03 07:42 pm UTC (link)
LMAO why would you sue them for your own stupidity?!?

(Reply to this)

NOT OT BECAUSE ONE OF THEM COULD BE IN IT~
[info]jackson
2009-07-03 07:43 pm UTC (link)
http://community.livejournal.com/ohnotheydidnt/36822009.html?thread=5301848313#t5301848313


does anybody know?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: NOT OT BECAUSE ONE OF THEM COULD BE IN IT~
[info]vampiric02
2009-07-03 08:28 pm UTC (link)
i replied with a guess, bb!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: NOT OT BECAUSE ONE OF THEM COULD BE IN IT~
[info]jackson
2009-07-03 08:29 pm UTC (link)
you were right, thank you!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: NOT OT BECAUSE ONE OF THEM COULD BE IN IT~
[info]vampiric02
2009-07-03 08:30 pm UTC (link)
yay, yw!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: NOT OT BECAUSE ONE OF THEM COULD BE IN IT~
[info]fallengirl81
2009-07-04 01:17 am UTC (link)
I like your kitty icon

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

Re: NOT OT BECAUSE ONE OF THEM COULD BE IN IT~
[info]vampiric02
2009-07-04 01:46 am UTC (link)
thanks, i like yours too!!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]tamaragrey
2009-07-03 07:48 pm UTC (link)
I think this could be really interesting, especially if we discover that the studio itself leaked it. If they haven't found the culprit by now I guarantee it's because they don't want to. Any systems analyst worth his salt could trace that. Did you notice how we'ver NEVER heard any more about it? It's because the movie made a bajillion dollars anyway! I agree that the guy was stupid for doing what he did, though.

(Reply to this)


[info]toaerythinness
2009-07-03 08:03 pm UTC (link)
Fired Fox News writer seeks $5 million in suit

Being dumb won't get you $5 million unless you have a vagina.

(Reply to this)


[info]vivavamp
2009-07-03 09:04 pm UTC (link)

(Reply to this)


[info]quirkyblah38
2009-07-04 12:53 am UTC (link)
$5 million dollar suit? COME ON!

(Reply to this)

My face:
[info]sketty24
2009-07-04 01:09 am UTC (link)

(Reply to this)


[info]abiding
2009-07-04 01:56 am UTC (link)
BITCH PLZ.

(Reply to this)


(22 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…