Home

Advertisement

Customize

maddowrightnow

Rachel nominated for a NewNowNext Award!

Apr. 30th, 2009 | 03:39 pm
posted by: in [info]maddowrightnow

Rachel is nominated for a NewNowNext Award.

Award is "Cause You're Hot"

Vote for her as many times as you want: http://www.logoonline.com/shows/newnownext_awards/vote.jhtml?qn=nnn_poll_09

Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

maddowrightnow

Two articles about Rachel

Apr. 1st, 2009 | 08:04 am
posted by: [info]rampling in [info]maddowrightnow

Enjoy!

Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

maddowrightnow

What's up with Rachel's Radio Show?

Feb. 4th, 2009 | 06:49 pm
mood: confused confused
posted by: [info]rampling in [info]maddowrightnow

RachelHey all, what happened to Rachel's Air America radio show? I've heard it airs here on the West Coast at 2am. Air America's website says her show is 5am-9am (EST)! (It also lists a different time elsewhere.) Is this all her real radio show, or is part of it the repeat of her MSNBC show? Or what's really happening?? And how is she managing a 5-9am (EST) radio show plus a 6-7pm (EST) TV show? Is that what she's doing? HELP, I'm so confused!!!

UPDATE: OK, doing some more research (from this comment on facebook) I found this NY Daily News story entitled Maddow rechannels energy at Air America that explains:
She has dropped her daily evening show on Air America, but will "provide content" for an hour-long morning program, largely built on her MSNBC show of the previous evening.

The problem, says Maddow, is that something had to give.

"I just couldn't keep doing both," she says. "It was a quality control issue - the quality of the program and my own quality of life. I need time to, say, eat and sleep, which I understand most people do every day. I wasn't. I needed not to be grabbing food off a cart at 2 in the morning."

So this arrangement lets Air America keep one of its most prominent alumni - not forgetting possible Sen.-elect Al Franken - while letting Maddow keep a prime-time TV show where she has pretty much complete control of the content.

Link | Leave a comment {6} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

maddowrightnow

Article about Rachel in UK lesbian mag

Jan. 13th, 2009 | 10:07 pm
posted by: [info]ladyvivien in [info]maddowrightnow

Can be read here.

Link | Leave a comment {1} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

maddowrightnow

"Infrastructure: Purrrrrrrr!" (MP3 Audio Clip)

Dec. 30th, 2008 | 04:18 am
mood: pleased pleased
posted by: [info]rampling in [info]maddowrightnow

As background to this post, I've always been a big enthusiastic supporter of infrastructure maintenance and improvement. A genuine fan of the topic. So I was more than delighted to find that it's one of Rachel Maddow's favorite issues!

I was in my car earlier today (Monday), listening to a replay of audio portions from The Rachel Maddow Show (MSNBC) on my local Los Angeles Progressive Radio station (KTLK1150AM), when I heard the audio portion of: Rachel's "Talk Me Down" segment from Dec 23. At (what I later discovered was) 1:22 into the segment, Rachel says sexily: "Infrastructure: Purrrrrrrr!". Wow, I instantly wished I could get a clip of that and save it or put it in my phone or something! So I thought I'd try to remember it later and try to look it up and find out some way to clip it.

Tonight, hanging out with a friend (after seeing Milk -- essential & well-done & important viewing of course), I mentioned my desire for an MP3 clip of Rachel's infrastructure purr. So after he left, I mused about finding a link to the video segment and posting to LJ to ask if anyone knew how to get an MP3 (or even .wav) audio clip off an MSNBC video link....

But what I ran into instead on The Front Page of Rachel Maddow's MSNBC Page was a little section marked New Ringtones by Popular Demand, and a link on the front page itself to:
Infrastructure: Purrrrrrr!     (mp3 clip/ringtone)
Wow, listen to it!! Score!!! Rachel rocks my world, yet again!! AND, a tad shockingly, I'm not the only freak out there who wanted a clip of that! :D

P.S. Anyone know how I could've made the MP3 audio clip myself, if I had to? Or even a video MP4 clip?

Link | Leave a comment {3} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

maddowrightnow

When Left is Right

Nov. 22nd, 2008 | 08:19 pm
mood: calm calm
posted by: [info]endless_reader in [info]maddowrightnow

Rachel Maddow always thought she was an outsider. How did she become a star?


