bettina_elvina ([info]fox_hunt) wrote in [info]house_wilson,
@ 2007-03-10 01:49:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:discussions by bettina_elvina

CASE FILE: Wilson, James M.D.
CASE FILE: Wilson, James M.D.
DIAGNOSIS: Codependence Disorder
STAGE: 4; Progressive
ANALYST: Bettina Elvina

In many forums discussing the House/Wilson relationship, the two have been described as codependent with one another. However, codependency is meant to describe an individual, not a pair, for codependency can only exist in a relationship in which at least one person within a social unit is a dependent.

This topic is a highly relevant issue because, after some careful research, codependence disorder is the best explanation behind James Wilson’s social and psychological behavior. It also explains the nature of his relationship with House, which more often than not, has proven to be as self-destructive as constructive. Now, before becoming a skeptic, please bear in mind that this essay has been written for the sake of analyzing the character of James Wilson, and that it in no way poses itself as canonical. Nevertheless, the evidence presented here is quite strong, and it would be remiss to dismiss the possibility that Wilson indeed suffers from a psychological disorder.

The true definition of codependency is as follows:

“Codependency" is used to describe the condition where a person becomes the "caretaker" of an addicted or troubled individual. The individual can be addicted to alcohol, drugs, or gambling. Or, he or she can be troubled by a physical or emotional illness. Codependents can be this individual's spouse, lover, child, parent, sibling, coworker, or friend.” […] “The term has been widely applied to define spouses of chemically dependent or otherwise dysfunctional persons. More generally, codependency has been applied to individuals who suffer from constantly focusing on the needs and behaviors of others. It is maladaptive behavior that results from a stressful preoccupation with another individual's life. Without treatment, codependency leads to dysfunctional relationships.” [1]

The information above strongly suggests that House is the dependent in the relationship, whereas Wilson is the codependent. The susceptibility of an individual to codependency is highly related not only to one’s genetic make-up (one’s natural proclivity to care for others), but also one’s family environment. It is highly common for codependent individuals to have grown-up in family situations in which one individual in the family was or is a dependent.

In light of that last, it is imperative to recall the episode Histories from season 1 of House M.D. It is revealed in this episode that Wilson has (or has had) a brother who plunged into homelessness. Statistically, most homeless persons are either substance dependents or psychologically damaged dependents (i.e. Vietnam veterans). Regardless of whatever category Wilson’s brother might fall under, his situation has very likely left Wilson emotionally traumatized.

The trauma of losing his brother, however, did not start the codependent behavior. Codependent behavior usually starts when the dependent’s addiction and/or physio-psychological illness becomes visibly apparent. Assuming the role(s) of “enabler, rescuer, caretaker, joiner, hero, complainer, and/or adjuster”[1] is a normal reaction for someone who has a loved one who displays self-destructive tendencies. Unfortunately, the assumption of one or a number of these roles becomes in and of itself an addiction, the symptoms of which are difficult to detect especially in the early stages of the psychological disorder. In fact, many people suffering from codependency disorder never get diagnosed.

Codependents’ Anonymous uses the following as criteria for fulfilling the disorder. Please note that not all are required to be diagnosed with codependency disorder:

Denial Patterns:
1.) I have difficulty identifying what I am feeling.
2.) I minimize, alter or deny how I truly feel.
3.) I perceive myself as completely unselfish and dedicated to the well being of others.

Low Self-Esteem Patterns:
1.) I have difficulty making decisions.
2.) I judge everything I think, say or do harshly, as never "good enough."
3.) I am embarrassed to receive recognition and praise or gifts.
4.) I do not ask others to meet my needs or desires.
5.) I value others' approval of my thinking, feelings and behavior over my own.
6.) I do not perceive myself as a lovable or worthwhile person.

Compliance Patterns:
1.) I compromise my own values and integrity to avoid rejection or others' anger.
2.) I am very sensitive to how others are feeling and feel the same.
3.) I am extremely loyal, remaining in harmful situations too long.
4.) I value others' opinions and feelings more than my own and am afraid to express differing opinions and feelings of my own.
5.) I put aside my own interests and hobbies in order to do what others want.
6.) I accept sex when I want love.

Control Patterns:
1.) I believe most other people are incapable of taking care of themselves.
2.) I attempt to convince others of what they "should" think and how they "truly" feel.
3.) I become resentful when others will not let me help them.
4.) I freely offer others advice and directions without being asked.
5.) I lavish gifts and favors on those I care about.
6.) I use sex to gain approval and acceptance.
7.) I have to be "needed" in order to have a relationship with others.
[2]

It is most interesting to note the 6th patterns under Compliance and Control. Wilson’s sexual activities, and the conscious and subconscious motivations behind them, clearly match the maladaptive patterns described. He has went through, and rather quickly, three marriages, an unknown number of sexual affairs, and his own cancer patient. “Since many codependents avoid interaction with healthy, well-adjusted people, the codependency cycle usually continues with a series of damaging relationships.” [3]

It should also be mentioned that he exhibits several of the other patterns as well, particularly #3 under Compliance Patterns, and all of the patterns listed under Control. Other characteristics indicative of a codependent include:

An exaggerated sense of responsibility for the actions of others.
A tendency to confuse love and pity, with the tendency to "love" people they can pity and rescue.
A tendency to do more than their share, all of the time.
A tendency to become hurt when people don't recognize their efforts.
A compelling need to control others.
Lack of trust in self and/or others.
Fear of being abandoned or alone.
Rigidity/difficulty adjusting to change.
Problems with intimacy/boundaries.
Chronic anger.
Lying/dishonesty.
[1]

When an individual becomes addicted to a codependent relationship, the individual expresses this addiction through more pronounced and observable behavior of all of the above. Although most codependents are not aware of their conditions, many reach a breaking point in which they realize they have confined themselves in a destructive, one-sided relationship. Yet their love for the dependent and their need to fulfill their impulse to care prevent them from breaking the connection.

