Critical Cricket ([info]criticalcricket) wrote in [info]fanficrants,
@ 2004-06-30 15:33:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood: amused

It's my Style!!
I was reading a book, and after reading over the chapter on style, I felt the need to write an essay. All too often people, when criticised, will pitch a fit and cry out "But it's my style!" Actually it's not, it's just you being stupid. Anyway, read the essay, the cricket commands you! Please? :)



Reading fanfiction, I see a lot of authors say “It’s my style.” They say this when you point out things varying from punctuation errors to confusing dialogue or simple incoherent writing. They cry, “You can’t criticize me, that’s my style!” I would like to point out that, no, it isn’t your style. It’s your ignorance.

In writing, your “style” is a culmination of all of your life experiences. Your style is how you remember things, how you describe them and how you view the world around you. It’s the things you choose to say and the things that you don’t. Style is not cosmetic; it’s the flesh of a piece.

In order to even begin testing out your style, you must fist be able to write. You must know how to form letters and words across a page or type with two hands and not henpeck at the keyboard. You must know how to spell. You must know the difference between a noun and a verb and their functions within a sentence. You must know how to use proper punctuation and the real function of a comma. That is not to say that you must know all of it before you can pick up a pencil, you just need a solid knowledge base to work with. People generally don’t walk around in dark caves without a map and a flashlight, nor should they attempt to write the next great novel without a basic understanding of how language works.

Once you have gathered together the basics, that is where style comes in. A style is like an accent if you will. Depending on where you live and who you associate with, you could develop a slow southern drawl or a nasal New York accent. You could pick up some street slang or even a pidgin language. People from London have different accents from people in Ottawa. The language is basically the same, but location and other life experiences determine whether or not you have a crisp accent or a smooth drawl. One accent is not the right accent or necessarily more correct than another. The fact that accents exist simply shows that people have different styles of speaking. When people from different locations get together, they might acquire new words or pick up twinges of the different accents. This only adds to the richness of their speech and in this way, an accent is like style.

While style is something that happens inherently, it is not something that happens from ignorance. As they say, ignorance of the laws does not exempt one from the consequences of breaking them. The same can be said of writing. Being ignorant of basic grammar rules, such as where to place a comma, does not excuse you from properly using them. Writing without commas is not style, its stupidity. You are not above grammar. Lack of grammar is not stylish or artistic, it’s stubborn and stuck up. All it proves to your audience is that you are either too lazy or too secure in your “genius” to do it properly. Such behavior will inevitably isolate your audience. That’s generally not a good idea, especially in a feedback driven art like fanfiction.

Your style is sort of like fashion sense. Everyone has it, though some peoples’ fashion sense could use a little (or a lot) of work. You can develop your fashion sense by watching and emulating others. Or it might come naturally and you are the one that is setting the trends that everyone else is trying to copy. What it all comes down to is the fact that it all comes back to you. You are unique and nobody has lived exactly as you have. Nobody thinks exactly like you do and nobody is going to see the world in exactly the same way. That is your style.

Style is your unique perspective. It is not something that you make up as you go along. It is always inside of you, changing as you change, evolving as you learn and becoming something that much more special each time you pick up something new. Style isn’t bad grammar, bad punctuation or terrible spelling. It’s not your struggle to be the next Shakespeare. It is the individual perspective that you bring to the table every time you decide to write. Once you understand this, you will be able to exercise you true sense of style. Once you discover your style, it is then that people will start to say things like “I like the style in their stories, it’s very unique.” Isn’t that so much better than hiding your ignorance of grammar behind the false cry of “It’s my style!”?




(Post a new comment)


(Anonymous)
2004-06-30 03:44 pm UTC (link)
You are an asshole.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]ironychan
2004-06-30 03:46 pm UTC (link)
Wow... troll on the first comment. That's gotta be a record.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]fernwithy, 2004-06-30 03:52 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]cie_anthy, 2004-06-30 04:04 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fernwithy, 2004-06-30 05:17 pm UTC
can't help myself... - [info]idemandjustice, 2004-07-01 08:31 am UTC

[info]criticalcricket
2004-06-30 04:07 pm UTC (link)
You know honey, you really really need to get a life and stop stalking my journal. Sorry that I trampled all over your beliefs that your ignorance equals style. Ok, I'm not really. Maybe if you stopped screwing around with trolling and actually picked up a book, you could accomplish something in your life instead of becoming one of those losers who lives in their mom's basement and trolls message boards because they've nothing else to do.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]_redpanda_, 2004-06-30 04:29 pm UTC
(no subject) - (Anonymous), 2004-06-30 05:05 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]minkboylove, 2004-06-30 05:28 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]nesmith, 2004-06-30 11:00 pm UTC

[info]nesmith
2004-06-30 04:46 pm UTC (link)
And you are pathetic. Go home, little girl/boy, you amuse us not.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]beccastareyes
2004-06-30 05:20 pm UTC (link)
[info]criticalcricket may or may not be an asshole. I don't have the knowledge to make that judgement. But that doens't change that that is an AWESOME essay, and the fact that you, little Annoymouse, haven't even the guts to sign your name to your trolling posts.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]gal_montag, 2004-06-30 06:27 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]paragonish, 2004-06-30 07:58 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]darksylvia, 2004-06-30 09:35 pm UTC

[info]fernwithy
2004-06-30 03:53 pm UTC (link)
Amen!

