Churchill Downs

Del Mar / Saratoga / The Big M Past Perfformances + many more!!

2008-07-23T12:51:46Z

Past Performances
http://racingindex.perlayer.com/jw/

whobet single card pps for the day of
http://mysite.verizon.net/whobet/trks2day.html

Stable Sponsors Where I Get My Goodies From..So Click Away Boys...Click Away

http://www.signsracing.com/index2.html

Grevelis Racing Stable And Ted Grevelis Blog
http://www.grevelisracing.com
http://grevelisracing.blogspot.com

Pocket Aces Racing Team
http://www.pocketacesracing.com/news.htm

Blue Sky Racing Stables
http://blueskyracings.com/

churchill_downs @ 2008-07-07T21:27:00

2008-07-08T01:27:31Z

Did anyone see Zenyatta's race? I missed it, but apparently she was stunning.
Is she going to be the next Ruffian?

Horse Racing - Lots Of Full Card Past Performances July 4th!!

2008-07-04T12:33:35Z

Past Performances
http://racingindex.perlayer.com/jw/

whobet single card pps for the day of
http://mysite.verizon.net/whobet/trks2day.html

THE ACTIVITY FOR THE STABLES I GET MY PAST PERFORMANCES FROM ARE TAILING OFF BIG TIME! PLEASE JUST CLICK ON EACH LINK...JUST BROWSE AROUND FOR A FEW SECONDS AND CLOSE IT

THANK YOU!

Grevelis Racing Stable And Ted Grevelis Blog
http://www.grevelisracing.com
http://grevelisracing.blogspot.com/

Pocket Aces Racing Team
http://www.pocketacesracing.com/news.htm

Photos!

2008-06-17T07:51:01Z

I just put up some photos I took in the 1990's. Yes I did take these photos! Check them out! Click Here. Comments are welcome!

Irgun with Gary Stevens up winning the 1994 Wood Memorial. Irgun won 3 of 5 short starts. He passed away at the age of 15 in Nashville,IL in 2006 where he was standing at stud.

Let the blame game begin!

2008-06-11T02:37:25Z

Because Big Brown had a Big Flop in the Belmont, Just go blame the Jockey!
Your lucky the horse was not seriously injured! How about that for a unfit horse leading up to the Belmont!

Story Here!

I was there on Saturday. By the Five Furlong marker Big Brown was done as going around the far turn Da'tara put 3 lengths on em' It was like Kent was pushing dead weight. Big Brown had nothing why abuse the horse. Dutrow ought to be ashamed of himself for blaming the jockey!

Well here is something to remember!

On this day Affirmed became the 11th Triple Crown winner and for now the last one by winning the Belmont Stakes by a head over Alydar.

Well it also has been awhile since I posted too, I have been doing a bit of traveling and can be reached over at myspace most of the time! Here are some recent photos from Belmont, Atlantic City, Arlington and Churchill Downs!

Belmont Park Photos! Click Here!
Atlantic City Photos! Click Here!
Arlington Park Photos! Click Here
Churchill Downs Photos! Click Here!

http://www.myspace.com/jbar387

Past-Performances For Tuesday - 5/27

2008-05-26T21:17:42Z

[b]PLEASE NOTE: I WILL BE PUTTING A PASSWORD ON THE SERVER VERY SOON DUE TO HACKER ACTIVITY.....THE ONLY WAY TO GET THE PASSWORD FOR EACH DAY IS TO JOIN HORSES WILD! I WILL POST THE PASSWORD EACH DAY IN AN ATTACHMENT FILE.[/b]

[b]HORSES WILD SIGN UP PAGE[/b]
http://www.horseswild.com/forums/register.php

[b]you can use warrant as a Referral [/b]

[b]FULL CARDS!!!!!!!!![/b]

[b]Track Of The Day - Mountaineer[/b]
http://www.pocketacesracing.com/Pocket%20Aces%20Web/graphics/MNR-5-27-08.pdf

[b]for other tracks just go to my server located here[/b] http://racingindex.perlayer.com/jw/ and click on the track you want

[b]Free Bris Data For Tuesday[/b]
http://mysite.verizon.net/whobet/tuesday.html

[b]REMEMBER TO CHECK OUT THESE STABLES AND THE BLOG!
WITHOUT THERE HELP THESE PP'S WOULD NOT BE AVAILABLE[/b]

[b]Pocket Aces Racing Team[/b]
http://www.pocketacesracing.com/news.htm
http://www.pocketacesracing.com/handicap.htm

[b]Grevelis Racing Stable and Ted Grevelis Blog[/b]
http://www.grevelisracing.com/
http://grevelisracing.blogspot.com/

[b]Blue Sky Racing Stables[/b]
http://blueskyracings.com/

Past-Performances For Monday 5/26

2008-05-26T04:30:45Z

[b]PLEASE NOTE: I WILL BE PUTTING A PASSWORD ON THE SERVER VERY SOON DUE TO HACKER ACTIVITY.....THE ONLY WAY TO GET THE PASSWORD FOR EACH DAY IS TO JOIN HORSES WILD! I WILL POST THE PASSWORD EACH DAY IN AN ATTACHMENT FILE.[/b]

[b]HORSES WILD SIGN UP PAGE[/b]
http://www.horseswild.com/forums/register.php

[b]you can use warrant as a Referral [/b]

[b]FULL CARDS!!!!!!!!![/b]

[b]Track Of The Day - Charles Town[/b]
http://www.pocketacesracing.com/Pocket%20Aces%20Web/graphics/CT-5-26-08.pdf

[b]for other tracks just go to my server located here[/b] http://racingindex.perlayer.com/jw/ and click on the track you want

[b]Free Bris Data For Monday[/b]
http://mysite.verizon.net/whobet/monday.html

[b]REMEMBER TO CHECK OUT THESE STABLES AND THE BLOG!
WITHOUT THERE HELP THESE PP'S WOULD NOT BE AVAILABLE[/b]

[b]Pocket Aces Racing Team[/b]
http://www.pocketacesracing.com/news.htm
http://www.pocketacesracing.com/handicap.htm

[b]Grevelis Racing Stable and Ted Grevelis Blog[/b]
http://www.grevelisracing.com/
http://grevelisracing.blogspot.com/

[b]Blue Sky Racing Stables[/b]
http://blueskyracings.com/

Past-Performances For Saturday 5/24 - FULL CARDS!!

2008-05-24T05:39:23Z

PLEASE NOTE: I WILL BE PUTTING A PASSWORD ON THE SERVER NEXT WEEK, THE ONLY WAY TO GET THE PASSWORD FOR EACH DAY IS TO JOIN HORSES WILD! I WILL POST THE PASSWORD EACH DAY IN AN ATTACHMENT FILE.

