Leah ([info]misswong) wrote in [info]feminist,
@ 2006-12-31 13:26:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
ArandanaD on "How to Stop Being an Ignorant/Indifferent White Feminist
Link Here

There is so much to love about this blog post but if I had to choose one thing it would her incredible compassion and genuine desire to help white feminists and her absolute right-on clarity (including naming-names of prominent feminst blogs) about what is racist behavior and how to change it.


Why'd I start this blog?

Actually, I had no intention of starting one because I'm not the best writer, and I read far too many blogs/articles per day to even try to summarize what I want to say. But at a certain point, I realized when I wrote comments on other people's blogs I was either a)muted b)'attacked'/'insulted' by librul white bois c)generally ignored. So, basically I started this blog for some space to call my own as a WOC.

Anyways, despite being 'political' there are indeed some topics I tend to shy away from (again because I don't think I am the best writer and we all tend to believe - 'someone else is already doing it, do I really need to?'). One of these topics I shy away from is the inability of white feminists to understand their own ignorance and perpetuation of 'racism'. Oh shite, shoot me cause I know y'all are thinking "bloody hell, there goes another one of those coloured gals playing the race card". Whine, whine, whine - is this all these coloured gals do?

It's really quite funny because if it wasn't for the internet I would not have any 'white' (white as 'dominant' not ethnic/religious minority) feminist friends. I do indeed surround myself with people of colour (both progressive and non-progressive). Having said that, I'm not a stranger to internet feminist communities and like many of you, I started out by participating at the Ms. Boards eons ago. At that time however, I was not 'officially' a feminist. I was a learner/lurker.

Over the years, one thing has been made clearer to me than ever - it's that the internet is a white space. Yeah, we can harp about how it's egalitarian - promises to be so etc... But anyone who has a site-meter should/can easily figure out which countries their traffic is coming from. Whatever happened to the golden promises of bridging the 'digital divide'... like everything else that's about inequitable distribution it's been thrown on the back-burner.

I digress, if the majority of bloggers are white and male, and the majority of feminist bloggers are white and middle-class it is no wonder that 'we' (WOC) are often discontent with the content of blogistan. Because I am not a separatist by any account and don't want to start a 'fight' (though there shouldn't be any for anything that I'm saying) I am trying to approach this matter as calmly and rationally as I can.

The following are just my suggestions about how you can stop being an ignorant/indifferent white feminist:

1) Stop quoting mainstream white conservative/liberal media for your 'token' race relations post. BUT if you do - try to look at that article from a 'third world perspective'/'Global South' perspective.

No, I'm fucking serious. You're all very quick to dissect mainstream news when they report/misreport some event that happens to any white woman. You instantly call bias when you see it. You're the first to point out "they're insulting said woman because they said this or that" (and I fully support you when you do this). But, don't you think that the same 'biased' lens is used to report on things that happen to the 'poor, oppressed, 'retarded', incapable, hopeless, voiceless' women of colour masses that comprise the majority of the world? You know it was this same 'save the women of Afghanistan' bullshit that was used by the US govt to invade Afghanistan, right? Women's rights didn't matter until GW wanted to invade a country, despite Afghan women who repeatedly called out for help under the Taliban often risking their lives to call out to the outside world.

So this should make you wonder how WOC are used in the mainstream media. Here's a clue, they're primarily used to perpetuate the idea that all MOC are evil-coloured-patriarchs and they're cultures are backwards and stupid. This is called "R-A-C-I-S-M".

I am not saying that you point out the WOC oppression globally in order to perpetuate myths about them, but rather NONE of this 'documentation work' that you do is supported by adequate WOC analysis or references. I.e you post about it - without any contextualization. You rarely do that for ANY articles written about white women. You scoff and laugh at how they are written in favour of patriarchy.

It's easy to point out patriarchy exists everywhere, it's harder to get a clue on how mainstream media rarely points out stories of the strong women of colour that do amazing work ALL OVER THE WORLD. With all these pathetic coloured women that exist globally - you'd wonder how a diasporic south asian woman ever got 'radicalized'... huh?

Indeed, a very nice prof of mine did ask me this very patronizing question once "How'd you ever become a south Asian [emphasis hers] radical feminist?", to which I responded "the same way you became a white one".

