Home

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Intoduction

  • Mar. 25th, 2006 at 6:54 PM
As we have been told we can't join in the discussion about the novel Danny, since that is the only discussion board on this topic we have decided we will start our own. Anyone who is new to the book or has been too intimidated to write on the already estabished discussion board due to all the conflict and the implications that anyone who wants to write on it is suspect, (believed to be Chancery Stone or one of her publishers) are welcome to discuss Danny here.

Anyone who wishes to reply will be responded to, and all comments will be open for everyone to view, as this is the internet, something that supposedly is a world wide resource.

Chancery Stone, your comments are welcome too (good or bad), we can take it.

Comments

foxyroxy1909 wrote:
Mar. 27th, 2006 05:11 pm (UTC)
Hi there jodie-took yr advice & came on the site-read Danny a few months ago (took me a while) really enjoyed it-the ending really surprised me though-what did you think off the ending? (If we can talk about this without spoiling it 4 anyone else who sees this, whos reading Danny).
(Anonymous) wrote:
Mar. 27th, 2006 10:37 pm (UTC)
Dear Chancery,
It's painfully obvious you are both jillandjody and foxyroxy, despite your efforts to "switch it up" with a little netspeak. You do realize that LJ timestamps journal creations, don't you? I'd advise you to please stop embarrassing yourself, but it's too much fun to watch!

Please, head on over to Fandom Wank (http://www.journalfen.net/community/fandom_wank), won't you? I can't wait to watch your head spin!

~An anon who prefers not to be featured on your poison-pen blog.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Mar. 28th, 2006 03:47 am (UTC)
Oooh! Fresh socks for the puppets!
(Anonymous) wrote:
Mar. 28th, 2006 11:15 pm (UTC)
Hee. These people are funny.

(I love how F_W is providing more activity for this comm than it ever would have gotten otherwise.)

(And who the fuck SHARES a username with someone? Too poor to get more than one...free...username?)
(Anonymous) wrote:
Mar. 29th, 2006 03:53 am (UTC)
Siamese twins might, no? Don't ignore the plight of siamese twins.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Mar. 29th, 2006 07:09 am (UTC)
Siamese twins, though, in general, tend to be fiercely independent, so I would think they'd want separate journals.
[info]jillandjodie wrote:
Mar. 29th, 2006 12:28 pm (UTC)
Hi this is Jodie thought id just explain whats going on here as it seems to have created something weird.

foxyroxy1909 is a friend of mine who has read Danny, I set up an account for her as she didn't know how to do it (our inexperience of the internet seems to be the major problem in all of this). She was logging on to talk to me about Danny as you can see. We haven't talked about it in much detail yet as I do not live near her any more( so i was really looking forward to chatting with someone about Danny who I haven't properly chatted about it with yet, but you lot strike again). Unfortunately something has happened and she has been deleted, don't know if setting up an account for someone else isn't allowed on this site, or if one of the people who are suspicious of us have done something to delete her journal and email me to say it is from my email address. Which is true as I set it up for her, but on her email address.

I really can't believe that I can't even speak to my friends on here, you lot complain when your posts are used against you but one of my friends has had the ability to post taken from them, either by you or due to your comments. So now you will not allow us to speak to people we know, maybe the idea of already knowing people in real life and not meeting them on the internet is confusing you. I guess we will have to revert to the phone, but if you would do me a favor if it is one of you that got rid of foxyroxy1909's account could you not do it to anyone else I ask to join me here. If it was not you and it is impossible for a user to do this, this means that the site owners must have seen your messages and terminated the account, could you please not accuse anyone on this discussion board of being sockpupits, (Whatever the fuck that is, would you just use real fucking words), and stick to doing that on your own site. Obviously I cannot stop you but a least give us the right to ignore you as you ignored us, by not wrecking any chance we have of a discussion. If you believe everyone on here is chancery stone, just don't come here.

Thanks
[info]jillandjodie wrote:
Mar. 29th, 2006 12:36 pm (UTC)
I am just informing you i will be setting up a new account for foxyroxy1909 as she cannot use that one any more, feel free to suspect that we are still chancery stone if you wish. We will still be posting here as we believe the internet is public and if people want to waste their time they can, as long as it doesn't stop us chatting with people. Also we hope that others could find the site and discuss Danny with us.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Mar. 29th, 2006 02:40 pm (UTC)
Such a pretty, pretty sock puppet...
[info]jillandjodie wrote:
Mar. 29th, 2006 03:30 pm (UTC)
By the way if you are so obsesed with people being who they say they are, why the anonymous. we have always said who we were.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Mar. 29th, 2006 05:06 pm (UTC)
Because you're a sockpuppet of Chancery Stone, and no one wants to get their ass stalked by her?
[info]jillandjodie wrote:
Mar. 29th, 2006 03:02 pm (UTC)
Could you please tell me if the deletion of foxyroxy1909 was down to anyone on here as if it was not I need to find out how it happened.

Even if the deletion was not due to the comments posted, I still have issue with the fact that me, my sister and the other people we know who want to chat on our board are unable to without suspicion. Ok if people want to be so paranoid that they think everyone is pretending to be someone else, fine, suspect everyone and drive people away from joining the discussion, but do on your own site.

By all means contend our opinions, argue with us about what we think, but stop fucking accusing us. If you think we are someone else don't speak to us.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Mar. 29th, 2006 11:02 pm (UTC)
The only way the journal could have been deleted is if she (by which I mean you, Chancery) deleted it herself. As the only comment she made was on this community there could have been no TOS violation which would have caused LJ admin to delete. So once again, you're only exposing more holes in your socks through your ignorance of LJ.

Profile

[info]cstonesdanny
Hope House Farm, Danny by Chancery Stone

Latest Month

May 2008
S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031