 

Read more... )



source


Link | Leave a comment {2} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

maddowrightnow

Rachel on the cover of The Advocate

Nov. 22nd, 2008 | 03:27 am
mood: awake
posted by: [info]rampling in [info]maddowrightnow

Been meaning to post this....

My sister pointed out to me that Rachel Maddow is on the cover of The Advocate, in the December 2, 2008 issue. Click to read the full story. So cool!!!

P.S. Apparently I needed a new icon, duh!

Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

maddowrightnow

Maddow: Obama Drama

Nov. 15th, 2008 | 07:45 pm
mood: thoughtful thoughtful
posted by: [info]endless_reader in [info]maddowrightnow

Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

maddowrightnow

LOLmaddow

Nov. 12th, 2008 | 01:38 pm
posted by: [info]mckennl in [info]maddowrightnow

Link | Leave a comment {3} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

maddowrightnow

One of the OUT 100 of 2008 is, naturally, Rachel

Nov. 7th, 2008 | 11:12 pm
posted by: [info]mckennl in [info]maddowrightnow

Click here to see Rachel's weird glamour pic where she kind of looks like an old-school movie star who, 50 years later or something, you find out she was secretly butch.

Like Barbara Stanwyck.



Not that I know if Stanwyck was butch or anything but that's what the picture made me think of.

Link | Leave a comment {5} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

maddowrightnow

Rachel Maddow: "The Idea of America"

Nov. 5th, 2008 | 02:05 pm
posted by: [info]heyfoureyes in [info]maddowrightnow

Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

maddowrightnow

Rachel Maddow on Shoot the Messenger

Sep. 13th, 2008 | 02:48 pm
posted by: [info]metatxt in [info]maddowrightnow

Lizz Winstead (co-founder of Air America and the Daily Show) and Rachel Maddow. This is a bit dated - December 17, 2007 - but I just found it, and it's really funny. I should warn you, there are disturbing stories about Republicans and their dogs in the beginning.

Link | Leave a comment {2} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

maddowrightnow

New member

Sep. 12th, 2008 | 05:31 pm
posted by: [info]endless_reader in [info]maddowrightnow

Just wanted to say Hi!

Link | Leave a comment {4} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

maddowrightnow

maddow fix

Aug. 28th, 2008 | 10:19 am
posted by: [info]heyfoureyes in [info]maddowrightnow

how are you getting your maddow fix these days?

Link | Leave a comment {2} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

maddowrightnow

Ask Rachel..

Aug. 28th, 2008 | 06:29 am
posted by: [info]bookgrrrl in [info]maddowrightnow

Rachel will be a guest of the Washington Post today doing a live chat at 11:30 Eastern.

As her a question here.

Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

maddowrightnow

more rachel love -- from Jezebel

Aug. 27th, 2008 | 11:55 pm
posted by: [info]mckennl in [info]maddowrightnow

I read Jezebel -- AND RACHEL DOES TOO and they all love her over there (check the comments for awesomeness for once!).

Anyhow, here's their love letter, er, interview with her:

jezebel interviews rachel maddow

Fixed?

Link | Leave a comment {1} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

maddowrightnow

Maddow love

Aug. 27th, 2008 | 04:38 pm
posted by: [info]mckennl in [info]maddowrightnow

I posted this in my personal journal, and [info]heyfoureyes invited me to crosspost here so:

OK one reason I put up with Chris Matthews on MSNBC is Rachel Maddow. She's the attractive woman with the short hair who is the only one at the table who can talk over Pat Buchanan. She set off TDO's gaydar in a microsecond last night, despite being all made up and wearing girlclothes, mostly. She's out, she's smart and she has her own TV show now. Anyhow, I just wanted to post some pictures of her offstage, not in corporate-woman-drag:





AWWW and here she is with her partner! SO CUTE!!!



She said something amazing the other night, because she said it while SITTING NEXT TO PAT BUCHANAN! She was like, well I was nineteen years old, not at all political when I was watching the convention the first time the Clintons were there -- you remember, Pat, you gave your speech at the Republican Convention about the culture wars that year --- and when I was watching the Clintons, I was thinking, OK, they seem like they don't hate me...