So when you post up an article about how the oppressed, miserable coloured women of the world who are dying under evil-coloured-people's patriarchy - try in some form or shape to account for media bias.

2) Read more WOC books. As a WOC I've been indoctrinated into the same white patriarchal BS that all of you have too, and like you it was not by 'choice'. Like you, I too have to do my homework. I've read all the cornerstone feminist books that you have (more or less) - but how many WOC perspectives do you seriously read? Do you own more than 5 WOC books? Do you own at least 2-3 post-colonial feminist readers/compilations? Do you own any third world books written by WOC?

Even if you do, do you feel you thoroughly understand everything that is being said in those books?

Any feminist theory 101 class has that nice little 'minorities' section tacked on at the end, but seriously - do you think your education on WOC extends only thus far? Because if it does, well then - I too should stop reading all the new material that keeps on being added to this body of work daily. "Hey, we read bell hooks' "Ain't I a Woman" back in 1981, that's all the education we need to know. We're down with the you need your own space bit. We also clap when you make some noise too, we're not the R-word."

Like my own process of ridding myself of my own prejudices will NEVER come to a halt, neither does yours. You too must continually 'get with the program' and 'upgrade' your views. As we know feminism is not isolated from the other political/economic/social pogroms that happen in our world.

3) Stop reacting to our requests with knee-jerkedness. We're not attacking you, we're saying this cause we consider you our allies and if you really support women or claim to be a 'feminist' i.e. one who fights for 'women's rights' then you better realize "I am a woman too" or maybe you need to read "Ain't I a Woman" a few hundred times again.

Such knee-jerkedness is similar to the way privileged white men respond to your accusations of sexism. Accusations that we as women also support.

The funny thing is, y'all probably feel you need to walk on eggshells before you address anything cultural/racial... funny thing is as you will see further in this post how much I have had to hold in over the past few months when I visit your blogs.

4) Don't use us as tokens. This rarely happens in blogistan, but it does happen more often than not in the 'real world'. Many of you feminist bloggers are quick to point out that 'your blogs are not educational resources for men', instead men should take it upon themselves to educate themselves about their own privilege. Likewise, you as white women need to do the same. We are not your token pieces. We are not 'obligated' to 'educate' you about race relations or anything else for that matter.

Like you, on some days I want to just 'shoot the shit'. I do not want to post about feminism/racism/whatever else. I too just want to put up a youtube video and bop my head up and down...

5) This should be fucking self-explanatory: Stop tolerating racist shit on your blogs. And by racist, I'm not only talking about 'overt' racism (which should be obvious) - but the kind of ignorant remarks that I do not have the time or energy to respond to but have read on more than one occasion.

As a radical leftist I am usually quite unforgiving and though my little blog does not matter much - there is a reason why your ass will never be on my 'blogroll' regardless of how big/important/analytical/famous it is. Largely it's because you just don't get it. I may link to a wonderful post you've written, I may link to ten of them because the quality of your writing is amazing and I completely recognize that - but I will never put you on my blogroll. ('yeah, yawn whoop dee doo AD, who cares!').

Some examples:

a) Reclusive Leftist: I really don't know why I am bothering when you continue to tolerate such a vile 'troll' just because you two are 'friends'. Disgusting that's all I can say. Poltergeist - don't even f'ing bother posting here - I will indeed delete every single comment you make.

b) I Blame the Patriarchy:

In which there are at least half a dozen really fucked up comments:

Quote: What really annoyed me about all this was the way some Indian men would come to the West, enjoy the sexual freedom offered here and then go back to India to marry the virgin their families had found for them.

Oh yeah, you know cause those really crazy fucked upeth horny brown men can't keep their hands off pure white pussy, those beastly, junglee savages! Of course this comparison can only be made because 'civilized and educated white men never, ever expect women to be virgins for them'.

Um, sorry lady - it's because women in the west are repeatedly and openly hyper-sexualized (of course not because it's their fault) globally.

In which ANOTHER commenter in the same thread makes this totally unnecessary comparison about a 'middle eastern' person she knew to this 'poor, helpless Indian woman' that was being discussed. I.e. essentially equating 'one brown evil religion with the next'.... Cause you know there are only 2 billion Muslim and Hindu's globally, right? And they're all kinda middle eastern and brownish.