Why, one must wonder, is codependency considered a type of addiction? The addiction stems from the “rewarding feeling” of helping a loved one and being needed. It is an addiction to a relationship that falsely promises permanence. The illusion of permanence comes from the belief that one will never be abandoned or left behind so long as the dependent needs a caretaker. Wilson’s relationship with House, it can be posited, is a ripple effect of Wilson’s relationship with his estranged brother. Once his brother became a lost cause and went missing (abandoning Wilson, in a sense), Wilson transfers his compulsion to rescue the hopeless to his career: oncology. When Wilson develops a bond with House, he might have found, as it were, a reflection of his absent brother. There is, therefore, such a thing as loving too much.

Having said that, the following excerpt explains, rather clearly, Wilson’s behavior during the Tritter Arc:
“[Codependents] have good intentions. They try to take care of a person who is experiencing difficulty, but the caretaking becomes compulsive and defeating.” […] “The problem is that these repeated rescue attempts allow the needy individual to continue on a destructive course and to become even more dependent on the unhealthy caretaking of the "benefactor." As this reliance increases, the codependent develops a sense of reward and satisfaction from "being needed." When the caretaking becomes compulsive, the co-dependent feels choiceless and helpless in the relationship, but is unable to break away from the cycle of behavior that causes it. Codependents view themselves as victims and are attracted to that same weakness in their love and friendship relationships.”[1]

What needs to be examined, at this point in the analysis, is Wilson’s increasing codependency. Yes, it has been increasing rather than decreasing over the spans of the three seasons. This is because codependents reach the more progressive stages of their condition when their desire to “protect or rescue” an addict reach the “point of self-sacrifice.” [3]

Season 1: Wilson gives-up his job to save House’s from Vogler.
Season 2: Stopgap.
Season 3: Wilson lies about House’s forged scrips. Wilson tolerates the loss of his prescribing license, car, and bank account. Wilson decides to not testify, deciding to go to prison in House’s place instead.

Notice Season 2 is a stopgap, but in Season 3, the behavior returns exponentially. Creative drama within House M.D.’s writing staff aside, there are several significant events in Season 2, which may explain what has cause the fluctuation in Wilson’s psyche.

The proceeding will briefly outline the dynamics of House and Wilson’s relationship. This summary is necessary to better understand the timeline of Wilson’s psychological disorder.

In House M.D.’s backstory, Wilson’s childhood is a mysterious one, but the only clue behind any kind of childhood trauma may be found in his history with his now missing brother. Fast-forward about a decade, Wilson finds himself working at Princeton Plainsborough Teaching Hospital. There, he meets and befriends Gregory House, through circumstances that are still unknown.

Wilson apparently (based on episode 20, season 3 spoilers) had a fallout with his wife not because of his sexual affair, but because of his emotional affair with House. Presumably, this might have happened immediately after House’s infarction and loss of Stacey. House has suffered a debilitating physio-psychological trauma. Wilson acts as caretaker. Their relationship, it can be deduced, blossoms.

In Season 1, time has passed (about 5-6 years). In that time, House’s personality has changed due to his increasing dependency on Vicodin. Though Stacy claims that House was “always a jerk,” she was not around House during the 5-6 year gap. Wilson was, and is therefore more reliable to believe when he says, “You’ve changed.” The change causes deep-seeded concern, as Wilson has already seen how dependency damages a person. Unfortunately, he is apparently blind to how dependency damages the people who are emotionally close to the dependent. Consequently, Wilson becomes codependent with House.

Later, House has admitted himself as an addict, and Wilson has brought that fact -however manipulatively- forward. Yet House denies that his addiction is a problem, which seems to have caused Wilson to doubt his own judgment (note #5 under Low Self-Esteem Patterns). He does not push the issue after the detox, allowing House to continue his dependency on Vicodin. It is probably safe to assume that the one-week detox backfired in the long run, as House returns to his pills with more enthusiasm. This is exemplified later on in the season and the overall series.

Toward the end of the season, Vogler threatens their seemingly comfortable relationship. The threat on House’s career further activates Wilson’s protect and rescue habits. When the threat disappears, the dynamics of their relationship are further challenged with the reappearance of House’s ex-girlfriend.

In Season 2, Stacy returns to House’s life, and House temporarily becomes less dependent on his pills and less aware of his leg pain for a few episodes. Wilson, in contrast, becomes noticeably vulnerable when it appears that his position as closest friend and confidant has been so quickly replaced by an ex. Though Wilson has House’s best interests in mind, it is difficult to imagine not feeling insulted, and worse for a codependent, being temporarily forgotten as the most important person in House’s life.

