Sparkly Hussein Stuff ([info]sparkly_stuff) wrote in [info]hp_essays,
@ 2005-11-25 16:07:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:characters:nymphadora tonks, characters:remus lupin, pairings:remus/tonks

What Would Dumbledore Say?
Since the release of Half-Blood Prince, there has been a lot of unrest in fandom about the way the Remus/Tonks relationship is played out in the Hospital Wing scene in Chapter 29. Many feel that Tonks acted inappropriately in this scene, is a "bad role model" for girls, and her love for Remus is one-sided. This has caused many fans to strongly dislike both HBP!Tonks and the Remus/Tonks pairing.



Apparently, there are even those in the fandom who, based on their interpretation of this scene, feel Tonks couldn't even care less that Dumbledore is dead, and is thus the most selfish character in the book and does not deserve Remus, much less any fan support.

Huh?

This opinion appears to come from the part where Tonks declares her feelings about Lupin while he is broken down over Dumbledore's death ("This is not the time to discuss it...Dumbledore is dead"); later, Tonks sports pink hair at Dumbledore's funeral.

How can Tonks dare to be so happy and un-mousy when Dumbledore is dead? What nerve of hers!

McGonagall has the answer to that right here in canon: "Dumbledore would have been happier than anybody to think that there was a little more love in the world." I guess people have forgotten that this is Albus Dumbledore we're talking about--NOT your average wizard. Would Dumbledore have been offended by Tonks wearing her pink hair to his funeral? No. This is the same man who allowed Harry to chew him out at the end of OOTP; the man who showed a wicked sense of humor wherever he went; the diplomat who always accepted people for who they were. Dumbledore would be relieved and happy that Tonks is feeling better and has her metamorphing ability back. He would also be delighted that Tonks and Remus have found love. (It's pretty likely that Dumbledore knew the whole time that there was something going on between those two, as he tends to be the all-knowing sort.) Knowing Dumbledore, he'd be disappointed if Tonks didn't have her wacky hair at the funeral.

As for Tonks, does the fact that she's over her depression at the end of HBP show that she's totally unaffected by Dumbledore's death--or even worse, happy that Dumbledore is dead? No. Throughout the Hospital Wing Scene, Tonks is just as devastated as everyone else over the news. But the Order isn't even discussing Dumbledore when Tonks finally snaps! Right before the "I don't care" scene, Molly and Arthur appear and the focus is turned to Greyback's attack on Bill, followed by everyone watching in shock as Fleur tells off Molly. Why is it that Tonks is being considered a selfish drama queen, when Fleur makes as much of a scene as Tonks does in the Hospital Wing? And it is only because of what Fleur says that Tonks feels compelled to bring up her relationship with Remus. She doesn't just randomly bring it up out of nowhere in order to selfishly cause a scene; there is a clear connection in her mind, and thus in the text.

In addition, if any of the other Order members (including Remus) had felt that Tonks' behavior at that moment was completely inappropriate, they would have said something or escorted her out of the room. Instead, Molly and Arthur jump in and defend Tonks' position on the matter, and then the stern, mature Minerva McGonagall puts in the part about even Dumbledore being happy. No one in the Order seems to be disapproving or suspicious of Tonks' actions. Yes, Remus does then try to change the subject back to Dumbledore, but I think that has more to do with him not wanting to discuss a private matter in front of twenty other people, rather than with him thinking badly of Tonks.

So, if none of the characters have a problem with Tonks, why do so many readers?

As for the funeral, Tonks' hair is pink and she and Remus are holding hands for one simple reason: JKR needed to show us that Tonks and Remus are together and happy without going into a long tirade about it. There's no room for it, especially because the focus of the story is now on Harry, and Dumbledore's death and funeral. So JKR just slips it in there, so that we know what happened with that minor subplot. The whole thing is really just a matter of bad timing--yes, I can see how it would be suspicious that Tonks is so happy so soon after Dumbledore's death. But Tonks also knows that Remus is (a) no longer risking his life hanging out with Greyback & Co. and (b) still in love with her. Two major sources of stress for her are now gone. The fact that that was all she needed to get out of her funk may help support some readers' theories that Remus was the only reason for Tonks' depression. But it does NOT show that Tonks is happy about Dumbledore's death.