Quote: Within the past five years, a 17-yr-old middle-eastern girl in the vicinity was murdered by her cousins for dating someone other than her intended.

c) Pandagon, Punkass Blog. ahhh, I'm tired - I don't want to say anything past 'burqa-gate' and your totally bitching on WOC in your comments section cause you 'just didn't get it'. (I recognize these have already been discussed to death, but I will use them as examples).

and I'm sure there are a shit load more....

Again, if you are going to come back and attack me about using you as examples - reread #3 again. If you are true to your word about being a feminist, not just a 'white feminist in particular', my criticisms of such behaviour are not unwarranted and you will do what you can to either 're-educate yourself' or to call yourself a 'white feminist' or 'white womanist'.

6) Making culturally irrelevant comparisons (or allow such comments to take place in your threads without drawing attention to them - see above). Wut? I.e. if you are not fully familiar with the context or reasoning of the cultural/racial comparison you are trying to make it is best to refrain from making it and sticking to something in which you are making a more effective, informed and intelligent point.

For example

a) I Blame the Patriarchy:

QUOTE: "Writing in the Australian, Pamela Bone complains that when a bunch of Muslim feminists (Muslim feminists! What’s next, “gay Republicans”?) met in New York last week to fix an agenda for dispelling a couple of anti-Muslim rumors going around (that they’re terrorists, and that Islam oppresses women), the media gave it a big fat pass. Bone thinks it should have been front page news on accounta Muslim feminists have the solution for the war on terror."

What is going on here? Twisty did you KNOW that it was MUSLIM - YES, MUSLIM Feminists who managed to organized to get rid of the bill to pass Sharia in Ontario? And guess who took the media gave the credit too at the end of the day???? White feminist lawyers who assisted the Muslim women's case. Go figure.

Also, many religious minorities (like myself) call ourselves "hindu-atheists" or whatever-atheists in recognition of the fact that we are religious minorities and that religious intolerance at the hands of WHITE CHRISTIANS is something that has happened to us, and continually happens whenever we encounter ignoramuses of whatever religion.

Whatever.... I hate religion as much as the next radical leftist person, but oddly enough if you talk to women who've experienced DV they'll tell you "God helped them to survive". It's a fact. Women can't just 'sod-off god' you know... for whatever reasons.

Twisty, again I repeat I totally LOVE your witty, intelligent and smart writing - but if I don't point this shit out - I will suffocate.

b) Women's space:

Quote: Like O.J., my ex was a tall, athletic, charismatic, charming, handsome black man. Like Nicole Brown Simpson, I am blonde and Nordic looking. Simpson and I are both mothers of biracial children, both abuse survivors. Just as nobody believed O.J. was an abuser, nobody believed my ex was an abuser either. He was just so charming and charismatic and fun to be around. Except when he wasn’t.

Heart can you tell me what this was about? I really never understood what relevance it was to point out that Nicole Brown and you were both white and blonde and that both your oppressors were black and male. um, so?

What was the point? Unless, you think racial connections have any bearing on male violence.

Look, again I repeat none of this is about 'breaking connections' or 'bitching at people' it is because I am tired of reading bogus on the net. I am tired of being an 'invisible minority feminist'.

We all need each other. In my heart of hearts I truly believe that it is our politics that unite us, because I only know how much it hurts when other minorities ignore racism/sexism/classism in favour of their limited 'privilege'.

PS. If you're from the pro-pornstitution feminist tag team (you know who you are) that somehow miraculously appears to suddenly 'befriend' every dissenting feminist voice on the net, to support them with their 'radical feminist bashing', there's no nice way for me to say this 'don't bother'. Seriously, on any other post I'd love to hear your comments - just not this one. Pornstitution is racist, it harms WOC and I have no desire to get support from any of you - just because you think 'I'm bashing your enemy'. No thanks. I do however, encourage you to comment on my other posts if you ever feel like it because like "white radical feminists", I do know that we have things in common - just not as many as I'd like.


(Post a new comment)


[info]belladonnalin
2006-12-31 07:13 pm UTC (link)
I DEEPLY love this post - it was linked to by a friend and I was about to post it in here.

