| |
[Aug. 29th, 2008|12:18 pm] |
|
"Brother, you seem... easily upset." |
|
|
| Damn... |
[Aug. 29th, 2008|12:13 pm] |
Gustav is restrengthening, may well hit western Cuba as a major hurricane, and is then headed straight toward New Orleans. Over water pretty much guaranteed to strengthen it to what looks like at least a category 3, if not a 4 or a 5.
Fuck. |
|
|
| oh politics, you are a soap opera! |
[Aug. 29th, 2008|11:49 am] |
McCain selects Palin.
I'm back and forth on whether this is politically genius or hopelessly stupid. In any event, sure takes the spotlight off of Obama at a key time. He is blatantly playing identity politics to an almost comical extent (which may work?), but he's also walking a thin line with his age because I don't think anyone really wants to see her end up as President. Not to mention the fact that he'll need to come up with a new set of criticisms of Obama.
And just when we thought we might stop seeing so much blatant sexism in the presidential race... Funny how many progressive Democrats are willing to get nasty when it's an attractive Republican we're talking about.
Meanwhile, here's a great comment about how skillfully Obama toed the positive/negative and "Angry Black Man" line with his speech last night.
Sigh. What a year, indeed. |
|
|
| |
[Aug. 29th, 2008|10:24 am] |
| [ | mood |
| | amused | ] | When the AP Newswire is indistinguishable from The Onion ...
Stars over the moon about Obama's speech By Ryan Pearson, AP Entertainment Writer Fri Aug 29, 7:28 AM ET
"First word on Barack Obama's historic nomination acceptance speech from a bevy of celebrities in attendance was decidedly partisan: 'It was excellent,' Black Eyed Peas singer Fergie said. 'It was amazing.' |
|
|
| A Friendly Reminder |
[Aug. 29th, 2008|10:50 am] |
It seems that I have not been clear lately about what the content of this journal is.
I am progressive, liberal, anti-sexism, anti-racism, anti-homophobia, anti-transphobia, anti-ableist, anti-bigotry queer feminist, without apology. I am pro-choice, anti-war, anti death penalty, and anti-poverty. call me a radical if you wish, but forgive me if I don't think desiring equality is all that radical. This is not a phase, this is not a fad. This is the evolution of a person that I have always been. I will stop when these basic inequalities are gone, or when I am dead, no sooner.
I am not going to sugarcoat or make things more palatable. I will do my best to be aware of when I am exercising my privilege, and will do my damndest to improve myself. I am open to being called out when I screw up, and I will always double check what I have said. I am respectful of others, but I am under no obligation whatsoever to take uncomfortable material and make it more palatable. I also have no obligation to sit down and shut up simply because I am saying something that you may find hard to hear.
If you have a problem with something I post, please feel free to let me know, but be sure that you can explain it. I have no problem with disagreement, but if you plan on taking disagreement as personal attack, you may want to leave now. If you plan on attacking me instead of my argument, you may want to leave now. If you plan on attacking me because I refuse to see your side the way you want it seen, you may want to leave now.
I am planning on a series of posts in which I clarify my positions on certain things, and in which I will lay out what is up for debate in this space that is mine.
For most of you, none of this had to be said. Most of you understand most of this and accept it, and for that I am thankful. I do appreciate discussion, debate and being challenged, and please don't take any of this post as an indicator otherwise.
So you track each trickle back to it's source, and then scream up the faucet till your face is hoarse, cause you're surrounded by a world's worth of things you just can't excuse. |
|
|
| |
[Aug. 29th, 2008|10:30 am] |
I've got a four day weekend coming up....... good because the job is getting on my damn nerves. too much petty bickering going on.
I'm gonna be staffing tomorrow because of no closer, tomorrow (my normal shift), and possibly sunday if I can't get anyone to do it. Who needs days off? shit man.
Sunday I'll be going to a church service for the guards ("Labor in the pulpits") at a church in west phila, then first thing bright and early on monday I'll be in the labor day parade with jwj. hopefully there'll be a ton of beer at the picnic afterwards.
Tuesday I took a personal day and I'm gonna get michelle ready for her first day as a teacher.
Last night: watched eagles preseason (4th quarter has almost no players who will make the team) and obama's speech. Kind of interesting... he's got a different style than I'm used to with politicians. My quasi-fascist co-worker tried to red-bait him to me by saying he was a disciple of Saul Alinsky. It sort of backfired because I like Saul Alinsky a lot.... and I do like that Obama got his start as a community organizer. I dunno. I couldn't stand Al Gore and John Kerry, but Obama's a bit more likeable. |
|
|
| Three Years Later |
[Aug. 29th, 2008|10:11 am] |
Three Years After Katrina: While Republicans and Democrats Gather and Celebrate, A City Still Searches for Recovery
As headlines focus on conventions and running mates, the third anniversary of Katrina offers an opportunity to examine the results of disastrous federal, state and local policy on the people of New Orleans. Several organizations have released powerful reports in the past week, examining the current state of the city; while grassroots activists have plans to broadcast their message from the streets. For those who have heard only uplifting stories about the city's recovery, the facts on the ground offer an urgent reminder of the ongoing disaster.
