You're absolutely right, it's a very anti-feminist attitude that there is a "right" or "wrong" use for the breasts. Who chooses what is right/wrong? What makes breastfeeding right? Well, breasts-for-breastfeeding-only doesn't allow for untethered female sexuality, and it does insinuate domesticity and marriage to the exclusion of any other lifestyles.
A woman who isn't using her body for procreative purposes (and who is purposely partaking in sexual enjoyment or pleasure) is too liberated for these fools.

I spit on them and their decisions about how I should use my body.

I may have to do something with that later when I get a chance to open Photoshop. It's positively begging to be satirized.

Oh, didn't you know? BOOBS ARE FOR THE BAAAAAAAAYYYBEEEEEEEEEES AND ANYONE WHO THINKS THEY ARE IN ANY WAY SEXUAL IS AN ANTI BREASTFEEDING, ANTI-FEMINIST SLAVE TO THE PATRIARCHY.

Jesus, I think I lost IQ points typing that.

The entire debate has just illustrated completely confused female identity is in our culture. It's almost like the line is drawn in the sand between "the female body for sex" and "the female body as only utilitarian", with no other choices. I'm on the CF/more-sex-than-utilitarian side of it obviously, but I feel almost bitter at the fact that I sort of have to objectify myself within the argument either way. To say the "right" reason is just...wrong.

Heh, I recently had a breast reduction, and the fact that I'm now unable to produce milk makes me feel more like a woman and less like an animal. I love it.

I DO use mine for the right reason: I make money with them.

Haw haw! Joke's on them.

I use my breasts for the right reason.

Wearing low-cut tops so the senior IT managers buy me drinks all evening.

Ugh, that's just sad. How fucking repressed can one get?

What I really hate is how they keep on stressing "breastfeeding is NATURAL, breastfeeding is NORMAL."

So sex is unnatural and abnormal? Gah.

From The Naked Ape, by Desmond Morris. Emphasis mine. A very interesting book overall.

If using my breasts to entertain my fiance is wrong, I dun wanna be right :3

My breasts are not sexual. They are not babyfeeders. Their purpose is being annoying sacks of fat hanging off of my ribcage. To me, they have no use, and therefore there is no right or wrong reason to "use" them. There just is no use for them. Period.

I personally get irked by both sides--the people who think that boobs are nothing but auto-refill baby bottles, and the people who think that boobs are some be-all of their identity as a "sexy" woman. Who cares what purpose you assign for your boobs? Just do what you want to do with them and stop worrying about everyone else's breasts.

There's no wrong way to use boobs. Unless they're ugly and saggy.

Got a link to this image on the original server? They seem to have wised up to the fact that it's antifeminist and changed it -- which doesn't make the fact that they came up with it any less appalling.

The right reason ... Yeah. They make it sound as if it were the only reason breasts are there for. Aside from sexual fun I believe breasts have other functions as well.

A nice and soft place to have your baby snuggle up against, for example.


Now don't you come screaming and yelling at me ... o.O°
I mean, don't we all enjoy the softness of breasts?

We lesbians and heterosexual men that is.

Does it strike anyone else that the slogan 'use your breasts for the right reason' is incredibly sex-negative, biodeterminist, prudish and basically highly fundiesque in nature?

Ayup.

It's a sort of virgin mother/whore dichotomy, don't you think? No, boobs aren't sexual or aesthetic at all! Their sole function is for nourishing offspring, and you're a sexist pervert if you think otherwise! I don't think that's any better than insisting that breasts are solely sexual and that breastfeeding is somehow wrong.

Seriously though, what's the subtext there? "Don't be like those little whores who flaunt their breasts around. Use them to be a chaste, nurturing mother!"