I'm particularly impressed by the things that also challenge me - because my anti-racist education is never completed, because I do own X number of books and shit, but I also know that I FAIL at these things. I do. I don't mean to, but I'm TRAINED TO fail and I have to do my own untraining.

Thank you so much for posting this.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]misswong
2006-12-31 07:24 pm UTC (link)
I know what you mean. Sometimes, in trying to be a better anti-racist or feminist or human being I am overcome with the sense of being a fuck-up. I like that Arandana has the clear examples of where people fuck-up, how and why they fuck and what can be done to not fuck-up in the future.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


ishoothippos
2006-12-31 07:21 pm UTC (link)
You know, this was a really good post and I gained some perspective on many things.

However, the comments in dealing with one user she quoted make me really sad. So concerned with "demonizing" the black abusive husband by mentioning his race in her traumatic experiences. Would you say she was demonizing men by mentioning his gender? There are negative prejudices in the world, and horrible steriotypes that need to be defeated, but I think that just because a blogger is white does not give free reign to belittle her experiences and acuse her of being ignorant and racist because she spoke about her divorce from a black man.

There are alot of things white feminists don't understand, but at the same time there is alot of very hurtful backlash. I know alot of you seem to be of the opinion that they ought to just "take it" for x, y and z reasons but honestly, we can educate eachother without tearing eachother down, can't we? We don't have to discount and discredit the experiences and lives of white women, just to gain a perspective on WOC?

I'm sorry if this post was out of place - it's coming from an "ignorant white woman" after all.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]misswong
2006-12-31 07:28 pm UTC (link)
I'm not sure why you think that this abusive man's race or the race of his partner was at all relevent to a story about abuse. I think it's fucked up and ignorant for Heart to focus on her racial commonality to Nicole Brown Simpson and to pretend that because she has partnered with a MOC she somehow gets a free pass to perpetuate the stereotypes of a violent or criminal black man.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]belladonnalin
2006-12-31 07:57 pm UTC (link)
I felt the defensiveness of your comment throughout this, but the last line sealed it.

I don't think that she is in any place condoning intimate partner or domestic violence. However, the point is valid that there is no reason that the woman's race and that of her partner only served in creating a "more sympathetic story". This sympathy was called for by making sure that we all connected his blackness with his violence.

Do I think this was intentional? Of course not. But it's a part of a larger systemic issue of race, the ways that racial assumptions go underground in our consciousness and our communications. And it has to be drawn attention to.

I've often quoted Paolo Friere in this community - "The oppressed have no obligation to educate our oppressors." It's true with gender issues, it's true with trans issues, it's true with class issues, it's true with issues of able-ism and it's true with race issues. In fact, Friere was a liberation theologist and theorist speaking from a post-colonial perspective.

This post is trying, just a little, to give white feminists some guidelines and some examples. I think they're amazing, not blaming.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]sabonasi
2006-12-31 08:21 pm UTC (link)
However, the comments in dealing with one user she quoted make me really sad. So concerned with "demonizing" the black abusive husband by mentioning his race in her traumatic experiences. Would you say she was demonizing men by mentioning his gender?

Being male affords one privileged. Being Black does not. So, no, emphasizing the gender of a [Black] male abuser is not the same as emphasizing the race of a Black [male] abuser.

To misswong, thanks for posting this. Guides on How Not To Be A Stupid White Feminist are always appriciated. ;-P

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]danadocus
2007-01-01 12:42 am UTC (link)
so well said

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]bestdaywelived
2006-12-31 10:19 pm UTC (link)
The comparison between the women's whiteness and the men's blackness in relation to the victim/violence aspect of the relationship was unnecessary. It's a fact that men often abuse their female partners, and yes, that some of those men are black and that some of hte partners in question are indeed white. This comparison that she set up, however, sets up a situation in which it seems as if black men are beating on women that are extremely pale and "Nordic". I'm getting the implication that the man's blackness was the reason why he abused her, and why OJ beat Nicole (and murdered her).

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]nymphaeales
2007-01-01 02:20 am UTC (link)
This comparison that she set up, however, sets up a situation in which it seems as if black men are beating on women that are extremely pale and "Nordic".