But because of House’s chipper attitude and renewed sense of hope, Wilson has little need to protect House from his addiction. Instead, he shifts his priorities to protecting House from Stacy. This explains the stopgap in his codependency. Although shielding House from Stacy shows signs of codependent behavior, Wilson still has enough of his facilities to know not to directly interfere. As a result, the dependent-codependent bond lessens to a degree. Their friendship, nevertheless, remains intact and, it should be noted, becomes healthier. House confides in Wilson more openly, and Wilson offers his opinions rather than manipulating the situation to fit what he believes House needs.

When Stacy leaves House, House returns to his addiction once more, and again, with increased enthusiasm. The pain in his leg, furthermore, becomes worse for psychosomatic reasons. Wilson is needed again, and they return to the old habits of their relationship.

As soon as Julie exposes her affair, Wilson goes to House for refuge. This situation does not appear new to them. Note that, in the time Wilson cohabited with House, House’s leg pain became less pronounced and House was, for all intents and purposes, playful. Wilson, however, was distraught with his failure at yet another marriage. In reaction, he sought out a needy woman and slept with her. This is a self-esteem and security issue. Wilson hates not being in a relationship in which he is needed, and the rejection from his wife pressures him to find another dysfunctional relationship. His relationship with House, though consistent, does not provide him with a sexual outlet. For Wilson, sex represents the highest form of caring- love. It is ironic to point out that for all of Wilson’s prowess in understanding human behavior and relationships, it is House who understands that the actions of sex and love can be separated.

Because House understands this, he points out to Wilson that he has a severe, psychological problem. Emotionally threatened, Wilson does not take House’s offer to stay with him, and once Wilson is permanently gone from the apartment, House’s leg pain returns, as does the progressive pill-popping.

Finally, Season 3. House temporarily removes the leg pain with the ketamine treatment. Such a radical change in his quality of life makes House friendlier, more active, and more cheerful. The change also affects Wilson: he no longer knows what his role is in relationship to House. Consequently, he reacts in a fashion that is contradictory to his nature, but compulsory to his codependency: he forces limitations on House through manipulation and lies.

“Many people assume that codependency is a strictly passive condition, with the codependent only performing as a servant to the addict. In reality, codependency is a passive-aggressive condition, with the enabler controlling the addict through emotional and physical manipulation.” [3] In short, a codependent wants control over the dependent, control in the form of caring. When the dependent no longer depends, the codependent will find new ways to care in order to remain in control. Such behavior is counterproductive to the dependent, frequently causing the dependent to return to his or her addictions and re-establishing the status quo. This is exemplified when Wilson outright lies to House about the success of the Cortisol in order to ‘humble’ him. When House believes he’s failed his patient, he becomes depressed. It is suspect that the depression affects the condition of his leg.

This is not to say that Wilson tried to humble House with the intent of causing psychosomatic pain. No. Codependents do not realize their behavior for what it is, and often they see their behavior as a purely positive force. The ill that may come from their actions comes from good intent. The desire to be in control and wanted is, for the most part, subconscious.

For this reason, when a codependent realizes that he or she has caused more damage than repair, the codependent responds with extreme guilt. The guilt manifests itself in actions that hope to win-back the favor of the dependent. Such actions usually cause the codependent to harm one’s self for the sake of the dependent, and enable the dependent to feed their addictions.

In each and almost every encounter with Tritter, Wilson stands his ground before House. It can be assumed that Wilson feels he must prove his loyalty to House in order to likewise prove that his lying about the Cortisol was done out of compassion and concern rather than malice (and indeed, it most likely was). In protecting House, however, Wilson enables House to continue his precarious lifestyle. The tension is pushed when House misdiagnoses a young girl and punches Chase for being correct. Wilson, for the first time, protects House in a manner that may, in fact, actually force House to cope with his addiction: he cuts a deal with Tritter. Upon hearing this, House reacts like a true dependent: he feels betrayed- blind to the fact that Wilson has done something that will actually help him. In the face of House’s anger, Wilson takes back his deal. Out of knowing House’s importance in the medical community? Yes. Out of compassion? Yes. Out of friendship? Yes. Out of guilt? Yes.

Upon finding House ODed on the floor of his apartment, both parties in the relationship receive a harsh wake-up call. Both, not just House. Their later actions speak for this.

Currently, their relationship is uncertain. As it stands, Wilson is still coping with the ramifications of his disorder, and it shows. The effects of progressed codependency are not limited to the mind and behavior. The disorder also causes visible physical effects including: chronic depression, weight loss and weight gain, insomnia, anxiety, migraine, chronic stress, erratic sexual behavior, and highs and lows between energy and lethargy.

Fortunately, Wilson appears to be handling House in a better fashion than he has previously. There is still a certain air of distance between the two, and it is likely due to their inability to navigate their respective roles in their friendship post-trauma. They cannot return to the original dynamics of their friendship. Rather, they must both deal with their addictions, and redefine their roles in one another’s lives. They cannot hope to form a healthy friendship, much less a thriving intimacy with one another, otherwise.

For Wilson, it is highly necessary for him to seek psychotherapy and anti-depressant medication. For House, he must seek rehab and other methods to deal with his leg pain. The likelihood for the latter, unfortunately, is very low.

