foto_decadent: Few аdditionаl photo

styliste (

styliste) wrote in

foto_decadent,
@ 2008-02-06 17:00:00

Few аdditionаl photo
Vogue Italia February 2008 :
Agnete Hegelund & Kamila Filipcikova
by Steven Meisel

scаnned by TFS

(Post a new comment)

	comhnall 2008-02-06 05:57 pm UTC (link)
	cute idea but i dont like the pics for some reason. (Reply to this) (Thread)

	reanimato 2008-02-07 01:45 pm UTC (link)
	exactly (Reply to this) (Parent)

	sutlers 2008-02-06 06:03 pm UTC (link)
	So I suppose frumpy is the new chic? (Reply to this) (Thread)

	isa6ella 2008-02-06 06:51 pm UTC (link)
	avant-garde frumpy... (Reply to this) (Parent)

	spc_alchi 2008-02-06 06:14 pm UTC (link)
	http://photos.streamphoto.ru/0/f/5/90b8d44b9ea81a510db21f982cc6a5f0.jpg What is going on with her hair? I believe it is Agnete that I am looking at. (Reply to this) (Thread)

	satansmuse 2008-02-06 07:13 pm UTC (link)
	maybe they did a fishtail braid on her?? (Reply to this) (Parent)

	stkoho 2008-02-07 02:49 am UTC (link)
	secretly an alien? just throwing the idea out there... (Reply to this) (Parent)

	teh_no 2008-02-06 06:21 pm UTC (link)
	Ah yes, some unscupulous fashion designer ripping off the popularity of Little House on the Prairie. Is nothing sacred? (Reply to this)

	karenleigh 2008-02-06 06:24 pm UTC (link)
	blah. (Reply to this)

	cigarettes214 2008-02-06 06:25 pm UTC (link)
	amish chic (Reply to this) (Thread)

	otherjoseph 2008-02-06 06:39 pm UTC (link)
	word. and those two things feel like polar opposites, even (Reply to this) (Parent)

	telegram_ 2008-02-06 06:56 pm UTC (link)
	yawn. they could have done so much more with this. (Reply to this)

	malfeasanceses 2008-02-06 07:05 pm UTC (link)
	There are so many more interesting physical things to do on a farm besides standing around holding things. (Reply to this) (Thread)

	stkoho 2008-02-07 02:51 am UTC (link)
	that was my first thought! milking cows, stacking hay, tilling [?] the land...it seemed a half arsed attempt because of that (Reply to this) (Parent)

	itami_kitsune 2008-02-06 07:23 pm UTC (link)
	I only like the forth picture. (Reply to this)

	spreadonlylove 2008-02-06 07:28 pm UTC (link)
	Love the idea, but the photos are dull and un-inspired, in my opinion. (Reply to this)

	ar_feiniel_ 2008-02-06 07:38 pm UTC (link)
	The model is very stiff. The last picture is nice though. (Reply to this)

	dontbealulu 2008-02-06 08:05 pm UTC (link)
	I wish they did something more inspiring in with the styling since it is a fashion magazine. (Reply to this)

	cutebunnygirl 2008-02-06 08:14 pm UTC (link)
	Im feeling this is really costumey and not in a good way .. more in a butterick pattern for halloween way . That said i love the concept , but like others have said there is so much more that could have been done ..... i am loving the bonnets . (Reply to this)

	herringbonekid 2008-02-06 08:54 pm UTC (link)
	i still can't work out what Steven Meisel's 'style' is. (Reply to this)

	regulationfree 2008-02-06 08:59 pm UTC (link)
	m night shyamalan's THE VILLAGE meet's Vogue (Reply to this)

	arleena753 2008-02-06 09:48 pm UTC (link)
	The concept and scenery I think are lovely. But the models are so cold and stiff. Their almost scowling. I do like the last picture however. Also, the model behind the window in the 3rd picture almost looks bald. It's kinda weird. (Reply to this)

	biv_lives 2008-02-06 10:21 pm UTC (link)
	I wish they would have gone further with it.. (Reply to this)

	caitlen 2008-02-07 12:23 am UTC (link)
	IS it just me, or are we now having a resurgence of 1950's clothing? (Reply to this)

	rock_pixie 2008-02-07 12:37 am UTC (link)
	the only thing I like is the typography. (Reply to this)

	stkoho 2008-02-07 02:53 am UTC (link)
	the cover says a fresh look at spring but nothing about that is fresh...not even slightly it all dusty and moth riden! (Reply to this)

	punchinello 2008-02-07 04:41 am UTC (link)
	heh. ya, the cover's pretty good. (and it's all downhill from there) (Reply to this)

	rubio_verde 2008-02-07 10:43 am UTC (link)
	something is weird about the pictures. the models are hella good though. (Reply to this)

	rushofblood94 2008-02-07 08:27 pm UTC (link)
	I don't think these photos deserve to be called "a fresh look at spring" as I see this as fairly drab and amishy. (Reply to this)

	breakfingers 2008-02-07 09:26 pm UTC (link)
	i think if they hadn't made the models look so severe and dramatic the effect would have been better... they just look like depressed housewives without electricity. i just think it was one of those that had potential to be fun and cutesy, and they just weighed it all down. (Reply to this)

	yishui 2008-02-07 11:46 pm UTC (link)
	i like this. (Reply to this)

	_signal 2008-02-08 02:43 am UTC (link)
	one thing i don't understand [amoung all other previous statements made by my fellow commenters], is why you would make almost 50% of the spread in b&w when it is supposed to represent the freshness of spring?! spring is full of COLOUR, vibrant, pastel wonderfulness! come onnnn! (Reply to this)

	waterhousesmuse 2008-02-08 04:43 am UTC (link)
	The amish would be pleased to know that they're "so right now". :) (Reply to this)

	soralunii 2008-02-08 03:01 pm UTC (link)
	the b&w ones do not work. (Reply to this)

	lorettabird 2008-02-11 01:03 pm UTC (link)
	I love their dresses. (Reply to this)

	pressnine 2008-02-17 01:40 am UTC (link)
	Some of these models are still too striking to make the theme work. (Reply to this)

	kevonmartini10 2008-06-05 02:00 am UTC (link)
	They are much too plain, this does not look like a fashion editorial at all. (Reply to this)

Username:		Create an Account Forgot your login or password? Login w/ OpenID
Password:
	Remember Me
	English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…