Previous Entry | Next Entry

This is the letter that I am sending to the upper management for the security team of Kemper Development Company for the assault from before. This letter is being written not only because I was Bingo'ed, but because he spoke down to me condescendingly, was very unprofessional, offered false legal counsel, and discriminated against the fact that I'm gay.



December 12, 2005

Tiger Wolf


Kemper Development Company – Security Department
575 Bellevue Square
Bellevue, WA 98004

Attn: Kemper Development Company Security Managers Ken West and Clark Rice.

Re: Complaint against Phil Hoyt, (Re: Discriminatory Behavior, Unprofessional Behavior, Providing False Legal Advice)

To Whom It May Concern:

This letter is in regards to the incident occurring at 13:57 at Lincoln Square Mall/Lincoln Square Cinemas on 12/11/2005.

My fiancé Sean and I were taking the escalator up to the 2nd floor of the Lincoln Square Mall. At the top of the escalator, I had the unfortunate accident of tripping over a small asian child, who looked to be approximately 3-4 years old. I looked around for the parent of this child, noticing two other people trip over her as well, one of whom was an elderly woman who almost fell because of it. When I located the parent about 6-8 feet away, back completely turned from her smaller child, I informed her in a normal speaking tone “You need to control your child and keep them next to you, people are tripping over her.”

The mother scowled at me for a moment and I continued walking. I got approximately half way to the next escalator to go to the 3rd floor, when she yelled as loud as possible “WHAT DID YOU SAY TO ME?”. I informed her again “You heard what I said. You need to control your child and keep them close so that other people will not trip over her.”

Sean and I then proceeded to go up to the 3rd floor. I gave him a card to purchase tickets with, and I was going to purchase a drink since we were running late for our showing in theater 15. As I put my hand on the door to open it, a man grabbed me from behind, dug his fingernails into my arm and raked them down it while turning me around (I did not notice the damage from it until later). He held my arm and proceeded to cuss me out about what I had supposedly said to his wife along with various other threats and insults. I informed him not to touch me and pushed him rather firmly away from me with the arm he was holding. He attempted to grab on to me again and I swatted his hand away from me and informed him “If you touch me one more time, not only will I get the police involved, but I WILL hit you back.”

He continued ranting for another moment or two before I simply said “I stand by what I said. Control your child.” and then continued in to the theater. All of this was done in front of his children and family; however the wife was contributing to the yelling and rudeness.

After purchasing my drink and meeting up with Sean again, we went and found a seat. This is the first chance that I had to actually look down at my arm. I saw 3 large scratches approximately 6-7” long up and down the inside part of my arm. This rather irritated me, so I excused myself for a few moments to go speak to management. This occurred at 14:07.

When I spoke with the theater managers, I informed them that while I did not intend on causing a scene, I wanted them to know that I had been assaulted directly in front of their business. The management took this extremely seriously, and offered me free passes, as well as asked me to identify the people so they could remove them from the theater. I let them know that the family had gone into theater 16, and then he said that he would contact mall security to assist in dealing with this.

When the security team arrived, along with a few other employees and managers, I explained the situation fully, including all events that led up to the assault. We proceeded into the theater and I identified them. When they were escorted out, the wife proceeded to yell a profane phrase or two, when she found out it was me, and then had to go retrieve her children whom again, she was not watching.

After this point, I did not see the family again. I spoke with your employee David, who was beyond professional. He followed procedure very well, inquiring if I needed any medical attention, as well as if I desired to press charges. He also took down my deposition and personal information. I decided that since nothing had been broken, I would think about filing assault charges on the man. David explained that he intended on filing criminal trespassing charges on the family, since the assault took place on mall property, and that this would be in effect for a period of one year (the duration information was requested by me). I said that I was going in the theater to inform Sean of the situation, and when I returned Phil Hoyt was there, speaking with David off to the side. He was looking at me and smirking and looking condescending, and after a few moments he walked off. David returned, and informed me that Phil had decided that the person and his family would only be asked to leave for the day, and that the man had claimed that I had started the entire thing, and that he had barely touched me.

David showed Phil my arm and indicated that the injury was not the result of ‘barely touching’, however Phil did not seem to be interested in that, playing it down as only a scratch.

Afterwards, I spoke with David again, and he asked me one more time if I would like to press charges on the man, since there was an officer across the street, and that he would be able to call him over to get the information on what happened. I decided that this would be the best course of action in the long run, in case he were to do it to anyone else, and said that I would return shortly after informing Sean again of what was happening.



