theljstaff ([info]theljstaff) wrote in [info]lj_2008,
@ 2008-03-12 18:00:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood: anticipitory
Entry tags:advisory board

Advisory Board Elections
Now that we have invited members to be on the Advisory Board, and created a clear mandate for the work of the board, it is time to begin talking about the elections for the user representatives.

To ensure the board members reflect a representative cross section of the LiveJournal community we will hold two separate elections. There will be one user-representative for the Cyrillic language users of LiveJournal (i.e. those who use Russian as their principal language of communication) and another for the non-Cyrillic segment of LiveJournal (i.e. those who use English, German or any of the other main LiveJournal languages). Posts regarding the elections will be announced in [info]news and [info]ru_news. The elections will run at the same time and in the same manner.

Timeline


The nomination and election process will cover the entire month of May. For the first two weeks, we will have open nominations, and the chance for users to second the nominations. When the nominations close, there will be time for LiveJournal to certify the candidates who have been nominated and for those candidates to communicate with users regarding positions or campaigning. The elections will be open for the entire last week of May. The new LiveJournal User-Representatives on the Advisory Board will be seated on June 1, 2008.

Requirements


To be considered as a candidate for the Advisory Board elections, a user must be:

  • at least 18 years old as of May 1, 2008
  • nominated and elected using their primary LiveJournal username
  • willing to serve under their full legal name, including having their name recorded on minutes, correspondence, opinions, or other material in relation to their service
  • available to travel to the once-a-year in-person meeting in Istanbul, Turkey the week of the third Wednesday in September (September 17, 2008)
  • available for quarterly conference calls, and for consultation via telephone or email correspondence should a situation arise which would need their advice
  • willing to sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement in relation to the work and discussion of the Advisory Board in order to keep the confidential nature of discussions which might arise


Voting


To be eligible to vote in the election, a user must have created their account before March 11, 2008. Voting will take place in the form of a poll, which will remain open during the entire last week of May. The winner will be determined via Instant Runoff Voting. This means that users will be able to select their first, second, and third choice candidate. In the event there is no clear majority, the lowest-ranked candidates will be eliminated and the users who selected those candidates as first choice will have their vote re-assigned to their second-choice candidate. That system is repeated until a clear winner is evident.

Serving on the Board


Logistics
The LiveJournal Advisory Board will meet annually on the third Wednesday/Thursday in September in Istanbul; this year, the week of September 17, 2008. They will hold quarterly conference calls with the management and Board of Directors to consider major issues. LiveJournal will reimburse all travel or related expenses and offer an honorarium, which may be paid directly to the member or to a charity of his or her choosing.

Structure
The LiveJournal Advisory Board is independent of the LiveJournal, Inc. management structure. There will be a chairperson appointed by the LiveJournal, Inc. management from the existing (non-user-representative) members of the board for the purposes of convening.

Non-user representatives will serve for a term of two years, after which they can be re-appointed upon mutual agreement. Elected user-representatives will serve for one year, with annual elections held each May. User-representatives can be members of the board for two consecutive terms before being obliged to stand down. Users who have previously been elected to the advisory board can put themselves forward for nomination again once they have spent at least one year off the board.

Should a user-representative of the LiveJournal Advisory Board find themselves unable to perform the necessary duties, he or she shall inform LiveJournal, Inc. management in writing. After his or her resignation has been accepted, the user with the next-highest amount of votes in the final vote tally from the previous election will be asked to take up their position on the advisory board. Should a non-user-representative of the LiveJournal Advisory Board find themselves unable to perform the necessary duties, he or she shall inform LiveJournal, Inc. management in writing. After his or her resignation has been accepted the member will be replaced at the discretion of LiveJournal, Inc. Additionally, there is nothing to preclude current or former user-representatives from being appointed as members of the advisory board in the non-user-representatives positions.

Meetings
The agenda for meetings and conference calls will be agreed between the LiveJournal, Inc. management and the chairperson of the Advisory Board. Management will respond promptly to any request for documentation and the LiveJournal Advisory Board will have its own independent secretariat.