Which leads me back to the bad old days of Emmett Till [not that shit like that doesn't still happen], in which any Black man could be lynched on the spot for so much as looking at a white woman, because they're all sexual predators out to wreak societal havoc through miscegenation.

Ugh. Gonna go barf now.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]mygod_shesaid
2007-01-01 08:56 am UTC (link)
Oh, Jesus Christ.

The gender is relevant because it details a clear power inequality, and also, MOST DOMESTIC ABUSERS ARE MALE.

The race is NOT relevant in this context because his abusiveness had little to do with the fact that he was black, i.e. he was not of privilege in his race and it's not like the majority of abusers are black or something.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]mygod_shesaid
2007-01-01 09:14 am UTC (link)
oh. i understand this comment now.

I'm slowly (sometimes far too slowly) learning to avoid internet communities about things that I feel passionately about. Hell, even some feminist communities reject my viewpoints. In many of the ones you'll find that if you are white, not-obese, and were born a woman with woman genitals your opinion is of no consequence, your feelings don't matter and you aren't "really" a feminist. Seriously.

See, the reason your viewpoints of certain things may be rejected by feminist communities might be because you just CANNOT UNDERSTAND THE ISSUE and maybe don't want to listen to people who do.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sabonasi
2007-01-01 08:49 pm UTC (link)
Out of curiosity, where is the quoted comment from?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]mygod_shesaid
2007-01-01 09:08 pm UTC (link)
The user's journal, it was a very recent public entry.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]four_thorns
2007-01-03 06:21 am UTC (link)
i agree with your opinion on the quote, but... posting it here without getting permission first? it's a public post, so i guess it's fair game, but seems kinda not cool...

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]shemale
2007-01-01 11:26 pm UTC (link)
...born a woman with woman genitals...

As much as I hate it when quotes are given without context, that one gave me a good dose of rage and nausea.

I love that even in the process of complaining about her opinions being rejected,
[Error: Irreparable invalid markup ('<lj-user="ishoothippos">') in entry. Owner must fix manually. Raw contents below.]

<i>...born a woman with woman genitals...</i>

As much as I hate it when quotes are given without context, that one gave me a good dose of rage and nausea.

I love that even in the process of complaining about her opinions being rejected, <lj-user="ishoothippos"> makes abundantly clear her utter lack of insight into the issues she holds those opinions on.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]shemale
2007-01-01 11:27 pm UTC (link)
ishoothippos, I meant.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]oh_annalouise
2007-01-02 05:16 am UTC (link)
there's a part of me that feels like quoting from a person's personal journal is kind of ....uncouth. I wouldn't say it's hard core inappropriate but it rubs me the wrong way.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]mygod_shesaid
2007-01-02 08:05 am UTC (link)
there's a part of me that feels like quoting from a person's personal journal is kind of ....uncouth. I wouldn't say it's hard core inappropriate but it rubs me the wrong way.

it was right there, something like the second public entry.

the reason i quoted it was because it was a shorter version on the attitude displayed in her comment. 'zomg the feminists are ganging up on me cuz i'm mostly privileged!!'

honestly, the whole comment was just infuriating and derailing. i can't say i feel awful.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]lil_elf
2007-01-02 02:57 am UTC (link)
There are negative prejudices in the world, and horrible steriotypes that need to be defeated

One of which is the stereotype that black men are more likely to be sexual assailants/batterers- especially with white women as victims.

Racism plays a huge role in our culture views, and treatment, of sexual assault and DV.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]gingersomething
2006-12-31 08:05 pm UTC (link)
That's fantastic.

(Reply to this)


[info]bastardinlove
2006-12-31 08:35 pm UTC (link)
I really like this article. I wish it could cover more ground, though. It's kind of like that "check your privilege" post a while back, but it gives less opportunity for teh white womens to "waaah".


That said, would any WOC be willing to suggest books and blogs one could read in order to further remove one's own ignorance?

(Reply to this)


[info]beginning
2006-12-31 10:21 pm UTC (link)
For anyone else who had the same reaction: [info]leftistlooney.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]belladonnalin
2006-12-31 11:45 pm UTC (link)
Funny. I made one, too.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]beginning
2006-12-31 11:53 pm UTC (link)
I didn't make it, so that one must be yours. :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]bestdaywelived
2006-12-31 10:23 pm UTC (link)
This was a great post!