Upon my return, Phil was standing there along with David and another security officer. (I did not get this person’s name, nor did they say anything.) Phil began to lecture me in a condescending tone, starting with “If you WANTED to file charges, you should have done it at the beginning. Now it’s been dealt with and everyone has gone now, so you can’t do it, so just deal with it. Besides, that’ll heal fast *indicating at my arm*”. I stood there quite baffled by the fact that this man was attempting to give me incorrect legal advice, and then he piped up again with “And besides, you had no right to tell her how to parent her child in the first place.”

This was too much for me and I said “Excuse me? I had every right to tell her to control her child. The child was standing at the very top of an escalator, which is unsafe to begin with.” His reply? “No you don’t.”

I again explained that I had every right as is in the first amendment, since I did not verbally abuse the woman or threaten her in any way, and in fact I had used a very civil tone and no foul language whatsoever. He argued with me again for a moment, and then resorted to “I guess we have a difference of opinion then.”

He then attempted to ‘bingo’ me, as it is called in ChildFree circles. He started with “Do you have kids of your own?”. I replied that I did not, nor would I ever have any in the future.” He then said “Then you have no right to judge parents.” .. I said “Excuse me? I have every right to inform a parent who is not paying attention to their child’s actions or who is letting their child actively misbehave that they need to do something about it.” He then resorted to the childish “Well when you have kids you’ll think differently.”

I fail to see the relevance of my child status to this case, or to the fact that Phil is attempting to say that my first amendment rights should be squelched when I see something wrong happening. He then said that if the staff of the mall security see a child a ways away from its parent, that they (quoted) “won’t touch that with a 10 foot pole”. I informed him that while the staff may have those rules, I am not an employee, and I have every right to tell someone to curb their child.

He attempted another argumentative tactic after sniggering a bit at me, where he said “Maybe it was a cultural difference and he didn’t approve of how you were speaking to a woman.”. When I responded with “Excuse me? I’m gay.” he began to snigger and chuckle again, mocking the fact that I am of the homosexual persuasion. This is not only discriminatory, but it is also extremely unprofessional. I then finished the sentence with something sarcastic (which yes, would have warranted chuckling afterwards) about how I am probably more of a lady than she was, considering how she was behaving.

His conversation then continued to get even more condescending by telling me “Well I guess you learned your lesson, didn’t you?”

Again, this is not his place to say, and I informed him of such, saying “What are you talking about? I did nothing wrong other than inform his wife that she needs to keep her child controlled and next to her when in a mall, rather than tripping people dangerously. That’s ESPECIALLY important considering how many amber alerts we’ve had in this area recently with people snatching children.”

He then said “Your lesson should be that if you say something like that, you might make someone angry and this might happen.”

I became quite irate with him at this point, and said “No. The only lesson that was learned in this situation should be by the man who assaulted me.. and he should have learned that when you attack someone, it’s going to cost you a fair bit of money and make your family miserable.”

Again, he brushed it off as a ‘difference of opinion’ and basically told me that nothing more than asking them to leave the property for one day would be done, and that I should go back and see the rest of my movie or whatever. I grudgingly shook his hand, and ‘thanked him for his time’ (not very sincerely, mind you). I then turned to David and informed him that I very much appreciated his help in the situation, and that I was sorry it turned out like this, and that his time was very much appreciated. I also shook the hand of the third party whom was there, and informed him “Despite the fact that I barely saw you and don’t know who you are, thank you for coming here.”

That is my documentation of the situation. If you have any further questions or concerns that need to be addressed, please feel free to contact me at (***) ***-****. I thank you for your time, and appreciate greatly the fact that this incident is being taken very seriously. I would like to request prompt termination of Phil Hoyt for his actions, as again, not only are they discriminatory and unprofessional, but some are actually illegal. I also feel that it is extremely inappropriate of Mr Hoyt to go around undermining the authority of his staff that he is supposed to be supervising.

Regards,



Tiger Wolf


I'm leaving in a few moments to turn that in to Ken. Please, don't contact the company and flame them or harass them or anything. Phil Hoyt seems to be the only member of the staff who is unprofessional and rude, and I received nothing but polite attention and understanding of the seriousness of this situation from every other staff member involved.

Well.. There ya go. I will keep you guys informed of what Clark Rice says, since he's pretty much top of the line, short of the owner. The only downfall I have in this case is that Mr Hoyt has a number of years with the company, however as Ken said, my case is quite strong, and moreso with an employee backing my claims.

So what do you guys think?

Comments

[info]leer wrote:
Dec. 12th, 2005 11:43 pm (UTC)
It sounds good... At first I thought the comment that it was an "asian" child might make people pull the omgracist card, but the 'cultural difference' b.s. kinda explains it.