The LiveJournal Advisory Board may publish position papers by majority vote, including dissenting position papers should LiveJournal management not follow their recommendations. Beyond the posted statements, LiveJournal Advisory Board members will be held to confidentiality and will be required to sign legally binding non-disclosure agreements to protect the integrity of the discussions. Advisory Board members are welcome to discuss their role and work of the board in public forums but are asked to respect the confidential nature of the discussions which take place.


The LiveJournal Advisory Board members previously announced each bring a unique perspective; law, business, knowledge of social media, and LiveJournal history and development. The elections for the LiveJournal user-representatives are intended to provide the unique perspective of the community of LiveJournal. Although there will still be at least one more appointed member, the Advisory Board will be a small group (seven to nine members) which is able to discuss and provide advice on any topic which is now, or becomes in the future, important to LiveJournal.



Page 1 of 3
<<[1] [2] [3] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]trepkos
2008-03-12 11:05 pm UTC (link)
Cool.

(Reply to this)


[info]tango
2008-03-12 11:08 pm UTC (link)
I'm definitely interested.

(Reply to this)


[info]qfemale
2008-03-12 11:10 pm UTC (link)
Istanbul, Turkey?
You're payin'?
I'm in!

(Reply to this)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]lil2yng, 2008-03-12 11:14 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]qfemale, 2008-03-12 11:18 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]lil2yng, 2008-03-12 11:19 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]qfemale, 2008-03-12 11:21 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]marta, 2008-03-12 11:22 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]archmage, 2008-03-12 11:35 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]marta, 2008-03-12 11:47 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]archmage, 2008-03-13 01:08 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]kahlan_amnell, 2008-03-13 01:18 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]its_paul, 2008-03-13 01:51 am UTC (Expand)

[info]spectralbovine
2008-03-12 11:10 pm UTC (link)
If you hold the Board in Constantinople
It'll happen in Istanbul

(Reply to this)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]azurelunatic, 2008-03-13 12:00 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]averysmallthing, 2008-03-13 12:19 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]sam42, 2008-03-13 12:22 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]averysmallthing, 2008-03-13 12:47 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]beckyzoole, 2008-03-16 03:31 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]mistakenelegant
2008-03-12 11:16 pm UTC (link)
I'm in if you're paying for me to fly there.

(Reply to this)


[info]karlita
2008-03-12 11:18 pm UTC (link)
I would be very interested.

(Reply to this)


[info]shanaqui
2008-03-12 11:21 pm UTC (link)
I approve. Keep going.

(Reply to this)


[info]cambler
2008-03-12 11:25 pm UTC (link)
50% of the representation for a single country/region/language, with 50% for everyone else?

This is fair... how?

Edited at 2008-03-12 11:25 pm UTC

(Reply to this)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]shanaqui, 2008-03-12 11:31 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]marta, 2008-03-12 11:40 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]maidenmorticia, 2008-03-12 11:44 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]koulagirl666, 2008-03-12 11:48 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]its_paul, 2008-03-13 01:59 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]maidenmorticia, 2008-03-12 11:42 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]koulagirl666, 2008-03-12 11:44 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]dzurlady, 2008-03-13 12:18 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]koulagirl666, 2008-03-13 12:26 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]dzurlady, 2008-03-13 12:36 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]ghoststrider, 2008-03-13 02:50 am UTC (Expand)

[info]cofax7
2008-03-12 11:36 pm UTC (link)
How will nominations work? Will individuals be required to nominate themselves, or may they be drafted?

(Reply to this)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]marta, 2008-03-12 11:41 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]thevelvetsun, 2008-03-13 12:11 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]averysmallthing, 2008-03-13 12:22 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]koulagirl666, 2008-03-13 12:32 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]averysmallthing, 2008-03-13 12:34 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]koulagirl666, 2008-03-13 12:35 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]jameth, 2008-05-14 07:17 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]odontomachus
2008-03-12 11:39 pm UTC (link)
Here's a little hint from a freelance advisor, completely gratis: if you want to create an "open dialogue", don't split up everything that's important into a billion and one different communities. It's pointless, stupid and only obscures the issue.
Also? *anticipatory.

(Reply to this)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]ghoststrider, 2008-03-13 02:49 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]pbristow, 2008-03-13 10:01 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]twirlandswirl
2008-03-12 11:43 pm UTC (link)
I have a dream!