However, let's forget about JKR's strategy for a minute and just go with the story. Now Tonks, who knows Dumbledore as well as we do, knows that Dumbledore appreciated her for who she was, crazy hair and all. So she has no problem wearing her hair pink for the funeral. She may have also done it as a sign to everyone else that she is okay again, as it was probably the first time that most of the Order has seen her since the Hospital Wing scene. The holding hands part--would Remus be holding hands with someone that he didn't love and was embarrassed to be seen with? No. Give the man some credit. He doesn't seem to have a problem with her hair, so why should anyone else?

(In addition--she's holding hands with him, a rather innocent gesture. She's not hanging all over him. She's providing support for him because she knows Dumbledore was important to Remus. But JKR doesn't have room to go on and on about that. They are minor characters, and the focus at Dumbledore's funeral should be right where it is--on Harry.)

And if Tonks really didn't care about Dumbledore being dead, why would she even show up to the funeral in the first place? Just to show off her new boyfriend? Or her hair? I don't think so. That's insulting to both Tonks and Remus.

Finally, it doesn't say anywhere that Tonks was smiling and happy and perky at the funeral. If it did, that would be a cause for concern. But it doesn't. Again, JKR doesn't need to spell out that Tonks was sad, and Remus was sad, and the squid was sad...blah blah blah. It's not necessary. So it's safe to say she and Remus were just as mournful as everyone else. I'd even be willing to bet that Tonks was dressed properly in modest black attire. (And if she wasn't...I still don't think Dumbledore would care.) But that's another thing that JKR doesn't need to spell out for you.

All the book says is that her hair was "returned to vividest pink." All that means is: she is back to normal. If none of this mousy-brown-depression stuff had happened, her hair would most likely STILL have been pink at the funeral, and no one--character or reader--would have batted an eyelash over it. That's the normal Tonks we all know.




Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]sporkyadrasteia
2005-11-25 10:23 pm UTC (link)
Great points. I think you hit it right on the nail.

Besides, doesn't it say that the funeral was too dreary and somber to be worthy of Dumbledore (Harry thinks "Nitwit Blubber, Oddment, Tweak" would be a more fitting speech). I simply can't see why being as Dumbledore would like Tonks to be is more insulting than drowning the audience with petty words of honor and just making everyone sleep, like all the eulogies of the speakers did.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sparkly_stuff, 2005-11-26 01:01 am UTC

[info]laurus_nobilis
2005-11-25 10:31 pm UTC (link)
Wonderfully said. :)

I didn't have any problems with Tonks as I read the book, and it really surprised me to see that most of the fandom ha such a negative reaction to her - not just the pairing, but also Tonks as a character. I'm glad you put this in such a clear way.

(Reply to this)


[info]patagonian
2005-11-25 10:39 pm UTC (link)
I hadn't even considered that Tonks's pink hair at the funeral was inappropriate until fandom exploded with a huge amount of Tonks hate. And I completely agreed with your assessment of what the pink hair meant - she was back to herself.

As for her actions in the hospital scene, I do agree with some in fandom that it wasn't quite the best place, best time, but I do not blame Tonks for her reaction. She has been under an incredible amount of stress since the end of OoTP. Sirius had died, she was losing or had lost Remus, had just battled with Death Eaters, had lost several other members of the Order through the year, and Dumbledore had just died. How the hell anyone can think that a person would act rationally and appropriately under those circumstances is beyond me. I think that Tonks telling Remus that she didn't care was more of a knee-jerk response, and very analogous to Bill and Fleur's situation and she didn't get particularly unreasonable, she didn't keep harping on it after the subject was closed.

(Reply to this)


[info]antonia_east
2005-11-25 10:47 pm UTC (link)
Same. I never thought it was remarkable until fandom went pop about it. I love Tonks for wearing her pink hair at the funeral. It just shows that her spirit is unbroken.

