ellinorianne ([info]ellinorianne) wrote in [info]ohnotheydidnt,
@ 2007-03-12 09:57:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Giorgio Armani junior ad sparks polemic in Spain


The advertisement shows a little girl in a bikini. The investigation started a few days after Dolce & Gabbana was forced to pull an image from Spain showing a woman pinned to the ground by a man as other men looked on.

A Giorgio Armani advertisement showing a little girl in a bikini has drawn the attention of Spanish authorities who are debating whether it depicts a child in an improperly sexual manner.

The Madrid regional government's child protection chief said on Monday he would ask the advertising industry self-regulator to consider whether the image visible on the Italian fashion house's Web site (www.armanijunior.com) should be withdrawn.

The decision was taken a few days after Dolce & Gabbana was forced to pull an image from Spain showing a fashionably dressed woman pinned to the ground by a man as other men looked on.

Parents have complained about the Armani Junior advert, Arturo Canalda, head of child interests for Madrid's regional government, said. "It's an advert where little girls aren't portrayed in the attitude of little girls," he said. They are wearing make-up and they are about six or seven."

The black-and-white Armani Junior poster shows two little girls, one wearing a bikini top and with her arm around the other.

In an email statement the Italian firm, said: "The matter will be reviewed once complete information has been received concerning the specific complaint."

SOURCE


Page 1 of 4
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]patrickryne
2007-03-12 05:04 pm UTC (link)
what's wrong with a little incest and child lesbianism?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

(Reply from suspended user)

[info]giwwian
2007-03-12 05:04 pm UTC (link)
Oh please, there is nothing sexual about that.

(Reply to this)


[info]ziekte
2007-03-12 05:04 pm UTC (link)
omg that asian girl is to die for. so fucking adorable.

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]lady_lockhart
2007-03-12 06:00 pm UTC (link)
I know right

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]muzicnem, 2007-03-12 06:07 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]muzicnem, 2007-03-12 06:08 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]fembot_in_use, 2007-03-12 09:49 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]elty, 2007-03-12 11:29 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]blue_skyyy
2007-03-12 05:05 pm UTC (link)
You have got to be kidding me. I wore a bikini at that age. It doesn't mean it is sexual.

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]oddballkansan
2007-03-12 08:59 pm UTC (link)
word, i'm a huge feminist and that doesn't offend me.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]fembot_in_use, 2007-03-12 09:50 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]macaroni1213, 2007-03-13 01:27 am UTC (Expand)

[info]moteur
2007-03-12 05:05 pm UTC (link)
Who doesn't have rape fantasies?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]moteur
2007-03-12 05:06 pm UTC (link)
lol at me actually reading the text instead of looking @ the pix. i'm backward. still, everyone loves some sexy kids.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]disco_balla, 2007-03-12 05:12 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]moteur, 2007-03-12 05:13 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]ziekte
2007-03-12 05:05 pm UTC (link)
"It's an advert where little girls aren't portrayed in the attitude of little girls," he said. They are wearing make-up and they are about six or seven."


That's NOTHING compared to those children beauty pagents. Now THAT is creepy.

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]itsjustaphase
2007-03-12 05:08 pm UTC (link)
iawtc

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]t3pps, 2007-03-12 05:11 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]kitkatisinhell, 2007-03-12 05:13 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]t3pps, 2007-03-12 05:33 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]kitkatisinhell, 2007-03-12 05:39 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]t3pps, 2007-03-12 05:41 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]kitkatisinhell, 2007-03-12 05:46 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]t3pps, 2007-03-12 05:58 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]ziekte, 2007-03-12 05:13 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]ziekte, 2007-03-12 05:15 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]t3pps, 2007-03-12 05:57 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]moteur, 2007-03-12 05:15 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]reddressorblue, 2007-03-12 07:24 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]parle, 2007-03-12 06:39 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]aloneinthetown, 2007-03-12 05:14 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]typicalfemale, 2007-03-12 05:16 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]nattiecakes, 2007-03-12 05:23 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]kissmemalfoy, 2007-03-12 06:22 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]swimmerbuddy90, 2007-03-12 07:55 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]macaroni1213, 2007-03-13 01:33 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]gingerannef, 2007-03-12 07:59 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]macaroni1213, 2007-03-13 01:27 am UTC (Expand)

[info]tamburlaine
2007-03-12 05:06 pm UTC (link)
At the very least: EXTREMELY SKETCHY AND/OR CREEPTASTIC.

(Reply to this)


[info]blue_skyyy
2007-03-12 05:06 pm UTC (link)
Oh, and the toddler kissing the little boy is so cute!

(Reply to this)


[info]urbanslug
2007-03-12 05:06 pm UTC (link)
we sell toddler bikinis at Old Navy. :/

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]giwwian
2007-03-12 05:17 pm UTC (link)
so what you're saying is old navy promotes child pornography?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]urbanslug, 2007-03-12 05:37 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]timed, 2007-03-12 07:02 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]urbanslug, 2007-03-13 12:18 am UTC (Expand)

[info]a_grumble_cakee
2007-03-12 05:07 pm UTC (link)
Armani junior... wtf is wrong with the world.