(Reply to this)


[info]maidenmorticia
2008-03-12 11:46 pm UTC (link)
willing to serve under their full legal name, including having their name recorded on minutes, correspondence, opinions, or other material in relation to their service

Well, I guess that puts me and everyone like me out of the running. Thanks a lot.

(Reply to this)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]angrychicken, 2008-03-12 11:54 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]marta, 2008-03-12 11:58 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]angrychicken, 2008-03-13 12:02 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]maidenmorticia, 2008-03-13 12:17 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]trobadora, 2008-03-13 12:26 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]andricongirl, 2008-03-13 12:54 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]readysteadystop, 2008-03-13 01:00 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]flashfire, 2008-03-15 10:50 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]randomposting, 2008-03-13 04:04 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]ciaan, 2008-03-13 05:16 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]randomposting, 2008-03-13 08:06 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]dbaxdevilsfan
2008-03-12 11:47 pm UTC (link)
[info]spydielives would be perfect!

(Reply to this)


[info]playingbyheart
2008-03-13 12:07 am UTC (link)
I'm tempted to run, but I don't think I could win. I just don't have enough friends on LJ, though I've been a long time user and have a lot of reason to fight to for the benefit of the long time user community. Hmm. How is voting going to work?

(Reply to this)(Thread)(Expand)

you have my vote - [info]yogiwan, 2008-04-25 07:57 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]veleda
2008-03-13 12:08 am UTC (link)
I would be interested as well. I have a background in business, economics, psychology, and accounting.

(Reply to this)


[info]thevelvetsun
2008-03-13 12:12 am UTC (link)
Sounds pretty good, I guess. I think it's odd that a language group that makes up 20% of LJ is getting 50% of the representation, but I guess that's what happens when you sell to a Russian company.

(Reply to this)(Thread)(Expand)

(Reply from suspended user)
(no subject) - [info]pavlajaqym, 2008-07-11 05:04 am UTC (Expand)

[info]trobadora
2008-03-13 12:12 am UTC (link)
Considering LJ just secretly abolished the creation of basic accounts - do you really expect us to believe anything any user representative might say might make the slightest bit of a difference? You're not even willing to keep us informed on major changes to the site, much less listen to our opinions.

(Reply to this)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]maidenmorticia, 2008-03-13 12:16 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]sabbrielle, 2008-03-13 12:16 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]pyrop, 2008-03-13 12:16 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]kethryvis, 2008-03-13 12:22 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]trobadora, 2008-03-13 12:24 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]cos, 2008-03-13 04:46 am UTC (Expand)
I can't believe they abolished basic accounts. - [info]dzurlady, 2008-03-13 12:29 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]sam42, 2008-03-13 12:30 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]dzurlady, 2008-03-13 12:37 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]trobadora, 2008-03-13 12:39 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]its_paul, 2008-03-13 12:58 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]ghoststrider, 2008-03-13 02:53 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]tsukinofaerii, 2008-03-13 02:57 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]eatingsoup101, 2008-03-13 03:16 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]cos, 2008-03-13 04:45 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]oconel, 2008-03-13 06:49 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]lilyofthewest, 2008-03-13 01:00 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]kathrynymudi, 2008-07-10 11:57 pm UTC (Expand)

[info]kethryvis
2008-03-13 12:16 am UTC (link)
1) How linked will LJ username be to IRL name? I have worked very hard to separate the two, and while I'd love to serve, I don't want to jeopardize the link between my two "identities."

2) I second the concern that 20% of a userbase is enough to get a full rep on the board, with one other rep to represent the other 80%. It's hardly fair to give one language bloc their own rep if you don't plan on giving EVERY language bloc it's own rep. Language seems to me a shoddy way of divvying up representatives. What does it have to do with anything, really? It really looks like you're giving preference to the bloc that caused you (LJ Inc.) to rise to prominence. Both seats should be up for ALL LJ members. That would be the most fair. Either that or a) divvy up the two slots in a more geographic manner, evenly split (even 60/40 would be nice), or b) give up more userslots so that EVERY segment of the LJ population is represented fairly.

