![[info]](http://p-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif){kind=small}
Am I missing something?
Okay, the NIE report is out. The intelligence communities OFFICIAL line is that Iran is NOT pursuing a nuclear weapons program. Now everyone has latched onto this as vindication that Bush is full of crap about the need to attack Iran.
Now... I don't like Bush. I think he's full of crap and I don't need the NIE report to prove it. My problem is that the NIE report on Iraq before the war said that Hussein did have weapons of mass destruction and he WAS in bed with terrorists, both of which turned out to be false. My problem is that we're using an agency who's credibility is currently suspect to attack someone who's credibility is already destroyed. Does anyone else see the danger here?
thoughtfulNow... I don't like Bush. I think he's full of crap and I don't need the NIE report to prove it. My problem is that the NIE report on Iraq before the war said that Hussein did have weapons of mass destruction and he WAS in bed with terrorists, both of which turned out to be false. My problem is that we're using an agency who's credibility is currently suspect to attack someone who's credibility is already destroyed. Does anyone else see the danger here?