I am paraphrasing, but that's pretty close to an exact quote. AMAZING. Pat gave that infamously blistering speech against gays and liberals and so on, and she just casually referenced it SITTING NEXT TO HIM. In short, she has brass lesbian balls and I lurve her. Also she is SMART SMART SMART. Plus pretty hottt. The End.

Link | Leave a comment {1} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

maddowrightnow

Oy!

Aug. 5th, 2008 | 08:09 pm
posted by: [info]rojomojo in [info]maddowrightnow

Confession time--I sit around at night to watch Keith and Rachel every night so I can hear intelligent commentary (and yes, I have been stuck on the road in hotel rooms in CA and TX where they are not on TV, and the best news is CNN). They laughed at John McCain tonight almost asking his wife to "show us your tits" at the annual biker fest in South Dakota. They said he blew up today. I am sorry to disagree, because today he won at 30,000 votes, showing he is one of the guys. Is this intellectual? Hell no, knuckle dragging to the nth degree. But I know these guys. I have worked with them all my life. McCain is now their buddy. Obama uses too many big words, speaks in measured tones (and real thoughtful sentences.) These guys want sloganeering. They want one sentence solutions whether they work or not. This is his majority and maybe a secondary base. His ads have appealed to this level of intellectual and critical thinking and it scares the hell out me he could be the worst candidate, but have a better PR firm that knows how to target the market he needs and goes after it. The electorate he is going after knows what words follow uppity and don't care if it is wrong if it gets them power. No moral dilemmas at all. This is what the campaign has devolved to.

He shows up at a nuke plant and he shows oneness with people that need gas money. They don't care or know the reactor melted down and was the basis for the movie the China Syndrome. They won't read the fine print. They will see the cultural hero at a Nuke Plant. They want relief now and a one sentence plan.

Call it dumb. Undisciplined, Immediate gratification. Whatever. This is the way more people in America are than we would care to admit. My great hope is that there will be huge bump after Denver at Mile High and from there it may be conversation about issues. The GOP has the answer if the campaign is to be one line slogans. Don't underestimate the guys who want their wife to show others her tits. They vote and would love to vote for a buddy.

rojo

Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

Help Us Win A Wedding!

Jun. 2nd, 2008 | 05:25 pm
posted by: [info]carol_monica in [info]maddowrightnow

 We're Getting Married!!!

With your help, that is...


 Please log onto www.lavendermagazine.com/wedding and with one easy click you can give us your vote.  




Monica and Carol are finalists in the WIN a WEDDING contest from Lavendar Magazine in Minnesota.  Read the essays that earned us the finalist spot below, or visit our website at http://carolandmonica.googlepages.com/home

Over the last ten years this current MBA grad student and her “non-profit sugar mama” have worked hard to support marriage equality and now they themselves have the chance to take the plunge, but they need your help. Vote here: www.lavendermagazine.com/wedding .
Through Thursday, June 19 they need as many votes as possible to win this contest.  Please help to spread the word to others who will support our stand for marriage equality!  Thank you! 
 
Please log onto www.lavendermagazine.com/wedding to vote for Carol and Monica. 





 


Please read our story below and vote for us to win


 the wedding contest at Lavender Magazine.


 


These are the questions Carol and I answered in Lavender Magazine’s 2008 Win a Wedding Contest.  Our responses caused us to be chosen as one of three finalist couples.  We are the only women.  Now the contest is in the hands of fair minded people all over the world who will log on to www.lavendermagazine.com/wedding and vote for us by Thursday, June 19.  We hope you will support us as we stand for marriage equality and ask for your vote!  VOTE VOTE VOTE!  Thanks! 


Tell us a bit about you (age, occupation, interests, etc.)


Carol is 31 and be proud to be both from the northern suburbs and a grad student working on her MBA.  This is quite a shift from her BA in Outdoor Education.  She still enjoys the outdoors quite a bit as a marathoner, backpacker, and referee for high school athletics.  Monica is 29 and prior to coordinating volunteers for The Aliveness Project (her job of the last 5 years) she also worked for OutFront MN and several electoral campaigns.  She loves to volunteer and does so frequently including Rainbow Families, the Red Ribbon Ride, and St. Stephen’s Loaves and Fishes program.  She also loves to be outdoors.  Carol says “Monica is a smart, beautiful woman with a fun loving attitude that attracts more people than I could ever handle.  I am a fiercely independent woman and Monica is the one person who knows how to handle my need for the feeling of freedom.  Our relationship is built on trust and open communication. I totally trust her with my heart and I know she trust me with hers.” 


