Bert Berlin ([info]bertberlin) wrote in [info]foto_decadent,
@ 2008-11-15 15:57:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Dogging


Editorial: Dogging
Magazine: V
Issue: November/December 2008
Models: Daul Kim, Anna Selezenva, Anna Maria Jagodzinska, Iris Strubegger, Natalia Chebanenko, Alban Blondiaux, Callum Turner, Daran Bunch, Jeremy Simpson, Rory Greer, Stephen Mabry, Tyler Riggs
Photographer: Steven Meisel













































Page 1 of 5
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]hypothesi
2008-11-15 04:40 pm UTC (link)
I'm not a fan of these at all. They're quite vulgar and totally unnecessary.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]patback409
2008-11-15 04:54 pm UTC (link)
Agreed.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]staggers, 2008-11-15 05:00 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]richey, 2008-11-15 11:20 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]staggers, 2008-11-16 05:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jordan_the_kid, 2008-11-15 05:06 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]silly_izzy_me, 2008-11-15 07:15 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]diamondolly, 2008-11-15 07:02 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aryaluna, 2008-11-15 09:14 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]x_pamelalala, 2008-11-16 12:44 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bacchante, 2008-11-16 01:34 pm UTC

[info]sashaismymuse
2008-11-15 04:44 pm UTC (link)
SO HOT!!!!!

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]anoushkakookoo
2008-12-14 10:34 am UTC (link)
Seriously?

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]someones_voice
2008-11-15 04:45 pm UTC (link)
omg what da fuck

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]londoncrown
2008-11-15 04:55 pm UTC (link)

seriously. the filters/colour effects are fucking ugly in this one

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]thought4food, 2008-11-17 05:27 pm UTC

[info]annasaurusss
2008-11-15 04:48 pm UTC (link)
Jeez, I had to take a cold shower after these. They're hot.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]nuits_froides
2008-11-15 07:16 pm UTC (link)
iawtc

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]miss_tami_lee, 2008-11-15 11:57 pm UTC

[info]jonathanchrist
2008-11-15 04:54 pm UTC (link)
Wonderful!

(Reply to this)


[info]synthetikbeauty
2008-11-15 04:54 pm UTC (link)
i'm not sure how i feel about these...
some of them look a bit like a rape scene which i'm not cool with
others make the model look like a whore, i'm also not cool with

some of the shoes are fantastic though

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]whistlingcheese
2008-11-17 12:43 am UTC (link)
I agree. Although I feel a bit mixed because there are some things I do like but the above mentioned and the cheesy effects makes me not like them at the same time.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]idance2anything, 2008-11-18 03:38 am UTC

[info]emmlaar
2008-11-15 04:57 pm UTC (link)
Delightfully slutty. And I mean this in a good way.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]idance2anything
2008-11-18 03:38 am UTC (link)
;-)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]daddybuymeapony
2008-11-15 05:03 pm UTC (link)
Whatever they were going for, they missed. If you're going for vulgar, do it with conviction. The models look bored and uncomfortable and some shots look too much like a rape. I don't like this.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]intertribal
2008-11-15 07:08 pm UTC (link)
I agree.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]mamaad, 2008-11-16 02:24 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]bacchante, 2008-11-16 01:42 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]idance2anything, 2008-11-18 03:39 am UTC

[info]ology
2008-11-15 05:10 pm UTC (link)
The first idea that these brought to mind was candid photos taken at some gang bang scene kid party that were then posted on MySpace and by the following Monday the entire high school knows what went down. Haha.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]no_cleopatra
2008-11-16 04:59 am UTC (link)
I second that haha.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]mondayhero
2008-11-15 05:22 pm UTC (link)
...

(Reply to this)


[info]exliontamer
2008-11-15 05:26 pm UTC (link)
This is just really bad taste and not in a good, perverse, kitsch way.

(Reply to this)


[info]foxyscience
2008-11-15 05:30 pm UTC (link)
They have a "gang rape in the woods" feel about them that I don't really like, and the colors/filter are super ugly.

Don't get me wrong, I'm all for vulgarity and nudity in editorials, but I prefer it done in a different way.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]warpedblonde
2008-11-16 11:37 pm UTC (link)
yeah like it looks like it's suppose to be like group sex or something but it's done really badly.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]idance2anything, 2008-11-18 03:40 am UTC

[info]kyserin_ko
2008-11-15 05:31 pm UTC (link)
These fail at being sexy. They look awkward.

(Reply to this)


[info]emiru89
2008-11-15 05:53 pm UTC (link)
it looks weird. i've seen more tasteful nudity, sensual shots. =/

(Reply to this)


[info]dali_drama
2008-11-15 05:59 pm UTC (link)
the technique used for these is beautiful, dreamy even. infrared? cross-processed infrared? night vision photography? i want to try it.

the subject matter? ugh, vile. the title should be, "hooray for roofies!"

i'm disgusted.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]sarshin
2008-11-15 06:39 pm UTC (link)
Agreed so very much. I love the colors, but hate the content.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]suzisu
2008-11-15 06:23 pm UTC (link)


I heard this was a Steven Meisel story and it was rejected by Vogue Italia???



(Reply to this)


[info]mickeyvillian
2008-11-15 06:32 pm UTC (link)
Pretty sure these are inspired by Kohei Yoshiyuki and his series of infrareds of public sex in parks at night:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/arts/gallery/2007/oct/18/art.photography?picture=331008260

They should have gone with the infrared look which is way better than this 'color filter/infrared/whateverthefuck' look

Besides that these aren't even good pictures in the first place

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]chokemenow
2008-11-15 06:53 pm UTC (link)
i was just about to say that. ha

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]gothicimage, 2008-11-15 09:17 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]geosh, 2008-11-15 09:53 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]ook, 2008-11-15 10:22 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]aquarian_days, 2008-11-16 03:06 am UTC

[info]suzisu
2008-11-15 06:35 pm UTC (link)
Yes apparently it's steven meisel

It's everywhere on the net that it is anyway...

Here's one link of many:

http://nymag.com/daily/fashion/2008/11/v_editorial.html

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]bertberlin
2008-11-15 06:47 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, I forgot to change the photographer's name from the last post I posted.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]kafija
2008-11-15 06:56 pm UTC (link)
wtf?

(Reply to this)


[info]tamburlaine
2008-11-15 06:57 pm UTC (link)
I really, really, really don't like these. They freak me out.

(Reply to this)


[info]lepetitchatmort
2008-11-15 07:08 pm UTC (link)
What is this? Rape?

(Reply to this)


[info]jenhz0
2008-11-15 07:09 pm UTC (link)
whoa... "DOGGING"? now i completely understand the title... dogging? seriously?

these r very sexual...

(Reply to this)


[info]owl_patronus
2008-11-15 07:12 pm UTC (link)
what a slutty photoshoot

(Reply to this)


[info]silly_izzy_me
2008-11-15 07:14 pm UTC (link)
Not sexy. It looks like some sick advertisements for roofies or something. Like, it just looks like the guys picked up already wasted girls and fucked them up more and took pictures.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]alibobali33
2008-11-16 10:46 pm UTC (link)
Thanks, exactly what I thought. Not cool. Just retarded.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]slow_speeding
2008-11-15 07:31 pm UTC (link)
I dont know but I'm not really thrilled about these, they're kinda cool to look at though.

(Reply to this)


Page 1 of 5
<<[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] >>

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…