[1] http://www.homesteadschools.com/LCSW/Courses/Codependency/text.htm
[2] http://www.coda.org/patterns.php
[3] http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-codependency.htm




(Post a new comment)


[info]barbaroshima
2007-03-10 11:08 am UTC (link)
Its far too early in the morning to write a good reply for this, but I can give it a shot.

In the list of criteria (and how depressing is it that i match most of those?) #6 in both Compliance and Control strike me a very Wilson. I've never seen Wilson as a 'panty-peeling' serial cheater, but could never really pinpoint how he came across to me. But looking at it under a light of codependency, especially those two traits, it makes sense. The wives, the alluded to girlfriends, Grace. And the escalation is there.

Though I have to ask-- maybe I'm dense or just haven't watched the ep in a while-- what was the wake-up call that Wilson received from House's OD? I do know that ever since his deal with Tritter, he seems to be busting a gut to get back into House's good graces. Well, maybe not good graces, that's not what I want. Status quo, maybe.
That just reminded me of one of Wilson's little speeches. (there are so many of them XD) Would it be a part of the subconscious aspect of codependency that he actually blames House's machinations-- or alludes to, whatever-- for his lack of 'good' relationships. Kind of the logic of 'if its House's fault, then there's nothing wrong with me.' (if that makes sense...i think i'm starting to ramble)

I wonder what would happen if House was to become a sexual outlet for Wilson, along with all their other relations. Would it makes Wilson's codependency worse? Or through some twisted way, better?
Hmm, now one has to wonder if Wilson first became House's friend either because he honestly liked the guy or because it was his codependency popping up. If its the later, then what was House's damage before the infarction? And it would have to have been before, because House doesn't strike me as the type to let relative strangers know him well enough to know, later down the line, that he had changed.

But I agree that they can't go back to the happy times a la season one. Too many things have happened, too many issued dragged out of their dark closets. If TPTB take a road like this for Wilson, there's a chance that they can reach a new understanding with each other. Especially since House seemed, in the last episode, to be looking for a pain management technique that's not Vicodin. (yea, i don't think his brain cancer scam was just to get new drugs to get high on, but his own messed up way of taking other options for the pain) So in the future, there may just be a chance for them to actually have a healthy relationship.

But its five in the morning and that's all the speculation I can come up with. x_x

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]earlwyn
2007-03-10 03:21 pm UTC (link)
Hello there. Just randomly popping in. Some of your questions/comments made me want to spout my own opinion. *g*

I wonder what would happen if House was to become a sexual outlet for Wilson, along with all their other relations. Would it makes Wilson's codependency worse? Or through some twisted way, better?

I think it would largely depend on how/why they entered into a sexual relationship. Working off the belief that Wilson is co-dependent (and how can you argue against an essay like that?), I could see it either being a moderately good thing or a very bad thing.

If House pursued a more physical relationship with Wilson out of love (and I do think House loves him, but as the essay pointed out, House can -- would probably prefer to, it seems -- seperate love from sex; it is possible House would seek or agree to sex with Wilson without associating it with love), it would re-validate Wilson's caring and keep them at a moderate status quo. Wilson would feel loved and accepted, like he did with his wives and girlfriends, and might then return to a less pronounced display of codependency. In other words, it could serve as a stopgap. House, in turn, might act happier, more playful (as he was when Wilson lived with him), and stop relying as much on the drugs. That then would lead to less need on Wilson's part to "manage" House, and the rest of his codependency psychosis could be found in having a loving, physical relationship. They wouldn't stop being dysfunctional, but there is a good chance they could be healthier and happier with each other.

If House slept with Wilson not out of love but something else -- and fanfiction has explored these option to know end but for example -- like anger, lust, control, etc. then I think things might become marginally better for a short time but in the long run fall even more to ruins. Wilson would, most likely, interpret sex as acceptance or love or whatever his disorder compels him to believe and feel happier momentarily. Yet as it becomes clearer and clearer that it was not love, not acceptance, and House continues to decline (and I think he would if he slept with Wilson and regretted it) the codependcy would increase. Wilson would become more manipulative, more miserable, and basically we would see another emotional ride that the Tritter Arc provided.

At least, that's my thoughts on the matter. I'm not a psychologist; I only read the essay. This is completely based upon my personal views and interpretations.

Hmm, now one has to wonder if Wilson first became House's friend either because he honestly liked the guy or because it was his codependency popping up.

I think it had to be because he liked him. Before the infarction and when he was with Stacy, I think House was generally an independent person. There's also signs in the way that they interact when they are being playful with each other -- the banter, the ribbing, etc. -- that suggests they formed a friendship based upon similar senses of humour and quick wit instead of dependent/codependent issues. Again, my take only.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]barbaroshima
2007-03-11 05:40 am UTC (link)
I agree that if the sexual relationship was started based on anything other than love, it would be bad. For all parties.
And yeah, I do think they were friends pre-infarction based on...well, whatever criteria they used to find friends. It just struck me as an interesting little tidbit to think about.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]fox_hunt
2007-03-10 07:39 pm UTC (link)
I'm short on time, so I'll make this quick:

Codependent people usually become codependent because the people they care for are people they've already developed strong feelings or a strong bond with.