HORSES WILD SIGN UP PAGE
http://www.horseswild.com/forums/register.php

you can use warrant as a Referral

FULL CARDS!!!!!!!!!

just go to my server located here http://racingindex.perlayer.com/jw/ and click on the track you want

Free Bris Data For Saturday
http://mysite.verizon.net/whobet/saturday.html

REMEMBER TO CHECK OUT THESE STABLES AND THE BLOG!
WITHOUT THERE HELP THESE PP'S WOULD NOT BE AVAILABLE

Pocket Aces Racing Team
http://www.pocketacesracing.com/news.htm
http://www.pocketacesracing.com/handicap.htm

Grevelis Racing Stable and Ted Grevelis Blog
http://www.grevelisracing.com/
http://grevelisracing.blogspot.com/

Blue Sky Racing Stables
http://blueskyracings.com/

Past-Performances For Thursday 5/22

2008-05-22T02:21:38Z

just go to my server located here http://racingindex.perlayer.com/jw/ and click on the track you want

Full Cards On My Server Today Are:
Pimlico
Churchill
Hollywood
Charles Town
Arlington
The Meadows
Rideau
Yonkers
Mohawk
The Meadowlands

Free Bris Data For Thursday (has belmont full card)
http://mysite.verizon.net/whobet/thursday.html

PLEASE NOTE: I WILL BE PUTTING A PASSWORD ON THE SERVER NEXT WEEK, THE ONLY WAY TO GET THE PASSWORD FOR EACH DAY IS TO JOIN HORSES WILD! I WILL POST THE PASSWORD EACH DAY IN AN ATTACHMENT FILE.

HORSES WILD SIGN UP PAGE
http://www.horseswild.com/forums/register.php

you can use warrant as a Referral

REMEMBER TO CHECK OUT THESE STABLES AND THE BLOG!
WITHOUT THERE HELP THESE PP'S WOULD NOT BE AVAILABLE

Pocket Aces Racing Team
http://www.pocketacesracing.com/news.htm
http://www.pocketacesracing.com/handicap.htm

Grevelis Racing Stable and Ted Grevelis Blog
http://www.grevelisracing.com/
http://grevelisracing.blogspot.com/

Blue Sky Racing Stables
http://blueskyracings.com/

Past-Performances For Wednesday 5/21

2008-05-21T03:41:34Z

PLEASE NOTE: I WILL BE PUTTING A PASSWORD ON THE SERVER SOON, THE ONLY WAY TO GET THE PASSWORD FOR EACH DAY IS TO JOIN HORSES WILD! I WILL POST THE PASSWORD EACH DAY IN AN ATTACHMENT FILE.

HORSES WILD SIGN UP PAGE
http://www.horseswild.com/forums/register.php

you can use warrant as a Referral

FULL CARDS

just go to my server located here http://racingindex.perlayer.com/jw/ and click on the track you want

Free Bris Data
http://mysite.verizon.net/whobet/wedday.html

REMEMBER TO CHECK OUT THESE STABLES AND THE BLOG!
WITHOUT THERE HELP THESE PP'S WOULD NOT BE AVAILABLE

Pocket Aces Racing Team
http://www.pocketacesracing.com/news.htm
http://www.pocketacesracing.com/handicap.htm

Grevelis Racing Stable and Ted Grevelis Blog
http://www.grevelisracing.com/
http://grevelisracing.blogspot.com/

Blue Sky Racing Stables
http://blueskyracings.com/

THE DEFINITIVE: Mint Julep (cocktail)

2008-05-19T01:33:09Z

"It's the hardest drink to make right,"
Bill Samuels Jr., president of Maker's Mark Distillery

The Mint Julep first appeared in print in 1803, being described as a “dram of spirituous liquor that has mint in it, taken by Virginians in the morning." in Travels of Four Years and a Half in the United States of America by John Davis. However, this is by no means the earliest account of the drink. Tracing its origin back to ancient Persia as gulâb (literally meaning “rosewater”), it began as a delicate tonic with a refreshing scent made from water, sugar, and rose petals. When it spread to the Mediterranean, rose petals were replaced with mint leaves, as mint is indigenous to that region. Now known as the mint julep, it soon grew in popularity throughout Europe and eventually made its way to the United States in the 17th century. Early versions were made with rye whiskey, rum, and most any other spirit available. It was not until the creation of bourbon in the 18th century that the mint julep would find its ideal base liquor – a pairing so harmonious, many would argue was written in the stars.

With bourbon now at the helm, the Mint Julep has become not only strongly associated with Kentucky, but also one of the state’s greatest traditions: the Kentucky Derby. For nearly a century, it has been the signature drink of the Kentucky Derby and Churchill Downs. Over 120,000 Mint Juleps are served during the two-day event alone. As with many classic drinks, it has transcended mere cocktail status and embodies something greater than itself. It has become a fundamental part of the Derby experience; a race without one just isn’t the same. To be a citizen of Louisville and not drink at least one a year is heresy. Even if it is only on the first Saturday of May, Derby Day, enjoying a Mint Julep is simply a must when observing the time-honored tradition from the infield, grand stands, or, if fortunate enough, Millionaire’s Row.

Recipe:
2.5 oz bourbon whiskey
4-6 sprigs of mint
1-2 tsp sugar

Gently* muddle mint and sugar in the bottom of the glass. Pour in a splash of water and stir until the sugar dissolves. Fill the glass with ice. Add bourbon. Garnish with mint.

*Additional notes: Be mindful to bruise the mint just enough to release its aroma and oils. Rubbing it between your fingers or against the ice is a great alternative to muddling. DO NOT over-bruise or crush the mint. Doing so releases chlorophyll found in the leaf and makes for an unpleasant bitter taste.

Use of a simple syrup infused with mint is an ideal substitute to muddling.

If you wish to be especially traditional, use crushed ice and a silver cup. The metal conducts the heat in the spirit through the metal to the exterior of the cup, causing condensation, and making the drink itself colder. It is to be held only by the bottom or the top edges of the cup.

For more content like this, check out LifeEpicurean.com or subscribe to our LiveJournal news feed for all the latest updates.

Tragedy at Churchill Downs

2008-05-04T16:57:18Z

Eight Belles was a strapping big filly who had proved she was the best 3yo filly in US by winning the Honeybee S. and the Fantasy S. Fate had it so that she was born into a crop of three year olds where the male wasn't very fast nor was there anyone, except Big Brown, who stood out as a clear leader. It seemed like a good time as any to enter a filly in the Derby. The owner and trainer set a condition though. She was to be cross entered into the Oaks and the Derby. If she drew what they considered a bad post in the Derby she would go into the Oaks. Fate once more decided to interfere. On April 28 the post positions for the Oaks was drawn. Eight Belles drew post 12 in a 12 horse field. Many regarded this as a sign that the filly was meant to be in the Derby. The day after Eight Belles was the sixth to pick a post position for the Derby, and ended up in gate five. The decision was made: the filly would run in the Derby. She was the first filly to enter since 1999, but people was not convinced that she belonged in the field. She has never run against colts, they said. She has never gone past 8,5 furlong, they said. But the filly didn't care. She loved to run which she proved by posting one good training time after another leading up to first Saturday in May. On Derby day she looked like the champion filly she was and people said it wasn't possible to tell her apart from the colts based on looks alone.

She broke well from the gate and was up with the pace the whole way around the track, as the field entered the stretch the favourite Big Brown took the lead and drew away, but the game filly was close on his heels. Although she wasn't able to catch him before the wire she ran a clear second and proved to be one of the best 3yo in US, filly or colt. For a moment there was glory and joy. Big Brown had become the first horse since Regret in 1915 to win the Derby of only three starts. Eight Belles had silenced the sceptics by running second, beating 18 colts in her first start against males and going ten furlongs.

The horses galloped past the wire and started to ease up as the jockey stood up telling them to take a break. The filly galloped steadily around the clubhouse turn enjoying her new found status as a top contender for the Preakness S. Suddenly fate struck again. How it happened has yet to be determined, but the filly took a misstep and on of her ankles broke. She took a nosedive into the dirt sending her jockey flying over her neck.

