Brad Fitzpatrick ([info]bradfitz) wrote in [info]lj_biz,
@ 2006-03-08 11:14:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Punching the monkey...

Hi, LiveJournal founder here. I haven't posted here in awhile, but I figured it was time I made an appearance. If you don't remember any of my previous rants over the past seven years or so, the summary is that I hate advertising. Especially punching animated monkeys that slow down my computer and distract me from what I'm reading.

Ever since LiveJournal started, we've had a very anti-advertising stance:

  • We don't put ads up on journals.
  • We don't spam you.
  • We don't even let YOU put ads on your journal, just in case other people on the net see them and think they're from us, and we don't want that reputation.

So how does LiveJournal continue to exist? (financially, etc...)

We've always asked users to pay. Normally websites make money from advertisers, not from users. To entice people to pay, we've held back some of the features from free users so there's a reason for people to pay. And though not everybody paid, the small percentage of people who did covered the costs for the entire operation.

This kinda sucks because:

  • Not all users want to pay. They're used to sites on the web being "free" because they're used to advertising.
  • Not all users can pay.
  • We want everybody to see all the fun features we have. As it is, only the paid users can appreciate them.
  • If more people could pay (even indirectly through looking at ads), then we'd have more money to hire more hacker monkeys to bust out cool features.

The thing people have been trying to beat into my head lately is that some users don't mind ads. That's frickin' crazy talk to me because I can't stand the things, but I guess it makes sense. (I also still don't understand why people would want to use a web-based email client, whereas most people nowadays don't even know of any alternatives! tangent...)

So in summary:

  • Some users can pay.
  • Some users can't.
  • Some users hate ads.
  • Some users don't.
  • The world doesn't universally recognize the awesomeness that is LiveJournal because some of the awesomer stuff is locked up in paid-only land.

My goal is to make everybody happy all the time. I always fail, because it's impossible, but it's a noble goal. So how do we make everybody happy?

Currently we have two main service levels:

Don't
Pay
Extra
Features
No
Ads
Paid Accounts - Check! Check!
Free Users Check! - Check!

What about the people who don't want to pay but want more features? Remember our impossible goal of pleasing you all.

So what we're planning on adding as an option (details still fuzzy) is a third level that users can choose if they want:

Don't
Pay
Extra
Features
No
Ads
Paid Accounts - Check!+ Check!
New Level Check! Check! -
Free Users Check! - Check!

(It's in yellow to show it's new, not that it's golden or better.)

Key things to note:

  • Paid users won't see ads -- if you're logged in as a paid user, you won't see ads, anywhere, even on a journal of a user that has enabled ads. We're not going to double-dip on you. If you paid us directly, we're not going to make more money by putting ads in front of you.
  • Paid journals won't have ads -- anybody looking at any part of a paid user's journal won't see ads, logged in or not.
  • You can switch levels -- if you want to try out the ad level, go for it. You can switch back to free or to paid if you don't like it.
  • Free is staying -- we're not phasing out the free level.
  • The new level with ads is opt-in -- we won't throw ads on your journal without you switching to the new level.
  • You should control your ads -- we want you to have a lot of control of what ads and what type of ads we can/can't show on your journal, lest you offend your readerbase/etc. These options won't be available right away, but it's what we're most interested in developing over time, especially as we get feedback from users.
  • We haven't worked out all the details -- a lot of details haven't been figured out, so we'll be asking for the community's input as things firm up. The last thing we want to do is tick you off. If we tick you off, you leave, and then we're sad because we're sitting around computers writing code for nobody.
  • We want you to kick and scream right now -- because I'm sure we missed some stuff in this post. Please let us know all your fears about how stupid/evil we are, so we can try and show you otherwise. (We can say whatever we want in lengthy posts like this, but actions speak louder than words....)

Pre-emptive FAQ time!

In alphabetical order...

Uh, why? Why now? LiveJournal's been doing fine for like 7 years!

Honestly, we probably should've done this years ago but I guess my hatred for advertising always stopped me. Nowadays a lot of sites do advertising well without annoying users (e.g. Google), and I hope we can do the same through our own ways/options.

We really do want people to see our cool features without paying, if they can tolerate ads. (which apparently people can, considering the web is full of them...)

