Bom Chicka Wow Wow ([info]mantber) wrote in [info]ohnotheydidnt,
@ 2008-04-27 19:33:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
A Topless Photo Threatens a Major Disney Franchise (Full picture)


LOS ANGELES — Fifteen years old, topless and wrapped in what appears to be a satin bedsheet in the June issue of Vanity Fair. Did Miley Cyrus, with the help of a controversy-courting magazine, just deliver a blow to the Walt Disney Company’s billion-dollar "Hannah Montana" franchise?



Some parents reacted with outrage over the weekend when the television program "Entertainment Tonight" began showing commercials promoting a scoop: Ms. Cyrus, the star of the wholesome Disney Channel blockbuster "Hannah Montana," had posed topless, albeit with her chest covered, for the Vanity Fair photographer, Annie Leibovitz.

Screen grabs of the photo quickly popped up online, sparking a blogosphere debate. "Bonfire anyone?" wrote Lin Burress on her marriage and parenting blog, Telling It Like It Is, referring to the mountain of Hannah Montana retail items — makeup, shoes, clothes — in the marketplace. "Parents should be extremely concerned," Ms. Burress said in an interview. "Very young girls look up to Miley Cyrus as a role model."

It is doubtful that one photograph — especially one that is tame in the context of an Internet awash in nude photographs of other starlets — could dent the Hannah Montana machine, said several Wall Street analysts. Retail sales for the franchise are expected to total about $1 billion in 2008. A motion picture is in the works for 2009 and Ms. Cyrus signed a seven-figure book deal with the Disney Book Group last week.

But keeping a teenage entertainment franchise on track in an age when stars are monitored around the clock by bloggers and paparazzi is extremely difficult, even for a company with the experience of Disney. Executives are constantly battling to keep minor slipups from growing into full-blown controversies.

Last week, the public relations problem du jour was a green bra; photos online showing Ms. Cyrus pulling away her tank top to flash her underwear.

Ms. Cyrus and the "Hannah Montana" series have been championed as one of the few entertainment sanctuaries for children, complicating matters. Last month, Ms. Cyrus was chosen favorite television actress at Nickelodeon’s "Kids’ Choice Awards."

More than 3 million viewers regularly watch "Hannah Montana," most of them age 6 to 14.

Media outlets, in particular the rabid celebrity-focused tabloids, have been pushing to capture new angles of the ubiquitous Ms. Cyrus. After popping up everywhere from the Academy Awards to "American Idol" in recent months, the only photos of her that are assured of selling are controversial ones.

A Disney spokeswoman, Patti McTeague, faulted Vanity Fair for the photo. "Unfortunately, as the article suggests, a situation was created to deliberately manipulate a 15-year-old in order to sell magazines," she said.

The article, written by Bruce Handy, seems to support that claim, quoting Ms. Cyrus as saying, "Annie took, like, a beautiful shot, and I thought it was really cool. That’s what she wanted me to do, and you can’t say no to Annie." She also said of the photo, "I think it’s really artsy. It wasn’t in a skanky way."

Ms. Cyrus had a different view in a prepared statement released on Sunday:

"I took part in a photo shoot that was supposed to be ‘artistic’ and now, seeing the photographs and reading the story, I feel so embarrassed. I never intended for any of this to happen and I apologize to my fans who I care so deeply about."

Beth Kseniak, a spokeswoman for both Vanity Fair magazine and Ms. Leibovitz said, "Miley’s parents and/or minders were on the set all day. Since the photo was taken digitally, they saw it on the shoot and everyone thought it was a beautiful and natural portrait of Miley."

At the very least, Ms. Cyrus and her advisers do not seem to be on the same page as Disney. The company learned of the photo only when "Entertainment Tonight" started showing its promos.

Last week, Gary Marsh, the president of entertainment for Disney Channel Worldwide, was quoted in Portfolio magazine saying, "For Miley Cyrus to be a 'good girl' is now a business decision for her. Parents have invested in her a godliness. If she violates that trust, she won’t get it back."