3) Please make it clear in the post that for the user-representatives, their travel expenses will be paid and not reimbursed. That info is currently buried in a comment, and not everyone will catch it, and many of us will not want to run if the travel is reimburse only. And, out of curiosity, why Turkey? With the majority of your announced board members (read: all of them so far) US based, shouldn't you wait until your entire board is set to decide on a location for your meetings, somewhere more midpoint... and isn't Turkey a little far for, so far, all of your members? And... expensive? Yes, I'm saying it. As a paid member, my money supports LJ, and I'm not overly sure I'm thrilled with the idea of sending seven people to Turkey, expenses paid, just so they can lounge around discussing LJ because someone thinks Turkey is cool, or it benefits that small 20% block "because it's close." [yes I have the same problems with my tax dollars, but that's a larger fish to fry.] If this is where LJ, Inc. is located that makes a bit more sense. But otherwise? I question this choice.

4) I also second (and have posted this before) the comment which stated that it's absolutely ridiculous to have us follow a million communities just to have an idea what is going on in LJ-land. None of this has been posted to [info]news, and I always thought that's what news was for... not just press releases of what's cool, but for actual news of import to the LJ community. I would say that having five communities for LJ-based info is more than plenty, and we're well beyond that. PLEASE look into having someone sit down and give a hard look to consolidating communities. If you broaden the mandates of a few communities (namely, [info]news) you could probably knock out half of the comms right there. Hell, I'd do it if you'd let me.

5) How will voting commence to be assured that it will not just be one great big "whoever has the most friends, wins" scenario? How will candidates be allowed to campaign, get their names out there, and state what they'll do for the LJ community if elected?

Edited at 2008-03-13 12:24 am UTC

(Reply to this)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]maidenmorticia, 2008-03-13 12:30 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]dzurlady, 2008-03-13 12:33 am UTC (Expand)

[info]readysteadystop
2008-03-13 12:43 am UTC (link)
I'm debating on running, not that it matters to anyone reading this... but I'll actually be running on the platform that meeting in Turkey isn't a free vacation and that I'll be there to champion the rights of LJ users. Hot damn. How novel.

ETA: And apparently, I'm one of the few who has absolutely no problem with how this will be run. So yeah.

Edited at 2008-03-13 04:16 am UTC

(Reply to this)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]strawb3rryh3ad, 2008-03-16 10:11 pm UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]readysteadystop, 2008-03-17 12:38 am UTC (Expand)

[info]desh
2008-03-13 12:48 am UTC (link)
Were the existing advisory board members consulted about abolishing Basic accounts? If not, what assurances can you give us that the advisory board will have any power or input at all?

(Reply to this)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]ankhutenshi, 2008-03-13 02:21 am UTC (Expand)

[info]archane
2008-03-13 12:52 am UTC (link)
If the Advisory Board is truly supposed to function "independent of the LiveJournal, Inc. management structure" then I have two problems with this.

First, a chairperson does more than just convene the meeting, a chairperson is also responsible for helping to direct the flow of discussion, being sure that the agenda is followed, and helping to set the agenda in the first place. As such, the chair has a lot of influence over the structure, tone and even - to a lesser extent - content of meetings and calls. I would be much more comfortable if a board operating on my behalf had the power to elect their own chairperson.

Second, also in the same vein, a genuinely independent Advisory Board should not need LiveJournal, Inc. agreement for agenda items. While I agree that discussion between the Board and LiveJournal, Inc. would be helpful for setting the agenda of meetings and conference calls, the final approval of the agenda should rest solely in the hands of the Board if they are going to be genuinely independent.

(Reply to this)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]readysteadystop, 2008-03-13 12:58 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]archane, 2008-03-13 01:28 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]readysteadystop, 2008-03-13 04:05 am UTC (Expand)

(Reply from suspended user)

[info]kahlan_amnell
2008-03-13 01:16 am UTC (link)
Meetings in Istanbul? So much for this company being US based though Russian owned.

Also, meetings in Mid-September in an international location pretty much rule out US college or graduate students, or anyone involved in academia being a part of this board unless they are willing to skip out on class within the first few weeks of the semester. I'd like to think that was accidental, but it very likely wasn't.

Edited at 2008-03-13 01:20 am UTC

(Reply to this)(Thread)(Expand)

(no subject) - [info]readysteadystop, 2008-03-13 04:06 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) - [info]ukihashi, 2008-03-13 07:18 am UTC (Expand)
(no subject) -