Her examples and ways to improve are things I'll definitely take into consideration. The *only* thing missing from her suggestions on how not to suck is that white feminists often skip over posts to do with a subject involving WOC because we don't know what to say/how to say it/how not to be an ass/have the luxury of not having to care about that particular issue. It's something I'm working on.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]odanu
2007-01-01 02:21 am UTC (link)
Too true. And those of us who have had some ally training are also conscious of the tendencies of allys to take over the space and "talk over" the people they are allied to. I have noticed that I post much less often in communities where I am a guest ally than in communities where I am a "target" member. I actually work at it a bit, because I can certainly write some long old replies when I have time to. So it's a balance that's difficult to strike.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]hopeless_addict
2006-12-31 11:54 pm UTC (link)
I'm not a feminist blogger per se. I read this lj-group (obviously). I look through the news. I've read a couple femblog articles.

But I don't understand what she's saying about pornstitution.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]hopeless_addict
2006-12-31 11:55 pm UTC (link)
*edit*
I don't know what the term "pornstitution" refers to. Is she referring to porn and prostitution in general?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sabonasi
2007-01-01 12:01 am UTC (link)
I'm curious, as well. I tried Wiki, but no luck. And there's no way in hell I'm googling that. Is anyone here familiar with the term?

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]nymphaeales
2007-01-01 02:16 am UTC (link)
Pornstitution = pornography + prostitution. It's shorthand used by some radical feminists who 1) aren't big fans of sex work and 2) don't make a distinction between porn or prostitution since they both involve women being paid to have sex and thereby exploit them more or less identically.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sabonasi
2007-01-01 03:44 pm UTC (link)
Oh. Yes, I could see how people could have issues with the stance. Also, thank you and thank dorktastic for answering.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]dorktastic
2007-01-01 01:37 am UTC (link)
Some radical feminists have taken to referring to porn and prostitution as a single institution because they don't think there's a meaningful difference between them - i.e., porn generally involves paying people to have sex on camera - they're still being paid to have sex. I'm sure there's more to it than that, but I don't spend tons of time reading radical feminists.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]celesteh
2007-01-01 03:09 am UTC (link)
Complaining about stupid comments on crap on I Blame the Patriarchy could make up a full time job. These complaints are correct, of course. Twisty Faster makes me sad. She can write up a storm and when she's right, she's really right on, but she's so often wrong, it breaks my heart.


Unrelatedly, I assume "'librul white bois" is not intended to refer to members of the genderqueer community? It's an unfortunate choice of creative misspelling.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]countpumpcula
2007-01-01 09:24 pm UTC (link)
Unrelatedly, I assume "'librul white bois" is not intended to refer to members of the genderqueer community? It's an unfortunate choice of creative misspelling.

I was a bit confused on the use of "bois" here too... :-\

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]mygod_shesaid
2007-01-01 08:52 am UTC (link)
It's always great when, say, nubian shows up on a comment thread and says, 'hey, guys, maybe you wanna check yr privilege or consider how this might be racist and/or white-centric? maybe?' and everyone goes, 'I CANNOT BE RACIST I R LIBRUL.'

If by great I mean absolutely infuriating.

It was really, really kind of her to take it upon herself to try and educate white feminists on this sort of thing when it is totally not her duty.


One of my friends is a baby feminist (she's working on it) and I'm trying to argue with her about how yes, even OUR GENERATION (we're 18-ish) is rather racist.

'How do YOU know that?!'

'Because, uh, I listen to POC and victims of racism?'

'Well, don't you think they're kind of BIASED?'

That's right, folks, apparently POC are too stupid and clouded by their 'victim mentality' (have I ever mentioned how much I hate this phrase?) to figure out that they're not REALLY oppressed.

Of course, my friend is 'too liberal to be a racist!' Or something.