Dolce & Gabbana was forced to pull an image from Spain showing a woman pinned to the ground by a man as other men looked on.

wow... seriously? anyone got a pic of that?

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]implasticine
2007-03-12 05:09 pm UTC (link)
srlsy ....

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]implasticine, 2007-03-12 05:14 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]a_grumble_cakee, 2007-03-12 05:25 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]implasticine, 2007-03-12 11:08 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]bohemianvixen, 2007-03-13 07:32 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]cocoamix, 2007-03-12 05:27 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]ginalin, 2007-03-12 05:10 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]ziekte, 2007-03-12 05:11 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]a_grumble_cakee, 2007-03-12 05:22 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]nattiecakes, 2007-03-12 05:24 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]duck_doesnt_do, 2007-03-12 05:12 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]a_grumble_cakee, 2007-03-12 05:21 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]nattiecakes, 2007-03-12 05:25 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]inside0ut_89, 2007-03-13 07:51 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]inside0ut_89, 2007-03-13 07:53 am UTC (Expand)

[info]brenden
2007-03-12 05:07 pm UTC (link)
people get miffed over the dumbest things

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]ellinorianne
2007-03-12 05:20 pm UTC (link)
Yes, indeed.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]sparkey_sparks
2007-03-12 05:07 pm UTC (link)
oh my god, people. CHILL
i can't believe someone is thinking about raising charges because of something like this. it's an advert for CHILDRENs clothes. kids wearbikinis.
has anybody made such a fuss when Liz Hurley made a whole catwalk show for kids in bathing suits/bikinis.
CHILL OUT people. oh my god.

(Reply to this)


[info]ginalin
2007-03-12 05:07 pm UTC (link)
Hey Spanish Gov't...don't let the bastards win. Just because there are pedophiles out there, don't forbid pictures of children innocently showing affection to each other or children showing their belly buttons.

(Reply to this)


[info]jamiesimpson
2007-03-12 05:09 pm UTC (link)
"Dolce & Gabbana was forced to pull an image from Spain showing a woman pinned to the ground by a man as other men looked on"

WHAT THE HELL! That's horrible! :O

(Reply to this)


[info]hclay
2007-03-12 05:09 pm UTC (link)
Bikinis on little girls are... wrong. I mean, they're designed to hold and physically be filled out by boobs. Boobs that little girls don't have yet. Little girls wearing bikinis suggests a certain level of physical maturity and sexual attractiveness that is beyond their years.

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]ginalin
2007-03-12 05:12 pm UTC (link)
I think bikinis on nearly anyone are wrong, judging from what I see. 98% of the people on the planet don't have the right body for one.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

(Reply from suspended user)
Re: Alba must be in the top 2% - [info]ziekte, 2007-03-12 05:37 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: Alba must be in the top 2% - [info]ginalin, 2007-03-12 05:38 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: Alba must be in the top 2% - [info]kawaii_cut, 2007-03-12 06:13 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]gun_music, 2007-03-12 05:13 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]kayleigh013, 2007-03-12 05:14 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]hclay, 2007-03-12 05:21 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]kayleigh013, 2007-03-12 05:30 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]muzicnem, 2007-03-12 06:12 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]kayleigh013, 2007-03-12 06:28 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]kayleigh013, 2007-03-12 06:28 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]hclay, 2007-03-12 09:51 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]ginalin, 2007-03-12 05:24 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]pinkyxxswear, 2007-03-12 07:31 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]littlearsonist, 2007-03-12 05:16 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]nattiecakes, 2007-03-12 05:26 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]ginalin, 2007-03-12 05:27 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]scientiste, 2007-03-12 05:48 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]chung_____chung, 2007-03-13 07:37 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]tuluum, 2007-03-12 08:25 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]rhomea, 2007-03-12 05:17 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]queerinmesoftly, 2007-03-12 05:51 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]staygoldpnyboy, 2007-03-12 05:55 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]tatyshki, 2007-03-12 05:57 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]chrisgold, 2007-03-12 06:07 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]watermeloncholy, 2007-03-12 06:17 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]chrisgold, 2007-03-12 06:21 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]watermeloncholy, 2007-03-12 06:26 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]indie_lauper, 2007-03-12 06:57 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]tuluum, 2007-03-12 08:28 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]missgamble, 2007-03-12 09:07 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]chrisgold, 2007-03-12 11:08 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]indie_lauper, 2007-03-12 06:54 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]lovenoelg, 2007-03-12 06:19 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]parle, 2007-03-12 06:27 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]lovenoelg, 2007-03-12 06:31 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]parle, 2007-03-12 06:34 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]indie_lauper, 2007-03-12 06:59 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]lovenoelg, 2007-03-12 07:07 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]tuluum, 2007-03-12 08:31 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]indie_lauper, 2007-03-12 08:49 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]tuluum, 2007-03-12 08:57 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]mellowraspberry, 2007-03-12 09:02 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]tuluum, 2007-03-12 08:27 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]eener, 2007-03-12 08:29 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]hclay, 2007-03-12 09:58 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]misscrystal, 2007-03-13 01:59 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]chung_____chung, 2007-03-13 07:40 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]hclay, 2007-03-13 11:33 am UTC (Expand)

[info]kayleigh013
2007-03-12 05:09 pm UTC (link)
The Ad is adorable.
Some people have serious problems. If the see sex in that add.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]kayleigh013
2007-03-12 05:10 pm UTC (link)
*they

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]panda_cookie
2007-03-12 05:10 pm UTC (link)
How stupid. I find nothing sexual about that advertisement.