The grandstand, still celebrating Big Browns win, didn't notice the filly's nosedive in the beginning, but the vet was quickly at her side along with the track officials who where trying to keep her on the ground. Some thought she had gone down by shear exhaustion, having run her heart out in the stretch. The diagnosis however was clear. Two broken ankles. She had to be put down on the track.

Her death is a tragedy for the sport, following only too shortly after several other breaks downs this and last year. She died long before her time and was deprived of the opportunity to show us what else she could accomplish.

R.I.P Eight Belles. You'll always be remembered for the great filly you were.

Kentucky Derby 2008

2008-05-03T16:23:41Z

Here are my predictions:

Win: PYRO
Place: TALE OF EKATI
Show: COLONEL JOHN

Your picks or thoughts?

Running styles

2008-03-02T19:20:08Z

It's seems like this community have become a bit quiet lately, so I was hoping to get a discussion going again.

Indian Blessing (filly) and War Pass (colt) are both three years old, and both are on the road to the first weekend in May. They both also have a front running style, which have kept them unbeaten in five starts. Is it possible to win the Derby and the Oaks with that kind of a running style? I know Winning Colors did it twenty years ago in the Derby, but that seemed like a lucky trip and she was nearly collared at the wire.

I have my doubts about Indian Blessings ability to go 9 furlongs. Proud Spell nearly caught her at the wire in the Silverbulletday S which was 8,5 furlongs, but I had by doubts that she could go that distance too, and she proved me wrong, so perhaps she'll surprise me again.

War Pass won an allowance last weekend, but has never been challenged for the lead. He might get the distance, but I'm not sure he'll be able to get the lead and win the same way he's being doing until now in the Derby.

Any thought people?

Driver's Licenses and Trainer's Licenses Should Both Be Harder to Get!

2008-01-30T05:14:18Z

This is hoped to be a conversation starter. I guess I'm what's called a "lurker" in a lot of communities. I'm a member. I read. I watch. Ocassionally I note. This is my first time posting. I would love to see as much activity in my horse communities as there is in my running and philosophy communities, mainly because horses consume most of my thoughts and time, and because my old body (21) doesn't hold up to much running anymore, and because the philosophy communities lately are a lot of superficial overeducated dribble that has been made deliberately inaccessable to all the lowest common denominators with it's boring and irrelevant analogies, references to authors whom no one with real-world experience and intellect could bear to read, and elitist vocabularies, all of which is done by the writers solely to make themselves feel superior, but really only makes for tedious and affected reading and discussions, and proves via their analogies that they aren't as smart as all their big words are meant to impress upon you, because if they were they would be able to concisely explain what they mean instead of having to compare skunks to apples to algebra, which is easy enough to follow but really detracts from the point.

The point is this: I am a cowboy (no, I don't have sexual identitiy issues; it just seems to me that most "cow-girls" tend to wear sequins and can't ride much, and I am not one of those, and most "equestriennes" tend to wear tights and formalize their riding to the same degree that the "philosophers" do their writing, and I am not one of those either) and don't feel inclined to stand on such ceremonies. I have an extensive vocabulary and education but prefer to just say what I mean in fairly plain terms, while at the same time trying not to sound like a complete hick, and apparently they don't like me for that. I make my living exercise riding at the racetrack (lately, Keeneland, but also The Thoroughbred Center out on Paris Pike (for those familiar with Lexington) where they stick all the trainers without the clout to get permanent stalls at Keeneland's Training Center during the frequent sales that run them off the backside, and previously at The Woodlands (Kansas City, Kansas side) and originally at Arapahoe Park in my home state of Colorado) and I've broken babies for the best and the worst in the world. I also love horses. Many of the horse rescue/animal rights activists and racing fans who have never actually been through the process of training racehorses that I see on these sites might not realize what a juxtaposition that is, but it's true. The racetrack is a bad place for horses. The actually "training" of the horse, mentally, is minimal at best, and most of the tactics used by riders and handlers to get around this disaster-waiting-to-happen once these large, high-strung flight animals are brought to fitness and fed up on "hot" grain is nothing short of abusive. Over half the horses I have galloped in my almost two years at the track have had something physically wrong with them that, in any other discipline, would be grounds to bring charges against any "horseman," if you can call them that, who continued to train on the horse, not to mention being a concern as related to the horse's ability to give it's top performance.

cross-posted

Contributing factors to the number of breakdowns seen on the track:

1. The breeding industry. Most people don't know that the horseracing they see on TV isn't really about horseracing. In fact, few horsemen outside the racetrack know that, in the Thoroughbred industry, the money is all in breeding. What you see on TV is just the glory. The purses are a drop in the bucket. All the real money is exchanged trying to attain that glory. Trainers don't, for the most part, make their money in purses. They make it in training fees paid to them by owners. Of course, the more races they win, the richer the owners they attract, and theoretically the better horses they get to train, but the fact is that you lose at least 90% of the races you enter. Your bread and butter comes straight from the owners' wallets. But the most profitable things to be are breeders, either pimping stallions for ungodly sums, or raising foals for the yearling sales each spring. The money is in the sales. In selling the highest priced yearlings possible. So what do you do? You breed to the stallion that has the most market appeal you can afford, not the one that is the best cross for your mare. And definitely not the one with the best legs, nor the one with the history of producing foals with the best legs. The most highly coveted foals are the ones whose sires produce the highest earning runners. Breakdown rates are not listed in the sire listings. Neither are conformational defects that will predispose a horse to injury. Stakes winners and earnings are. Price is decided, roughly, 65% by breeding, 30% by what the horse looks like above the knee, and 5% by what the horse looks like from the knee down. I believe, and I'm sure some fan will correct me if I'm wrong, that it was A.P.Indy who underwent total reconstructive knee surgery, both legs, as a yearling so that they could even feasibly get him to the track. He ran well. Traditionally, the first year sires who won the most money on the track attract the owners of the best mares, and therefore have the best odds of producing the best foals. This is what happened for A.P.Indy. And his foals ran well. Today he is a leading sire, and his sons and daughters are going on to the breeding shed. What do you think the legs on this whole line of horses look like? More expensive horses usually go to better trainers and so have a better chance at getting the care they need to stay sound, so this is going largely unnoticed. But after enough generations of this trait being passed along, these horses will find their way into the hands of greedy unscrupulous and/or ignorant trainers and their below average exercise riders, and do you know what will happen to them there? Use your imagination. I am going to point out something that seems extremely obvious to me, but apparently breeders miss it completely, or else ignore it because once the foal is sold and the millions are in their pockets, they just don't care anymore about the fact that a horse is an extremely large animal. They are very, very strong, and running around on legs about the same size as ours. Now, it seems to me that if any particular joint does not have the ideal alignment, the longer the bones of said joint are, the more leverage will be applied. The more weight placed on said lever, the more force/torque/pressure will be placed on said joint. Yet the popularity of big strapping colts remains. So breeders keep trying to grow their foals bigger and bigger, breeding the fastest horses to the fastest horses, who will inherrently place the greatest forces on their legs (momentum=massxvelocitysquared) and yet give no thought to the structures that will have to hold up and carry all of this glorious speed, power, musclemass...Their only thought is for who will be the fastest. Too bad they aren't breeding trains, who have no emotions or physical sensations at all, and can in fact be continuously reengineered to be bigger faster stronger. In horses we are overlooking the stronger part, and this is a ghastly mistake. Any engineer will tell you that everything has a structural limit. A maximum load capacity. And when you surpass a structure's ability to accomodate your demands, it breaks. Even the perfect horse has this critical point, and over the last few thousand years of selectively breeding for speed, we have come quite close to it. The problem is, that most horses are not running around on perfect legs. There have been many articles since the news of Marion Jones' doping regarding physiological capacity and why after the year 2023, there will be no more world records (without drugs, which tend to lead to former star athletes inexplicably dropping dead at the age of 34) Having reached a point extremely close to the horse's physiological capacity, perhaps it is time to begin breeding for soundness instead of speed, so that we may continue to enjoy this sport and the horses may continue to enjoy being alive. They simply cannot be made to be much faster and by continuing to press that limit we only ensure the continued degradation of the sport and the animals. Want to see another Secretariat? Focus on soundness, because a lot of horses out there have got the stuff and will never get to show it otherwise.

