Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Query Letter Sans Excuses

  • Oct. 24th, 2007 at 8:29 AM
Looks like I'm first up for the Querython.  Here goes...

Dear [Agent, by name of course],

My novel, The Undead Socialite's Guide to Nightlife, is currently being reviewed by an Ed. Director at Penguin's New American Library, after an extensive review by editor, Liz Scheier.  I met Ms. Scheier in Portland this past summer and pitched the novel as Sex in the City meets Dawn of the Dead, and the character as a zombie with a great skin care regimen, she expressed interest, and...well you know the progression.  I'm unrepresented, but this novel seems to be generating momentum and I'd hate to start negotiations, on my own.  A fan of [author's] work, I thought this comedic take on a cliched horror staple, might interest you.

My Urban Fantasy novel, which runs around 75,000 words, centers around advertising executive turned flesh-eating zombie, Amanda Feral and her search for her missing friend, a succubus named Lisette.  From the nightclubs of the damned, where deadish strippers flaunt their insides for the drooling masses, to twelve step groups for recovering supernaturals; demonic bowling leagues, to mortuary make-up heists, our heroine's search uncovers an undercurrent of hilarious depravity in Seattle's supernatural community, and a diabolical plan to start the last great zombie outbreak.  Despite all the new friends, there's no way Amanda can allow a full-blown epidemic to happen-"hello, does the word "fresh" mean anything to you?  Amanda doesn't "do" dead meat, and that goes for the bedroom, too."  But intervening in the apocalypse means facing fears and Amanda really hates conflict, so it could go either way.  Amanda's a deadutante with a heart of coal, a mouthful of snappy comebacks-among other things-and a crew of friends you won't soon forget.

As a precocious only child, my hobbies were reading, spying on adults and collecting disturbing anecdotes, which I turned into short stories for my mother to worry about.  I'm a fan of both horror and comedy, and that amalgam is reflected in my work.  Because my psychotherapy day job is nowhere near as interesting as the daydreams boring clients can produce, I've put down the pad and taken up the laptop, again.  My first published work of short fiction, An Acquired Taste, appears in Loving the Undead, an Anthology of Romance, Sort Of, out next month.  I am a co-founder of The South Sound Algonquin's Writing Group, and a member of The Willamette Writer's Association.

I am seeking representation, and have sent out a number of queries.  I look forward to hearing from you soon.

Sincerely,

Mark D. Henry

Now, let's dissect.  Obviously, I've had a title change, but this was the query that got HAPPY HOUR OF THE DAMNED (and me) a great agent.

Comments

[info]magicnoire wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 03:38 pm (UTC)
Well, I'd say the voice is strongest trait of this query. It's great and entertaining. I haven't read HAPPY HOUR OF THE DAMNED, obviously, but it sounds like your query matches the voice of the novel and I'd think that'd be really important to an agent considering your work.
[info]mdhenry wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 03:41 pm (UTC)
Absolutely. The other thing was, I was so green I didn't know to be worried about the query.

I think the first paragraph sells it. It's sort of bullying, now that I look back at it.
[info]quiet_rebel wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 03:41 pm (UTC)
I have to agree--the voice was great and it was what caught my attention. So I guess it's true when they say the voice should match the book!

Thanks for sharing!
[info]mdhenry wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 04:45 pm (UTC)
You're welcome. And, yes, match the voice, as much as possible.
[info]wandereringray wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 03:56 pm (UTC)
*smacks self in the head for all the times I've taken the smart-mouth comments out of my query letter for fear of being too personal*

:D Thanks Mark, it's nice to find out that you don't have to be all prim and proper to land an agent.
[info]mdhenry wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 04:40 pm (UTC)
Or grammatically correct, even.
(no subject) - [info]wandereringray - Oct. 24th, 2007 04:41 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]irysangel wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 04:08 pm (UTC)
Voice voice voice!

Love it. At first I thought, "Ye gads that's long." But then, you hooked us right away with "Mr. Agent I practically have an offer on the table" and then had a cheerfully, delightfully gross conversation about your story.

