| † そらいろ † ( @ 2018-01-11 11:19:00 |
| Entry tags: | # the community |
Welcome to Éternelle Fleur!
Welcome to my archives community,
eternelle_fleur! *claps, claps*. Although I don't think my work is the best and I have lots of things yo improve, I wanted to show you all everything that I do and enjoy doing ^_^
.
Please, remember to read the rules before anything!
★゜・。。・゜゜・。。☆ 。。・゜゜・。。・゜★
Reviews
Reviews
During all these years I have been into LiveJournal, I got really surprised that any community offered reviews for improving the comms or journals that offers graphics and etcetera n( o _ o )n !! So, if you want one, I can make it for you o( ^ - ^ )o~. Just comment here telling me you want one; please, add this form into the comment!
REVIEW INFORMATION
For: ________ [You put here the name of your comm/journal and a link to it].
Moderated by: _____ [Moderator/moderator's journals --please, tell me who's the owner].
Theme: ____ [Secific theme of the comm/journal].
• The review will be posted here.
• The awards will be only for that comm, not for taking.
• When the review is ready and posted, I will re-respond the comment the comm made requesting the review telling them that it is already made.
• I will say only the truth. If you think you won't like somebody else's opinion, then just don't take the review. This is not for destroying.
• I won't take requests from drama, hate communities related comms/journals.
• If you feel you are not prepared to receive a posible surprise, then just don't take the review. I make this just only because I like seeing lovely comms/journals improving and bettering themselves ^_^. Just have fun!
I WILL ASSESS:
• First impression (5/5): it is just simply that. What impression the comm/journal gives when you enter (both Profile and Journal).
• Design (10/10): if it suits the theme of the comm/journal, its aesthetics, color combinations of the layout.
• Organization (20/20): sections, navigation, rules position (this is very important), tags (I recommend to use them, they organise A LOT).
• Content (15/15): it has also to be organized. Heavy images under a LJ-cut, coherent titles, list of goods everybody is offering and spelling. I know it is really hard for the mods to read every entry their members make, so I will focus into the Profile and general spelling of the website. Of course I will subtract points if it is all talked LiKe tHiS or u nevah say sth without this kind of spelling.
• Links (10/10): here I will check if the links are properly working (-1 mark for broken link) and give the correct access to the specified section (if the link says "profile", it has to show the profile not the calendar, for example).
• Profile (20/20): how does it looks, easy to navigate into it, welcome text, rules, resources, affiliates, etcétera.
• Atittude (20/20): To be kind and polite is ESSENTIAL into the comm/journal; between the members, between the mods and between mods & members. Constructive criticism is always welcome, but destructive criticism is not worth; it is useless most of times. Active participation of the mods is also essential.
Excelent 90-100
Very good 70-89
Good 60-69
Regular 30-59
Bad 0-29
Your comm/journal will be marked from 1 to 100 and I will make an award congratulating you for the effort you putted and still putting into the comm/journal.
REVIEW INFORMATION
For: ________ [You put here the name of your comm/journal and a link to it].
Moderated by: _____ [Moderator/moderator's journals --please, tell me who's the owner].
Theme: ____ [Secific theme of the comm/journal].
• The review will be posted here.
• The awards will be only for that comm, not for taking.
• When the review is ready and posted, I will re-respond the comment the comm made requesting the review telling them that it is already made.
• I will say only the truth. If you think you won't like somebody else's opinion, then just don't take the review. This is not for destroying.
• I won't take requests from drama, hate communities related comms/journals.
• If you feel you are not prepared to receive a posible surprise, then just don't take the review. I make this just only because I like seeing lovely comms/journals improving and bettering themselves ^_^. Just have fun!
I WILL ASSESS:
• First impression (5/5): it is just simply that. What impression the comm/journal gives when you enter (both Profile and Journal).
• Design (10/10): if it suits the theme of the comm/journal, its aesthetics, color combinations of the layout.
• Organization (20/20): sections, navigation, rules position (this is very important), tags (I recommend to use them, they organise A LOT).
• Content (15/15): it has also to be organized. Heavy images under a LJ-cut, coherent titles, list of goods everybody is offering and spelling. I know it is really hard for the mods to read every entry their members make, so I will focus into the Profile and general spelling of the website. Of course I will subtract points if it is all talked LiKe tHiS or u nevah say sth without this kind of spelling.
• Links (10/10): here I will check if the links are properly working (-1 mark for broken link) and give the correct access to the specified section (if the link says "profile", it has to show the profile not the calendar, for example).
• Profile (20/20): how does it looks, easy to navigate into it, welcome text, rules, resources, affiliates, etcétera.
• Atittude (20/20): To be kind and polite is ESSENTIAL into the comm/journal; between the members, between the mods and between mods & members. Constructive criticism is always welcome, but destructive criticism is not worth; it is useless most of times. Active participation of the mods is also essential.
Excelent 90-100
Very good 70-89
Good 60-69
Regular 30-59
Bad 0-29
Your comm/journal will be marked from 1 to 100 and I will make an award congratulating you for the effort you putted and still putting into the comm/journal.
★゜・。。・゜゜・。。☆ 。。・゜゜・。。・゜★
Questions & suggestions will be answered in this entry