(Reply to this)


[info]typicalfemale
2007-03-12 05:10 pm UTC (link)
"It's an advert where little girls aren't portrayed in the attitude of little girls," he said. They are wearing make-up and they are about six or seven."

Oh please. I was wearing make-up when I was "about six or seven" for dance recitals that was a LOT less tasteful than that. But I knew the difference between playing dress-up and real life. I'm sure these kids don't do that every day.

And I've seen kids running around their backyards in bikinis. It is only sexual if we MAKE it sexual. Also, that first picture, I dare you to go to a Hallmark and NOT be able to find a black-and-white photo of kids kissing on a Valentine's Day card or friend card or birthday card or whatnot.

(Reply to this)


[info]cellophanestarr
2007-03-12 05:10 pm UTC (link)
I think it's more outrageous that some parents will dress their kids in Armani, when they'll grow out of it in 6 months anyway. Shop at Old Navy.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]nogular
2007-03-12 05:14 pm UTC (link)
Lol, I buy my little cousin clothes there all the time.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]vonlisbon
2007-03-12 05:10 pm UTC (link)
Yes what a uniquely slutty advertisement for young girls. Sexual to the likes never before experienced by western civilization.

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]ziekte
2007-03-12 05:12 pm UTC (link)
omg in the first pic. the dress on the right; so cute.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]vonlisbon, 2007-03-12 05:17 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]jamiesimpson, 2007-03-12 05:12 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]vonlisbon, 2007-03-12 05:18 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]muzicnem, 2007-03-12 06:15 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]blue_skyyy, 2007-03-12 05:23 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]t3pps, 2007-03-12 05:38 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]chrisgold, 2007-03-12 06:12 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]vonlisbon, 2007-03-12 08:31 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]mellowraspberry, 2007-03-12 09:00 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]chung_____chung, 2007-03-13 07:44 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]vonlisbon, 2007-03-13 10:47 am UTC (Expand)

[info]socialkittn
2007-03-12 05:10 pm UTC (link)
lol oh god. They sell bikinis everywhere. I personally would still have my little girl wear a cute one piece, but it's not that bad

(Reply to this)


[info]itsjustaphase
2007-03-12 05:11 pm UTC (link)
It's funny that this came up. I was just debating with a friend on whether or not I should post some pictures of my kids in the bath on my LJ. Is it sad that I'm apprehensive about posting the innocent and cute as hell pics because of internet sickos out there? y/n?

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]typicalfemale
2007-03-12 05:12 pm UTC (link)
Not sad. True. Sad that people are sickos.

I'd post 'em, but under a friends-filter. Anyone else who wants to see, you can e-mail them.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]itsjustaphase, 2007-03-12 05:19 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]typicalfemale, 2007-03-12 05:23 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]t3pps, 2007-03-12 05:39 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]itsjustaphase, 2007-03-12 05:51 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]t3pps, 2007-03-12 05:53 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]ginalin, 2007-03-12 05:16 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]littlearsonist, 2007-03-12 05:18 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]itsjustaphase, 2007-03-12 05:21 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]icequeen1502, 2007-03-12 05:22 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]scientiste, 2007-03-12 05:52 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]lovenoelg, 2007-03-12 06:25 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]carbonise, 2007-03-12 07:54 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]basketcasey15
2007-03-12 05:11 pm UTC (link)
It's not the "sexuality" in the picture that is wrong, it's the sick people out there who are looking at pictures of children and seeing sexuality in it that are wrong.
It's just a little girl in a bathing suit. There wouldn't be anything wrong with it if it weren't for all the creeps and pedophiles who WANT something to be wrong with it.

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]hclay
2007-03-12 05:23 pm UTC (link)
Exactly my thoughts.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]diosabellissima, 2007-03-12 05:35 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]basketcasey15, 2007-03-12 05:42 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]diosabellissima, 2007-03-12 05:45 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]basketcasey15, 2007-03-12 05:51 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]diosabellissima, 2007-03-12 05:54 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]lovenoelg, 2007-03-12 06:29 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]sofiascarlett
2007-03-12 05:11 pm UTC (link)
I don´t know what I think of this ad, but I think children should be allowed to be children. Not some mini-grownups.

(Reply to this)


[info]xyresic
2007-03-12 05:13 pm UTC (link)
Everything aside, the little girl in the bikini looks like she's going to be a total bitch when she grows up. However, little asian girl is adorable.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]crashclash
2007-03-12 06:15 pm UTC (link)
i agree, that little girl does look like a bitch.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Page 1 of 4
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] >>

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…