2. Horsekeeping practices. This is probably the most freakishly insane thing I have noted at the track and in the industry, and if you grew up in Kentucky you probably take it for granted that this is just the way things are done. First of all, they want horses born early in the year, like January or February, in hope that the horse will have the maximum possible level of physical maturity by the time it is of racing age in order to compete against horses that might be a few months younger. This insures, in many cases, depending upon the weather, that the horse will live exclusively in a stall for the first several weeks of it's life, a time critical for developing connective tissues and especially the all-important internal structures of the foot, which can only be done by moving out freely, preferably over some pretty hard ground. The horse, even if it ends up straight which is very unlikely, is already at a disadvantage. Once spring arrives the horse enters what will be the best days of his life. His only days of freedom, unless he is fortunate enough to get laid up with an injury and turned out, are as a foal and weanling. When the spring yearling sales approach, which coincide timing-wise with a vital period in the development of the horse's social skills, turnout time is greatly reduced or eliminated to prevent the horse from getting any nicks, dings or scratches that might negatively affect his price. Colts will never be turned out with company again, just as they reach the age where they crave it, not always sexually, (though this can easily be acheived via the hormone shots all the coming-yearlings get to maximize their growth) but simply to rough-house with others like them whichs helps them to learn equine etiquette. Can't take a chance on them seriously injuring one another. (Highly unlikely.) They instead get fed high-protein diets and placed daily into an automatic horse-walker (think: moving cells or cubicles) to be jogged and fattened for the sales. After the sales they are turned out in individual pens until breaking season arrives, at which point they seek their rough-housing with the unfortunate trainer or rider assigned him. During this first year of life, the horse has been handled daily, stalled nightly, and learned absolutely nothing that will do him a bit of good. They learn how to be calm when trapped in a stall where they are utterly defenseless against any threat natural to a horse. They learn that, whenever a human has hold of you in any way, you cannot escape whatever indignity he may try to do you, and your best best is to freeze, trancelike, until it's over. Many who still retain enough of the wild, free-spirit we so admire them for who cannot submit themselves in this way, learn to either run over the top of some hapless groom, or to run backward from the threat, which eventually leads to flipping over backward, and, confusingly, rather than being killed and eaten for going to the ground, freedom. Inherrently, the worst problems I have noted in breaking babies raised Kentucky-style have been balking, because he thinks he can't move forward while I've got hold of him unless I'm leading him, flipping, because it's his only remaining escape option, and laying all over my hand when steering or stopping, seen most often in the colts with the most desire to play with you or run you over. You don't really get the time to teach the things the grooms (cheap Mexicans or mentally-impaired white people) should have been doing all along, like respecting personal space, giving to pressure, move your hindquarters and forequarters seperately, back up, moving forward on your own as when going through a gate... After all, these now strapping yearlings have been handled every day since they hit ground, and, as the trend will be set throughout their lives, their education has been minimal at best. When they have been broken "sufficiently" to move them to the track (often before the turn of the new years when they officially turn two, regardless of whether they were born in January or June) it is typically all downhill. The seeming chaos of the track triggers panic in horses, flight animals to begin with who have been bred and raised to have a maximal flight response, while never being taught to trust a human to acknowledge their fear and see them safely through it, nor to stop or steer, is often disastrous. The bigger and fitter they get, typically the more numb and robotic they get to their surroundings, trying simply to finish their workout as quickly as possible, much to the dismay of riders a tenth their size, and occassionally just snap, coming completely unglued over some unusual or mundane perceiveed threat. A horse you want to be confident and competitive, and often percieve by his robotickness to have acheived, is really just afraid. Afraid of the stick. Afraid of the reins. Afraid of whatever is scaring all those other horses to make them run so fast, and scared of the fact that I'm being restrained even though I know the slowest horse gets eaten, and conditioned to be numb to all of it and unconditionally obedient. And the ones who aren't, the ones who have the most natural horse behavior left in them, are the ones who get accused of being stupid every day of their lives. You do nothing but feed them, fit them, and train them to run, and the whole training process after that is one constant invalidation of their desire to do so. And you wonder why they are "tough" and angry and unruly, and why they are so hard on themselves physically. Because you wont let them be the selves you've conceived and raised them to be! Because you never gave them a chance to be what they are, which are HORSES! Because you lock them in a stall 23 hours a day, feed them for maximal energy output, and seek only to hold them back. Ironic that the very things that captivate us most about these animals, their power, their free-spiritedness, their beauty, and above all their speed, which has allowed them to survive all these eons, epitomized in the momentary glory of racing, are the very things most opressed by the very process of preparation that makes up 95% of the sport.