Pop-ups? Punch the monkey?
Hell no.
Is this Six Apart's fault? You guys were cooler when you were goat herders from Oregon rather than money-hungry San Francisco tycoons!
How does one reply to that strong of an argument? :-) Actually, we chose Six Apart because the other options weren't cool enough. The founders of Six Apart were two people working together in their living room, much like LiveJournal. We're growing together.
So why should I keep paying now?
Paid users will still have higher limits/quotas than the new level. (More storage, more pics, more bandwidth, etc...) If none of that matters to you then it may depend on how you balance the inconvenience of paying versus the inconvenience of ads.
What features will the new account level have?
We haven't worked out those details. The idea is they'll have most of the paid user features but with less capacity, and without the ability to, say, customize their journal style enough to be able to remove ads. :-)
But when are you going to fix ____________? Like memories!
At any time a lot of stuff is broken or in flux as we add/change features. It's regrettable, but it's life. We're actively reworking a lot of broken stuff on the site right now (memories, outgoing email architecture, etc...)

Joey is actively working on fixing memories.

Isn't there another way to make money? Why don't you sell more t-shirts or sell printed journals or go door-to-door?
I think we actually lose money on T-shirts, and they're still way too expensive. Printed journals are okay, but there are copyright issues when we want to sell you printed comments or the contents of your friends pages. And then it's also very low margin.
What are you going to do with all that extra advertising money?
What happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas...

It depends how popular the new level is. Hopefully a fair number of users prefer it over free and we'd be able to hire more programmers, buy more servers, and just generally make LiveJournal better.

So now that you're making money from advertisers, what's to say you won't stop listening to users as you spend an increasing amount of time listening to the needs of your advertisers!?
That's my biggest fear! That's why when I introduced myself to our ad person here at work, I gave my title as "Consumer Advocate" (much to the amusement of everybody else at work). The LiveJournal team and I are very reluctant to do anything which distances ourselves from users. We'll do our best to keep the ad people in check. (to be fair, our ad people are very pro-user to begin with, but they don't necessarily understand LiveJournal users yet.... you're uh, unique. :-))

They've started posting in [info]lj_ads, and will regularly, so go read that if you want to know more and give them feedback. (we'll also be posting to [info]lj_biz and [info]news, linking to relevants posts wherever they appear, so don't worry...)

If I'm a free user, will I see ads on my Friends Page? (sorry, the link is for the non-LJers who might be confused...)
No.
If I'm a free user, will I see ads on my friend's entry pages once I click off to their journal from my Friends Page?
Yes, if your friend has turned on ads. The way we see it: your Friends Page is just your aggregator of all your journals/blogs/news you read, and people on LiveJournal already read lots of ad-supported websites. So if a new user comes to LiveJournal and enables ads, and you find them interesting and want to read them, how are ads on LiveJournal any less offensive than ads on a remote site?
What about your Guiding Principle to avoid banner advertisements? What about things you've said in the past? Why should I continue to trust LiveJournal?
Well, we're not forcing it on users. It's purely a new option that users can enable if they want, so we don't feel it's that evil.
I am morally against ads. Why should I keep supporting/promoting LiveJournal? If you're going to bring in so much money now, why should I keep volunteering for you?
That's a question you'll have to ask yourself. We're not going to try and convince you to like ads or what we're doing, if you're morally opposed to it. Hopefully you respect at least how we're going about this.
What if I see an ad that is inappropriate?
We won't be accepting inappropriate ads, but the definition of "inappropriate" is very subjective, so we want to eventually let users control their ad options (if they want) and have very easy ways to complain about ads they don't like. We won't launch with this level of control right away, but we will work on developing it over time. Of course, you could also just turn them all off too by switching to another level.
Will free users ever get any new features or just ad and paid users?
Free users will continue to get new features. Our model's always been to give out a little to get you addicted, then hope you pay if you're happy with the service and want more.
And what about communities?
Currently communities can choose either the free or paid level. Eventually community admins will be able to opt-in to the new level with ads if they choose. We're working on what we will offer communities in the new level. We'll talk more about this later and solicit your suggestions.
Will any of my "personally identifiable information" be sent to advertisers? Will my email address be sold?
No.
Are ads going to slow down the performance of the site?
Not any more than any other site with ads. Your browser will have more stuff to download!, but LiveJournal's performance will be exactly the same. The ads will be served from different machines, unrelated to the LiveJournal servers. If you have a fast computer and fast Internet connection, you won't notice.
Why is this being posted to [info]lj_biz and not [info]news?
[info]lj_biz is where we've historically discussed stuff like this, although we regret we haven't been using it as much as we used to. It's also a smaller audience for us to get initial feedback/questions/fears/etc, so when we do our [info]news post it'll be more comprehensive. Also, we like to reserve news for stuff that's available immediately, not plans for the future. Plans for the future are better in [info]lj_biz and [info]lj_dev. Please share this post with your friends and others that might be interested if you don't think they read this community.
When are you launching the new level?
Not for another month or so. We're trying to do it very carefully, taking our time, trying to get everybody's feedback incorporated. I'm sure it won't be perfect at launch, but we'll continue to improve it over time, as we have with all the other levels and features. Check back here and in news for more information, and in the meantime leave your feedback in the comments below.
How can I trust any of this information?
I guess you can't. I'm just the old fogey poking my head in again with my ideals. It's easy for me to make statements, but like I said earlier, actions speak louder than words. Don't just blindly trust me ... wait and see. We're working hard to do this in a way that won't suck, and we're going to listen to you and do what we can to make sure we make as many people happy as possible, even if we can't please everyone. Check back in later to make sure we're being nice.