Um, I actually don't have anything to add.

(Reply to this)


[info]minkboylove
2004-06-30 03:55 pm UTC (link)
Oh God. A-MEN.

I'm so sick of seeing shitty grammar, sentence fragment abuse and even abominations like Author's Notes smack in the middle of stories being described as 'style'. It takes years and dedication to create your own style. Dropping the uppercase does not (and I saw a pleasing icon to this effect) make you e.e. cummings any more than writing about jailbait makes you Vladimir Nabokov.

A style is like an accent if you will.

Yes! Narrative voice. It's the thing that makes you recognise someone's work. If you were handed pages at random you'd be able to say 'Yes, that's John Updike' or 'that's definitely D.H. Lawrence' or 'okay, I'm going to run screaming now because that's James Fucking Joyce. ARRRRRGH!'

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]blueshinra
2004-07-01 10:50 am UTC (link)
'okay, I'm going to run screaming now because that's James Fucking Joyce. ARRRRRGH!'

Heh; I have that exact reaction with Ernest Hemingway >:)

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]agnes_bean, 2004-07-01 12:22 pm UTC

[info]sashwizzled
2004-06-30 03:58 pm UTC (link)
So, what you're saying is that a person's writing style isn't their grammer, punctuation, spelling, syntax - that's what it needs; what it is is their soul on paper?

(Yeah, I'm paraphrasing Pirates of the Caribbean. Leave me alone.)

Yeah, I completely agree with that. :~grins~:

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]minkboylove
2004-06-30 04:07 pm UTC (link)
what it is is their soul on paper?

Hey, if hurts, it's good for you, right? :-)

Except James Joyce, obviously.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]criticalcricket, 2004-06-30 04:09 pm UTC

[info]rachelthedemon
2004-06-30 04:23 pm UTC (link)
Exactly.

Many authors have been known to break the rules of grammar for the purposes of style (i.e.: sentence fragments). The difference is, they know the rules before they break them, and they do it on purpose to make a statement. You find the same thing in virtually every art movement since Mannerism.

Style is about manipulating the language to get your point across, not breaking rules that you don't know exist. The same way animators learn human anatomy before drawing deformed character designs, one must learn the rules of proper writing (spelling, grammar, etc.) before they play around to find their own voice.

Style is about creative use of language, not blatant disregard for it.

Sorry for ranting on your rant. In short, A-frikken-men.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]beccastareyes
2004-06-30 05:24 pm UTC (link)
The same way animators learn human anatomy before drawing deformed character designs, one must learn the rules of proper writing (spelling, grammar, etc.) before they play around to find their own voice.

May I just say that this is true for art as for fiction. Ever since I started looking at anatomy, and thinking of my characters as stylistically drawn people rather than slavishly copying another artist's poses, my art has gottne better.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]rachelthedemon, 2004-06-30 07:18 pm UTC
*grins* - [info]miss_aya, 2004-06-30 08:06 pm UTC
Re: *grins* - [info]norwegianne, 2004-07-01 12:30 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashilleong, 2004-07-01 01:11 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]ashilleong, 2004-07-01 01:13 am UTC

[info]rhi_silverflame
2004-06-30 04:28 pm UTC (link)
I'm afraid I've already sold my soul, but can I sell you an organ or two, maybe? A limb?

Because . . . a-fucking-men.

(Reply to this)


[info]akilika
2004-06-30 04:32 pm UTC (link)
Learn the rules before you break them. Ignorance isn't cool.

Amen. ^^

(Reply to this)


[info]nesmith
2004-06-30 04:44 pm UTC (link)
Well, since the people about whom you rant don't have any grasp of sentence structure, plot, pacing, characterization, or grammar, why on earth would you expect them to know what style is? ;)

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]criticalcricket
2004-07-01 03:00 pm UTC (link)
I know, I know, I shouldn't have such high expectations. People whine about getting picked on for their style and I just felt like pointing out that they basically have no idea what they're talking about. You have to know what it is before you can whine about it.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]cassandralupos
2004-06-30 05:28 pm UTC (link)
Dude. Wordy McWord.

...You've said it all, and better than I could. *envies your coherence*

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]rosehiptea
2004-06-30 05:37 pm UTC (link)
Seconded.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]oldgentleman
2004-06-30 07:49 pm UTC (link)
Wordy von Ueberword. :) Very well said.

(I'm glad to see this as it fits neatly into a private discussion I'm having about the problems of betaing: you can't fix the militantly ignorant.)

(Reply to this)


[info]paragonish
2004-06-30 07:59 pm UTC (link)
I swear to god and fifteen other proverbial deities, there is no sane fandom ANYWHERE.