(Reply to this)


[info]rj_anderson
2005-11-25 10:49 pm UTC (link)
You mean people are really blaming Tonks for this? Oy, HP fandom is insane. The idea that Tonks wasn't showing proper respect/grief for D. never even occurred to me, and I'm not even that big on Tonks as a character.

Well argued, anyway.

(Reply to this)


[info]polygonia
2005-11-25 11:14 pm UTC (link)
I never even heard folks complain about that. That is a bit ridiculous as I was happy for Tonks having been in that position myself too many times. Plus that whole scene leaves me in danger of tears anyway.

(Reply to this)


[info]mari4212
2005-11-25 11:20 pm UTC (link)
You've got a lot of good points. I'd always assumed that Tonks' hair was a way to honor Dumbledore, not an insult.

(Reply to this)


[info]chrysantza
2005-11-25 11:43 pm UTC (link)
So, if none of the characters have a problem with Tonks, why do so many readers?

1) Because a certain pet Ship was capsized

2) Because female characters - or, more specifically, young, sexually attractive female characters - just plain cannot win with much of the fandom.

I remember when Tonks was bashed as "a Mary Sue" and "too perky and cheerful" when OOtP came out. Now she's selfish, whiny and downtrodden. The poor girl cannot catch a break.

Anyhow, thank you for this essay. Well-done.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sparkly_stuff, 2005-11-26 01:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]beyond_pale, 2005-11-26 05:14 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]meghatron, 2005-11-29 09:36 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]hernandezstudio, 2005-11-27 02:21 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]rogueravenclaw, 2005-11-27 02:24 am UTC

[info]tychoelite
2005-11-25 11:56 pm UTC (link)
I think the only people that really feel this way are the Remus/Sirius shippers.

Or at least, I don't really like it and I'm a Remus/Sirius shipper.

I mean, this isn't any worse then all the Jo hatting that went on after people finally realized that Harry/Hermione was just a figment of their imaginations.

Personally, I just thought it was a bit weird, that's all. I don't mind it though, since Sirius is (for all intesive purposes) 'dead'. Everyone deserves to be able to move on... and really, we have fandom to remedy these sorts of things ^.~

(Reply to this)

You're missing the point...
[info]ook
2005-11-26 12:32 am UTC (link)
The message was that, at the end of the book, Tonks was "back to normal" because she got her man. This implies that she was incomplete without a man and involved in a romantic relationship. This tells readers that a talented, intelligent, strong woman can not feel whole and "normal" unless she's paired up with a man. THAT is what pissed people off about Tonks...not that she had pink hair and was happy at the funeral.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: You're missing the point... - [info]laverinth, 2005-11-26 12:57 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]ook, 2005-11-26 01:33 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]gunderpants, 2005-11-26 02:06 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]lyo, 2005-11-26 03:54 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]gunderpants, 2005-11-26 03:58 am UTC
Jumping in here... - [info]swatkat24, 2005-11-26 04:38 am UTC
Re: Jumping in here... - [info]gunderpants, 2005-11-26 04:54 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]swatkat24, 2005-11-26 04:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gunderpants, 2005-11-26 04:57 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]swatkat24, 2005-11-26 11:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gunderpants, 2005-11-27 01:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]yeats, 2005-11-26 12:58 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]alchemia, 2005-11-26 01:12 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]sparkly_stuff, 2005-11-26 01:20 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]ook, 2005-11-26 01:45 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]sparkly_stuff, 2005-11-26 01:58 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]ook, 2005-11-26 02:00 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]ryf, 2005-11-26 07:30 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]swatkat24, 2005-11-26 04:42 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]aglia, 2005-11-26 04:10 pm UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]snorkackcatcher, 2005-11-26 01:41 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]alchemia, 2005-11-26 01:46 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]snorkackcatcher, 2005-11-26 02:22 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]sparkly_stuff, 2005-11-26 02:26 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]back_in_black, 2005-11-26 02:49 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]back_in_black, 2005-11-26 02:51 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]the_prof, 2005-11-26 02:59 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]alchemia, 2005-11-26 03:12 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]ryf, 2005-11-26 07:21 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]alchemia, 2005-11-26 07:56 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]ryf, 2005-11-26 02:28 pm UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]alchemia, 2005-11-26 10:35 pm UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]sparkly_stuff, 2005-11-26 10:39 pm UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]alchemia, 2005-11-27 01:41 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]gunderpants, 2005-11-27 08:50 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]ook, 2005-11-26 01:56 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]laverinth, 2005-11-26 02:34 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]gunderpants, 2005-11-26 02:38 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]ook, 2005-11-26 02:41 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]laverinth, 2005-11-26 02:42 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]gunderpants, 2005-11-26 02:44 am UTC
Mod warning - [info]ryf, 2005-11-26 07:31 am UTC
Mod warning - [info]ryf, 2005-11-26 07:34 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]a_t_rain, 2005-11-26 02:40 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]nights_mistress, 2005-11-27 03:03 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]sparkly_stuff, 2005-11-27 03:09 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]nights_mistress, 2005-11-27 03:15 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]sparkly_stuff, 2005-11-27 03:25 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]nights_mistress, 2005-11-27 03:31 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]firebird5, 2005-11-28 09:35 pm UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]ryf, 2005-11-26 07:25 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]grey_fuzzy, 2005-11-27 03:57 am UTC
Re: You're missing the point... - [info]licentious, 2005-12-18 01:32 am UTC