3. Track surfaces and shoeing practices. Tracks are banked toward the rail for drainage purposes. A horse with both legs the same length will inherrently place more pressure on the leg on the higher part of the bank. In America, where we always train in boring dum-dum circles in the same direction day in and day out, this is the right leg. However gradual, subtle or even imperceptible (from our blissfully ignorant viewpoint) the grade may be, the repetition does eventually tire and weaken the overused structures (to say nothing of how dulling and frustrating it is to horses' minds.) Has no one considered this given the ratio of right-leg-breakdowns to left-leg-breakdowns? I don't know that the "hard" dirt surfaces themselves are causing problems; the polytrack movement, although extremely well-intended, is geared more toward treating the symptoms of all the points I will mention than the problems themselves. I think it has been primarily beneficial for the horses because of the drastic reduction of injuries, both catastrophic and otherwise, BUT, long-term, it may prove ineffective because it will simply enable trainers to train even harder before seeing the same effects they would see otherwise on a less forgiving surface. It just may take awhile for this to develop. Furthermore, the rebounding properties of the surface, while they do make it easier on overloaded front-ends, seem to cause a lot of comparatively minor hind-end discomfort (galloping horses land-hind-feet first), usually spinal or hock, because of the concussive impact simply being sent back up the leg, which must then be absorbed somehwere in the body. If repetitive impact leading to bone injury is the big worry, a movement toward a surface that simply absorbs/deadens it without sending it back up would be preferable. Think sand, wood chips, or soft turf. The problem you then run across is that the horse must work harder to move itself and you now have an increased instance of connective tissue injury instead. In my opinion, the hard dirt surfaces are preferable because they will show the ill-effects of bad training the soonest, and lead to the soundest possible horses amongst the few good trainers, but if no one else is going to change their training practices then the polytrack is probably the best compromise. Leaning toward the ideal of the self-sufficient horse, the best way to combat "surface" problems would be to let the horse go barefoot. Horses are shod for several reasons, among them: 1)To protect tender soles. 2)To prevent horses from wearing their hooves down to the point that they have nothing left to walk on. 3)To hold together hoof walls that aren't worth a fuck. 4)"Support" 5)For traction. 6)Because it's always been done. There are several problems with traditional shoeing, as there are with most "traditional" horsekeeping practices, namely that the way humans do things is directly oppositional to the way horses are made to live and work. First of all, the hoof is NOT a rigid structure. The hoof wall, particularly in the quarters (where nails go) and heels needs to be able to move up to one inch both vertically when the horse banks itself in tight turns and horizontally during every weight-bearing phase of every step the animal ever takes. Steel and aluminum shoes, being rigid, and, in the racing world, applied extremely tightly, do not allow this, and therefore do not allow the hoof to properly absorb concussion, thus leaving it to be done by joints not made for it, and also negatively effect circulation in the hoof and therefore the growth and overall health, both by preventing flexion of the wall and by elevating the frog (by the thichness of the shoe) to the point that it is no longer able to make ground contact. I can already hear the howling. What about tender-soled horses? What about hoof wear? What about weak walls and crushed or underrun heels? Tender soles would not be such a problem if horses hadn't been selectively bred for thousands of years to not be worth a fuck. That is to say, bred for our purposes rather than for soundness. Show me a wild horse that is crooked or tender-soled and I will show you coyote bait. Natural selection. Tender soles would not be such a problem if horses were not kept constantly shod rather than given a chance to toughen them by being gently worked, gradually brought to fitness, and turned out on suitable ground in their natural state, which is barefoot. Unfortunately, what's been done for thousands of years is done, and we only have the results to work with, not the ideal. Many horses, given a chance, will be prefectly fine barefoot or in front shoes only, especially given the highly maintained surfaces they are provided to work on. Furthermore, great strides have been made in recent years to produce functional synthetic shoes. These will flex with the foot, allowing it to function more like it would in it's natural state while providing sole protection and frog support. This is extremely important and the traditional ways of shoeing compromise it greatly, which is a great contributer to thin, weak, brittle hoof walls, crushed and underrun heels, thrush, seedy-toe, and inadequate hoof growth per wear. All of this last list of problems, by the way, are due to the poor circulation caused by rigid shoes. If you do not have some understanding of the internal structures of the hoof and how they work to absorb shock and affect circulation then this will probably be over your head, but if your shoer is worth what you are paying him he should be able to explain this to you and the contradiction between what the hoof wants and needs and what shoes do will be quickly evident. Furthermore, steel and especially aluminum have actually been shown to exponentially increase the shock to the horse's leg with each stride. And finally, if it is traction that concerns you, a particular brand of synthetic shoe has been engineered to allow the placement of studs, but truthfully traction has mainly negative effects on the horse's leg. This can be particularly noted in the shearing forces placed on the leg by toe grabs, a leading contributer to bucked shins, chipped knees and quarter cracks, and also on small "bullring" tracks, because a horse when turning needs to have some slippage to avoid putting torque on structures only made to go front to back, such as the fetlock, a perfect hinge joint, another example of why the wall needs to be able to move. If you must, put studs in your synthetic shoes only on race day, or have the horse put in aluminums (nothing more severe than queens plates on two-year-olds (if you insist upon running them at that age) and nothing more severe than level-grips on three-year-olds, and never ever the "louisiana toe grabs" seen on many quarter horses) a few days before racing and pull them off immediately after. Believe me, this is compromise enough to your horse.

4. Breaking horses too young, specifically as YEARLINGS!! when their bone structure is not mature until the age of SIX!! Apparently all the multi-million dollar horse farms in this multi-billion dollar industry can't afford to feed their horses for an extra year before seeing a return on the investment. In the racing industry, horses are broken in October or November of their yearling season. They will probably not be racing until the same time the following year. A sound horse (provided you like horses better than money and can therefore keep him that way) can be brought from pasture turnout to racing form in three to four months. Rather than waiting on these babies until June of their two-year-old year, letting them mature an extra seven months before putting weight and pressure on them and having them ready to run in September or October, the same time they would be anyway, they instead break them long before their bodies are ready (many are still not ready in June) and let immature structures endure training for a full year. This might be justifiable if this time was spent giving these horses a solid educational foundation, getting their ground manners, getting them to trust and respect a rider, getting them flexing, bending, collecting, extending, elevating the forehand, elevating the back, giving to the bit, following your hand, not dropping the shoulder, so on and so forth, and above all, CROSS-TRAINING to develop bones and connective tissues to have some sort of lateral stability in order to head of the number of spiral fractures seen due to a slight bump, bobble or misstep on the track, but it's not. They are "broken" just to the point that hopefully an average rider can stay on them, which is often not the case, and then they are "conditioned." This is "training" to these people. Some think it does their mind good to "just be around the track," "see the sights," like this will keep them from coming unglued later, when they're fit and grained up, even though they never learned to trust their rider's judgement in moments of fear. The only excuse for doing things this way is the fact that competent help is hard to come by, and they want to make sure the horses are "good and broke" before they get big and strong enough to do any real damage, thus raising the fees for workman's comp insurance. Typically it is a bunch of cheap labor (Mexicans) who couldn't make better money for less work anywhere else in their country or ours, who really don't know a fucking thing about horse psychology or the life that animal would choose for itself if allowed, and for the most part the trainers are equally thoughtless. The horses are simply a means. The more athletic Mexicans work their way up to exercise riding, compounding the problems of soundness (because none of them know how a horse ought to go, and the ones who do learn it to a small degree leave no room for an individual animal's way of compensating for his own conformation, and understand that most of them don't even care enough to try to learn; they just collect their ten dollars and tell the trainer "he went good," or "he pulled hard") and saneness (because, let's face it, if you don't know what the horse is thinking and feeling when you're a hotwalker, you're much more inclined to panic when the same situation occurs on his back, grabbing the reins and getting in his face, which will lead to one of two things: the horse flips over backward or the horse runs off because that is all it knows how to do with pressure in it's mouth.) Many horses do not see their three-year-old season. But on the bright side, if you win the Breeder's Cup Juvenile and never race again, you can stil stand at stud for the next 20 years of your life for $50k per ejaculation (there is no artificial insemination in registered Thoroughbreds) Unfortunately, only one colt per year gets to achieve this out of many thousands born.

5. Racing horses too young. Juvenile (2-year-old) races are where all the pressure is at because then breeder's can justify hiking the stud fees for their freshman sires. Personally, I'd rather breed to something that will throw a foal with some longevity, who will win races when it's six or seven and still be worth a shit for something when it retires from the track, because honestly, most horses just aren't good enough to justify breeding them, including many of the ones that get bred anyway.