(Post a new comment)


[info]burr86
2006-03-08 07:16 pm UTC (link)
What about the Early Adopters? :)

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]legomymalfoy
2006-03-08 07:17 pm UTC (link)
OMG ABE FIRST COMMENT YOU LUCKY BASTARD!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]poetpaladin, 2006-03-15 02:00 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]palmer_kun, 2006-03-23 06:07 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]poetpaladin, 2006-03-23 06:11 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]palmer_kun, 2006-03-23 06:16 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]poetpaladin, 2006-03-23 06:21 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]coffeechica, 2006-03-08 07:17 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]tammy, 2006-03-08 07:21 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]stevieg, 2006-03-08 07:21 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]bad, 2006-03-09 07:04 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]filthylinen, 2006-03-14 04:08 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]midnightmadness, 2006-03-08 07:36 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]o_goncho, 2006-03-09 07:49 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]bloodrebel333, 2006-03-17 10:27 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]anotherdream, 2006-03-18 12:21 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]wolfgrin, 2006-04-14 03:17 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]forecaster15, 2006-04-18 09:44 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]anotherdream, 2006-04-18 09:50 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]seasidecircus, 2006-04-19 11:55 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]personality, 2006-04-20 05:57 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]jc, 2006-03-08 07:18 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]stevieg, 2006-03-08 07:19 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]jc, 2006-03-08 07:23 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]stevieg, 2006-03-08 07:31 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]midnightmadness, 2006-03-08 07:37 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]kamara, 2006-03-08 10:13 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]jc, 2006-03-08 10:17 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]kamara, 2006-03-08 10:19 pm UTC (Expand)

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]angrychicken, 2006-03-08 07:18 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]ursamajor, 2006-03-08 07:19 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]platys, 2006-03-08 07:56 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]prissi, 2006-03-08 08:00 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]bubba, 2006-03-08 08:01 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]jette, 2006-03-08 08:18 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]shinyday, 2006-03-09 11:33 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]bikini, 2006-03-10 10:16 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]shamess_the_elf, 2006-04-13 10:34 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]kamara, 2006-03-08 10:12 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]azurelunatic, 2006-03-08 10:16 pm UTC (Expand)
Writeup created. - [info]azurelunatic, 2006-03-09 12:00 am UTC (Expand)
Re: Writeup created. - [info]dawna, 2006-03-09 05:10 am UTC (Expand)
Re: Writeup created. - [info]azurelunatic, 2006-03-09 08:55 am UTC (Expand)
Re: Writeup created. - [info]forecaster15, 2006-04-18 09:41 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: Writeup created. - [info]azurelunatic, 2006-04-19 02:22 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]forecaster15, 2006-04-19 05:23 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]bad, 2006-03-09 06:57 am UTC (Expand)

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]palmer_kun, 2006-03-23 08:48 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]azurelunatic, 2006-04-19 02:26 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]palmer_kun, 2006-04-19 05:26 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]legomymalfoy
2006-03-08 07:16 pm UTC (link)
Cool :D

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]mrscard
2006-03-12 12:42 am UTC (link)
dido ;)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]stevieg
2006-03-08 07:17 pm UTC (link)
This looks like a good plan. I'm all for it!

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]jaebird
2006-03-08 07:29 pm UTC (link)
^_____^ Kenya! You should see my Kenya Icon series for holidays ^_^ I love the lion but the tiger is so cute /end rant

(Reply to this) (Parent)

i got dibs on brad's daughter!
[info]wcu
2006-03-08 07:23 pm UTC (link)
I know how busy the lj staff is working those slave labor hours, so I thought I would take a quick moment and help you in the search for proper advertisements:







Many people have suggested putting advertisements on the site. Putting ads on Brad's site would be like whoring out his daughter to pay rent; even if it did pay the bills, I'm against it on a matter of principle. I'm proud of this site, and ads ruin the spirit of journalling.

