movingfinger @ 1:23pm: Fine distinctions
How amusing that Madeleine Robbins said:
"MR took this up, saying that a certain kind of historical romance drives her nuts, where the protagonist gets away with being a 1990s girl in an 1810 setting. [...]"
When I was just gritting my teeth over exactly that. But I think this is the province of good writing in general, and not of Fantasy of Manners.
and her reported remark goes on:
"She's interested in the way that FoM can allow a writer to feed in modern attitudes, as long as the story is anchored in the historical time; FoM is about ways that characters can subvert the system to their very small ends, in a very mannered way that makes it look like they're acting within society's rules. The weapons are always social and verbal."
This brings Cabell to mind, of course.
I must disagree with Ellen Kushner on the invention question and look at Fletcher Pratt (
The Blue Star).
I have not yet seen anything that makes me think Fantasy of Manners is anything but, concisely, a subclass of Comedy of Manners, with fantastic elements. It appears to meet every criterion for the first and the second is obvious.