Otter ([info]antiotter) wrote in [info]democrats,
@ 2006-07-22 20:01:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Arab-American Internment camp proponent and all-around lunatic Michelle Malkin is at it again, with yet another attack piece on the New York Times, accusing them yet again of treason.

Her evidence? A NYT article which mentions the US approved a sale of precision-guided bombs to Israel, which she titles "HEZBOLLAH'S FAVORITE NEWSPAPER."

Israel buys US-made weapons is a secret? Who the hell didn't know this? I suppose Google is next on her list of traitors, as a Google Image Search for "Israeli F-15" produces this image:



What's even more pathetic is the idiotic attempt at humor following the article. In keeping with traditional right-wing political "humor," it is neither accurate, incisive, makes sense, or even funny (See any Cox & Forkum political cartoon for further examples).

Original article

Author's Note: I was granted a Cosmic Top Secret Atomal SSBI/SCI/SAP security clearance by the United States government. I think it's fair to say that I know a tad more about handling classified material than Ms. Malkin.

(Post a new comment)


[info]mysticknyght
2006-07-23 02:01 am UTC (link)
Ms. Maglalang needs a ballgag...simple as that...

(Reply to this)


[info]debergerac
2006-07-24 02:34 am UTC (link)
Author's Note: I was granted a Cosmic Top Secret Atomal SSBI/SCI/SAP security clearance by the United States government. I think it's fair to say that I know a tad more about handling classified material than Ms. Malkin.

do you?

the united states government doesn't issue "cosmic top secret atomal" clearances.

"cosmic" and "atomal" are nato designations which indicate the classified material can be shared between nato countries.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

[info]antiotter
2006-07-24 02:55 am UTC (link)
...and who has access to it. It's why they dropped the C/A access when I left Germany, as I no longer fell under NATO command.

Don't believe everything you read on Wikipedia.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

[info]debergerac
2006-07-24 04:43 am UTC (link)
Don't believe everything you read on Wikipedia.

why would you assume that?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

[info]antiotter
2006-07-24 04:56 am UTC (link)
A friend of mine is a struggling writer, and offered up my email on some now-defunct web-based writers' community as a technical advisor for people writing military fiction.

Most of their stuff is in the ballpark, but off a bit. I ask where they got their information from and 99% of the time it's Wikipedia.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

[info]debergerac
2006-07-24 05:50 am UTC (link)
wikipedia can be useful but only when reference links are provided and when info presented can be corroborated elsewhere.

i have a background in intel which includes european service.


(Reply to this) (Parent)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…