Isn't me but did the Finance Committee aren't aware that the same politicians have opted to slashed the initial proposal of increasing the fare hike of 7.5 % to 3-3.5%. Why the flip-flop? If I am not mistaken the members of the audit, budget and finance committee are some of our city politicians. And actually they want the fare hike to be implemented in March 2010 instead of July 2010.
And to add insult to injury, the same committee is proposing cuts as well to routes. I don't know what routes this useless committee are targeting (since they didn't bother posting a document/agenda of today's meeting online) for cancellation. While the Citizen it says re-orginaization, I am pretty sure those cuts proposed are simillar to what was proposed the last two years but was soundly rejected twice by Council. Why insisting on cutting those routes - it's obvious it will never be accepted.
Oh and the comittee also wants to scrap the funding for the university transit pass, another flip-flop.
Obviously while this city wants (?) to promote a greener environment, this committee is actually doing the complete opposite with these kinds of ways to help ease the budget pain - not that it would ease a lot though probably just pennies in savings Looking at the $30 million cost cited by the auditor general this week in costs for sick days of municipal employees or the heavy cost of suburban sprawl and useless road widening projects and other anomalies caused by our brilliant (?) politicians, it is quite easy to find ways to ease the budget pains although the politicians doesn't seem to get it .
While it would be great to cut the tax hike significantly, stop targetting the wrong areas such as transit. It would be a lose-lose situation for the city and the users. It would actually means a major lost of revenues and probably worsen the budget hole.
By the way, here's the CTV link
http://ottawa.ctv.ca/servlet/an/local/C
And the Citizen article
http://www.ottawacitizen.com/health/Cit
