entries friends calendar user info Previous Previous Next Next
profile
Dark Christianity
Name: Dark Christianity
calendar
Back April 2009
1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930
links
page summary
Dark Christianity - Phamacist's Refusal Leads to Unwanted Pregnancy -- and Lawsuit
Exploring and Exposing Dominionist Christianity
britzkrieg
[info]dark_christian
[info]britzkrieg
Add to Memories
Tell a Friend
Phamacist's Refusal Leads to Unwanted Pregnancy -- and Lawsuit
Pharmacist Refuses To Fill Prescriptions For Moral Reasons
Walgreens Allows Pharmacists To Not Dispense Drugs They Object To

MILWAUKEE -- A WISN 12 News investigation has discovered that a Milwaukee-area pharmacist has refused to fill prescriptions for women citing religious reasons.

A Milwaukee mother of six walked into a north side Walgreens with a prescription for the so-called morning after pill.

The woman, who 12 News is not identifying, said it was a difficult decision.

"Financially, I wouldn't be able to afford having another child," Jane Doe said.

She asked 12 News to disguise her identity -- afraid of backlash from those who might judge her.

"I mean, I guess I was desperate," Doe said.

Doctors prescribe the pill to prevent pregnancy. It should be taken within 72 hours of conception. [Note: This is factually incorrect. There are two pills, for one thing, and the first needs to be taken within 120 hours of unprotected sex, not "conception."]

"It was right after New Year's weekend. I got it as soon as I could," Doe said.

But the pharmacist refused to fill her prescription.

"She just told me that she will not fill it. That she's Catholic, and it's murder," Doe said.

Then, she said, before a crowded waiting area, the pharmacist berated her.

"'You're a murderer. I will not help you kill this baby. I will not have the blood on my hands,'" Doe said. "I tried to explain to her that it's emergency contraceptives, that it's not an abortion pill. She then snatched the form from me, that the prescription was attached to, telling me the paper was full of lies, and she won't be a part of it. I was crying, shaking, upset, so embarrassed. I wanted to run out of the store and hope nobody else could get a good look at me."

"So, did you ever get your emergency contraceptives?" 12 News Senior Investigative Reporter Colleen Henry asked.

"No, I never received that one," Doe said.

"And you became pregnant?" Henry asked.

"I did become pregnant, and I had to terminate the pregnancy. It was very hard. And I didn't want to be what she called me. But that's what I ended up being," Doe said.

The woman claimed she's emotionally distressed, that Walgreens breached her privacy and discriminated against her.

Her lawyer said Walgreens failed to ensure its female customers have the same access to reproductive health care as men.

"Condoms are sold there, very easily, very accessible. Viagra ... and I suspect there is no situation where that pharmacist has said to a man, 'I think there's something wrong in you taking Viagra,'" attorney Tricia Knight said.

WISN 12 News wanted to see for itself so it sent producers wearing hidden cameras back to the Walgreens pharmacist to ask about the morning after pill.

"I won't dispense it. You have to wait until the next pharmacist comes in at 2 p.m.," pharmacist Michelle Long (pictured, right) said.

"You said you won't do it, why?" the producer asked.

"Because I'm Catholic, and it's against my religion," Long said.

Later, Long explained her position to another undercover 12 News staffer.

"It's a chemical abortion. If there is a fertilized egg, it prevents it from implanting, which causes a chemical abortion," Long said.

"Isn't this pill legal?" the staffer asked.

"It's legal. It's legal, yeah," Long said.

I'm just confused. I don't know why, if it's legal, why can't have it?" the staffer asked.

"Regular abortion procedures are legal also, but not everybody in the country believes in it," Long said.

Each time, Long was consistent in her position.

WISN 12 News went to Long to ask about the woman's complaint.

"She said that you refused to fill her morning after pill prescription, that you called her a baby-killer, and said you didn't want blood on your hands," Henry stated.

"No, I'm sure I didn't say that. No, I'm quite positive I wouldn't say that," Long responded.

"Do you fill prescriptions for the morning after pill?" Henry asked.

"No," Long said.

"Is that for religious reasons?" Henry asked.

"Yes," Long answered.

Walgreens policy allows pharmacists to refuse to dispense drugs they object to.

"If a pharmacist does refuse, we require the pharmacist to pass the prescription on to another pharmacist at that location, or to another pharmacy," a Walgreens spokesman told 12 News.

"It's like she's trying to play God or something," Doe said.

But the woman believes Walgreens' policy is selling women short.

"What's been the hardest thing for you in all of this?" Henry asked.

"Having to have an abortion. I feel like it didn't have to get to that point. It could have been prevented. That's what I was attempting to do," Doe said.

"She became pregnant. She had an abortion. She says that it was because you wouldn't fill her morning after pill prescription," Henry told Long.

"This is the first I'm hearing about it, so I'm not really prepared to comment on that," Long said.

Long told 12 News she feels strongly about her beliefs and would like to talk more about them, but Walgreens advised her not to comment, and told Henry they have no official record of the woman's complaint.

Long was not confrontational with the 12 News producers who asked about emergency contraception.

A state lawmaker has introduced a bill to give pharmacists a so-called conscience clause -- legal protection for refusing to dispense a prescription. It would be the same way the law protects doctors who opt out of procedures they find immoral.

Wisconsin was the first state to reprimand a pharmacist who refused to fill a college student's prescription for birth control pills.

Pharmacist Neil Noesen is now at the center of a national firestorm. You can hear his story Thursday on "12 News at 5:00."

Source

Tags: ,

Comments
crookedsixpence From: [info]crookedsixpence Date: May 7th, 2005 03:09 pm (UTC) (Link)
That pharmacist should be fired.