Easy to see why he would be hooked. :)
[info]mdhenry wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 04:41 pm (UTC)
It was all about that opening paragraph. The rest was just spew.
[info]legionfalcon wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 04:18 pm (UTC)
I have to agree. The voice is great in this. Thanks so much for sharing!
[info]mdhenry wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 04:44 pm (UTC)
You're welcome. Happy writing!
[info]green_knight wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 04:33 pm (UTC)
I'm afraid the voice didn't do much for me, so I noticed other things - namely the 'I've got serious interest and don't want to start negotiations on my own,' which, together with a fresh premise would have awakened my interest; but I also noticed that there were a couple of misplaced commas and awkward semicolons, quotation marks out of place, that sort of thing. They were minor but made the text a little hard to read in places. I think it's quite heartening, though, because it means that if your position, your voice, and your premise are strong enough, your career won't crumble at the first typo. And I have to admit that I love 'Happy Hour of the Damned' as a title!
[info]mdhenry wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 04:43 pm (UTC)
I think that most people--agents and editors alike--overlook a lot of the grammar stuff in favor of a fresh voice and interesting premise.

But you're dead on. The proximity to an offer is the catch.
(no subject) - [info]green_knight - Oct. 24th, 2007 05:13 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]mdhenry - Oct. 24th, 2007 05:17 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]jordansummers1 - Oct. 24th, 2007 06:10 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]mdhenry - Oct. 24th, 2007 07:16 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]frost_light wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 05:03 pm (UTC)
I'm a fan of the voice too, and it's a great example of how the voice in a query matches the voice in a novel.

And of course, not all agents may have gone for the snappy, irreverent tone, so it's important to note that if an agent didn't like your query, they probably would have passed on your book, too. Which wouldn't have meant that you had a bad book OR a bad query; it just meant it wouldn't have been a match for every agent (subjectivity in all its glory).
[info]mdhenry wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 05:10 pm (UTC)
I'm so glad I found a snappy and irreverent agent!
[info]cdpeck wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 05:45 pm (UTC)
Just curious -- how exactly did you meet the editor in Portland to pitch it? Was it at a convention or something?

I agree that the voice sells it, and that you already seemed to have a deal going through. My (naive) impression of publishing is that you can't get an editor to read a manuscript unless it's already represented by an agent, but apparently I'm wrong.
[info]jordansummers1 wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 06:14 pm (UTC)
It's been my experience that it's easier to get an editor interested in your work than it is to get an agent's interest. I was once standing in line next to an editor at a conference. We started to chat about my writing. Keep in mind, I wasn't pitching a book to her. She handed me her card and told me she'd like me to submit something to their new line. Turns out she was the senior editorial director for the publishing house.
(no subject) - [info]cdpeck - Oct. 24th, 2007 06:24 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]jordansummers1 - Oct. 24th, 2007 06:39 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]cdpeck - Oct. 24th, 2007 06:46 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]poshcat - Oct. 24th, 2007 08:22 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]cdpeck - Oct. 24th, 2007 08:41 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]mdhenry - Oct. 24th, 2007 07:19 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]lankywriter - Oct. 25th, 2007 03:59 am (UTC) Expand
[info]m_stiefvater wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 05:58 pm (UTC)
I think injecting as much of your voice into your query as possible is crucial, because when it comes down to it, it's the voice of your book that will catch readers. Like a band that gets serious radio play, it doesn't matter if some people love you and some people hate you, just that they all know what you sound like and you sound like no other. Far better to be creating a strong response EITHER way than to be just OK. Just OK means you sit in the slush pile, even if you have a very functional style and cohesive plot.

Mark's query shows off his style really well and I'd disagree politely that the first paragraph sold it. Good agents (and I know he was only querying good ones, Mark would not be that dumb, even if he does spend a lot of time with zombies) aren't looking for the easy sale. It helps, but if the author isn't someone they're going to want to be stuck with for the next few projects, they won't take it. So the slam dunk of the next few paras was essential in my mind.
[info]jordansummers1 wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 06:15 pm (UTC)
I agree. :)
(no subject) - [info]mdhenry - Oct. 24th, 2007 07:22 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]m_stiefvater - Oct. 24th, 2007 08:00 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]patricemichelle wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 06:16 pm (UTC)
Great voice, Mark!