Which means that Wilson was friends with House before he started showing tendencies.

I'd go more into detail, but I gotta run!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]idonmatrix
2007-03-11 02:59 am UTC (link)
Please go into more detail when you have a chance. Always love to read analysis of H/W.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]barbaroshima
2007-03-11 05:26 am UTC (link)
Psycho-analysis on the fly! XD

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]oanja
2007-03-10 11:08 am UTC (link)
Very interesting stuff. Thanks for researching that and sharing it. ^_^

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]fox_hunt
2007-03-11 03:17 am UTC (link)
And thank you for reading. =)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]ringhelediel
2007-03-10 12:37 pm UTC (link)
oooo good one. i never knew that this kind of clingy relationship wilson has is actually a disorder.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]fox_hunt
2007-03-10 07:42 pm UTC (link)
Not all clingy relationships are disorders, though. Those are pretty ubiquitous, and we can't define all of them as dependent-codependent relationships. It depends on behavioral patterns.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]antychan
2007-03-10 12:46 pm UTC (link)
Considering RSL has always had an attraction towards playing doormats who try to give their lives meaning by sacrificing themselves for and working themselves up over a powerful figure who pushes them away (Killer, Invention of Love, Fifth of July, and his dream part's the son in The Seagull), Wilson fits the pattern nicely.

RSL's just one of those actors who get off on exploring pain without having to suffer the consequences (he said the Tritter arc was the most fun he's had on the show). I assume the writers picked up on that and started to write Wilson accordingly.

(Reply to this)


[info]elicia8
2007-03-10 01:41 pm UTC (link)
Very interesting and awesome analysis of Wilson's character. You raise some great points, and while I wouldn't say Wilson suffers from Codependent Disorder, I think you're proven that he certainly has tendencies. I would only argue that Wilson seems to lack that edge of anger and resentment (even "mopeyness") that you'd expect in someone with Codependency . Of course keeping in mind that Wilson is fictional, I'd say he simply isn't passive-aggressive enough for this disorder. But still, wow, a great argument and a great read! He's such an interesting, puzzling character on the show--no wonder House likes playing with him. Nice job. :)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]fox_hunt
2007-03-10 07:37 pm UTC (link)
He at least has passive-aggressive sandwich making. LOL, where is that icon? =)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]elicia8
2007-03-10 08:04 pm UTC (link)
*dies laughing*

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]xel1980
2007-03-10 01:48 pm UTC (link)
Wow... thanks for this accurate analyses... *meditates on it*

(Reply to this)


[info]senepa
2007-03-10 01:58 pm UTC (link)
This is amazing! I'd love to post something more intelligent, but all I've got is that this is brilliant.

(Reply to this)


[info]rose000
2007-03-10 03:26 pm UTC (link)
Wow. That explains so much...It's really interesting too.

(Reply to this)


[info]earlwyn
2007-03-10 03:30 pm UTC (link)
Major props to you for researching and writing this. You present it in such a calm, concise style. Very nicely written and great intellectual fodder. This is the kind of character study I like to read.

I find the idea of Wilson as a character who is codependent rather blase. I can see truth in it; it explains his actions well and gives insight into the reasons behind the choices he has made. Yet it isn't a radical theory; there is nothing there to maintain my interest. Wilson as a character who is codependent and in a sexual relationship with his dependent, however -- that intrigues me greatly.

I already (attempted to) briefly shared my thoughts on the subject up thread but I am deliciously desirous to hear others.

What does the introduction of sex alter in an already dysfunctional, dependent-codependent relationship? Would it be good or bad? Could sex be, uh, medicinal in Wilson's case or would it screw things up more? What about House's status as a dependent? What would sex change for him?

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]fox_hunt
2007-03-10 07:19 pm UTC (link)
I tried to avoided discussion regarding the ramifications of a sexual relationship with the dependent because there isn't any canonical evidence for me to write a strong theory. I considered having a section focusing on that in this essay, but decided against it lest I move away from analyzing actual decisions he has made over the course of the series.

If you are interested, I can take the time to write-up a part 2 to this essay that will conjecture what would happen if sex were introduced to a codependent-dependent relationship. I've already read some text on what sex entails in such a relationship, so it would not take me as long to write as this essay. Unfortunately, I am very busy this weekend, so I won't be able to write it for a few days.

Thanks for commenting. To be honest, I'm not fond of the idea that Wilson's behavior is based on a disorder either. I happened to research what codependency is since so many people describe that as House and Wilson's mutual relationship. The more articles I read (more than the articles I've sited in this essay), the more my stomach turned cold. I began getting worried because Wilson simply fit into too many codependent patterns too well. Wilson scored relatively high in several tests, but not nearly high enough to be considered "battered," "abused," or "brainwashed." These people tend to be the wives of alcoholics, and Wilson certainly doesn't fit that image.

The problem with codependency is that it is difficult to score the level of severity. Some codependency is, in fact, normal. It's not the same as other diseases or disorders. It's a learned psychological condition that can present at varying degrees and at any stage of life. WIth that in mind, I do believe that Wilson has this disorder. To what degree is difficult to say, I think he's a 4 out of 7, depending on what scale you use. However, that does not in any way simplify his character. His character does not revolve around the disorder. To believe this would oversimplify the behavior of actual human beings, and that is not possible. The disorder, or at least the tendencies of the disorder, is only one aspect of him. I don't think this makes him boring in any way. It only opens up more questions that need to be answered.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]earlwyn
2007-03-10 11:46 pm UTC (link)
I tried to avoided discussion regarding the ramifications of a sexual relationship with the dependent because there isn't any canonical evidence for me to write a strong theory.