6. Overtraining. I really don't get this. Seriously, how stupid do you have to be to do this? The horse is tired. Train through it and he'll be stronger, assuming of course that the colt bought for half a million dollars as a yearling doesn't hurt himself trying to compensate for muscle fatigue with his bones and connective tissues. And assuming he doesn't start "bleeding" (Exercise Induced Pulmonary Hemorrage) from the exertion and/or the tension stemming from anxiety about being forced to go to the track when he doesn't really feel up to it. The horse is sore. You assume "body-sore" (in his muscles, i.e. lactic acid buildup) because you can't find heat or swelling in his legs nor sesitivity in his feet, but then, the horse can't tell you for sure, can he? So you train through it based on the logic that all that time spent resting in his stall the other 23 hours of the day will aid in rebuilding those muscles (it is muscle-soreness, right?) so they end up even bigger and stronger than they were before(as opposed to letting him rebuild from the initial soreness which may or may not have been in his muscles??) So now you have even more mass to carry around on the same (sore?) legs and hooves, on an animal that, through thousands of years of selective breeding and many months of growth hormones, is already dangerously close to it's structural and physiological capacity for speed. By all means, push him a little further; he's cheap. Fucking idiots.

7. Overracing and training yearround. Regardless of whether the thing is sound or falling apart, if you, the trainer, think you can hold him together for one more race, then keep him up and running by any means necessary, because the owners definitely wont be happy about having to feed him for the course of a layoff during which time he wont be earning anything (as if he'll earn to his full potential running crippled) and then have to wait (and pay you) for an additional three-four months while he is brought back to racing form. All these animals are cheap and replacable, so the bottom line is to make as much money with them as possible right now this very second. It's cheaper to replace him than it is to invest more money in him over a period of time that will allow him to unltimately win more races and more money. The expense isn't worth the payoff. You think the amount it costs you to have a racehorse to begin with justifies running him twelve months out of the year? Bullshit. If you have that kind of money in the first place you need to lay him off three months every winter for "horse time", lame or not, take the time getting him ready (mainly mentally), and run him half as much. If you can't afford to do that, then you can't afford the horse. Period. Contrary to what you think, this doesn't cost you a fucking penny more than it would otherwise because the racing end of this business is mainly throwing money away (for both owners and bettors)on the gamble anyway. On the vet bills, on the entry and jockey and training fees for races you don't win, on more vet bills trying to hold him together. If you lay him off, at least he'll win those races he does run because he'll be sound and not sour. (Flashbacks to a Military colt who stopped, and I mean STOPPED, in the middle of a breeze one day because I turned my stick up, as I'd been instructed to do. Good thing I'm not a cow-girl or equetrienne or I would have let that horse find his own way home.) Do the right fucking thing. For the horse, not for your pocketbook. Give the horse a chance to do himself justice.

All of which lead to:

8. Training on sore horses. It's official. Your vet has diagnosed a suspensory strain, a strain of the sesamoidian ligaments, an ineffectual bone chip in the knee or ankle, osselets, ringbone, a problem with a flexor tendon, or my personal favorite "footsoreness" (usually navicular or pedal osteitis but frequently sidebone, a crushed digital cushion, the beginnings of a quarter crack, or damage to the sensitive laminae, diagnosed as "a bruise" or, more accurately though equally unalarmingly "repetitive impact" soreness)(Those X-rays are just far too costly!) What do you do? Give him time off to heal? Consider retirement or an alternative career? Nah! Give him some Bute and keep after it! Even when the horse's attitude and behavior begin to decline (what's that Lassie? Timmy's stuck in a well?) the answer is more drugs. Usually Ace, a tranquilizer, not race legal, and will test if given within 48 hours, but enough to make angry, unruly horses controllable (as opposed to listening to what they're trying to tell you and addressing it) so that you can safely train them to have them "fit" to run. What a joke.

and

9. Racing sore horses. Hooray for equine pharmaceutical companies making this possible! And legal! Hooray for Bute (horse aspirin) which, as applied in the racing industry (daily, and in doses directly proportionate to the severity of the horse's problem, to allow hurt horses to keep training and even racing(!!!) without raising any eyebrows amongst activists in the stands) often leads to ulcers. Like gut problems (colic) aren't enough of a problem given the average diet of a racehorse. Hooray for Banamine, a muscle relaxant used to aid horses who "tie-up" (which to me has always seemed like cramping after a run, though I'm told with no satisfactory explanation that it's different in horses) and in some who bleed, so that trainers may continue running "psycho horses" (the cause of which is highly debateable)(note the high percentage of horses on Banamine flipping in the gate) without addressing the cause of the horse's anxiety (usually fear, or pain, or fear of pain) and/or getting the horse feeling relaxed and secure about it's job and life, or addressing dietary changes (think electrolyte imbalances) that might aid muscle function. Hooray for Lasix, given to all horses suspected of bleeding (those scopes are just far too costly, and, when they come up negative, it's just far too difficult to figure out why ELSE the horse might not have given his best performance) so that instead of getting him relaxed and travelling well in training on a consistent basis, and instead of schooling him until he is reassured about his anxieties, you can just give him a drug and continue to train with him holding his breath or roaring because he's all bound up, particularly in the chest/windpipe/ribcage(think: lungs) area. Note also, how horses who run on Lasix almost never run without also being on bute. Can't let him travel in training when he's already sore. If you insist upon training him, you can't possibly throw him his head and let him compensate for his own faults and injuries. Nope, gotta impede him to keep him from hurting himself any worse. Gotta hold him together to see if we can win some money in one more race, when the horse's performance cannot be reasonably expected to come anything close to doing him justice. And well, if he's that bad we'll just run him cheap, against totally inferior horses who will beat him anyway because he's depressed and scared and angry, and above all, HURT! Does anyone ever think that if you didn't fuck them up from the get-go, the horse might be smart enough not to hurt ITSELF? Might not be so "conditioned" to run through pain and so scared of STOPPING because of what riders do to balky horses that she might just trust you enough to listen when you tell her not to run off with half her leg flapping by a shred of hide?!! (Go For Wand)

Which ultimately lead to:

BREAKDOWNS!
Not all are catastrophic. Not all are even career ending. But very, very few are not preventable, and all of them cause pain, sometimes crippling, and sometimes even death to innocent animals that don't deserve it. Innocent animals who give us everything of themselves, even the parts that we should know better than to take. They are kind enough to let us do this to them, but God knows why. If I was as big and strong as a horse, I wouldn't let you strap a saddle to my back and ride me and pull me around with a piece of metal in my mouth and all manner of tie-downs. Even at my current size (jockey) you would have a hell of a time getting it done. There are those rare instances where a good trainer enters a perfectly straight, sound animal at the top of it's game and for seemingly no reason at all, maybe a crooked break, maybe some slight bump with another horse during the race, maybe crossing the hump where the chute enters the main track, or as the result of any of a thousand other speculations, the horse snaps a leg off. (I am referring of course to the immortal Ruffian, who had had a hairline fracture early in her training that had never caused an issue after the trainer addressed the problem and let it heal completely) These are rare and tragic. Even more tragic is the widely held belief amongst racetrackers that, if it's going to happen sometimes anyway in spite of your best efforts, you may as well not waste the effort. Or expense. They'd rather take the loss. And that uncaring, underachieving attitude results in the sickening display that is modern american racing. The staggering numbers of breakdowns in horses who had something wrong with them before stepping into the paddock on race day, problems which the trainers were fully aware of, whose feed was just too expensive for owners who can afford them to begin with to lay them off until they were better. Horses who could have been easily saved. Horses who could have been sold for a few hundred bucks to be somebody's pasture ornament, and been happy, who instead were killed for the chance at running out a few thousand more dollars at the end of a quarter-million dollar career spread over six years. Or multi-million-dollar horses killed at the age of three for a chance at one more race that would have allowed them to stand for 750k instead of 500k if that leg would have made it another mile. You don't see it from the rail or the grandstands or on the simulcast screen behind the betting windows. You probably didn't even see it sitting in your own living room during warm-ups the day Barbaro broke down. All you see are the glory and the tragedy. You don't see the elaborate amounts of bullshit that go in to actually getting it done. Into actually killing Kentucky Derby winners. That horse could have never started again if it was found that he had a problem and still stood for half a million just for winning that one race and coming into it undefeated. Are you telling me that there is that much pressure for a Triple Crown winner that trainers and owners alike are willing to throw away that kind of money, to say nothing of the horse, but THE FUCKING MONEY and potential for more money that has been driving this whole disgusting scene all along right out the window? I guess that's why they call it gambling. It's just that, when I fell in love with racing at age 11, I still held the ideal that we were gambling on which horse was fastest, not on whether the favorite's leg would hold up until the wire.