On a more financial note, ads don't make that much money.

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)

Re: i got dibs on brad's daughter!
[info]stevieg
2006-03-08 07:25 pm UTC (link)
You win at life

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: i got dibs on brad's daughter! - [info]bradfitz, 2006-03-08 07:34 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: i got dibs on brad's daughter! - [info]avatar, 2006-03-08 10:28 pm UTC (Expand)

(Reply from suspended user)
Re: i got dibs on brad's daughter! - [info]avatar, 2006-03-23 11:17 am UTC (Expand)
Re: i got dibs on brad's daughter! - [info]chanchal, 2006-03-09 05:27 am UTC (Expand)
Re: i got dibs on brad's daughter! - [info]silveramethyst, 2006-03-09 05:39 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: i got dibs on brad's daughter! - [info]dina, 2006-03-08 07:48 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: i got dibs on brad's daughter! - [info]jameth, 2006-03-09 06:49 am UTC (Expand)
Re: i got dibs on brad's daughter! - [info]dina, 2006-03-09 04:23 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: i got dibs on brad's daughter! - [info]ex_5h00114, 2006-03-08 08:24 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: i got dibs on brad's daughter! - [info]whodini, 2006-03-09 12:26 am UTC (Expand)
Re: i got dibs on brad's daughter! - [info]wcu, 2006-03-09 12:45 am UTC (Expand)
Re: i got dibs on brad's daughter! - [info]whodini, 2006-03-09 12:59 am UTC (Expand)
Re: i got dibs on brad's daughter! - [info]jameth, 2006-03-09 06:50 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]llenterak, 2006-03-10 08:12 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]palmer_kun, 2006-03-23 06:19 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]renabunny42, 2006-03-24 07:19 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: i got dibs on brad's daughter! - [info]revmischa, 2006-03-09 01:19 am UTC (Expand)
Re: i got dibs on brad's daughter! - [info]crankygirlie, 2006-03-10 09:12 am UTC (Expand)
Re: i got dibs on brad's daughter! - [info]revmischa, 2006-03-10 12:44 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: Whitaker dance - [info]ianiceboy, 2006-03-10 03:38 am UTC (Expand)
Re: i got dibs on brad's daughter! - [info]a1icey, 2006-03-10 05:08 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: i got dibs on brad's daughter! - [info]1337_493n7, 2006-03-14 04:38 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: i got dibs on brad's daughter! - [info]kora_lye, 2006-03-16 09:38 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: i got dibs on brad's daughter! - [info]1337_493n7, 2006-03-16 09:58 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]loony_bob
2006-03-08 07:24 pm UTC (link)
It's in yellow to show it's new, not that it's golden or better.

Glad you cleared that one up! *laughed*

I don't mind it since I don't view other people's journals very often at all. I'm with you, though - why people would want ads is beyond me.

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]txteva
2006-03-08 10:03 pm UTC (link)
if you don't/can't pay but want to support the site?!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]duelbygunfight, 2006-03-17 09:32 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]truekikyo, 2006-03-10 08:51 am UTC (Expand)

[info]onsafari
2006-03-08 07:24 pm UTC (link)
How will RSS feeds be treated? Will they stay at the "free" level?

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]jameth
2006-03-09 06:52 am UTC (link)
No

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]matgb, 2006-03-09 08:52 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]fyre, 2006-03-19 03:55 am UTC (Expand)

[info]bandicoot
2006-03-08 07:25 pm UTC (link)
The camel's nose is under the tent ;p But it's all ok - it doesn't soil my burqua. You gotta pay for the service some way or it won't keep existing. This seems as thoughful a way as any I could think of.

(Reply to this)


[info]tpau
2006-03-08 07:26 pm UTC (link)
where do permanent accounts fit in this?

