alternjupiter ([info]alternjupiter) wrote in [info]lojban,
@ 2008-02-27 09:26:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
10 suggestions for the changes to the website
I read earlier that part of the reason the website hasn't changed is because no one has proposed any alternatives. I signed up for this group to do just that, but be warned: this will likely be an opinionated post and because (from what I understand) Lojban's website has operated in mostly the same fashion since the early 1990s this may seem a bit radical and/or rude, but I assure you that is not the case.

1) The most immediate thing I notice are the three superfluous search bars on the top left. Yes, Lojban is a wiki, but Lojban is also an informative website representative of the LLG and the language as a whole. The wiki features should be off in a separate section of the site making themselves less apparent, because most of your views are from people who have no clue what Lojban is and no less than one minute's reading time to find out.

2) Main Menu: There's no reason why you need every drop down option exposed like that, but, more importantly, every menu item should be central and preferably on the top. Take this for example:



Every menu is a simple, clean button that makes for easy access. You can still keep everything, but you need to prioritize the information. Stuff like links to a Lojban song should be *very* deep into the page, whereas at the moment you have equal chance of stumbling across a Legend of Zelda translation of Lojban as you do the Lojban mailing list. Which brings me to another point:

3) Graphics. Not very complex ones, but still--the Lojban page is *very* uniform in its colors. Even reddit.com, in its text-based glory, uses colors to make its links stand out from one another, and digg.com does the same. You can use colors and icons to separate key categories visually. A great example is the main page of Lojban's very own Matt Arnold.

4) The news doesn't look like it's actually news. That is, there's no visual indication that brings the user to it saying "this is news", it's just text like any other text.

5) Speaking of text, Lojban's website text is very large. Verdana size 12 or Times New Roman size 12 are eclipsed by the behemoth that is the current font.

6) "What is Lojban?" on the main page, followed by information about the LLG. Nearly every website has a very distinct "About" button, but if you must explain the language upfront, take notes from ubuntu and try not to go too deep into explaining what Lojban is on the page people immediately see. Save that for an in-depth page.

7) Livejournal and forum/mailing list meshed on the main page. Currently, the displaying the Livejournal posts makes the page enormous, and displaying the mailing list as a forum tricks the first-time viewer into thinking there is virtually no forum activity despite that mailing lists behave very differently. I'd say get vBulletin, get a "shoutbox" plugin which serves as a chat (but don't display this on the main page), and a "top 10" plugin for the main page (but display the font in tinier text than the main font--if you use size 12, make it size 10 or less) and then be done with it.

8) I'm not sure who updates the site, but it really looks bad to have News that hasn't been updated since a year ago. Even if it's really minor news, it's still activity. This gives the impression to someone that has never seen the language before that it's an obscure language spoken by a small group of geeks (note: I don't mean this offensively, I consider myself a geek as well) in their basement, and however accurate that impression may be, that doesn't mean that's the impression you have to give. Lojban is useful for not only science, but for law, and the impression you should try to achieve to balance both of these is that of a company like Mozilla or Ubuntu, which is still undeniably geeky yet able to work with stuffy professionals if need be.

9) Make donation and the fact that you're a non-profit more obvious, and allow donations to be done by a method other than PayPal. I would donate to Lojban if it were more like the donation system on Barack Obama's website, where I don't need to go through the hassle of PayPal to donate.

10) Finally, don't use tiki for every page. Simple web pages, though less 'open', would be more appropriate. As it is, the current tiki makes pages that should be simple and informative very convoluted.



(Post a new comment)

Re: 10 suggestions for the changes to the website
[info]adamgarrigus
2008-02-27 06:17 pm UTC (link)
Thoughtful, sensible, & well-presented suggestions, perhaps my favorite of the recent spate of suggestions. And neither radical nor rude.

(Reply to this)


[info]matt_arnold
2008-02-28 11:04 pm UTC (link)
I believe a new, second, separate site is needed. Allow Lojban.org to continue to be the language development authority. But newcomers need the sort of site you propose. I volunteer to donate my domain rlnj.org. What we need to do is decide what software I should install there. Perhaps Wordpress?