Would Barbaro have preferred to take the loss? I know it's all noble the degree they went to trying to save him, but think of what that horse had to suffer in the process because some millionaire hoped to become a billionaire off of his sperm. The next time you see a horse break down, think about this: there is a 98% chance that someone, somehwere in that horses life-off-screen, knew that something might have been wrong, and was either too uncaring, too selfish, or too fearful of job-loss to open their mouth.

I know there has been some outcry of late about the retirement of perfectly healthy horses at the age of three, before they have even been allowed to peak physically at the task they were bred for. I have two things to say. First is that, as I have already mentioned, he was not, in fact, bred to win races. He was bred to win just enough races to justify standing him at stud, which is vastly more profitable. Second is that many of the horses you see disappear just when you're getting excited about their four-year old season, are anything but "perfectly healthy" and the owners are simply protecting their investment in him as a stallion rather than continuing to risk him on the track. As for the few that are sound after being exploited at the equivalent age of an eight-year-old child, it is disappointing to the fans, which racing desperately needs, but maybe, given the sickening nature of the industry, it is the best thing for the horse?

As a side note, I think I am going to put a big sign on the right side of my truck reading: "You know you're from Kentucky when you can't merge with the only other car on the road."

Anyone following the Eclipse Awards?

2008-01-09T22:12:07Z

Nominees have been announced. Kentucky Horse Park will be getting a special Eclipse this year for it's contributions to racing.

request (begging, really) for Ruffian photos

2007-06-15T07:35:22Z

I'm on something of a quest for photos of Ruffian. Color, b&w, large, small, I don't care. Does anyone have any they would be willing to scan/email to me?

Thanks so much~

Rags to Riches Beats the Boys!

2007-06-13T17:20:01Z

Ruffian is problably turning over in her grave!

Jun 11, 5:11 AM EDT

All eyes on Rags to Riches

By RICHARD ROSENBLATT
AP Racing Writer

NEW YORK (AP) -- What's next for Rags to Riches? The first filly to win the Belmont Stakes in 102 years was in fine form Sunday, a day after her extraordinary victory over Preakness winner Curlin in the final leg of the Triple Crown.

"You can tell she ran a race, but she wasn't exhausted and laying down in her stall," trainer Todd Pletcher said. "She was ornery as ever in the morning."

Pletcher already is looking at a summer and fall season for his star 3-year-old filly, one which could include taking on the boys again in the Travers on Aug. 25, or even the Breeders' Cup Classic on Oct. 27. A 4-year-old campaign is in the cards, too.

"These guys are sportsmen," Pletcher said of owners Michael Tabor and Derrick Smith, who bought Rags to Riches for $1.9 million. "Obviously, we wouldn't have been in the Belmont if they weren't. They have a lot of horses and breed a lot of horses, and they say as long as the filly's OK, she'll race next year."

Pletcher said Rags to Riches likely will start next in the Coaching Club American Oaks for fillies on July 21 at Belmont Park. Then, he said, it's either the Alabama for fillies on Aug. 18 or the Travers, racing's "Midsummer Derby" already on Kentucky Derby winner Street Sense's schedule. Curlin could be there, too.

"That could be awesome, a race for the ages," said Pletcher. "She added a lot to the race yesterday, and by winning it she'll add more to any race she goes into from here on out."

Beating the boys elevated Rags to Riches to celebrity status, and her every move will be followed over the next few months - all because she beat Curlin by a head after a thrilling stretchlong duel and became the third filly to take the Belmont. Ruthless took the inaugural in 1867 and Tanya won in 1905.

When Street Sense was pulled out of consideration for the Belmont, Rags to Riches entered the picture. Pletcher said he wouldn't go against the top three horses from the Derby and Preakness - Street Sense, Curlin and Hard Spun - but would consider it if one dropped out.

Street Sense complied, and Rags to Riches was in.

"We thought it was something the public would like to see," said Tabor, who owned 1995 Derby and Belmont winner Thunder Gulch. "It was a fantastic feat."

There may be more to come, too.

"My hat is off to the owners, they deserve a lot of credit for running the filly," said Hall of Fame trainer Nick Zito, whose C P West led for a mile before finishing fifth in the seven-horse field. "They have to get the accolades, along with Pletcher and (jockey) Johnny Velazquez. We all saw history because of it."

The win ended Pletcher's 0-for-28 drought in Triple Crown races, a streak that was mentioned constantly. Even though it's over, Pletcher has already heard a revised version: "What about winning with a colt?"

At least Pletcher can laugh about it. He said Rags to Riches, the 4-1 third choice behind Curlin and Hard Spun, was his best chance for a breakthrough. But he had to sweat it out from start to finish before his filly won her fifth in a row after a career-opening defeat.

Rags to Riches stumbled - and nearly fell - out of the starting gate. But she regained her balance and moved into position along the outside for what turned into a sensational stretchlong duel with Curlin.

With the usually restrained Pletcher cheering along with the 46,870 fans at Belmont Park, the two horses went eyeball-to-eyeball until Rags to Riches put her head in front. Curlin, despite the urging of jockey Robby Albarado, was unable to cut into the margin although the gallant colt never quit trying.

"When she turned for home I thought we're going to win," Pletcher said. "But when he dug in at the eighth pole I thought, 'Man, this would be an absolutely brutal loss to get nosed out here.' He really stuck his nose down on the wire. He was getting all of the (head) bob. ... I knew we'd won, but it was close."

After the race, Velazquez led Rags to Riches on a victory walk past the grandstand, pointing to the filly with the crowd standing and applauding racing's newest star.

It was a fitting way to close a Triple Crown season that produced three exhilarating races, one which began with jockey Calvin Borel's daring rail-hugging Derby win aboard Street Sense followed by Curlin's final-stride, head decision over the Derby winner in the Preakness.

"We wound up probably getting the three best horses in the nation running and winning each of these races," said trainer Bill Kaplan, whose Imawildandcrazyguy was fourth in the Derby and sixth in the Belmont. "That's pretty good."

If all three show up for the same race, a little more history could be made.

© 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed. Learn more about our Privacy Policy.

Ruffian: The TV Movie Tonight

2007-06-09T17:13:44Z

Tonight at 9:00pm PDT ABC will air a bio-pic about
Ruffian.

Will you watch?

UNION-TRIBUNE

June 9, 2007

Bill Nack is a friend of mine.
A friend of every turf writer he's ever met, really. And, I expect, a “most memorable character” candidate for anybody outside the profession who makes his acquaintance.