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]burr86
2006-03-08 07:27 pm UTC (link)
Treated as Paid accounts -- will never ever see ads.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]dawna, 2006-03-08 07:30 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]xevinx, 2006-03-08 10:46 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]blue_cat, 2006-03-08 10:48 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]xevinx, 2006-03-08 10:51 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]theinnocence, 2006-03-09 04:37 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]wyldkyss, 2006-03-09 01:44 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]llenterak, 2006-03-10 08:11 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]tehpatronsaint, 2006-07-15 02:46 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]1337_493n7, 2006-03-14 04:40 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]firewallender, 2006-03-10 09:00 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]zzyzx, 2006-03-08 09:48 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]sparklyjazz, 2006-03-12 11:47 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]jameth, 2006-03-09 06:52 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]aurosan, 2006-03-09 09:13 am UTC (Expand)

[info]phatphatkitty
2006-03-08 07:26 pm UTC (link)
Seems fairly well thought out and reasonable. Opting in-or-out is a great idea; no one can really complain if they're choosing to display ads on their journal. Also, being able to not see ads if we don't want to is.. kind and thoughtful. Thanks. :)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]jamesd
2006-03-09 05:17 am UTC (link)
You don't think that friends who dislike ads will ask their friends to stop putting ads in their face?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]phatphatkitty, 2006-03-09 06:10 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]foxfirefey, 2006-04-13 05:25 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]sparklychibi, 2006-04-01 06:21 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]contestant
2006-03-08 07:26 pm UTC (link)
I like it. I trust you guys.

(Reply to this)


[info]idonotlikepeas
2006-03-08 07:27 pm UTC (link)
Uh-oh! Giving people more options? What's wrong with you! You're supposed to force people to comply with your business model, not let them decide things. It's almost like you give a shit about your users or something.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]lordlucan
2006-03-16 12:14 pm UTC (link)
Absolutely! Isn't that, like, totally unAmerican? Or something?

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]tjackson
2006-03-08 07:27 pm UTC (link)
I'm assuming perm is in the same 'section' as paid?

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]legomymalfoy
2006-03-08 07:32 pm UTC (link)
Yes!

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]quidditchmaster, 2006-03-08 07:41 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]slappytanker, 2006-03-11 05:44 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]1337_493n7, 2006-03-14 04:42 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]zzyzx, 2006-03-08 09:48 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]jameth, 2006-03-09 06:53 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]volare, 2006-03-14 03:22 am UTC (Expand)

[info]rho
2006-03-08 07:28 pm UTC (link)
Doesn't bother me either way. So long as I can remain ad-free, then I'm content.

Have you considered how adblock et al might influence this? It would be a pain if everyone switched from paid to ad accounts, then used an ad blocker to avoid actually seeing ads and giving you any revenue. I'm not sure if anything of that ilk is sufficiently ubiquitous yet to be a potential problem, but it was something that struck me as I read.

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]ursamajor
2006-03-08 07:30 pm UTC (link)
Heh, yeah, that was my first question.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]supersat, 2006-03-08 07:35 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]idonotlikepeas, 2006-03-08 07:50 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]supersat, 2006-03-08 07:56 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]secretbutterfly, 2006-03-10 08:50 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]secretbutterfly, 2006-03-10 08:53 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]sparklychibi, 2006-04-01 06:24 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]ex_deadmanta171, 2006-03-09 12:25 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]uozaki, 2006-03-08 07:47 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]10dimensions, 2006-03-08 09:24 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]logansrogue, 2006-03-08 11:59 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]conuly, 2006-03-09 03:11 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]logansrogue, 2006-03-09 03:23 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]digitalsidhe, 2006-03-09 03:52 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]bikini, 2006-03-10 10:18 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]recalcitrant, 2006-04-02 03:16 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]foxfirefey, 2006-04-13 05:20 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]foxfirefey, 2006-04-13 05:20 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]tbone
2006-03-08 07:28 pm UTC (link)
Anytime you can give people more choice without taking anything away, that's a good thing. Rock on, guys.

(Reply to this)


[info]swerved
2006-03-08 07:31 pm UTC (link)
It's always sad when someone sells out their principles for money, but if money is the only thing that keeps this service going then there isn't a whole lot of choice. I don't want to see my journal die because LJ couldn't make enough money to stay afloat, no matter how much I detest Ads.

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]contestant
2006-03-08 07:38 pm UTC (link)
You don't get ads if you don't want them. You have to specifically opt-in to get them. If you don't want them, just don't opt-in, and everything keeps spinning. :-)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]swerved, 2006-03-08 07:42 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]emmavescence, 2006-03-08 07:40 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]swerved, 2006-03-08 07:49 pm UTC (Expand)
*insert cynical icon* - [info]emmavescence, 2006-03-08 07:50 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]technopatra, 2006-03-08 08:01 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]swerved, 2006-03-08 08:06 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]rustnroses, 2006-03-08 09:33 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]swerved, 2006-03-08 09:51 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]isabeau, 2006-03-08 10:05 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]rileysaplank, 2006-03-23 10:41 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]huntster, 2006-03-23 08:31 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]idonotlikepeas, 2006-03-08 09:36 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]swerved, 2006-03-08 09:56 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]realitysgonemad, 2006-03-09 12:06 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]secretbutterfly, 2006-03-10 08:56 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]palmer_kun, 2006-03-23 06:24 am UTC (Expand)

[info]wolfdreamer
2006-03-08 07:33 pm UTC (link)
Did putting the tracker on LJ that people threw fits over have anything to do with ad support? I honestly hate the idea, and I'm a paid user. I understand the whys and wherefores, but it doesn't mean that I like it or think it's a great move.

