Everything To Do With Newspaper Writing's JournalWednesday, July 8, 20097:31PM - If you could make the readers understand just one thing...As a random little community wake-up, I thought I'd pose this question: Thursday, May 7, 20098:18PM - Facebook and TwitterHi everyone. I need a little help, if you can give it. Tuesday, April 7, 20091:11PM - Media CEO compensationI love public records. Not so keen on what they say sometimes, but getting the records is a good thing. Monday, April 6, 20093:58PM - Staff Sgt. Phillip MyersI work for one of the papers that covers Hopewell, Va. (The area has one regional, one local and one hyperlocal.) I think we're among the few that care beyond the fact that the news was allowed to cover his remains arriving in the U.S. Is it just the local journalist in me or does anyone else think it seems that the dead airman is taking a backseat to being able to cover that there is a dead airman? I know his family isn't ready to talk but it wouldn't take much work to find out what year he graduated from high school, his wife's name, how many children he has, &c. Monday, March 2, 20092:02PMTurner Classic Movies is showing a series of journalism movies today. The Front Page just started and they're showing Libeled Lady, Teacher's Pet and It Happened Tomorrow later. Tuesday, February 24, 20095:56PM - Web readersDo any of your respective newspapers charge for any online content? Are you making money from it or losing it? How many hits are you getting? 11:33AM - News for freeHello, Wednesday, February 11, 20098:26PM - would like reassurance herenew conflict, maybe Monday, February 9, 20093:24AM - i like this story idea, but others don'tWhile I'm on a roll with the controversy, and people in here aren't nearly as hateful toward me as the general public...There is a difference. Reporters know how to listen. Some others don't listen to get your point. Instead they read their own ideas into what you say. Sunday, February 8, 200911:21PM - just say gay or black, key words to get yourself attacked no matter whatIs it possible to say the word "gay" without being attacked, if you are a straight person? I don't think so. Is it possible to say the word "black" without being attacked, if you are a white person. I don't think so. Is it acceptable to try to learn about gay people if you are not gay. I don't think so. Is it acceptable to try to learn about black people if you are a white person. Probably not. If you aren't one of them, the message I get is, it's none of my business. I don't need to know anything about them, and I am to agree with everything they tell me regardless of my lack of knowledge. I suppose that's how white people kept the slaves in their control. Don't let them go to school, and don't let them read books or get any kind of education. Don't let them know what is going on around them. Keep them dumb so you can control them. Nice concept, and it's exactly what I see certain groups attempting to do to me, except I'm not that dumb, and they make me trust them even less, and I still get to vote for or against their causes. This is my life experience so far. And I guarantee I am going to get attacked for this simple explanation of my own experiences....absolutely guaranteed. Am I bad for being curious and for wanting to learn about things I don't know much about? Am I bad that life didn't automatically provide me with such learning experiences? Yes, I will be considered bad. You say the word black or gay in any sentence, and you're bad. The upcoming attacks further prove that I am right. Tuesday, January 27, 20091:29PM - i can puff out my chestOkay, I'm open for criticism. I was taking down names of a group of 1979 basketball players at their reunion, and one of the guys decided to spell out his whole (long) last name for me, and he really had a rude tone about him, like he was talking down to me. His name is long but common around here, and I've ran photos with him in them in the past. Anyway, I felt he was being a dickhead. Umm, is that politically correct? As the professional that I am, I would not normally say anything in response but just ignore the pricks of the groups. However, it just spilled out, with a dead tone not necessarily sarcastic, just monotone-bored tone. "Wow, how old were you when you learned how to spell that name?" The guy next to him laughed, and he just took a step back and raised his eyebrows and came up with nothing. Yeah, not a biggy, but BAM in your face dingus boy. Sometimes I just don't care what people think and think it is okay to show a backbone to people like that...in front of their friends. Monday, January 19, 200910:08AM - Sad but true...Wednesday, January 14, 200911:46PM - Gannett to furlough employeesFrom The New York Times Monday, December 8, 20089:06PMI apologize to everyone who reads Tuesday, December 2, 200810:24PM - HiHey. Friday, November 21, 200812:59PM - 45 years ago todayA collection of reporters' memories of the day JFK was shot Wednesday, November 19, 20081:29PM - what do we do with this one, he's not deadOh great. We just got a call to let us know that a particular man is NOT dead, and we have a photo in the paper stating that he is deceased. This guy brought in a photo of four generations standing next to a tractor and wanted us to print it, showing that the tractor has been used by four generations in his family. He said it was taken in summer 2007. So he was told we would like one that is more current. He said something like "what difference would it make, the photo would look exactly the same." It was repeated that we want our photos current. He said "but I can't because "John" is dead." (name changed). I let the photo sit for awhile before deciding, 'what the heck, it will make the guy happy'. We had a page running with historical society things running, so I put it on that page, and noted that the guy was dead. The call came today. HE IS NOT DEAD. So how do I run this correction?! That guy is probably going to get more phone calls in the next few days than ever in his life. We probably will, too. I have yet to see the family reaction. All we can figure is that the person who brought in the photo did not want to go get another photo, so he made up the excuse that one of the people in the picture is now dead, so he can't get another photo. I don't know. It's hard to figure. Thursday, November 6, 20082:35AM
Tuesday, October 21, 20089:18PM - EndorsementsDoes your publication endorse presidential candidates? If so, who are you endorsing? Thursday, October 9, 20085:11PM - Win $25 for Voting
Navigate: (Previous 20 entries) |