Most importantly, there are several areas in which you have the power to do the work yourself. Particularly point 8. Do it!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Why not lojban.com?
[info]jimdabell
2008-03-01 03:11 am UTC (link)
Why not have lojban.org for the developers and lojban.com for the beginners? lojban.com seems far nicer for newcomers than rlnj.org. The LLG has already registered lojban.com, but it's nothing but a redirect to lojban.org at the moment.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: Why not lojban.com?
[info]matt_arnold
2008-03-01 03:19 am UTC (link)
Ooh, that's quite an idea there.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Agreed
[info]jimdabell
2008-03-01 03:09 am UTC (link)
The website has long struck me as falling short of its potential, especially when it comes to new visitors. The wiki software really isn't cut out for this kind of job and massively overcomplicates things. There's a *lot* of room for improvement.

As I see it, the real problems fall into a few different categories:

* Organisation: You go to the site for the first time and you are hit with everything at once. It's a *lot* to take in and it all looks really complicated. Finding the relevant sections can be frustrating, even if you've been to the site before.

* Design: The different sections aren't visually distinguished enough, there's a lot of superfluous details that just don't need to be there, some parts are broken or don't make sense.

* Double-duty: The website is used for both introducing new users and for development. This means the new visitors get hit with a lot of things they don't want and you can't make things easier on the developers because you need to keep stuff in for the new visitors.

* Information overload: Sometimes the best approach is not to keep absolutely everything available. For instance, if I look at the "Texts in Lojban" page, I'm swamped, it mixes the expert stuff I can't read with the beginner stuff I can, along with archaic text from the early 90s. A lot of the current stuff should just be archived for posterity rather than keeping it as part of the site. I think there's a need for a high-quality, non-specialist-subject, modern corpus rather than "anything anybody's ever written in Lojban" corpus, but that's a project in itself and primarily caused by the size of the community.

I think the website is definitely due for a radical simplification. Perhaps it does make sense to separate the developer and the beginner websites as Matt says, however I really think the current site needs simplifying even from a developer perspective.

I've toyed with a few design ideas for the simplified site, but I don't have anything I'd consider viewable yet. Is anybody else working on this?

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: Agreed
(Anonymous)
2008-03-22 02:31 pm UTC (link)
Exactly!

Maybe some kind of "text"(/media) "archive" site, where people can add their contributions and links, all bundled with different types of ratings (for difficulty and "goodness", et cetera) and categories (ie. beginner's studies, poems, ...) would be nice? Maybe inspired by digg's design a little? (I'm not really familiar with digg, but at least I think it's kind of like ... "that".)

Oh, and lots of other stuff. Ahh... Ah, well. Anyways.
I've got lots of space and probably more than enough bandwidth if you guys are in need of some. I'd be glad to help.

mu'o mi'e la nukis.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Disastrous changes!
(Anonymous)
2008-03-27 03:55 pm UTC (link)
Well, SOMEONE has indeed been mucking with the website, and so far as I an tell, only for the worse:

1) Where in the world did the online refgram go?? I'm getting broken links, and you can't even get there from the front page, which should defintiely be possible.

2) "popular pages" is gone. At lesat that gave me some direction in navigating from the front page. No replacement?

3) link from recent-changes is broken, so I can't even tell WHAT has been done on this tiki

All in all, can't say I'm impressed by the changes so far. I want my old lojban.org back :,-(
--gejyspa

(Reply to this)

usability testing
[info]azetidine
2008-08-14 07:44 pm UTC (link)
Hey guys, long time no see.


I took a class in HCI this spring, and would be happy to use what I learned about usability testing to redesign the old site or design a new one.

However, the usability test I conducted as part of the class involved paper prototyping, which isn't applicable here since it requires being face-to-face to conduct the tests. There are other ways of quick prototyping, but it would be most expedient for me to work with someone who knows the nuts and bolts of web design. The usability testing I have in mind would involve lots of input from the community through discussion, surveys, and as participants.

If anyone's interested in collaborating, let me know. Otherwise I'm probably going to be too busy/distracted to follow up on this idea.

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…