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]bradfitz
2006-03-08 07:36 pm UTC (link)
The tracker was because:

Biz people need to use Excel all day and make graphs.

Graphs need data.

So we can either mine our logs and get them data, or they can use a 3rd party service.

They like 3rd party services because it means we're doing what we're good at and don't have to worry about doing one-off stats for them.

That's the idea, at least.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]naraht, 2006-03-08 07:48 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]fyre, 2006-03-19 03:59 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]alacrity, 2006-03-09 02:11 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]technopatra, 2006-03-08 08:19 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]foxx, 2006-03-14 08:13 am UTC (Expand)

[info]farmer
2006-03-08 07:34 pm UTC (link)
Man, that's eeeviii-

No, actually seems ok.

(Reply to this)


[info]mark3
2006-03-08 07:34 pm UTC (link)
My status is as a permanent account/formerly early adopter. The Permanent account was earned through volunteer work with LJ, so is this something that's going to affect those of us in my situation?

Other than that, I hate ads but as you said they are already EVERYWHERE. It's a good source of income which gives LJ/Six Apart a chance to grow which is a GOOD thing. However Mr. Fitzpatrick, The FIRST POP UP will get you a face to face meeting with me, Rocky and my Wheelchair which is infamous for it's ability to crush toes and inflict serious PAIN. In other words, as long as I don't start seeing POP UPS all over LJ I can deal with just about anything.
~Mark

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]zzyzx
2006-03-08 09:53 pm UTC (link)
Nah, if you have a permanent account, you're better than everyone. Duh.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]leora, 2006-03-09 11:50 pm UTC (Expand)
Thank You - [info]mark3, 2006-03-10 03:30 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]theodicy, 2006-03-14 03:50 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]rapta, 2006-04-03 04:48 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]theodicy, 2006-04-03 04:41 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]jzig
2006-03-08 07:35 pm UTC (link)
You should have an easily accessible "complain about this ad" thing. On plenty of other sites which claim to personally check over their ads and never allow unacceptable ones, some asshole with singing javascript or something sneaks through. When this happened on Metafilter, I knew what to do (email the admin). If this happened here, I wouldn't really know what to do.

Also yeah, early adaptors should get special privelages kthnx.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]bradfitz
2006-03-08 07:37 pm UTC (link)
We want a "delete this ad" inline on the page (without reloading or moving the page scroll position) which both deletes it from view, and logs what/why/when it was deleted, so we can inspect it.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]ursamajor, 2006-03-08 07:44 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]andricongirl, 2006-03-08 10:23 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]adudeabides, 2006-03-08 11:46 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]andricongirl, 2006-03-09 12:06 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]jzig, 2006-03-08 11:59 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]ciphergoth
2006-03-08 07:36 pm UTC (link)
If I'm a free user, will I see ads on my friend's entry pages once I click off to their journal from my Friends Page?

Yes, if your friend has turned on ads.


This is the way in which this proposal will make LJ worse for those who don't opt-in, and is therefore the true bone of contention, no?

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]bradfitz
2006-03-08 07:39 pm UTC (link)
But then you'll know who you friends really are, right?

After all, they're the ones that enabled ads, not us.

How's that any different from de-friending somebody because all they do is post Quizillas and you get bored of them?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]ciphergoth, 2006-03-08 07:48 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]herongale, 2006-03-08 08:39 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]mavi, 2006-03-08 09:02 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]mendel, 2006-03-08 09:58 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]rly, 2006-03-10 02:16 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]pbristow, 2006-03-08 11:23 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]nightsinger, 2006-04-19 02:58 am UTC (Expand)