I can see that as a valid reason for not including it in your original essay. It was better to stick with canonical evidence and establish the theory as Wilson being codependent first then to state a conjecture before madly running off into slash psychosis with it.

I would like to read a second, follow-up essay, though, since you raises the possibilty of writing one. I'm curious as to the ramifications of that sex (being a House/Wilson shipper as I am) would being to their relationship. Your essay above gives good insight into Wilson as seen on the show; a second essay could give good insight into Wilson as how he might be represented (accurately) in fanfiction. Those are my primary reasons for wanting a part two. Also, you written this supremely well. It's nice to be able to read intelligent comments on characters. *g*

Wilson's bevarior tied into a disorder irks me simply because -- well. Poor Wilson! my brain cries. It is a completely emotional response in that I don't want Wilson to be "sick". I want him to be healthy and perfect and healthy, etc. etc. Even if he's not "brainwashed" -- and what terrible imagery that is -- it's still disheartening to think he has more problems then originally realized.

However, on an intellectual basis, the idea that his actions and reactions are linked to a disorder is very intriguing. Like you said, it doesn't simplify his character; it doesn't operate as an excuse. Instead it compounds his character, makes him for lifelike, and much more interesting to analyze.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]barbaroshima
2007-03-11 05:46 am UTC (link)
it doesn't simplify his character; it doesn't operate as an excuse. Instead it compounds his character, makes him for lifelike, and much more interesting to analyze.

Agreed.
Plus, just because me may have such-and-such disorder, it doesn't explain or rationalize every single aspect of his character.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]fox_hunt
2007-03-13 03:03 am UTC (link)
Wilson's bevarior tied into a disorder irks me simply because -- well. Poor Wilson! my brain cries. It is a completely emotional response in that I don't want Wilson to be "sick".

It's all out of love! Understandable, since I love WIlson as much as I love House (if not moreso). Knowing that he, assuming that this is true, 'has a disorder,' doesn't actually change him. The only thing that's changed is that we have, in theory, figured out why he behaves as he does. It's a label, not one to be used lightly, but a label nonetheless. Even if he is never diagnosed with the disorder in the canon, he still presents the symptoms of it. If, and again this is assuming he does have disorder, it's brought about in canon, then he will at least try to deal with it. This isn't likely to happen. I don't think the writers view him as someone with a very real problem.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]dragonwrangler
2007-03-11 12:57 am UTC (link)
I would also be interested in reading a follow-up essay to this one. This is a wonderfully thought out piece and I would like to hear your theories regarding what might happen if sex is added into the equation. If nothing else thank you for writing this piece- it certainly something to consider in regards to the complexity of Wilson's personality and his friendship with House.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]idonmatrix
2007-03-11 05:00 pm UTC (link)
B, put me on the list of people who love your well-written analysis and look forward to part 2. There is some Wilson dialogue that I haven't figured out yet. I have a request. Could you touch on Wilson's comment to House in Who's Your Daddy in which he referred to House as "my protector, my champion." How has House protected Wilson or championed him? I don't get it?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]fox_hunt
2007-03-13 02:46 am UTC (link)
I'd have to re-watch Who's Your Daddy again. My guess is that "my protector, my champion" was said with a bit of an ironic tone. That is to say, Wilson is poking fun at the fact House isn't exactly a protector or a champion of him, but he's his best friend anyway. I'll need to review the scene to confirm, though.

I'll work on the 2nd analysis when I'm feeling more inspired. To me, there are too many possibilites about what would happen if sex were introduced to a dependent-codependent relationship, the majority of which have negative repercussions. If we are to assume House is truly a drug addict, and canon presents this as such, then Wilson will never be more than number 3 in House's life. I say 3 because the first person in House's life is House. With addiction, Vicodin is number 2. Without the addiction, Wilson would be number 2.

But I don't want to get into any this without thoroughly making my case, lest I get ambushed by adament H/W fans. =)

Also, as forewarning, I don't really have much to work with in terms of evidence, so whatever I have to say won't have much value. It's all speculation from this point foward. I find working with canon is more fascinating- I have pieces I can make sense out of. Speculation, on the other hand, I'm dealing with invisible fragments in the dark.

I'll give it a shot, although I'm afraid most people will not like what I'm going to say because I'm going to be writing the essay without slash in mind (if that makes sense).

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]housepiglet
2007-03-10 03:34 pm UTC (link)
Very interesting stuff! Many thanks for writing and posting it.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]fox_hunt
2007-03-10 07:36 pm UTC (link)
And thanks for writing "How Steve Found a Friend." I've been contemplating buying a pet rat ever since.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]housepiglet
2007-03-10 07:50 pm UTC (link)
Thank you! :) So have I!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]thewlisian_afer
2007-03-10 05:13 pm UTC (link)
haha. Crap. This is one of those times when I really really wish I didn't identify with Wilson so much. D:

I've put this in my memories because it's fantastic. And so are you. ♥ Every time I think you couldn't possibly get any more awesome, you do. :D

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]fox_hunt
2007-03-10 07:32 pm UTC (link)
You flatter me so. I'm sorry I haven't replied to your comments on my LJ. I will eventually. I've been very busy the past week.