Good luck :)
[info]tigerwolf wrote:
Dec. 12th, 2005 11:46 pm (UTC)
Yeah. I had to put it in there since the manager asked me to. He told me to document EVERYTHING I could on it, since I seem to be very observant and quite able to record times and such in my head.
[info]serawench wrote:
Dec. 12th, 2005 11:44 pm (UTC)
Excellent! Please, please keep us updated. Very professionally written and I hope it is received professionally as well. You were clear and concise, did not throw accusations about, and made clear what your desires were and what your concerns about the situation are. (No, I'm not taking a course in interpersonal effectiveness AT ALL!).

Good luck!
[info]dasmeg wrote:
Dec. 12th, 2005 11:47 pm (UTC)
I'm not sure the company management will understand what you mean by 'bingo', so you could either replace that with something along the lines of 'acted condecendingly'.
[info]tigerwolf wrote:
Dec. 12th, 2005 11:49 pm (UTC)
I just explained that it's a term used by ChildFree people, and then proceeded to explain what it was that he did. The managers here are pretty smart from what I gather, plus I explained bingo'ing to Ken this morning. :)
[info]donnaidh_sidhe wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 12:43 am (UTC)
It might just be easier to get the point across if you say "acted condescendingly" in any case, because jargon is generally a bad idea for correspondence between people who aren't in the same work/social circle (i.e. people who don't know immediately what the jargon means).
[info]jesirose wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 02:15 am (UTC)
Ditto. No need to point out that you're CF and use bingo. It'd be simpler to say condescended.
[info]tigerwolf wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 03:15 am (UTC)
Yeah. The manager found out this morning and as soon as I explained it he dinged inside his head and understood completely. He knows I wasn't mad at the child or acting as such because I hated the child. It was 3-4 year old. That's a little bit different than a sprog who's doing it to be a pest. A kid that age doesn't know better. @_@
[info]maladaptive wrote:
Dec. 12th, 2005 11:49 pm (UTC)
Excellent letter!

My word of advice would only be to take out the mention of bingoing. His bullshit shines pretty clearly without the label, and associating yourself with childfree circles may bias the reader. Not that CF groups are bad, but it's irrelevant to the story.

Keep us posted.
[info]tigerwolf wrote:
Dec. 12th, 2005 11:50 pm (UTC)
I explained bingoing to the manager this morning and he seemed totally fine with it. :) He cocked his head at me for a second when I said it at first and I was like "Oh. Bingoing means this" and he went "Oh! I see."

He's a smart man, and from what he tells me, Clark is pretty smart too. :)
[info]satanicmantis wrote:
Dec. 12th, 2005 11:50 pm (UTC)
Good letter :) If I were you I'd leave out the "bingo" reference and play down the CF angle though...your CF status is irrelevant to the way you were treated by this guy, and it might just invoke the "OMG cyyuld hater!!!11!!" response and get your complaint ignored.
[info]ms_daisy_cutter wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 12:49 am (UTC)
Agreed. I'd cull the CF language completely. Because it's unusual to most people and (unfortunately) threatening to many, it takes the focus off Phil and puts it on you.

Also, I would lock this post and anonymize last names, as well as the company name and address. We don't know who lurks here who might want to contact the company and cause trouble for you.
[info]tigerwolf wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 03:17 am (UTC)
Even if they do. I want people to know what a flying jackass this guy was. *shrug* If he gets harassed, it's his own problem. :)
[info]elevenphoenix wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 04:23 am (UTC)
I strongly agree and thought the same thing when I read the letter.
[info]rednympho wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 12:14 am (UTC)
Excellent letter-however I think I'd leave out the bit about "bingoing". Leaving the conversation as it is would be more effective.
[info]tigerwolf wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 03:06 am (UTC)
Actually the manager was informed earlier in the day what bingoing is, and he understood as soon as I gave a brief explaination. He knows that I wasn't pissed at the child, I was pissed at the bad parents in this case.
[info]ozzisme wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 12:28 am (UTC)
I didn't follow how the "I'm gay" bit was a relevant response to his babble about "cultural differences."

I'm not saying it wasn't relevant, just that it's different to understand from the letter. You might want to explain more clearly.
[info]ms_daisy_cutter wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 12:49 am (UTC)
Oh, man, that icon is a hoot. :-)
[info]jesirose wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 02:16 am (UTC)
I thought that too.
[info]tigerwolf wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 03:38 am (UTC)
See above. It was justifying that I didn't care that she was a woman. I don't treat someone better just because they're female. I'm gay, it means much less to me that someone's female than it did back when I was straight. *lol*
[info]spooke wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 02:20 am (UTC)
That icon is great. *g*
[info]tigerwolf wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 03:09 am (UTC)
The I'm gay part wasn't about the cultural differences, it was in him thinking I gave a shit whether the person I was speaking to was a man or a woman.

