beregite_lift ([info]beregite_lift) wrote in [info]foto_decadent,
@ 2008-04-25 22:01:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Nudes by Peter Lindbergh
Magazine: Vogue Italy April 1998
Editorial: Nudes
Photographer: Peter Lindbergh
Model: Milla Jovovich


















































Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]spy_a_rainbow
2008-04-25 06:07 pm UTC (link)
oh my!

(Reply to this)


[info]hxcfairy
2008-04-25 06:11 pm UTC (link)
Love this woman♥

(Reply to this)


[info]hudzyk
2008-04-25 06:15 pm UTC (link)
what happened to Jovovic? she looks hideous

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]my_ivory_tower
2008-04-25 06:17 pm UTC (link)
Ha. I was kinda thinking the same thing. It was ten years ago, which explains it.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)
(no subject) - [info]hudzyk, 2008-04-26 01:02 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]tresorart, 2008-04-27 04:12 am UTC

[info]dealatedwren
2008-04-25 06:15 pm UTC (link)
I think Milla is gorgeous, but I don't really find women that skinny appealing when they are nude. not enough curves!
plus she has those crazy eraser nipples and they kind of weird me out a little

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]rushofblood94
2008-04-25 07:48 pm UTC (link)
i agree with all your points.

(Reply to this) (Parent)
(no subject) - [info]seasontoseason, 2008-04-25 09:17 pm UTC

(Deleted post)
(no subject) - [info]198735168461328, 2008-04-25 09:30 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]slave1, 2008-04-26 05:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]genissimo, 2008-04-26 01:43 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]slave1, 2008-04-26 05:46 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dealatedwren, 2008-04-27 12:51 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]civilian_jobs, 2008-04-28 01:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]dealatedwren, 2008-04-28 01:27 am UTC

[info]mo0neh
2008-04-25 06:25 pm UTC (link)
Hmmm I like it! A real characteristic (though skinny) body, beautiful woman.

(Reply to this)


[info]fleacircus
2008-04-25 06:26 pm UTC (link)
I love that she's still wearing shoes.

(Reply to this)


[info]bellahdance
2008-04-25 06:35 pm UTC (link)
Amanda Palmery.

I love it.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]glowering
2008-04-25 06:55 pm UTC (link)
That's what I thought.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

[info]nativeseas
2008-04-25 06:41 pm UTC (link)
Beautiful, unique. So much character, in face and body.
Love this woman.

(Reply to this)


[info]stmarc
2008-04-25 06:41 pm UTC (link)
The weird part about the Milla-ster is that in a movie or on television or any time she's moving around, she's the sexiest thing on two feet.

Take static images of her and she becomes this bizarre-looking thing. I won't say she's *ugly,* as that's a subjective judgment, but at least to me, her moving around just does not look anything like her sitting still.

M

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]dealatedwren
2008-04-25 07:09 pm UTC (link)
agreed

(Reply to this) (Parent)
(no subject) - [info]oriscus, 2008-04-26 02:29 am UTC

[info]glassblowfaerie
2008-04-25 06:42 pm UTC (link)
I would have preferred a more curvaceous body, but she has a beautiful intensity about her.

(Reply to this)


[info]slave1
2008-04-25 06:54 pm UTC (link)
Alot of people say I look like her which I take as a compliment.
I do much prefer her now, at a normal weight. She is just scary skinny in those pics above... but beautiful face. :)

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]chaospider
2008-04-26 12:02 am UTC (link)
i get told i look like her too... it's definatly a compliment!

(Reply to this) (Parent)

[info]thedandiest
2008-04-25 07:07 pm UTC (link)
Cmon! Thin girls are hotness. If I want to see 'curves', I can go hang out in a Walmart parking lot.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]noobwar
2008-04-25 07:27 pm UTC (link)
o.O................