Also, drawn and quartered, but thats not gunna happen.
britzkrieg From: [info]britzkrieg Date: May 7th, 2005 03:12 pm (UTC) (Link)
I'll be interested to see how the lawsuit goes.

In the meantime, Walgreens must suffer. We must at least boycott them.
mirtharesa From: [info]mirtharesa Date: May 7th, 2005 03:52 pm (UTC) (Link)
here here.
honestly, i don't see why people take jobs in which they are going to have to be asked to do things that they won't do, unless their entire purpose in that career is to make a point of giving people grief. it's like a vegan working at McDonalds and lecturing everyone who orders a big mac and calling them an animal killer.
somehow, i don't think it would fly in the food industry, and i don't think it should fly in the pharmacutical industry either. next thing you know radicals will get involved in the development of the drugs and women's birth control will stop working. oh wait, mine didn't. (yeah, a little far fetched, but you know what i mean)
britzkrieg From: [info]britzkrieg Date: May 7th, 2005 03:59 pm (UTC) (Link)
I don't see why people take jobs in which they are going to have to be asked to do things that they won't do, unless their entire purpose in that career is to make a point of giving people grief.

Some people allege that Dominionists are entering fields like pharmacy for exactly these reasons. I don't know if this is true to a great extent, but I suppose it's true of somebody somewhere.

It's like a vegan working at McDonalds and lecturing everyone who orders a big mac and calling them an animal killer.

Yup. I'm a vegetarian myself. I, however, recognize where I need to compromise to get along in society at large.
mirtharesa From: [info]mirtharesa Date: May 7th, 2005 04:04 pm (UTC) (Link)
and i don't eat shellfish, pork, or any of the other "unclean" foods from leviticus... but I don't go around proclaming that everyone eating an easter ham is going against god's will.
dominionists need some serious help, or containment.
adoka From: [info]adoka Date: May 7th, 2005 04:14 pm (UTC) (Link)
Containment. If they are all gathered in one area it would be easier to keep an eye on them.
britzkrieg From: [info]britzkrieg Date: May 7th, 2005 04:30 pm (UTC) (Link)
Some of them would like to contain themselves. Gawd, I wish they would -- and leave the rest of us alone.
adoka From: [info]adoka Date: May 7th, 2005 05:23 pm (UTC) (Link)
The Carolinas eh. I'd support that. Florida would be better though. It would be easier to blockade Florida. Maybe if the US bought Baja from Mexico we could shuffle them off to a new promised land and let them stay on that peninsula. To tell the truth though, I think these Dominionists are like a virus and will completely infect this country. It is yet to be determined if they are like Infuenza or Ebola. My money is on Ebola. A Dominionist strangle hold on the country will so warp this country that we wouldn't recognise it in 20 years.
dogemperor From: [info]dogemperor Date: May 7th, 2005 05:11 pm (UTC) (Link)
Re the allegations that dominionists are entering professions for the specific purpose of subverting them:

It's true. :P I can verify this at least as far as the medical profession as well as professions such as teaching and school boards...

I do remember as early as the early 80s notes in the more hardline "pro-life" groups (run by dominionists) that specifically were advising people to go into pharmacy and the other medical professions specifically so they could block people from "killing babies".

For that matter, I remember from the *seventies* articles recommending people run for school boards (without revealing links to dominionist groups) SPECIFICALLY so they could both take over those school boards (and prevent evolution from being taught and put in place dominionist-friendly policies) and so they could get more political experience.

"Stealth evangelism" has been practiced for a good fifteen or twenty years *AT LEAST* by dominionists, and infiltration of pre-existing structures as "prayer warriors" has been encouraged even longer.
sunfell From: [info]sunfell Date: May 7th, 2005 05:51 pm (UTC) (Link)
And law. Don't forget that. Yesterday's part 3 of the NPR series about Christianity in the public square talked about the flocks of lawyers these Christian colleges are churning out. It's rather chilling.
kalibex From: [info]kalibex Date: May 7th, 2005 08:40 pm (UTC) (Link)
...who will then defend those pharmacists refusing to dispense birth control in such a way that they will not be truly 'sanctioned' for having denied the legal repoductive rights of others.

I have a 'Lazy streak', in that I have my stuff going on, but not a whole lot of time left for community involvement (working f/t while being in grad school nights might have something to do with that).

But now, to my Irritation, the message, especially after the conference, seems pretty clear: 'Get Intensively Involved in your community especially in a political sense...

...or be supressed, maybe destroyed' by those who crave to force themselves upon others.
ellid From: [info]ellid Date: May 7th, 2005 05:54 pm (UTC) (Link)
It's been used against the teaching of evolution for at least twenty years. Nice and honest, no?
crwilley From: [info]crwilley Date: May 7th, 2005 04:42 pm (UTC) (Link)
Oopsie. The pharmacist berated the patient loudly enough to cause her embarassment? Holy HIPAA, Batman. The pharmacy is probably liable.
archanglrobriel From: [info]archanglrobriel Date: May 7th, 2005 05:05 pm (UTC) (Link)
I just can't -wait- until some pharmacists decide that they can't distribute drugs to control HIV because they don't agree with the "homosexual lifestyle" and that they believe AIDS is God's punishment for sinfulness....

that's their next stop on the extremist highway.
I don't understand why women aren't rioting in the streets over this. I mean, seriously - what the HELL? Didn't we fight for women's right to reproductive control already?
ladyegreen From: [info]ladyegreen Date: May 7th, 2005 08:26 pm (UTC) (Link)
That's exactly what this is about, punishing those who don't do what the Christian Right wants them to do. I think you're right because the only next logical step for them is to start refusing medication to those they religiously feel deserve to be ill.

Tremors, shake rattle and roll.

L.
15 comments or Leave a comment