But still. (Y) to the rant. (Y) indeed. :>

(Reply to this)

*bows down to worship*
(Anonymous)
2004-06-30 09:33 pm UTC (link)
Critical Cricket, you are my god. Goddess. Deity of my choosing, whatever you would like. I totally agree with you, and was getting so fed up with it, I was going to write my own rant, but your rant is so much better than mine would have been! I love you, really. And you are totally right; that hot-of-the-press look isn't very nice. People like to read final copies, not first drafts. Anyway. Wow, I managed to rant about your rant. I have impressed myself.

Though, I must say, some people do write in a way that lets them use certain grammar rules more often; I myself use the semi-colon. See, look, it's in this twice. Anyway. I guess what the moral of this story is is that I love you! Yay!

(Reply to this)


[info]pinkdormouse
2004-06-30 10:56 pm UTC (link)
Style is partly about which rules you choose to follow. I was taught not to use contractions in narrative, and don't use them in my fiction. My posts and comments on LJ *do* use contractions, because that feels more like dialogue to me. So part of my writing style revolves around finding alternatives to the various verb structures involving 'not'. I know that most people out there were taught that it's okay to use 'don't', 'wouldn't, 'couldn't', etc in their writing but it still feels wrong to my. My style vs their style, perhaps.

On the other hand my writing style is far crisper since I found betas who insist on very accurate punctuation and advise against my longer run-on sentences.

But I agree that style also comes from word choice and how those words are used, which is about life experiences and personality.

Great essay by the way.

Gina

(Reply to this)


[info]whisperinghope
2004-07-01 05:38 am UTC (link)
*drily* Like the kind of people that says, "Hate it, don't read it"?

(Reply to this)


[info]callie_chan
2004-07-01 07:54 am UTC (link)
....oh dear sweet mother of God.

I am adding this to my memories and I am going to stuff it DIRECTLY down the throat of the next person I meet who hides behind that defense.



(There's no end tag on that one. Eternal, get it?)

Also, charming little troll you've acquired. Does it do tricks?

-Callisto

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]criticalcricket
2004-07-01 02:35 pm UTC (link)
Does it ever? It follows me around like a sad little puppy and spits out lame insults on command!

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]callie_chan, 2004-07-01 10:31 pm UTC

[info]callie_chan
2004-07-01 08:00 am UTC (link)
On a random note, e.e. cummings has been the inspiration for more crimes against the English language than can ever hope to be counted.

I'm sure he meant well, but lord help him if I go to the same place he went when I die, because I will have some choice words for him when I get there.

-Callisto

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]winterfox
2004-07-01 08:13 pm UTC (link)
Yes. It's gotten to a point where I start snarling "E.E. Cummings you are not!" at people who scoff at grammar/punctuation as "conformist." Tards.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]idemandjustice
2004-07-01 08:34 am UTC (link)
Hear, hear. I don't know what else to say.

(Reply to this)


[info]spacellama
2004-07-01 11:32 am UTC (link)
Essay is great. Nit: There is a difference between style and narrative voice. For instance, you can write in academic style, technical style, journalistic style, etc. Those things usually involve audience, purpose, and things like how you set up references and use capitalization. Reading style manuals is boring as hell (I recommend the Chicago Manual of Style, which is the boringest of the boring). For a shorter read, the definitive style guide is Strunk & White's Elements of Style/. Style can always be learned; it is never innate.

Narrative voice is something slightly different, closer to what you were talking about Joyce and Hemingway. Most fic writers have no sense of narrative voice. The best fic writers approximate the narrative voice of their chosen canon.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]criticalcricket
2004-07-01 02:52 pm UTC (link)
Yeah, but I wasn't talking about technical styles *whines*

I like to call it style over voice. When I talk to people about the voice in their papers, they usually look at me funny, so style is the fall back term. The expression of their personality etc etc. Lots of people refer to it as style or recognize it when used that way.

Besides, the book I was reading referred to it as style, hence the essay was on style and not voice. :)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]etcetera_cat
2004-07-01 02:18 pm UTC (link)
Oh, yes! Articulated much better than I could have as well...

>^-^

(Reply to this)


[info]sailormac
2004-07-01 02:32 pm UTC (link)
All I have to say about that essay is --

Wordy McWord Word of the Clan McWord.

*Brilliant*.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]criticalcricket
2004-07-01 02:48 pm UTC (link)
Perhaps, but you know there can be only one.

*sharpens sword and glances around*

(Reply to this) (Parent)

style, whatever
(Anonymous)
2004-07-14 04:16 am UTC (link)
"you must fist be able to write."
*snort* Talk about the pot calling the kettle black.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: style, whatever
[info]wildwolf15
2004-07-18 12:55 pm UTC (link)
Oi, Cricket! I do believe you have another troll! -pokes it- 'Tis cute. Does this one do tricks as well?
~Jen

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Re: style, whatever - [info]criticalcricket, 2004-07-20 12:11 pm UTC

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…