New York Times


Page 1 of 15
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
[12] [13] [14] [15]
>>

(Post a new comment)


[info]hom0phone
2008-04-27 11:49 pm UTC (link)
Where's Miley Cyrus going to be at the end of the year

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]kaylapoo
2008-04-27 11:51 pm UTC (link)
Hopefully in a ditch somewhere

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]la_bellavidaxo, 2008-04-27 11:55 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]fate_steps_in, 2008-04-27 11:59 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]ididthatonce, 2008-04-28 12:44 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]coldvic, 2008-04-28 12:01 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]hoot, 2008-04-28 12:02 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]nat, 2008-04-28 12:04 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]random_glitz, 2008-04-28 12:41 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]surferxchris, 2008-04-28 12:13 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]rescueme_fromme, 2008-04-28 12:50 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]pamberry, 2008-04-28 12:52 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]teasailor, 2008-04-28 01:00 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]pamberry, 2008-04-28 01:05 am UTC (Expand)
she's supposedly going to be a billionaire - [info]noplanesgo, 2008-04-28 12:54 am UTC (Expand)
Re: she's supposedly going to be a billionaire - [info]lovelyeccentric, 2008-04-28 12:57 am UTC (Expand)
Re: she's supposedly going to be a billionaire - [info]shanny_w, 2008-04-28 01:05 am UTC (Expand)
Re: she's supposedly going to be a billionaire - [info]waldorfs, 2008-04-28 02:12 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]poshspice, 2008-04-28 12:56 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]nyno1angel, 2008-04-28 01:00 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]celtic_thistle, 2008-04-28 01:02 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]lil_bit810, 2008-04-28 01:06 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]de_wood, 2008-04-28 01:12 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]dollhouses, 2008-04-28 01:17 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]thisisbelinda, 2008-04-28 01:21 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]callingapathy, 2008-04-28 01:24 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]tink_1326, 2008-04-28 01:30 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]hrhobo, 2008-04-28 02:20 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]floating_to_sea, 2008-04-28 02:27 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]shanny_w, 2008-04-28 02:28 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]ohh_hay, 2008-04-28 02:38 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]opusdeihohoho, 2008-04-28 04:51 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]unlickdbearwhlp, 2008-04-28 05:49 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]mellieebelliee, 2008-04-28 06:27 am UTC (Expand)

[info]askastylist
2008-04-27 11:49 pm UTC (link)
OMYGOD. Why?

(Reply to this)

XXX
[info]nonfictions
2008-04-27 11:49 pm UTC (link)
Why did she do this? SHE IS TOO YOUNG? Didn't her parents know about this?

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)

Re: XXX
[info]shrewtee
2008-04-27 11:50 pm UTC (link)
they were there

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: XXX - [info]askastylist, 2008-04-27 11:50 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: XXX - [info]lennyjewis, 2008-04-27 11:54 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: XXX - [info]askastylist, 2008-04-27 11:56 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: XXX - [info]coldvic, 2008-04-28 12:01 am UTC (Expand)
Re: XXX - [info]celtic_thistle, 2008-04-28 01:03 am UTC (Expand)
Re: XXX - [info]ohshiny, 2008-04-27 11:50 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: XXX - [info]thelittlevoice, 2008-04-27 11:52 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: XXX - [info]askastylist, 2008-04-27 11:52 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: XXX - [info]shanny_w, 2008-04-28 01:21 am UTC (Expand)
Re: XXX - [info]la_bellavidaxo, 2008-04-27 11:58 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: XXX - [info]teen_rex, 2008-04-27 11:58 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: XXX - [info]cheppu, 2008-04-28 12:51 am UTC (Expand)
Re: XXX - [info]lady_sativa, 2008-04-28 01:04 am UTC (Expand)
Re: XXX - [info]shanny_w, 2008-04-28 01:06 am UTC (Expand)

[info]mentiritas
2008-04-27 11:50 pm UTC (link)
I'm more bothered by the awkward pose. It almost looks like her head is on backwards.