Also, too, consider that agents get so many query letters...they are looking for something different from what they've seen many times over. Mark pointed out right up front in that first paragraph that he was taking a comedic take (read:a twist) on a cliched horror staple.


[info]mdhenry wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 07:25 pm (UTC)
Comedy was totally a selling point. It's one thing to inject humor into characters in Urban Fantasy--many authors do--it's another to work out scenes based on comedy routine.

Thanks, Patrice!
[info]alchemuse wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 06:45 pm (UTC)
Wow. Great voice, FTW. Definitely attention-grabbing.
[info]mdhenry wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 07:23 pm (UTC)
Merci, Dahling!
[info]amanda_marrone wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 07:04 pm (UTC)
collecting disturbing anecdotes, which I turned into short stories for my mother to worry about.

LOL!!!!!
[info]mdhenry wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 07:22 pm (UTC)
And she's still worried!
[info]carrie_ryan wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 07:43 pm (UTC)
One of the other great things about this query is that Mark was specific. After reading, you get a great sense of the world. Imagine how different (and I would argue weaker) the letter would have been if he'd just said "she explores the crazy supernatural community" rather than "nightclubs of the damned where deadish strippers flaunt their insides for the drooling masses, to twelve step groups for recovering supernaturals; demonic bowling leagues, to mortuary make-up heists..."
[info]mdhenry wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 08:15 pm (UTC)
Plus. You knowing Jim, and all. How could he not respond to the tone? I got lucky. He's good people.
(no subject) - [info]carrie_ryan - Oct. 24th, 2007 08:24 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]mdhenry - Oct. 24th, 2007 08:25 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]carrie_ryan - Oct. 24th, 2007 08:50 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]rhonawestbrook wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 08:16 pm (UTC)
I love reading these and all the comments.

Thanks guys!
[info]mdhenry wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 08:24 pm (UTC)
Yur Welcome!
[info]ravelda wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 09:21 pm (UTC)
Now I'm REALLY going to have to read this.
[info]mdhenry wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 11:15 pm (UTC)
Me, too!
[info]dpeterfreund wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 09:30 pm (UTC)
This definitely got me interested in the novel.

In fact, it was so fascinating that this former copy editor didn't notice any grammar issues at all. When agents say they don't want to take on queries that aren't well written, they are talking about people who really don't understand how to use language. They aren't talking about a misplaced comma. Put it this way: if they are noticing the commas, you've got bigger issues.

I disagree with Jordan. I never really got much interest from editors until I got an agent. I'd pitch to them at conferences, they'd sound all excited and then my manuscript would sit on a slush pile with thirty dozen others. I can't imagine trying to get an editor first.
[info]mdhenry wrote:
Oct. 24th, 2007 11:16 pm (UTC)
Well, she didn't turn out to be my editor. That's the rub. She lost the book in a mini-auction.
(no subject) - [info]dpeterfreund - Oct. 25th, 2007 02:16 am (UTC) Expand
[info]markdf wrote:
Oct. 25th, 2007 02:31 pm (UTC)
I would have asked to see this ms. too.

While we're talking about voice---we're seeing two things here: Mark's voice AND the voice in his novel. In this case, they both work to sell. However, I have seen queries where an writer "creates" a voice that isn't them or, worse, isn't the novel.

Some people write a stronger voice than others. If you try and "create" a strong voice that isn't naturally you, it rings false. Mark's works because he makes himself sound as odd as he really is (People--have you read his blog?).

Query letters are hard enough as it is. My advice is that if you're working too hard on the voice of your letter, back off and keep it more business-like.

And always always always read the query out loud to someone who doesn't love you to see what their reaction is.
[info]patricemichelle wrote:
Oct. 25th, 2007 03:26 pm (UTC)
And always always always read the query out loud to someone who doesn't love you to see what their reaction is.

This is such great advice!
(no subject) - [info]mdhenry - Oct. 25th, 2007 03:57 pm (UTC) Expand

Profile

fur, fey, fangs
[info]fangs_fur_fey
Fangs, Fur, & Fey

Latest Month

July 2009
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

---------------------------------

---------------------------------

---------------------------------

---------------------------------

---------------------------------

---------------------------------

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by [info]chasethestars