According to a study by PolicyLink, 81 percent of those who received the Federally-funded, State-administered Road Home grants had insufficient resources to cover their damages. The average Road Home applicant fell about $35,000 short of the money they need to rebuild their home, and African-American households on average had an almost 35% higher shortfall than white households.
More than one in three residential addresses – over 70,000 - remain vacant or unoccupied, according to a report by the Greater New Orleans Community Data Center. While workers with Brad Pitt's Make It Right project are working on overdrive to finish the first of their scores of planned houses in the notoriously devastated Lower Ninth Ward, the neighborhood overall ranks far behind other neighborhoods in recovery, with only 11 percent of its pre-Katrina number of households. The same report notes that since the devastation of the city, rents have raised by 46% citywide (much more in some neighborhoods), while many city services remain very limited – for example, only 21% of public transit buses are running.
Divided City
Its not just radicals that speak of race and class divisions in New Orleans. A poll by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that 70% of residents feel we're divided by class and/or race. The Kaiser survey also found unity among New Orleanians: we're united in feeling forgotten by the rest of the US. Eight out of 10 said the federal government has not provided sufficient support. Nearly two-thirds think that the US public has largely forgotten about the city.
Click through the link at top to read the whole article. Look at how little is being done from the top down, and how that is wresting more and more control from the people of New Orleans. See how the most helpful stuff is community efforts, organized by the people themselves.
And don't forget. Never forget. |
|
|
| |
[Aug. 29th, 2008|09:31 am] |
I dreamt that while I was falling asleep I was being bitten by bugs and couldn't fall asleep.
I have really lame dreams. |
|
|
| Recommended Reading: Zombie Edition |
[Aug. 29th, 2008|09:53 am] |
So.very.tired. But I snuck onto a computer at work. Ha!
Too bad I'm too tired to think. Luckily, my flist thinks for me!
Via ldragoon: Why Strong Female Characters Are Bad For Women
Yeah, the trouble is, although these characters were marginally better than the original Damsels in Distress, they still ended up having to be saved in the final act by the male hero. There would usually be a scene (or three) where the “Strong Female Character” would be trapped by the villain and put into sexy clothing, I guess as a punishment of some sort. And even when she was being strong, she was always doing it in the sexiest way possible. She’d never, say, get a black eye or a broken nose in a fight. Her ability to fix cars (a powerful, masculine trait) would basically allow her to get sexy grease all over her slippery body. Her ability to shoot a gun was so the film’s advertisers could put her on a poster wearing a skimpy outfit with a big gun between her legs. All in all, the “strength” of her character was just to make her a better prize for the hero at the end - and for the horny male audience throughout.
Hathor reviews an old episode of Joan of Arcadia: Bringeth it On:
The police started by going to the school and asking to interview students who could be the girl they’re looking for, and Vice Principal Price had helpfully compiled a list of girls he thought were most likely. Helen quite rightly refused to make any copies for the investigation or give it back– Price claims he’s qualified to identify “at risk” students, but Helen says they just don’t fit his ideal of the perfect young lady and that the only reason her own daughter isn’t on the list is because Will’s the chief of police. And why aren’t they talking to any boys? They eventually decide to have a small group of people listen to the 911 tape to see if anyone recognizes the voice. Showing some shocking naivety Will says later in private that the list would never have been made public, but as Helen points out “The CIA couldn’t keep that list from getting out in a high school”.
furikku links to a study on IRC Harrassment that I haven't had a chance to read but I thought would interest others.
I'm zombie-Anna today. I want to write good things about meeting gentlespirit, ginny_t and hysteriachan, and tell anecdotes about having met interfolks before and how badly that went, and tell you about New!Job, and talk about the conference and the art and the stuff, but right now all I can pull of a wee wave. *waves*
(Part of why I'm so tired this morning is because the nominations for my Political Party of Choice have become contested and I needed to send an email out to one of the candidates asking hir to stop being a jackass and learn how to use the enter key. It was nicer than that, though.) |
|
|
| |
[Aug. 29th, 2008|08:11 am] |
I'm kind of crabby right now.
I stayed up at late as I possibly could last night (which was just after 2am - I'm so not good at this game). I was so exhausted that the only thing I could do was play Yahoo Pool. I tried playing Bingo but that required too much focus. I set my alarm for 8am this morning. So I'm giving myself 4-5 hours to do everything I need to do today then sleep the rest of it. I hope this works for changing my circadian rhythm quickly. I doubt that it will. However, I shouldn't complain that much because, honestly, I do need the money and my scheduler has really done a great job of getting me a lot of hours for this event. (Also, looking over the schedule, I should be glad I don't have a 4a-8pm shift like someone else does. That's INSANE.)