(Reply to this) (Parent)
(no subject) - [info]iheartthepixies, 2008-04-25 07:35 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]skullptures, 2008-04-25 08:45 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]simplylovely1, 2008-04-28 02:00 pm UTC
LOL...it depends on what - [info]joanshearer, 2008-04-25 09:40 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]affair, 2008-04-25 09:49 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]schizophrenique, 2008-04-26 03:21 am UTC

[info]maytel
2008-04-25 07:23 pm UTC (link)
Wow. I normally adore anything that Mila does, but this is repugnant.
She looks like she's about to die or something. Very unflattering.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]vierasesine
2008-04-27 10:32 am UTC (link)
Seriously. It takes a lot of hard work to make someone so beautiful look like that.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

[info]delgaserasca
2008-04-25 07:29 pm UTC (link)
I've always loved the intensity of this shoot.

(Reply to this)


[info]noobwar
2008-04-25 07:31 pm UTC (link)
Those eyebrows frighten me.

None the less, she still remains exquisitely beautiful.

(Reply to this)


[info]darkofamatinee
2008-04-25 07:43 pm UTC (link)
the third picture up freaks me out for some reason, it's just such a awkward position and her nails look hella sharp.

(Reply to this)


[info]dumortierite
2008-04-25 07:50 pm UTC (link)
God, she looks about to die of starvation, ugh.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]falterdecadence
2008-04-26 07:03 am UTC (link)
really? i do not see that at all. to me it just seems like she's got no boobs and has prominent bones on her back. i have those too and i'm far from anorexic, i just don't carry weight there

(Reply to this) (Parent)

[info]_stethoscope
2008-04-25 07:53 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, I don't want to see that thing naked..

(Reply to this)


[info]tsuribashi
2008-04-25 07:55 pm UTC (link)
oooh she's so pretty
thanks for sharing!!

(Reply to this)


[info]darlin_sane
2008-04-25 08:48 pm UTC (link)
Wow, Milla is looking really, really rough in this shoot. :/

(Reply to this)

Lighting?
[info]paisleycat
2008-04-25 08:54 pm UTC (link)
Something about the lighting in this shoot really coordinates with the clothes, hair, and makeup to give it a very vintage look. Can anyone here speculate or tell me about how this shot looks like it was lit?

As for the model, I enjoy the drama of the poses, and she uses her body well for these dramatic angles. I cannot decide if she looks threatening or vulnerable in most of these shots.

(Reply to this) (Thread)
Re: Lighting?
[info]rock_pixie
2008-04-25 09:34 pm UTC (link)
my guess, as far as lighting, is that they used one main light from above, slightly from the front, and angled slightly to the right (judging by the shadows), and then used a really big/close bounce card or panel to fill in the shadows a little.

this gives is a vintagey look for a few reasons..
1) it's really simple and cheap, which is how they did things back then (not anymore, for the most part)
2) it has more dark grey tones, without a huge amount of contrast (highlights are not especially bright), which is an aesthetic choice that doesn't seem very fashionable these days

also it looks like it was shot on black &white film, which in my experience tends to capture way more midtone &greys than digital, or colour film images converted to black &white.

hope this helps.

PLUS I totally agree with your comment about threatening vs. vulnerable. I think that's why it's strong.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

[info]zhabba
2008-04-25 09:16 pm UTC (link)
богиня

(Reply to this)


[info]198735168461328
2008-04-25 09:34 pm UTC (link)
This shoot was hit or miss. It got a lot better new the end once she starts taking off the dress.
These two work the best for me.
http://i035.radikal.ru/0804/64/c0811d7e2b21.jpg
http://i035.radikal.ru/0804/cb/364ae4a37735.jpg

(Reply to this)


[info]jann_ness
2008-04-25 09:41 pm UTC (link)
this shoot is ten years old and she looks at least ten years older than what she looks nowadays ....

(Reply to this)

Too butch for this
[info]joanshearer
2008-04-25 09:43 pm UTC (link)
I've never liked her very much anyway, but there's something to masculine about her for the feel of this shoot. It reminds me of the "progression shots" of Eadweard Muybridge...I don't know if that's what he was going for, but it's there.

(Reply to this)

Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…