If it was the father instead of the lady there, would I have said anything different? No. I would have said exactly the same thing. Just because someone is a woman, does NOT mean that they instantly earn my respect. Respect is not freely given with me, it's something you have to work for.
[info]mschilepepper wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 12:54 am (UTC)
I guess I just don't understand why you involved the theater people at all; if the incident didn't happen *in* the theater, they have no liability or responsibility to intercede for you. You were assaulted, plain and simple, and you should have gone straight to the police (and, to a lesser degree, the mall management/security). The police are paid to assist citizens, and what happened to you was a criminal offense.

Yes, I fully understand the theater dude was a horse's ass, and yes, you should complain to his superiors, but there just wasn't a reason to involve them at all.

I understand the reluctance to involve the police sometimes, but they are trained and paid to handle situations like this; the theater employees are not, and it seems this is a classic case of muddying the waters by involving people who have no interest in the matter.
[info]bites_the_sun wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 01:04 am (UTC)
^agreed.

The guy was a smug arsehole, but the guy assaulted you, plain and simple, and where he did it had no bearing on what happened nor did the theatre staff bear responsibility for what happened to you.

Next time, call the police immediately. You had physical marks from the assault - I think they would have taken you seriously. And people who do that to others need to be taught more of a lesson than being banned from a fucking movie theatre.
[info]jesirose wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 02:17 am (UTC)
Sean and I then proceeded to go up to the 3rd floor. I gave him a card to purchase tickets with, and I was going to purchase a drink since we were running late for our showing in theater 15. As I put my hand on the door to open it, a man grabbed me from behind, dug his fingernails into my arm and raked them down it while turning me around (I did not notice the damage from it until later). He held my arm and proceeded to cuss me out about what I had supposedly said to his wife along with various other threats and insults. I informed him not to touch me and pushed him rather firmly away from me with the arm he was holding. He attempted to grab on to me again and I swatted his hand away from me and informed him “If you touch me one more time, not only will I get the police involved, but I WILL hit you back.”


The Assult did happen in the theater.
[info]bites_the_sun wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 02:39 am (UTC)
OK, it happened in the theatre, but it wasn't the theatre's fault in any way, unless rhere's some law that says if someone does something on your property it's your fault too. I agree one of the staff was a total tosser about it and that needs to be brought up as customer service matter, but the focus should be on the cretin who assualted her, not the theatre staff, as the more serious breach of behaviour by far was commited by him. The man broke the law by physically assaulting her and that calls for the police to be summoned as a matter of course, in my opinion.
[info]tigerwolf wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 03:43 am (UTC)
her? I'm male. *lol* And no, the reason it was brought up to the theater staff is because it happened in their place of business. They HAVE to know stuff like that because they know the proper avenues to follow for such. I was offered police, as well as mall security being called. They also said that they did not want the man on their properly and that once he was pointed out, they would promptly eject him with no refund.

I even told them that I wasn't raising a stink about it, but I just wanted to inform them what happened. When they saw my arm, THAT is when the shit hit the fan. The claw marks in it were 6-7 inches long and very very red with broken skin along them. They provided me free passes to return, since they knew I would be missing a portion of my movie too. :\ It was kind of them, and I told them that they didn't have to do that for me, but they insisted. I also apologized to them that it happened in their place of business, and explained that I didn't hit him because I wanted to demonstrate more class than he was showing. (that's not the full reason, but yeah..)
[info]bites_the_sun wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 08:20 pm (UTC)
Sorry I misunderstood. I'd just come back from a weekend away in which I had approximately 4 hours sleep over 48 hours.
[info]tigerwolf wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 08:25 pm (UTC)
It's alright. There's so many people involved in the whole damned thing, and that's the reason I'm not getting frustrated with explaining it over and over to different people.

The waiter at the restaurant I frequent last night overheard me telling my roommate more about it and he came over and asked me to tell him the whole story. *lol*

Then again, that's not a common occurance for the waitstaff there either. I usually have something new to rant about on a regular basis, especially with Washington people. Oy vey.. @_@
[info]tigerwolf wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 03:48 am (UTC)
Sorry. The other thing. The focus isn't on the theater staff. The theater staff were EXCELLENT in handling the problem. It was the mall security supervisor who not only undermined the security guard that was helping me's authority, but proceeded to act like the whole situation was nothing, told me I couldn't do anything about it, bingoed me, was very condescending and unprofessional, and mocked me openly because I'm gay.