2 How and when did you first meet?


Monica writes: We first met ten years ago in college.  In an effort to meet other GLBT people in Duluth, Monica (a College of Saint Scholastica student) thought she’d try out for the women’s rugby team at UMD.  One of the first drills at practice involved learning how to tackle.  Although Carol was about three inches shorter and a good twenty pounds lighter she was an experienced rugger.  Athletically and deftly she threw the less than graceful Monica flat on her back.  Talk about sweeping her off her feet!  It must have done the trick! 


3 How long have you been together?


While in college and shortly thereafter our friendship grew but we were never in the same location together for very long.  We both dated other people and Carol traveled and studied abroad.  It was about five years ago that our friendship began to deepen into who we are today.  As friends we had spent a great deal of time discussing our other girlfriends and experiences before we both began to realize, albeit rather shyly, that our true attractions were to each other.  When we finally came together the summer of 2003 all of our friends were glad we had successfully realized this for ourselves.  It is so much fun to be in love with such a dear and true friend. 


4 How and when did you first know you were in love?


Monica writes: I first realized I was in love when it occurred to me that our families had very much become each others.  We our both quite close to our very Catholic families.  For both of our mothers our coming out periods in the late nineties was very difficult.  In our first year together Carol’s mom, Pat, became terminally ill.  Our families met, and gained solace in seeing how genuinely Carol and I cared not only for each other, but for each other’s families.  Before Pat’s passing, she recognized how deeply and authentically I held Carol in my heart.  She validated and said she supported our reality letting me know she trusted me to care for her daughter and the rest of her family.  This validation, soon echoed by my own mom, is one of the greatest gifts I’ll ever receive.  To me it signifies when I realized our love was truly real and quite likely to last. 


Tell us how you got engaged, or decided to get married?


We’ve had several less-than-romantic events that have helped to solidify our relationship, or as Carol puts it “make a paper trail”.  We have a joint checking account and our cell phones are a “family plan”.  We’ve confounded HR departments into creating affidavits so we can file for each other’s insurance plans (but we’re glad they did it)!  But one year on our favorite island in the Apostles I dipped two simple silver rings into Lake Superior of course presenting it to her as a sign of my love.  We wear them on our ring fingers.  Also, last November we finally went with a small group of family down to Minneapolis City Hall to file for our Domestic Partnership which despite the genteel and truly excited clerks it felt rather anti-climatic: “a bit like paying a parking ticket” as Carol puts it.  Everyone now keeps asking when we’ll have a real ceremony.  My brothers want to be able to hire bagpipers and throw rice! 

What is your favorite memory from your relationship thus far?


Monica writes: Most of my favorite memories of us have to do with Lake Superior.  For our first anniversary we kayaked to a beautiful beach in the Apostle Islands to which we now return for each anniversary.  That first year I brought a bottle of wine (yes, in the kayak) which I attempted to “chill” in Lake Superior (trickier than you might think!).  Problem was I forgot a corkscrew, so I had to approach other campers on the island pleading to borrow theirs explaining it was our honeymoon!  One cheery couple loaned us theirs provided I promised to recycle the bottle- a no brainer- but boy did that wine taste especially good.  We love Lake Superior so much that last year we circumnavigated it! 


Describe your ideal wedding:


Carol writes:  My ideal wedding would consist of LOTS of people.  I have a very big family and most, if not all, have met Monica.  I have never made a formal proclamation “I suppose you are wondering why I brought you here today.  I’m gay, and Monica’s my girlfriend.”  This has never happened, but everyone, especially Grandma, gets it.  Monica has been at every family event from Christmas to births and birthdays, my Mom’s funeral to Swarm games.  Ideally our ceremony would be rather formal.  We’d like to have it in a church and preferably a Catholic church even though we know that may not be possible.  I would like the ceremony to be sincere, thought- provoking, and joyous.  But I also think weddings should be a great reason to party it up with all of your circles of family and friends.  We would want everyone to have a great time! 