Saturday morning, I get off work at 5am. There was a schedule change which leaves me back at work at 6pm Saturday night until 8am Sunday morning. I guess there are security sweeps, so only one person is allowed on the premises. That person is me. I'm a little bit terrified, honestly, of having to work 14 hours alone because those times fall from right in the middle of dinner to breakfast. Is it going to be too much work for me to handle or will food service be suspended during that time or what? (I just thought to email and ask. Ha. I'm brilliant.)
I'm crabby because in order to get myself out of bed this morning, I've basically had to make up things to do to ensure I get out of bed. I'm going to the Mall of buy more hair gel (something I've actually needed to do). I'm going to pick up my room (also something I've needed to do). I don't know what else - maybe talk with my brother about Birthright? So now I'm up after less than 6 hours of sleep with annoying tasks to do. Sigh.
So instead, I update my livejournal. Pointless. Sorry, folks. |
|
|
| |
[Aug. 29th, 2008|11:51 am] |
I don't know where nyetwork finds the crazies, but I can't pass this one up. Maine grandmother might go to jail for stealing a library book doing a good deed FOR TEH CHYLDRUN~!!1 Pro-life circles are spinning it as a heroic battle for the moral good of American children who don't need to be exposed to cartoon pr0n [o hai 4chan!] and that "birth control" thing. [It leads to abortion anyway.]
nyetwork even went digging around a pro-life site in search of news on the subject. Now that is heroic. [Or pure masochism. The two are sometimes hard to tell apart.] |
|
|
| I love this man. |
[Aug. 28th, 2008|10:49 pm] |
Wow. WOW.
We got to the convention center around one. Obama wasn't speaking until eight. We had NO tickets. NONE. This meant that we'd be standing outside, watching from a jumbo tron. But, before we left, we prayed that we'd get tickets to the floor. So. We're in line. A LONG LINE. I'd asked the security guard if we needed a pass or ticket to get in. "No! Everyone can get in this line." Right. We get to the front of the line and the ticket woman, very kindly, turned us away. Then we see tons of people asking for tickets. Holding signs like, "Grad student needs 1 ticket!!" or "Choir needs 10 tickets!! Please!" So we wait around for a few mintues. Then I spy the guy that was holding the choir sign with 10 FREAKING TICKETS! So we made a sign. We ended up getting 6 tickets and one floor pass. Amen to that. There we're three other ladies outside, so we passed the extra three on to them.
That speech. More tomorrow. Remind me to talk about abortion, war, and guns. |
|
|
| ass out of u and me |
[Aug. 29th, 2008|12:19 am] |
I read this book The Four Agreements a couple months ago. It's really quite straightforward: Be impeccable with your word. Don't take anything personally. Don't make assumptions. Always do your best.
That's it. Those are the four agreements. However, the book explains them a little bit more, otherwise it would be quite a thin book.
The book made a lot of sense to me and I've done what I could to use what seemed practical from the book and incorporate it into my life. I try to be as honest and intentional with my words as I possibly can. I try to communicate clearly, or as clearly as possible. I try not to take anything personally because there is a good chance that however anyone else is feeling about me, it's their issue. If they're happy with me or sad at me or do/don't like me, it's probably their issue to sort out. Perhaps the biggest change I've made is that I don't make assumptions and I am very aware of when I have made assumptions or when other people are making assumptions. Clearly, I can't NEVER make assumptions because we all make small ones all the time: when I'm at work and someone orders a drink, I can only assume they will pay for it upon receiving their drink, for example. When I'm hanging out with J, I find myself repeatedly telling her that she can't make the assumptions about people she's making - she's projecting her emotions onto their behavior. Finally, I think I do my best, but that last agreement is a little bit more abstract to me and I sort of glossed over it. (I suppose in that context, I did my best as I tend to really struggle with finishing books.)
I've been noticing lately how many and how often people make HUUUGE assumptions and project their own emotions or insecurities or anger onto other people. It just seems silly and useless to me. I don't understand the point in making assumptions about people and their behavior, or what they might think.
Long story short, I commented on a note (on Facebook) of someone that I haven't spoken to in years. It was thought provoking and raised some interesting points - my comment was a question. She sent my a message that basically said, "Just because I said 'heteronormative' doesn't mean I need your two cents. Especially after we haven't spoken in years." While her second point is completely valid, I was a bit confused as to why she thought I commented just because her note had something to do with heteronormativity and practices of it. She made an (incorrect) assumption about my motivation to comment. I was very tempted to write back and explain why I decided to comment. However, I also realized that there was no point. I simply replied, "Understood. Good luck with marriage and life." (basicall). I then promptly removed her from my friends (but, of course, not before I thought to go back to the original note and delete my comment) and that was that. I suppose it's something I should have done a long time ago. However, I will note a little bit of irony: If my memory serves me correctly, she is the one that requested to be Facebook friends.