[info]penguinishness
2005-11-26 12:55 am UTC (link)
I am, myself, a Remus/Tonks shipper and was slightly displeased with Tonks in HBP. What I hated was that through out the entire book she was depressed, which is shown mainly through her "mousy brown hair", and we find out in the hospital wing scene that this is mainly rooted in her unreciprocated love for our favorite werewolf. Now, sometime between the hospital wing scene and the funeral, she and Remus have managed to work out whatever problems they had and are happy together. At the funeral she is obviously back to the person she was in OotP, shown through her vibrant pink hair. What irritated me was that she seems quite unaffected by the death of Dumbledore. Through the short description of her, her opinion seems to be: "Dumbledore is dead, Bill was bitten and Hogwarts may be closing! But that's okay; Remus and I are together!" To me, this seems to make her a 2-Dimensional character, concerned solely about her personal life, rather than the fate of the wizarding world.
As I mentioned above, I like Tonks and ship Remus/Tonks myself. I was just displeased with the way it unfolded in Half-Blood Prince.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sparkly_stuff, 2005-11-26 01:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]penguinishness, 2005-11-26 05:16 pm UTC

[info]gunderpants
2005-11-26 01:24 am UTC (link)
People got upset because they saw a female get with a man they fancied in a children's book, and they would rather him gay than with another woman because they confuse the boundary between fictional characters and real people.

I love myself so hard.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]ook, 2005-11-26 01:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sparkly_stuff, 2005-11-26 02:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gunderpants, 2005-11-26 02:04 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sparkly_stuff, 2005-11-26 02:07 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ook, 2005-11-26 02:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gunderpants, 2005-11-26 02:35 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ook, 2005-11-26 02:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gunderpants, 2005-11-26 02:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]a_t_rain, 2005-11-26 03:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]swatkat24, 2005-11-26 04:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ook, 2005-11-26 12:48 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]swatkat24, 2005-11-26 04:54 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]forgotnsuitcase, 2005-11-26 05:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sekhmets_temple, 2005-11-26 06:18 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sparkly_stuff, 2005-11-26 06:23 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]i_said_boourns, 2005-11-27 09:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gunderpants, 2005-11-27 11:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]out_fox, 2005-11-27 02:23 pm UTC

[info]snorkackcatcher
2005-11-26 01:24 am UTC (link)
Basically agree with all this, but then you're preaching to the choir here. Her reaction seemed appropriate enough the first time I read the hospital wing scene -- and still seems so when I read it again just now to check.

The pink hair at the funeral seems as much an act of defiance as anything else -- "yes, I can do it again!". Because pink hair just is Tonks, it's her natural style even if it isn't her natural colour (obviously). There was no suggestion that Harry or anyone else cared -- about that, or Fred and George's black dragonskin jackets, or Slughorn's fancy robes ... And from the description of the hand-holding, it's as likely as not that she's doing it to comfort him as the other way round.