8 Any nicknames for each other?  What are they?  Any story behind them?


Carol writes: Sweetpants.  I don’t know why I started calling her that, or at least a PG story as to where it came from but I do have a story about the nickname.  In my cell phone I have her parent’s number categorized as “Monica home”.  On an older cell phone a few years back the screen would simply say the name of the contact and then an icon of a tiny mobile or a tiny house.  One evening as my phone rang I didn’t pay enough attention to the icon and answered the phone “Hi sweet pants!” Only problem is that it wasn’t Monica, it was her Mom!  She replied “It’s so nice that you called me sweetie”.  I didn’t correct her on the “pants” part!  Monica often calls me “Sweetpea”, which I think is just a derivation of my name for her.



9 What makes you want to spend the rest of your lives together?


We’ve lived apart long distance, and we’ve lived together.  We’ve experienced both death and new life.  We’ve had our disagreements and we always work hard to resolve them.  We’re already living the rest of our lives together each day.  We’re just so lucky to have fallen in love with someone we loved as a friend first, because it seems to make everything else just fall in line.  Monica says “I know she’s the one for me because she so often makes the deepest part of me smile”. 


10  In your own words, define marriage.


Importantly, the word “marriage” conveys a social understanding accepted most everywhere in the world.  Most people won’t question one’s introduction to another “this is my wife…”  We know we have every right to be part of that.  We hope the way we live and love proves that to those who may have doubts.  We believe marriage is a contract of two hearts who agree to hold each other in the beauty and the difficulty of life’s craziness, and both the certainties and the surprises of each day. 
 


Thanks for the opportunity just to write this.  We enjoyed the exercise regardless of whether you choose us as finalists or not.  I truly do have the most incredible girl in the world!  (a note we wrote to the panel at Lavender). 
 


Thanks for taking a moment to read our short essays!  Please help us gather votes from computers all over the world! www.lavendermagazine.com/wedding




 


 





 





 





 


 



 


 

 


 


Link | Leave a comment {2} | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

maddowrightnow

Today's Paper

May. 11th, 2008 | 09:28 am
posted by: [info]rojomojo in [info]maddowrightnow

In today's Sacramento Bee, there was a very good article on conservative versus progressive talk radio. It is worth the read.


I had the dubious distinction of having the drive of Denver, CO to Cactus, TX routinely for a period of 6 months about 5 years ago. I often played radio roulette to see what the rest of the country was thinking. On that trip, there was the choice of the American Family Network and the American Freedom Network on AM radio. That was it. 300 miles covered only by conservative and biblical conservative conversation. NPR existed when you got closer to Amarillo. Kansas is much the same, Nebraska a little better. Iowa has had enough NPR on AM radio to break up the conservative monopoly. Colorado Springs now can get KKZN out of Denver during the day, but at night it is an endless stream of Hugh Hewitt, Glenn Beck, Doctor Michael Savage and Bill Cunningham. O yes, Focus on the Family, too.
 
If this is your only cultural and political reference and major source of information, it is a very narrow band of filtered information you can get. It limits your conscious choices as there is so much you do not hear. If you are not at all affluent, XM or Sirius radio are not there for you. Yes, people in rural areas, or even even urban areas, may have access to the internets, but will they check politico.com or digbysblog.blogspot.com. Not if they are told over and over again that these are at best "feminazis" or "the devil's minion."  
 
Reagan did a disservice when the fairness doctrine disappeared. I am afraid that is out of the bottle forever, particularly with any first amendment challenge to this Supreme Court. Clinton did not help when he opened up ownership. CNN and Fox helped clinch the deal when the news division became a profit leader.
 
When my wife and I moved to Sacto recently, we wondered how 1240 could stay on the air given the lack of commercials. To this day, I do not understand why tattoo parlors, massage therapists, the Sacramento Food Coop, etc. were not hit up for small commercials at a reduced rate just to get some money coming in. Harlow's rock and roll venue, local organic wineries, many others have to have progressives coming there. Buying advertising on a progressive talk radio station should not alienate their primary target audience. I don't get it. UC Davis is right near by (and yes, you could hear it there). There had to be places to buy advertising.
 
I have often wondered if the Sacramento Coop could sponsor an ownership group through their mailing list and owners to get a radio station started to carry liberal or progressive broadcasting. Why not? Won't restaurants that believe in  local food advertise? It probably is time for progressives in marginal markets to think of ways to get their message of hope out and the airwaves are the most accessible.

rojo

Link | Leave a comment | Add to Memories | Tell a Friend

Advertisement

Customize