I'd like to invite you to get to know him by availing yourself of an unusual Bill Nack immersion opportunity that's heaviest today but will extend through the rest of the month and beyond.

Get to know him through the sport he has covered and written about better than anyone else for the past 30 years or so.

AdvertisementStart with this afternoon's Belmont Stakes. It emanates from Belmont Park on Long Island in New York, one of Nack's main haunts while covering racing for Newsday in the 1970s.
Belmont was one of the three New York tracks where Nack followed Secretariat during his incredible career. It was there that Nack and racing fans the world over were dumbstruck by the big red colt's awesome 31-length victory in the Belmont to complete the 1973 Triple Crown.

It was where Nack did much information-gathering for his book “Secretariat,” which remains the consummate piece on the horse many consider the greatest of all time.

Belmont also was where Nack, fresh from writing “Secretariat,” became wrapped up in the amazing but tragically short career of the filly Ruffian. A filly so fast and powerful that Secretariat's trainer, Lucien Lauren, was quoted as saying, “As God is my witness, she may be better than Secretariat.”

Nack was an unwitting, unintentional stoker of the machinery that led to the “Battle of the Sexes” match race – a concept Nack did not favor – between Foolish Pleasure and Ruffian in 1975. The race ended with Ruffian's horrific breakdown that led to her being euthanized within hours of the accident.

Nack has written a book, recently released, “Ruffian: A Racetrack Romance” (ESPN Books, $14.95) that is, essentially, a personal memoir of the days he spent covering Ruffian.

The book is the basis of a made-for-TV movie that ABC will air tonight at 9. The book, not the movie, begins with Nack accounting the gut-wrenching feeling of déjà vu he had when he was again trackside, a year ago, for Barbaro's breakdown at the Preakness.

So watch the Belmont this afternoon. A race that lost a lot of pizazz when Kentucky Derby winner Street Sense was narrowly beaten in the Preakness and then taken off the Triple Crown trail. A race that got an infusion of interest with the entry of standout filly Rags to Riches to take on the colts for the first time.

Then tune in to the movie tonight.

“Ruffian,” the movie, strays mightily from Nack's book to rightly focus on the filly, trainer Frank Whiteley and owner Stuart Janney. Sam Shepard and Nicholas Pryor play Whiteley and Janney, respectively.

In May, when the book came out, I asked Nack, who consulted on the film, who played him in the movie.

“An actor named Frank Whaley,” Nack said. “If you ever saw 'Pulp Fiction,' he was the guy that Samuel L. Jackson takes his hamburger and eats it before he shoots him.”

Shepard, a horse racing follower and owner, has hard-boot, old-school trainer Whiteley down cold, Nack said. Whiteley and Janney are both sympathetic, honorable characters whose priorities and intentions clearly were always to do the best for the horse but who got sucked into the match race situation by forces – mainly racing's need for an attention-grabbing event to keep up with the times – beyond their control.

There is, of necessity, a lot of dialogue with the sole purpose of providing background to the multitudes of viewers unfamiliar with racing in general and the Ruffian story specifically. A lot of scenes are compressed for purposes of moving the story along that may or may not have happened in real life.

Whiteley and jockey Jacinto Vasquez, who rode Ruffian, have sued ABC and ESPN, alleging trademark infringement, and sought an injunction that would prevent the film from being promoted as based on a true story.

The suit alleges that after Whiteley and Vasquez declined ESPN's offer to option the rights to their life stories in 2004, they weren't consulted in making the movie.

Key scenes involving Whaley as Nack are based in fact, however. Most notably the one where Nack, totally focused on the stricken Ruffian far away on the Belmont backstretch, is almost run over by Braulio Baeza on Foolish Pleasure as Nack crosses the track to sprint across the infield to get to the Ruffian scene.

“I could see the headline: Ruffian breaks down, reporter killed, Foolish Pleasure breaks shoulder,” Nack said. “It would have been like getting hit by four Dick Butkuses going 40 miles an hour.”

If, after the race and the movie, you haven't had enough of Bill Nack, there are opportunities to catch him again in the HBO documentary “Barbaro” that will play at selected times on HBO or HBO2 almost daily between now and June 29 and be available through HBO On Demand through July 8.

It's a thoroughly well-done, thoroughly touching account of the Barbaro saga with comments from all of Team Barbaro, several journalists who covered the event and the Pimlico track emergency medical team.

Nack, addressing the question why the public interest in Barbaro became so great says: “These animals become like national pets . . . we human beings reach out emotionally to these horses . . . these horses become like the center of Greek tragedy. And when we see them injured like this, we're all part of the chorus, trying to bring them back.”

It's Curlin

2007-05-20T02:01:20Z

No Triple Crown Winner again this year, Street Sense got nipped at the line by Curlin.

Story

Amazing Video of Barbaro!

2007-05-14T20:33:46Z

Kentucky Derby

2007-05-05T12:57:44Z

Here are my selections for todays Kentucky Derby:

WIN: Scat Daddy
PLACE: Circular Quay
SHOW: Great Hunter

Hi everyone!

2007-04-30T04:04:56Z

It is only a couple of days before the Derby, It is too bad that Barbaro could not overcome the problems. I think it is the only the second Derby winner to pass on less than a year after winning the Derby (Swale in 1984 being the other). I did not see the special that NBC had for him, The Hockey game ran long, So NBC did not show it! I don't know if it will be shown? If anyone knows please tell me. I don't have a derby pick as of yet. It is most likely the most boring fields I have seen in awhile. Well anyway enjoy the Derby and hope you have a winner.

Go For Gin taking the 1995 Derby

I also been transfering my race collection from video! You can see the few here!

Once again enjoy the derby!

Happy Birthday, Barbaro!

2007-04-28T17:11:00Z

I am posting this today one day early:

Happy Birthday, Barbaro!

Barbaro party set for Sunday
Track to celebrate 2006 Derby winner's birthday
By JACK IRELAND, The News Journal

Posted Saturday, April 28, 2007
More than 500 people are expected to celebrate Barbaro's birthday during events at Delaware Park on Sunday.

Barbaro, who opened his career at Delaware Park in fall 2005 with a win on the turf, would have turned four on Sunday.

The colt, who broke down in last year's Preakness, had to be euthanized Jan. 29 after developing complications from laminitis while being treated at the University of Pennsylvania's New Bolton Center in Kennett Square, Pa.

Barbaro's owners, Roy and Gretchen Jackson, of West Grove, Pa., have been invited to the Delaware Park celebration.

Proceeds will be donated to the Laminitis Fund at the New Bolton Center.

TV monitors inside the tent will show a Barbaro video that includes his DelPark maiden win.

The track will show the documentary "The First Saturday in May"on its infield TV screen at 6:30 p.m. The movie, which premiered at the Tribeca Film Festival in New York on Thursday, follows the course of five 3-year-old horses (including Barbaro) up to the 2006 Kentucky Derby.

Barbaro fans will gather on a smaller scale at locations in Florida, California, Maine, Colorado, Nevada, Ohio, Missouri and Massachusetts.

Contact Jack Ireland at 324-2808 or jireland@delawareonline.com.

IF YOU GO

churchill_downs @ 2007-04-26T11:15:00

2007-04-26T18:15:45Z

horse_feathers

We're back and better than ever! Come join this GREAT community!

(I didn't see in the rules that this wasn't allowed,
so Moderators, please feel free to delete if this is against your rules)