Oh well. Rehashing old arguments again. :)

(Reply to this)


[info]rotae
2005-11-26 01:33 am UTC (link)
Well, I was a Wotcher/Wolvie shipper after OotP came out. So I am a happy camper. Everything that I wanted to happen in HBP, happened, so I can't complain! lol.
It was interesting to see that most people think that her mousy brown hair is her natural colour... personally, I think she's subconciously imitating Remus, or maybe even a mixture of the two, but there you go, not important.
I completely agree with everything you've said. I didn't realise that people thought that her pink hair was inappropriate until I came on the internet and found people bashing her for it. It's who she is, and especially as a metamorphagus, I can't imagine Dumbledore wanting her to be anybody but herself. ;)
Well put.

Peace,
Rotae

(Reply to this)


[info]souliesoul
2005-11-26 01:43 am UTC (link)
My issue with the pink hair suddenly reappearing at the funeral is that it's a funeral. It's been drilled into my head so often that whatever colour your hair may be, if there is a big, serious occasion where respect is crucial you do not have brightly coloured hair (pink, firetruck red, blue, anything that isn't seen normally in a crowd at the event you will be attending) and you damn well better be able to get it to something plain that won't stick out by the date of the occasion.

It is a timing thing, and a 'I'm running out of space, must fix this subplot now' thing - but to me it reeks of disrespect.

So, if none of the characters have a problem with Tonks, why do so many readers?
None of the characters had a problem with Pettigrew and look where that landed them. Not that I think she's evil, or that she's happy Dumbledore is dead, or that she is in any way in collaboration with any of the Dark forces at work in the books- I just feel the need to point that out.

As for your statement that some people think Tonks in this book is a bad role model for girls? I have to say that yes, she is a poor role model. Just like the whole Harry/Ginny debacle is a very bad role model, but this is not the place to go into that one.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]sparkly_stuff, 2005-11-26 01:49 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]souliesoul, 2005-11-26 09:48 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]aglia, 2005-11-26 04:34 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]gunderpants, 2005-11-26 02:05 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]souliesoul, 2005-11-26 09:45 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sparkly_stuff, 2005-11-26 06:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]souliesoul, 2005-11-27 12:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gunderpants, 2005-11-27 01:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]souliesoul, 2005-11-27 01:56 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gunderpants, 2005-11-27 03:28 am UTC

[info]psychic_serpent
2005-11-26 02:15 am UTC (link)
So, if none of the characters have a problem with Tonks, why do so many readers?

While this is not true for all readers, for a great many it is the same reason that so many people throw hate in Ginny's and Ron's directions: shipping. Some folks simply refuse to recognize that Remus was never paired with anyone else in canon, so Tonks did not "steal" him from someone else. This is what JKR always meant to write, and both the Bill/Fleur and Remus/Tonks material in the hospital scene makes them direct parallels to Harry/Ginny. JKR clearly did this very deliberately; other Tonks or Remus ships would not have had the relevance to Harry that their relationship does (as I discussed in my essay on the role of minor characters). Tonks/Remus is in the book for a reason: the parallel to Harry/Ginny. It does not need to be "explained away" with theories about Tonks really being Draco on Polyjuice any more than Harry/Ginny needs to be "explained away" with theories that Hermione gave Harry a potion that caused him to be attracted to Ginny.

At the funeral, I got the impression that Tonks was Remus's "best source of comfort" and vice versa. Her pink hair is more like an act of defiance against the darkness, not disrespect toward Dumbledore. I agree that the old man would have thought it perfectly appropriate and that it was in the spirit of whimsy that Dumbledore embodied.

Great points!

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]gunderpants, 2005-11-26 02:16 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]sparkly_stuff, 2005-11-26 04:48 am UTC

[info]twiggie
2005-11-26 02:28 am UTC (link)
Honestly, when I read the books without seeing anyone's opinions first, I didn't see the whole 'bad!Tonks' thing. I thought that was just what ANYONE would do in that situation. I mean, if she didn't, that would have been a tad apathetic. But I think this stems with why people hated Cho so much. I never understood the Cho hate, because the girl never did anything wrong. Harry and Cho just didn't work out, like most relationships do when kids are 14.