I also noticed you mentioned me in one of your postings (people I'd like to meet meme). I'm excited you'd like to meet me as I'd love to meet you too. =)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]hry2007
2007-03-10 06:27 pm UTC (link)
This is brilliant, in particular explaining his relationships with women. Memmed.

(Reply to this)


[info]purridot
2007-03-10 06:33 pm UTC (link)
What a wonderful read, and beautifully articulated and explored argument -- I felt all tingly reading it, because it seemed so reasonable and it also made Wilson seem so *real*; it explained so much about the short scenes we get to see him in: he may not get as much screentime as the other characters, but his importance in relation to House is huge!

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]fox_hunt
2007-03-11 04:09 am UTC (link)
Thanks for reading.

Wilson has had plenty of screentime in the first half of the 3rd season, but yes, he's lost a lot of scenes post-Tritter. It stands to reason, but I prefer watching Wilson than I do watching the ducklings.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]hopegeeksout
2007-03-10 06:35 pm UTC (link)
I see a lot of Cameron here too, leading me to believe that although as a W/Cam shipper I've identified their similarities, it's wrong to assume they could be together if both are technically codependent.

"He has went through, and rather quickly, three marriages, an unknown number of sexual affairs, and his own cancer patient."

This should read "He has GONE through, and rather quickly..."

Interesting, long analysis. Was this for a class? Also, I think when House analyzes Wilson, a la "All In" and "House vs. God", TPTB are definitely using this personality disorder as basis for House's accusations. But a lot of House's readings of Wilson have shown to be wrong, so I'm not quite sure the character in and of itself is necessarily codependent. But your essay is very good and obviously well-researched. Thank you for posting.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]fox_hunt
2007-03-10 07:29 pm UTC (link)
Actually, it's the similarity you find that proves they can't be a couple. Codependent people strongly dislike other caretakers, especially if they are vying to take care of the same person. Two codpendent people who have a relationship with one dependent leads to rivalry.

I didn't write this for a class, hence the sloppy grammar. I only wrote it for fun, after reading about codependency. Reading random stuff in wikipedia or in news sites is a favorite hobby of mine. So yeah, I didn't bother to proof it. I posted immediately after I finished writing. To be fair, I went back and fixed some structural issues.

As I made a reply in another comment: people have a tendency to oversimplify a character after he or she has been diagnosed with a disorder. This frustrates me to no end because people with disorders are MORE complex than relatively normal people. People who have a disorder cannot be identified by their disorder alone. That is not only narrowminded, it is callous. I believe the same holds true for Wilson. Simply because he may have a degree of codependency does not mean his character revolves around that dependency. That's far, far too simplistic for my tastes, but to dismiss Wilson having any of the symptoms is erronous and equally careless as well.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]fuzzygherkin
2007-03-11 02:51 am UTC (link)
My only thing is that, because you've justified your identification of Wilson as a codependent so well (though until I started reading comments about his manipulations I would have thought he fit way more of the Compliance criteria than the control ones) it kind of makes me feel that instead of creating an original and complex character via their own careful construction of his backstory, the writers have looked up the definition of a codependent and based Wilson's motives and actions around just that. I'm not saying that can't be complex and original, I just sort of feel that it takes away a little from the regard I held the writers in, sort of like they just followed a textbook example of a character instead of coming up with this beautifully twisted character on their own. But really that's kudos to your wonderfully laid-out argument.

To be honest I don't hold the writers in very high regard anyway, what with all the timeline screwups etc. But the mystery of Wilson's character is now lessened for me, and that was the only reason I watched the show. I'm not saying the disorder has to be all there is to Wilson's character, but it is now up to the writers to prove this.

This is my screwed-up and unclear way of saying I was pleasantly surprised by this well-researched essay, I just wish Wilson didn't fit it so neatly.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]fox_hunt
2007-03-11 03:26 am UTC (link)
" ...kind of makes me feel that instead of creating an original and complex character via their own careful construction of his backstory, the writers have looked up the definition of a codependent and based Wilson's motives and actions around just that."

To be honest, I don't think that's what the writers did to Wilson's character (as a writer, that's simply a bad way to create a fictious person). I also say this because Wilson, as well as the other characters, can be inconsistent in behavior from season to season. Overall, he fits the criteria pretty well, although I doubt the writers intentionally forced his character to match the symptoms of a codependent. Rather, I think Wilson's nature and his relationship with House makes him predisposed to be codependent, much like people from real life.

Real people can fit into the symptoms of any disorder or disease very well- almost perfectly. That's how House makes his diagnosis from episode to episode.

Also, I wouldn't be concerned about losing the mystery. If anything, there is a bigger mystery: what exactly happened in Wilson's past that made him develop codependency? I offer one possibility, the brother, but that doesn't mean that's the answer. Moreover, because codependency is a learned psychological disease, that means there should have been more than one incident that led him to be a compulsive caretaker. We still don't know what those incidents were.

