I was just thinking: I learned in western civ this semester that the Protestant Reformation helped to spread literacy in that the Calvinists felt it was important for women to learn to read so that they could read the Bible.
This was also way before our modern time period of mass printing of novels and such. Now you can walk into a Christian book store and buy all kinds of books about the Bible containing all sorts of points of view: all kind of authors, like books by Joyce Meyer, Stormy Omartian, Donald Miller, John Piper, C.S. Lewis, Max Lucado, Tim LaHaye, the list goes on and on...
But back then they didn't have all these books. Maybe they had one or two prayer books or hymnals, and of course, the Bible (probably the King James version).
I was just thinking: while books by authors today like Piper, Lewis, and so on offer great depth of understanding on the scriptures, do you think that they (the early Protestants like Lutherans, etc and the Catholics) were better off only reading the Bible and discerning for themselves? Or are we better off because we are able to reference literature by great minds such as C.S. Lewis and so on? Because I was thinking, what about the books that are really just people's own modernized "versions" of christianity? Like, one might say that these books offer more deception than they do delving into the scriptures.
Also, if you look at how now the average Christian probably has much more liberal values than those of two to three hundred years ago. I mean, if you read sermons from way back then, it seems they focused more on repentance and salvation or damnation, whereas now it seems like sermons focus more on personal spiritual growth. I mean, obviously people's views change over the course of centuries but...
What do you all think? I am personally not sure. I think it's great we have so many references, but at the same time, some books written today are people's "versions" of christianity that have more to do with modern values and personal convenience rather than the gospel. So I say we're better off for having such an extensive amount of sources, but it can also be distracting from the Bible which can be bad in the sense that you don't want other people's opinions and agendas polluting your understanding of the Bible.
Like the Bible does say "Trust in the Lord with all your heart and lean not on your own understanding." Prov. 3:5
Thoughts?
Current Mood: 
contemplative