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]frelling_tralk, 2006-03-09 05:54 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]secretbutterfly, 2006-03-10 09:09 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]fettered_free, 2006-03-11 06:22 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]swatkat24, 2006-03-11 02:26 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]phobi, 2006-04-23 10:50 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]desh, 2006-03-08 09:47 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]clement, 2006-03-08 10:55 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]shadrow, 2006-03-09 12:06 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]keristars, 2006-03-09 02:53 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]herongale, 2006-03-09 05:33 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]lovelyregret, 2006-03-23 12:51 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]kyrielle, 2006-03-09 06:00 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]eboniorchid, 2006-03-09 01:16 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]jotasbrane, 2006-03-09 05:25 pm UTC (Expand)
Breaking the Business Model - [info]matgb, 2006-03-09 09:00 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: Breaking the Business Model - [info]eleventh_guard, 2006-03-10 10:37 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: Breaking the Business Model - [info]politas, 2006-03-23 08:28 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]darwiniacat, 2006-03-23 03:08 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]secretbutterfly, 2006-03-10 09:12 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]elvenjedi, 2006-03-23 03:36 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]quasadu, 2006-03-15 03:05 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]lizw, 2006-03-20 02:43 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]whatifoundthere, 2006-03-22 12:04 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]desh, 2006-03-22 12:11 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]whatifoundthere, 2006-03-22 12:32 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]palmer_kun, 2006-03-23 06:33 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]whatifoundthere, 2006-03-23 07:42 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]palmer_kun, 2006-03-23 08:14 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]whatifoundthere, 2006-03-23 03:06 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]palmer_kun, 2006-03-23 06:13 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]whatifoundthere, 2006-03-23 07:48 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]palmer_kun, 2006-03-23 11:26 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]whatifoundthere, 2006-03-24 12:40 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]palmer_kun, 2006-03-23 08:12 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]triadruid, 2006-03-28 07:13 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]palmer_kun, 2006-03-28 07:29 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]louisadkins, 2006-03-08 09:58 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]jameth, 2006-03-09 06:54 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]dantc, 2006-03-09 05:11 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]rho, 2006-03-09 11:07 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]tinnny, 2006-03-12 10:37 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]lovelyregret, 2006-03-23 12:53 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]tinnny, 2006-03-30 01:13 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]lucy_u2, 2006-03-13 02:28 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]vampwillow, 2006-03-13 02:26 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]oedipamaas49, 2006-03-14 03:01 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]lucy_u2, 2006-03-15 11:27 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]uniquewonders, 2006-03-16 03:51 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]johncoxon, 2006-03-25 12:23 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]oconel, 2006-03-27 08:01 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]harryh, 2006-03-08 07:42 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]ciphergoth, 2006-03-08 07:44 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]touch_of_ink, 2006-03-22 05:35 am UTC (Expand)

[info]norinel
2006-03-08 07:36 pm UTC (link)
Will not-golden-or-better users see ads on LJ at large (With the new subdomain scheme, www.livejournal.com stuff), or just on the space of them and other not-golden-or-better users?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]emmalina
2006-03-12 12:57 am UTC (link)
*Chuckles* Entirely off-topic but "at large" made me laugh. Like the ads are naughty little outlaws.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]essbee80
2006-03-08 07:38 pm UTC (link)
I dont like it. I'm sorry but if you cant pay or dont pay you dont get. I've had a free account and chose to get a paid account to help support a site I believed in and for new features. You going to refund me now?

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]kari_marie
2006-03-08 07:46 pm UTC (link)
Get over it. Why is this a bad thing? I'm a paid user too, and I will remain a paid user so I don't have to see the ads. I don't want a refund and I'm not going to whine about one. If people want to sacrifice their eyeballs to ads, then let them get the other content. I don't really care.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]matgb, 2006-03-09 09:46 pm UTC (Expand)
Like Paid user i say: - [info]maf_angel, 2006-03-20 12:52 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]tinyjo, 2006-03-08 07:49 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]azurelunatic, 2006-03-08 10:22 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]sibylle, 2006-03-08 11:27 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]matgb, 2006-03-09 09:48 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]solcita, 2006-03-10 04:19 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]palmer_kun, 2006-03-23 08:20 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]palmer_kun, 2006-03-23 08:31 am UTC (Expand)

[info]caras_galadhon
2006-03-08 07:39 pm UTC (link)
Whoa, whoa here. Are these users choosing the ad option going to have access to the same features -- all of them -- as the paid and permanent account holders, who have directly chosen to support LJ (vs. get something for nothing?).

(Reply to this) (Thread)(Expand)


[info]bradfitz
2006-03-08 07:40 pm UTC (link)
No, paid/perm will still have the most.