Besides, the writers can throw another wrench into the works in the next episode and completely destroy the argument of this essay. It would ruin the believablity of Wilson's character, though

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]fox_hunt
2007-03-11 03:05 am UTC (link)
I just recently re-read the third paragraph of my reply to you. I'd like to make a apologize if I sounded to harsh, and that my ending rant wasn't directed at you, but rather people who judge others by their disorders, weaknesses, illnesses, etc., before considering all the other aspects of an individual.

So yes, sorry if I hurt your feelings. I didn't intend to. I easily get upset when people oversimplify other people.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]hopegeeksout
2007-03-11 04:38 am UTC (link)
Actually, it's the similarity you find that proves they can't be a couple.
That's exactly what I said I realized: "I see a lot of Cameron here too, leading me to believe that although as a W/Cam shipper I've identified their similarities, it's wrong to assume they could be together if both are technically codependent."

I was acknowledging how the idea of them both being codependent wrecked my shippage of that pairing. Sorry if I wasn't articulate.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]fox_hunt
2007-03-11 04:57 am UTC (link)
Damn it, my fault again. I re-read your post and saw what I missed. So sorry. I first read your message when I just woke-up and wasn't all there. I should reply only when I'm actually alert, lest I make more stupid mistakes. @_@

Totally my fault, not yours.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]hopegeeksout
2007-03-11 05:34 am UTC (link)
Oh, no worries. I just wanted to make sure you didn't think of me as a delusional shipper. I mean, I am, but not when it comes to Wilson/Cameron. :)
Thanks for writing this essay!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]hellspoette
2007-03-11 07:01 pm UTC (link)
Although, all that being said, I kind of love the idea of playing around with Wilson-Cameron dynamics. Not necessarily in a romantic sense (note the absence of a slash), but in a explosive, Through-the-Looking-Glass sort of way. It seems to me that the writers have already started to toy with making them rivals; their scenes together are tense & uncomfortable. Cameron's behavior toward Wilson during the Tritter arc was especially eyebrow-raising. If you recall in season one, when Wilson confronted Cameron about becoming too close to that terminal cancer patient, it was made apparent that he probably understands her motivations a little too well. Mingling in both their personalities are traces of codependent behavior, abandonment, and commitment issues (recall Foreman's speech to Cameron regarding commitment?). I like the idea of Wilson & Cameron butting heads because it forces to the surface the very issues we're discussing here, and more specifically, how those issues now relate to their relationships with House. Because I'm a H/W 'shipper through & through, I think these things need to be addressed (eventually) if their relationship is ever going to grow & become healthier (and I DO think that's possible). I think that kind of progression could also help Cameron grow, & help her avoid a lot of the pitfalls Wilson has stumbled into. I think House & Wilson are linked irrevocably, and Cameron's place in the dynamic is far more in the position of a student, with House as a mentor/father figure. I think the same for Chase, which makes the Chase/Cameron hookup yet more interesting. BUT I DIGRESS.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]hopegeeksout
2007-03-11 11:15 pm UTC (link)
Very interesting. I like all exploration of the Wilson-Cameron dynamic, but I just feel like TPTB neglect it far too often and have their interactions alluded to as in they talk off-screen. So I like the (albeit microscopic) sub-fandom of "House" that actually explores Wilson and Cameron AND specifically their relationships/UST with House through shipping them as Wilson/Cameron. You should read one; a lot of the writers who ship W/Cam are also die-hard H/W shippers (like me) and a good number of the fics are amazingly well-written and IC.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]hellspoette
2007-03-12 02:40 am UTC (link)
I actually did read one fic of that nature by [info]karaokegal which I enjoyed. I almost didn't read it because the IDEA of Wilson & Cameron schtupping turned my stomach, but I admittedly enjoyed the fic quite a lot. I don't think J-Mor & RSL have much on-screen chemistry, but when they start getting pissy with each other, something begins sparking. I'm not sure if it's necessarily sexual chemistry; it's definitely a feeling of rivalry, & most on-screen rivalries do generate some sort of sexual chemistry, even if it's incidental. I wouldn't be opposed to the characters having a hateful one-off fling (which is what the karaokegal fic explores), if only because it would draw all their feelings about House to the surface.

...but I just feel like TPTB neglect it far too often and have their interactions alluded to as in they talk off-screen.

This is true, but it seems like they're exploring it a BIT more now than they used to. I don't expect to see anything actually happen with the two of them, but the occasional scrap of subtext just adds fuel to the overall... subtextual dynamic. I feel like I'm repeating key phrases an awful lot here.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]spamala97
2007-03-10 06:36 pm UTC (link)
Hmmm... interesting, very interesting. And very well-written, I might add.

The "symptoms" Wilson has are overwhelming.

I'm almost wondering if the writers are aware that they've made House and Wilson a dependant/codependant pair like that?

*muses*

Again, this is fascinating. Thank you for sharing.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]fox_hunt
2007-03-11 03:02 am UTC (link)
Thanks for reading and commenting!

I think they might have done some research themselves. In House vs God, House says, "you eat up neediness" or something to that effect. In article #3, the wording of what a codependent is is almost identical, "codepedents eat-up neediness."

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]no_eden
2007-03-11 01:33 am UTC (link)
Wow. I have nothing intellectual to add, but I think you deserve some kind of award for writing all this up.

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…