There is someone else in my life right now that I'm finding myself very confused with. J is very insistent that her read on the situation is correct. I hem and haw a little bit because, while I can see her point of view, I really struggle with making such big assumptions about someone who is, basically, a closed book. A lot of my confused was alleviated today when I got a very simple text in the midst of a text conversation that so clearly explained her position, I felt a little bit like a dunce for not having seen it before. J was partially correct, but her interpertation of this person's actions were not.
I am just so over making assumptions about things I shouldn't be making assumptions about. |
|
|
| 08.28.08 link round-up |
[Aug. 28th, 2008|10:25 pm] |
| [ | Tags | | | activism, biden, clinton, dnc, election 08, hillary clinton, hurricane katrina, iraq, kerry, kucinich, lgbtq rights, mccain, michelle obama, obama, race, racism, rnc, roundup, veterans rights | ] |
I admit I'm still getting through the videos. So it's more like a to-do list for myself. *g*
Edit: Obama's speech links added below. Soon as it's up, I'll add the link to Gore's speech.
**********
On the Radio
LA Activists Commemorate Katrina, Draw Connections Locally http://uprisingradio.org/home/?p=3045
Today we hear from local organizers who are putting together a series of events here in Los Angeles that includes a candle-light vigil, art, food, theater, speakers, live music, and film. Further more, the organizers are attempting to connect the struggles of people in New Orleans and Los Angeles.
The event by The Right to the City coalition is this Friday August 29th at 6:30 pm at 3300 Wilshire Blvd in Los Angeles. For more information, visit http://www.saje.net.
You might need tissue for this one:
Katrina Pain Index: New Orleans Three Years Later http://uprisingradio.org/home/?p=3050
Earlier this week [human rights lawyer Bill Quigley] published a series of staggering statistics called Katrina Pain Index – New Orleans Three Years Later. The audio version of these statistics is read by Teddy Robinson and Donna Walker of KPFK. Music by Terence Blanchard from the soundtrack to When the Levees Broke.
It can be read here: http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2008/08/24/11127/
**********
Activists Gear Up for RNC http://uprisingradio.org/home/?p=3046
CNN estimates that tens of thousands of people will converge onto St. Paul next week. Among them are groups against the Iraq war and those calling for government funding of more productive and just endeavors, including welfare.
**********
Iraq Vets Confront Democrats in Denver http://uprisingradio.org/home/?p=3048
Outside the convention hall Rage Against the Machine played to a crowd of thousands, followed by the largest demonstration of the week, an antiwar march led by Iraq Veterans Against the War... Eventually one [Iraq Veterans Against the War] member was allowed to cross the police line to meet with a representative of the Obama campaign. Major US news media chose to completely ignore this dramatic story.
**********
This one from yesterday I have to get to:
"Gook: John McCain’s Racism and Why it Matters" http://uprisingradio.org/home/?p=3044
In describing the book’s thesis, Tang asks, "war fertilizes racism, and racism justifies wars and the killing of civilians. This dynamic thrives within the most dangerous leaders of the world. Is John McCain one of them?"
**********
Video - DNC
Hillary Clinton http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=268ncnoitEc
**********
Joe Biden http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVH58DeUThg
**********
Bill Clinton http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3r6xvwPGcY
**********
John Kerry http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dO2PAm4iCtE
**********
Michelle Obama addressing the LGBT Caucus http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NOc9cROLbK8
**********
Dennis Kucinich drinks the Kool-aid endorses Obama http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lv0smG7ptcM
**********
Obama's speech http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yZCrIeRkMhA
Transcript: http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7012104327
Thanks to angelsscream for the link.
**********
Official Obama YouTube page YouTube page: http://www.youtube.com/user/BarackObamadotcom
**********
 |
|
|
| |
[Aug. 29th, 2008|12:54 am] |
I love the night sounds of crickets. There is no escaping the cricket noises, and where everyone seems so isolated by drawn blinds and air conditioned cars streaming down hot roads its comforting to be always connected to thousands of insects. At night I can also hear trucks going down 32. Night noises.
blech I feel stereotypical just writing that because disparaging suburbia is a pretty common subject of really tiring poetry. but I don't know. I like suburbia because it can be interesting to live where the frontier of rigid social norms meets fields and the re-growth of forest, where dead cicadas litter the sidewalks and blanket peoples cars every 15 years with nothing to be done for it. And I like night here a lot, which leaks into and darkly thickens every vast, manicured lawn. I wouldn't write a poem about it, but I like living here sometimes.
I am reading To the Lighthouse and I love it a lot! |
|
|