Some things (like SMS features and incoming phonecall minutes for our voice posting) cost us money per-use, so we can't give out for free. With ads, the ad money would pay for the per-use things so we could give it out partially to ad users.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]caras_galadhon, 2006-03-08 07:45 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]kunzite1, 2006-03-08 10:11 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]imaria, 2006-03-09 01:22 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]kunzite1, 2006-03-09 01:24 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]imaria, 2006-03-09 01:25 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]kunzite1, 2006-03-09 01:28 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]imaria, 2006-03-09 01:29 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]johncoxon, 2006-03-25 12:15 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]futureperfect, 2006-03-08 11:33 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]snellios, 2006-03-10 07:38 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]palmer_kun, 2006-03-23 08:33 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]burr86, 2006-03-08 07:41 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]caras_galadhon, 2006-03-08 07:47 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]palmer_kun, 2006-03-23 08:35 am UTC (Expand)
Kicking and screaming, etc.
[info]cmshaw
2006-03-08 07:39 pm UTC (link)
If I'm a free user, will I see ads on my friend's entry pages once I click off to their journal from my Friends Page?

Yes, if your friend has turned on ads.


This I hate.

For myself: Yes, I have a permanent account, but I don't stay logged into it at all times. The thought of clicking on a LiveJournal link from one of my non-logged-in computers and having ads thrown at me on a trusted LiveJournal site gives me the creepy-crawlies.

For my friends: When I'm logged in, I won't see that a page has ads. If I send the link to someone who's not a paid user (or not a user at all), they'll see the ads and might assume that I'm in some way endorsing that.

What I might consider an acceptable situations: the "Recent Entries" page of a journal has ads visible to all except paid users and the site scheme pages have ads visible only to ad-level users who are logged in. Yes, it means that ad-level users can avoid most ads by not logging in, but if they're not logged in they'll lose some of the benefits they bought by accepting ads, right?

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Kicking and screaming, etc.
[info]bradfitz
2006-03-08 07:43 pm UTC (link)
but I don't stay logged into it at all times

Blasphemy!

If I send the link to someone who's not a paid user (or not a user at all), they'll see the ads and might assume that I'm in some way endorsing that.

If I send somebody a CNN.com link, I really doubt they think I'm talking about the ads in the sidebar. *shrug*

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)(Expand)

Re: Kicking and screaming, etc. - [info]cmshaw, 2006-03-08 07:55 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: Kicking and screaming, etc. - [info]bradfitz, 2006-03-08 08:12 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: Kicking and screaming, etc. - [info]bandicoot, 2006-03-08 08:26 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: Kicking and screaming, etc. - [info]kenboy, 2006-03-08 08:26 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]raynala, 2006-03-08 08:49 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]biscayne, 2006-03-09 06:16 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]palmer_kun, 2006-03-23 08:24 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]jiggery_pokery, 2006-03-08 09:32 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]hillarygayle, 2006-03-08 10:01 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]fearlessness, 2006-03-08 10:14 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]wickedelf, 2006-03-08 10:27 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]eleventh_guard, 2006-03-10 10:42 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]palmer_kun, 2006-03-23 08:25 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]grrliz, 2006-03-08 11:13 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]omgsirius, 2006-03-09 05:33 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]frelling_tralk, 2006-03-09 06:00 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]flamingo_killer, 2006-03-13 12:51 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]myth_adventure, 2006-03-09 12:53 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]lea724, 2006-03-09 01:35 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]spiralled, 2006-03-09 01:23 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]frelling_tralk, 2006-03-09 05:59 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]waka_laka, 2006-03-09 10:44 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]palmer_kun, 2006-03-23 08:26 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]llenterak, 2006-03-10 08:27 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]blue_hobbit, 2006-03-12 03:12 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]ddddisaster, 2006-03-14 07:17 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]bookshop, 2006-03-15 01:09 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]kellibunny, 2006-03-15 10:57 pm UTC (Expand)
... - [info]lovelyregret, 2006-03-23 01:06 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]palmer_kun, 2006-03-23 08:28 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]palmer_kun, 2006-03-23 08:23 am UTC (Expand)
... - [info]johncoxon, 2006-03-25 12:16 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: "login stack" - [info]thevelvetsun, 2006-03-16 08:14 am UTC (Expand)
Re: Kicking and screaming, etc. - [info]palmer_kun, 2006-03-23 08:21 am UTC (Expand)
Re: Kicking and screaming, etc. - [info]palmer_kun, 2006-03-23 08:22 am UTC (Expand)
Re: Kicking and screaming, etc. - [info]secretbutterfly, 2006-03-10 09:29 pm UTC (Expand)
Re: Kicking and screaming, etc. - [info]lejlkwiet, 2006-04-18 08:30 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]uozaki
2006-03-08 07:41 pm UTC (link)
I'm...hesitant. But as long as I never have to see them.

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…