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]suzycat
2008-04-28 12:07 am UTC (link)
And she does look quite a lot like Linda Blair when you think about it.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]i_bleed_magenta, 2008-04-28 02:51 am UTC (Expand)

[info]shrewtee
2008-04-27 11:50 pm UTC (link)
tbh the shot is not that offensive

it's that they made her look really GOLLUMy

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]snobbyshannie
2008-04-27 11:55 pm UTC (link)
my thoughts exactly. the first time i saw this on ONTD i thought it was posted because of how wrecked she looks.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]macaroni1213, 2008-04-27 11:56 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]musicalpenguins, 2008-04-28 12:41 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]i_bleed_magenta, 2008-04-28 02:52 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]musicalpenguins, 2008-04-28 04:07 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]cl0vergirl, 2008-04-28 01:15 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]mainweather, 2008-04-28 01:59 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]tammyinlalaland, 2008-04-28 01:17 am UTC (Expand)

[info]ledforthehed
2008-04-27 11:50 pm UTC (link)
oh god.

(Reply to this)


[info]xxtaste_of_ink
2008-04-27 11:50 pm UTC (link)
Oh Miley. Gurl, put your top back on.

(Reply to this)


[info]allhopelost88
2008-04-27 11:50 pm UTC (link)
she looks like samara from the ring. lol can't wait to see this bitch in a few years.

(Reply to this)


[info]mommyneedsacig
2008-04-27 11:51 pm UTC (link)
wait guys it isn't her it's just a girl who ~resembles~ miley cyrus

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]lullaby_blue
2008-04-27 11:58 pm UTC (link)
uh huh iasfm

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]marcsummerz, 2008-04-28 12:45 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]mommyneedsacig, 2008-04-28 12:57 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]glassgrrl, 2008-04-28 02:04 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]mommyneedsacig, 2008-04-28 02:35 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]glassgrrl, 2008-04-28 02:36 am UTC (Expand)

[info]wanderingbelle
2008-04-27 11:51 pm UTC (link)
I'm more concerned with the fact that her face looks BUSTED in that photo.

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]shrewtee
2008-04-27 11:52 pm UTC (link)
exactly she looks like a hot bulimic mess

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]wanderingbelle, 2008-04-27 11:53 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]ella5767, 2008-04-28 04:10 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]hakalina, 2008-04-27 11:55 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]picnmix, 2008-04-28 12:27 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]musicalpenguins, 2008-04-28 12:42 am UTC (Expand)

[info]another_slender
2008-04-27 11:51 pm UTC (link)
who thought this was a good idea from the beginning?

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]candycanegrl
2008-04-27 11:56 pm UTC (link)
mte

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]icutandpaste, 2008-04-28 12:09 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]musicalpenguins, 2008-04-28 12:43 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]shanny_w, 2008-04-28 01:14 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]mommyneedsacig, 2008-04-28 02:39 am UTC (Expand)

[info]rhapsodeeinblue
2008-04-27 11:51 pm UTC (link)
Grossssss

(Reply to this)


[info]gaspworthy
2008-04-27 11:51 pm UTC (link)
You can't have the best of both worlds, Miley.

You can't be a Disney star and a sexpot. :(

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]shanny_w
2008-04-28 01:19 am UTC (link)
theres no in between :O

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]justinesuitor, 2008-04-28 08:41 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]yellowfishbulb
2008-04-27 11:51 pm UTC (link)
Annie!?! I was hoping it wasn't her! Dammit.

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]mantber
2008-04-27 11:53 pm UTC (link)
Me too :(

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]amateur_photog, 2008-04-28 12:00 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]lizzie127, 2008-04-28 12:08 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]hp_humper, 2008-04-28 12:28 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]yellowfishbulb, 2008-04-28 12:35 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]hp_humper, 2008-04-28 12:40 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]yellowfishbulb, 2008-04-28 01:23 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]uhohlisa, 2008-04-28 04:52 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]yellowfishbulb, 2008-04-28 05:09 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]girlfriendplz, 2008-04-28 05:18 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]wandersfound, 2008-04-28 12:37 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]miss_murder5, 2008-04-28 01:40 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]me_and_jimmy, 2008-04-28 02:05 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]abbyroadme, 2008-04-28 02:16 am UTC (Expand)

[info]deathxboy
2008-04-27 11:51 pm UTC (link)
What a stupid decision.