Gahhhhhh.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]cappedinblack
2007-01-01 03:49 pm UTC (link)
It was really, really kind of her to take it upon herself to try and educate white feminists on this sort of thing when it is totally not her duty.

yes.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]cappedinblack
2007-01-01 03:53 pm UTC (link)
i wasn't able to get through all of this yet, but her point that "woc" are used to portray "moc" as evil etc. was very well stated. i've always had problems with the portrayal of women in other countries as victims of a horrible patriarchy that are helpless and need our (white) help. while i saw the sexism, i always felt a discontent outside of it, and her words have helped me understand/explain my feelings.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]tabari
2007-01-01 08:31 pm UTC (link)
Oh, wow, yeah. And this is a difficult issue for me to negotiate, because while there's certainly a lot of global oppression of women in the world, there's a supreme arrogance when Western nations (run by white males, for the most part) decide they're going to save the poor oppressed WOC from the evil, oppressing MOC. And it's not always untrue that there's oppression - certainly, the Taliban oppressed women, who also happened to be WOC - but there's this assumption that all MOC and non-Western races are oppressing women in ways that the Enlightened West would never do - which is supreme arrogance. Because on the one hand, as a human being I don't wnat to stand by and see my sisters suffer, but on the other hand, as a white human being, I have to battle my arrogance and self-righteousness when it comes to other cultures just as much.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]sabonasi
2007-01-02 02:41 am UTC (link)
I think you'd like this article.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]oh_annalouise
2007-01-02 03:56 pm UTC (link)
I really like that Arandana suggests that instead of either having self-righteous and colonialist ideas about women in other parts of the world or feeling paralyzed by the desire not to, that we make a special effort to seek out what women in those parts of the world are doing for themselves.
That's something I really struggle with myself, the conflicted ideas about cultural understanding and basic human decency and, embarressing as it sounds that I didn't really think of it before, it was incredibly helpful to me to see the argument framed in that way: "listen to women of the developing world. listen to muslim feminists. they are out there"

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]four_thorns
2007-01-03 06:32 am UTC (link)
yeah. have you heard of mukhtaran bibi? she's doing amazing stuff in pakistan. nicholas kristoff has had a lot of columns about her work in the ny times. it makes me sad that women like her aren't covered more in the media.

(Reply to this)(Parent)

I was following fine until the PS
[info]tyresias
2007-01-01 08:39 pm UTC (link)
"If you're from the pro-pornstitution feminist tag team [...] Pornstitution is racist, it harms WOC and I have no desire to get support from any of you - just because you think 'I'm bashing your enemy'."

Is she saying that she's against porn & prostitution? (on the grounds that both institutions are systemically racist) I just want to make sure I understand what she's saying in that PS.

I agree that the overwhelming majority of porn made is racist. I also know that the overwhelming majority of trannies killed every year are MTFs of colours who do sex work. It is a point often made at TDOR when a bunch of white trannies who don't do sex work claim a bunch of deaths as trans-bashing when it's more likely due to the fact that they were sex workers and/or WOC (it's hard to know because so little is ever known about the deaths because they are sex workers). [note: I know a great deal more about trans sex workers than cisgendered ones, but I don't doubt that similarly disturbing stats about violence towards sex workers occur for cis-WOC sex workers vs. their white counterpart]
I don't however know that I would go on to be against sex work and porn (if that is in fact what she is saying). Racism in the porn industry clearly needs to be checked and eliminated. I am aware of a disturbing history (still ongoing in some places) whereby WOC of far more encouraged and expected to get abortions than white women. That needs to be stopped. But I don't think one of the ways to reduce that is by lobbying against abortion rights. I'm including this to hopefully better illustrate why I don't think that being anti-porn will help rectify the racism systemic in the porn industry. Ditto with sex work. I think it is imperative to come up with better ways to address the violence against sex workers, methods that take into account the obvious link to racism behind most of the acts of violence. I don't think this is done by being anti-sex work.

If I've misunderstood her than this comment is null. But if I haven't, I need to be better explained the reasoning before I can really consider it further. I just don't see how further driving sex work (and the disturbing sex trade it behind it) further underground (since it is still illegal in most countries) will better WOC sex workers then legalizing it would. I could see only a better chance to address the racist violence against them if it is legal and they can have access to better resouces to address the harassment they encounter, if their profession wasn't illegal.