About the hair. I can see why people would be bothered, but since it's her hair, not her robes, I think it's fine. Hair is different than clothes. I think the ship should have been developed more and not come out of nowhere, but I do support the ship.

(Reply to this)


[info]lyo
2005-11-26 03:58 am UTC (link)
I didn't particularly care for Tonks in this book, but I didn't care for anyone in this book so I just figured it was a bad book.

My major problem would be that, like others have said, that the relationship seemed to come out of left field and that possibly too much emphasis was put on it, making it seem more hokey than it was. Aside from that, I wasn't particularly thrown by her pink hair.

(Reply to this)


[info]jennjenn724
2005-11-26 05:11 am UTC (link)
I didn't have a problem with the pink hair, however, I did think that she acted rather inappropriately in the hospital scene. They had just found out about Dumbledore's death like a minute before that, it wasn't as though it had been a day or two. It just seemed very odd for her to suddenly be saying all these things to Remus. I don't think that this means that she didn't care about Dumbledore, just that she has bad timing. She HAS been portrayed as a sort of clumsy, awkward character, after all.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]gunderpants, 2005-11-26 05:17 am UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2005-11-26 10:57 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]gunderpants, 2005-11-27 01:42 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]a_t_rain, 2005-11-26 04:23 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]author_by_night, 2005-11-27 11:36 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]lunar_music, 2005-12-13 03:21 am UTC

[info]hernandezstudio
2005-11-26 05:36 am UTC (link)
Here from [info]hogwarts_today...

I understand what your essay here is saying and I agree with some of it, but I also understand what others mean when they say that HBP Tonks seemed selfish and 2-dimensional. It's such a fine line and hard to explain... I think you're right about how the pink hair at the funeral wouldn't have been offensive to Dumbledore. But she had lost her metamorphmagus abilities due to stress and worry, right? Well, there's still so much to be stressed and worried about (even more now than at the beginning of HBP where we see Tonks already distraught) - Dumbledore is dead, Harry (and the entire wizarding world, for that matter) is in increasing danger, Bill has been brutally attacked and will never be the same, etc. To have her suddenly regain her abilities because she's together with Remus makes her seem a little shallow and self-centered. Her reaction certainly isn't unusual - there are a lot of self-centered people in the world - but it wasn't very endearing and I think it turned a lot of people off the character.

A major disappointment for me in HBP was the way she treated Harry. She knows Harry's situation - orphaned as a baby, raised by relatives who hate him, hounded by Voldemort, and now he's lost his only 'family' - his godfather, Sirius. Yet at the train station JKR specifically mentions that Tonks speaks to Harry "without smiling" and "still unsmiling" and she was rather cool to him. I thought it was pretty sad that she couldn't muster even a weak smile for the poor kid. And then later, when Harry runs into her in the 7th floor corridor, he even mentions missing Sirius and tries to talk about him to which Tonks blankly replies, "What? Well...I'll see you around, Harry." We're to believe that she's worried about Remus, and I can understand that, but to me, the fact that she can't spare a moment to talk to a kid about the godfather he may still be grieving, screams "self-centered." An example from my RL: when my mother died, a friend whose mother has terminal cancer came to the funeral. She and I talked for a very long time, both about my Mom and hers. My grief wasn't greater than hers, my problems weren't more important. I think that's what annoys many people about HBP Tonks - her unrequited love for Remus matters more to her than everything else combined which strikes many as being unnaturally obsessive.

Why is it that Tonks is being considered a selfish drama queen, when Fleur makes as much of a scene as Tonks does in the Hospital Wing?

a) Fleur didn't know Dumbledore well.
b) That scene revolves around two things - Dumbledore's death, and Fleur's fiance's horrific injuries. Fleur has every reason to have her little outburst, where Tonks' outburst was jarring and out-of-the-blue.

A