(Reply to this)


[info]tvisgood
2008-04-27 11:51 pm UTC (link)
She looks like a corpse in that picture.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]forget_midnight
2008-04-28 07:17 am UTC (link)
i know! it makes me sick.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]shrewtee
2008-04-27 11:51 pm UTC (link)
btw i hardly think one photo will derail the machine that is hannah montana

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]askastylist
2008-04-27 11:53 pm UTC (link)
some of her fans on imdb are freakin~ out

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]0_blue_ruin_0, 2008-04-27 11:53 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]coldvic, 2008-04-28 12:03 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]dolcianiblows, 2008-04-28 12:06 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]stellabella84, 2008-04-28 12:22 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]aubreyfleming, 2008-04-28 12:56 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]shrewtee, 2008-04-28 12:56 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]celtic_thistle, 2008-04-28 01:05 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]shanny_w, 2008-04-28 01:16 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]illiadria, 2008-04-28 04:18 am UTC (Expand)

[info]__violet
2008-04-27 11:51 pm UTC (link)
so it is real

still skanky

(Reply to this)


[info]boogabooga_xx
2008-04-27 11:51 pm UTC (link)
that pic doesnt look so bad, actually.

reminds me of something they would do for their "up and coming" young stars mag they do occassionally.

(Reply to this)


[info]pink__sparklies
2008-04-27 11:51 pm UTC (link)
Who thought it was a good idea to take this photo, honestly?

Also..she looks like a fucking corpse.

(Reply to this)


[info]hospitalights
2008-04-27 11:52 pm UTC (link)
the photo itself isn't a big deal
I don't see anything sexual or suggestive about it
the only thing that annoys me is how she's handling it like she's a victim

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]nomoneyfun
2008-04-28 12:55 am UTC (link)
there isn't anything blatantly sexual about it but the fact that she's fifteen and her naked torso is only covered by what appears to be a bed sheet is just way inappropriate.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]alzzers, 2008-04-28 01:17 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]asouthernthing, 2008-04-28 01:31 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]spendthriftsigh, 2008-04-28 02:16 am UTC (Expand)

[info]_aboutaboy
2008-04-27 11:52 pm UTC (link)
http://www.people.com/people/article/0,,20195785,00.html

lol Miley is sorry for the pics that leaked on the internet... bitch please.

(Reply to this)


[info]yeahwell_britt
2008-04-27 11:52 pm UTC (link)
so like was the deadness intentional?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]chrisgold
2008-04-28 01:07 am UTC (link)
I think so. It looks like one of those pictures on the news or SVU where the child porn victim looks dead inside. A big hit with pedophiles to see someone subjugated like that apparently.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]lennyjewis
2008-04-27 11:52 pm UTC (link)
forget the nudity, bitch is just ugly as fuck.

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]surferxchris
2008-04-28 12:13 am UTC (link)
ROFL!

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]godsy, 2008-04-28 12:22 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]misspinkkate, 2008-04-28 12:37 am UTC (Expand)
IA - [info]blairbarella, 2008-04-28 12:47 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]celtic_thistle, 2008-04-28 01:06 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]shanny_w, 2008-04-28 01:18 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]mommyneedsacig, 2008-04-28 02:40 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]anydoppelganger, 2008-04-28 02:50 am UTC (Expand)

[info]prisness
2008-04-27 11:52 pm UTC (link)
here comes the wank...

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]larrylurker
2008-04-28 12:16 am UTC (link)
Bill O'Reilly and all of the 24/7 news channel execs. are creaming themselves and they haven't even seen the pictures yet.

lol

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]ria04, 2008-04-28 01:04 am UTC (Expand)

Page 1 of 15
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11]
[12] [13] [14] [15]
>>

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…