(Reply to this)(Thread)

Re: I was following fine until the PS
[info]misswong
2007-01-01 08:50 pm UTC (link)
The most recent entry on the her blog is an apology for that ps.
I wasn't so pleased with it myself, although I feel like her point was that she didn't want people to use this post as a way of saying, "see, radical feminists are dumb", which while I'm no fan of radical feminism, I can get behind.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: I was following fine until the PS
[info]tyresias
2007-01-01 09:37 pm UTC (link)
Ah, gotcha.

Thanks for clarifying :)

(Reply to this)(Parent)

Re: I was following fine until the PS
[info]shemale
2007-01-01 10:08 pm UTC (link)
It is a point often made at TDOR when a bunch of white trannies who don't do sex work claim a bunch of deaths as trans-bashing when it's more likely due to the fact that they were sex workers and/or WOC (it's hard to know because so little is ever known about the deaths because they are sex workers). [note: I know a great deal more about trans sex workers than cisgendered ones, but I don't doubt that similarly disturbing stats about violence towards sex workers occur for cis-WOC sex workers vs. their white counterpart]

I'm so glad that you brought this up. I think that it's over-simplifying, though, to attribute violence against trans women of color who work in the sex industry "more" to either their being trans or to their being women of color. While working in the sex industry, without question, puts one at a dramatically greater risk of being a victim of violence, as a "cause," it's not realistic to claim that we know MTFs of color who work in that industry are victims for either reason to a greater extent because it's impossible to measure; we can't really survey perpetrators of the crimes and ask them what their motivation was (or take too seriously any response that they might give). If we look at the statistics, sure, we'll see that trans women of color doing sex work are disproportionately likely to be victims of violent crime. But it's not unlikely that, because of our systemically racist national and global economy, disproportionately more women of color are forced into the industry than white women, which leads me to believe that we should weight being trans more heavily as a causal factor than you're implying we should relative to race. As you must know, trans women in the industry are more likely than non-trans women in the industry to be victims of violent crimes, even, I would imagine, if we set up a dummy variable to take race out of the equation (if you've got it, give me a data sheet and I'll see what I can do with it).

I think that both the adversity faced by existing as a woman of color in our white-privileged world and the adversity faced as a result of being trans contribute to the demographic characteristics of the sex industry, but, in my opinion, when sex workers who are trans WOC are brutally murdered, the fact of their personal history and/or genitals is more frequently a catalyst than race or ethnicity, and race or ethnicity may or may not play a role in that the perpetrator of the hate crime- especially white ones, whose experiences on the privileged side of the power structure twists the way they view people- may hold the view that killing a woman of color would be less risky than killing a white woman (and, who knows, they may be right given the inequalities in law enforcement and justice with respect to race and ethnicity) and the fact that the victim is a sex worker will definitely contribute to that sick fucking weighting of risk to satisfaction from murder.

But hell, I could be wrong. Maybe most of those trans sex workers were murdered without any consideration taken to their being "really a man" and the perpetrators' violent rage targeted them because they (the perpetrators) were violently racist, violently anti-sex worker, or thought that no one would miss a sex worker- especially when that person is a person of color. But I think that extreme heterosexism and rigidly gender bipolar perceptions of the world play a greater role than you're implying.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)

Re: I was following fine until the PS
[info]tyresias
2007-01-03 08:25 pm UTC (link)
I would need to know what the murder rates are for cisgendered women who do sex work (of all races) before I could truly extrapolate what impact, if any, being trans plays in the murders of MTF sex workers.
As we've both pointed out, the fact that they are sex workers unfortuantely makes it hard to get much information about their murders.

One thing that did occur to me however, was that a large number of the known murders (since I'm sure there are many more that occur but are never found) occured elsewhere then the US or Canada. At least, that's the impression I get when the list of names are read with the location. I point this out because unless we can prove that it's white guys in South America that are killing Latina MTF sex workers, it seems off to claim that it was their race that got them killed in a country where they are (presumably) dealing primarily with people of the same race. No? Or am I getting the wrong impressions and are there as many murders occur in the US and Canada?

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]amphibian23
2007-01-03 06:01 pm UTC (link)
I don't think judging blogs by trolling commenters who post admist a load of others is really valid as a general rule....

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…