| Johnathan Fii ( @ 2007-08-11 11:48:00 |
More Meyshi
Looks like Meyshi decided to DCMA me as well.
Time to play.
EDIT: Does anyone but me cry BS that her cousin died...? I know that when one of my friends died in HS, I certainly wouldn't have been in good enough spirits to PS just cuz I wanted to PS for teh lulz.
Looks like Meyshi decided to DCMA me as well.
Time to play.
EDIT: Does anyone but me cry BS that her cousin died...? I know that when one of my friends died in HS, I certainly wouldn't have been in good enough spirits to PS just cuz I wanted to PS for teh lulz.
To Whom It May Concern,
At 13:33 UT, August 11th of 2007, I was sent a notification from LJ Abuse, stating that a DCMA claim had been filed against me for post http://mcpo-john117.livejournal.com/1870 33.html , stating that I had violated the copyright of another.
This is a counter-notification, informing LJ staff, and the claimant in question, that I have not violated any existing US Copyright Laws, nor does the claimant in question have any right to claim ownership of a work of fanfiction. My usage of the Fanfic-writer's work was well-within the bounds of the Fair Use Doctrine, which covers not only reviews, but satirical parody as well. The entire piece was not quoted, several parts were cut - as is stated in the work of satire itself.
The work in question may be found here: http://www.fanfiction.net/s/3685465/1/As sassination_Nation
However, even if I had quoted the entire piece, the Fair Use Doctrine places no legal limitation on the word count that may be quoted. So long as I have not laid claim to the piece as my own, and the author is not only credited for her original work in the header of the journal entry, but linked to as well, I am well within the bounds of the law.
Furthermore, the piece in question is a work of fanfiction. Meaning that unless the claimant is JK Rowling herself, the claimant has no right to file against me.
This individual has been trolling the LiveJournal community Deleterius, located http://community.livejournal.com/deleter ius, for some time now. She and her syncophants have been rather abusive and have threatened outright violence against the userbase there, for daring to exercise our right to satire under the Fair Use Doctrine.
Here is my contact information:
[Stuff About Me Censored]
I am of legal age to represent myself, and am willing to testify in a court of law.
Yours sincerely,
[Real Name Censored]
At 13:33 UT, August 11th of 2007, I was sent a notification from LJ Abuse, stating that a DCMA claim had been filed against me for post http://mcpo-john117.livejournal.com/1870
This is a counter-notification, informing LJ staff, and the claimant in question, that I have not violated any existing US Copyright Laws, nor does the claimant in question have any right to claim ownership of a work of fanfiction. My usage of the Fanfic-writer's work was well-within the bounds of the Fair Use Doctrine, which covers not only reviews, but satirical parody as well. The entire piece was not quoted, several parts were cut - as is stated in the work of satire itself.
The work in question may be found here: http://www.fanfiction.net/s/3685465/1/As
However, even if I had quoted the entire piece, the Fair Use Doctrine places no legal limitation on the word count that may be quoted. So long as I have not laid claim to the piece as my own, and the author is not only credited for her original work in the header of the journal entry, but linked to as well, I am well within the bounds of the law.
Furthermore, the piece in question is a work of fanfiction. Meaning that unless the claimant is JK Rowling herself, the claimant has no right to file against me.
This individual has been trolling the LiveJournal community Deleterius, located http://community.livejournal.com/deleter
Here is my contact information:
[Stuff About Me Censored]
I am of legal age to represent myself, and am willing to testify in a court of law.
Yours sincerely,
[Real Name Censored]