THAT is what this letter is about. Many people asked for followups on the situation after the whole thing and suggested I go after the security supervisor, which this letter is about. The sec. officer who helped me directly (David in this letter) was BEYOND professional and courteous, and he attended the meeting with Ken this morning where Ken asked me to write this letter.

I was told that my story has a lot of credibility behind it because of how well I documented the times and what was said etc, but also because David was supporting my claims 100%. He said that everything that I said was true.
[info]tigerwolf wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 03:31 am (UTC)
Heh. Oh TRUST ME... if shit like that happens again? Now that I know the law in this state for self defense I will NOT hesitate to thump the shit out of whoever grabs me. No, I won't use excessive force, but I'll use ENOUGH force that they won't soon forget it.
[info]tigerwolf wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 03:26 am (UTC)
Ok. This is where you're confused.

The theater people were involved because it happened directly in front of their theater in the mall, or.. next to their box office WHILE I was going into the doors where they take tickets and where the concession boots are. The theater is responsible for this area.

2. It was the mall security who was involved. It was just brought to the theater manager's attention because of where it happened, which again, is as I was entering their place of business. They contacted mall security and also asked if I wanted the police called.

3. I've lived in quite a few places where the police actively discriminate against homosexuals like myself. I'm one of those guys you can easily tell just by looking at me that I'm gay, and I wouldn't want them coming to 'help the fairy with his widdle boo-boo' or something to that extent. I'm quite capable of defending myself physically, however, for potential liability issues, and the fact that I was not going to let the guy and his wife get away with what he did to my arm, I just spoke to the managers of the theater.

4. The theater staff were GREAT in dealing with the situation. As were all of the mall security staff EXCEPT the mall security supervisor for the day. He tried to make it look like the incident was nothing, like the guy barely touched me, and then not only undermined the authority of David who was going to follow policy and trespass the family off the properties for a year, but also was discriminatory, condescending, and inflicting his incorrect legalese on me.

Again, I am always reluctant to involve police in anything save for reporting drunk drivers. Why? Because there are a LOT of 'dirty' cops out there. A majority of them. And quite honestly, I don't want the shit to deal with just because I'm a fag.

All parties that were involved were supposed to be involved. The waters weren't muddied by me. The thing happened on theater/mall property. Theater management and mall security were involved, and this letter is addressed to the security managers, so that it will be appropriately handled. I do know what I'm doing here.
[info]yayfortaints wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 01:52 am (UTC)
Always have a police-officer document it when things like this happen, even if you decide not to press charges. Having a cop see your injuries and take your testimony strengthens your case. (You don't want people saying "Well, if this was so serious, why weren't the police called?" later on.)
[info]tigerwolf wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 03:35 am (UTC)
That was what I did today actually after the original meeting with Ken, whom this letter is addressed to. Ken asked me to document the information that I gave him in a letter that was signed and dated by me, and bring it back to him ASAP. He recommended that I file charges or document it too. The post below is explaining what I did. I documented it rather than filing charges because the cop was trying to bingo me too. @_@

Though in the cop's defense, he DID say that regardless of whether the husband thought I was rude to his wife or not it did NOT give him the right to touch me.
[info]aloneinthesun wrote:
Dec. 14th, 2005 05:10 am (UTC)
he DID say that regardless of whether the husband thought I was rude to his wife or not it did NOT give him the right to touch me.

Exactly. Which is why the whole debate with the mall security officer is so incredible.

Too bad this crappy situation unfolded =( I hope things go your way in the end.
[info]have_you_seen wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 05:01 am (UTC)
Says it all. I am following with interest and hope that asshat gets demoted or fired. I am glad there was a good security guy as well, so it's not all "we say - they say".
[info]tigerwolf wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 05:05 am (UTC)
Yeah. My anger wasn't only about how I was treated, but how the good one was treated too, having his authority totally undermined despite him following the guidelines set up by the mall, and basically being treated like a child. Unacceptable in my eyes.
[info]nicoledramon wrote:
Dec. 13th, 2005 03:18 pm (UTC)
I still think that telling the company how to handle personel issues (firing the guy) makes you look bad. (Remember, you're the good-guy here.) Sure the guy may deserve to be fired and I think you outlined it well in your statement of the incident. To come out and say something like that is worse form than even I would muster. (I am one of the most tactless people you will ever meet.) Also, the bingo reference and the mention of the fact that you are gay also don't serve any real purpose in your letter. I read your explanation of why you put them there, but I still feel that it is extraneous.

Latest Month

July 2009
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Teresa Jones