Home

Advertisement

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Comments

[info]tehsp0rk wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2007 09:09 pm (UTC)
Haha. A+, would LOL again.
[info]hawkward wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2007 09:12 pm (UTC)
That made me lawl for realz, yo.
[info]ebneter wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2007 09:23 pm (UTC)
Cut, please? That might not be SFW in a lot of places...
[info]einheitstochter wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2007 09:36 pm (UTC)
Lol, sorry, but ... wtf?
[info]ebneter wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2007 09:40 pm (UTC)
There are some workplaces where the macro might not be considered appropriate, and it shows up on the friends page of any user who has the comm friended.

Granted, it has to be read and interpreted. But the potential is still there. And there are workplaces (mine included) that don't mind if you read your LJ friends page while waiting for other things or while you're on break.
[info]vwsandcoffee wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2007 09:47 pm (UTC)
kinda like your userpic?
[info]spiritosa wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2007 09:53 pm (UTC)
...which is not visible from the viewer's friends page, and would not be visible unless the viewer clicked on the entry?
[info]ebneter wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2007 02:01 am (UTC)
Ah, but my user pic doesn't show on anyone's Friends page, since it's only in the comments. It's not my default pic.
[info]wyntermoonwolf wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2007 01:51 am (UTC)
If you read this community at work, you deserve to get in trouble.
[info]ebneter wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2007 02:05 am (UTC)
The community is on my (and many other people's) Friends page. One good reason for using a cut is to make sure that possibly offensive material has to be actively clicked on -- [info]badtattoos_4 is also on my Friends page, but they put everything behind a cut, so there's no issue with possibly NSFW material. It's pretty much common courtesy, you know?
[info]wyntermoonwolf wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2007 02:25 am (UTC)
On any page view of this community, there's several macros that contain stuff that could be deemed NSFW that are not behind cuts - it's also not a requirement of the community.

So if you read this community while at work, you take the risk of getting in trouble. Same as if you decide to speed while driving, you take the risk of getting a ticket.

I've learned a long time ago to not read my friends list at work and that was when I was subscribed to only "safe" communities.
[info]ebneter wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2007 04:57 am (UTC)
I do find it somewhat amusing that people are assuming that I "got in trouble" over this. It was just a polite request (one to which the OP has not responded one way or another, I might add...). I do realize that cuts for non-work-safeness are not required in this community; it's still considered polite. Wasn't part of the reason for the creation of [info]wtf_catmacros to provide a place for patently offensive and non-worksafe macros? (Not, by the way, that I consider this particular one to be patently offensive. Just more potentially non-worksafe than many others.)

Yeah, I know: tl;dr.
[info]obeytheturtle wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2007 02:31 am (UTC)
Did you even read the top of the page where it says "Post some fucking cats"? This is NOT a worksafe community.
[info]ebneter wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2007 04:51 am (UTC)
Um, did I say I was reading the community at work? Nope. It's on my friends page. And wow, I'm highly amused at the reactions of people (none of whom is the original poster, I might add) to a simple polite request. Which was not really even on my own behalf, I might add -- no one where I work would care about that macro.
[info]obeytheturtle wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2007 05:34 am (UTC)
Which completely ignores my point. This is not a worksafe community. Nowhere on the communty info page does it say that this is a worksafe community, nor does the moderator ask people to place possibly offensive material behind a cut.
[info]ebneter wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2007 05:41 am (UTC)
Whatever. Many people do put NSFW material behind cuts, even on communities that aren't advertised as worksafe. (Even on this community.) It's considered, you know, polite. It's still making me laugh that such a simple request engendered such a response, too. Good Lord, you'd've thought I'd suggested that cat macros were child pornography or something.
[info]obeytheturtle wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2007 05:58 am (UTC)
If people want to put their possibly offensive pictures behind cuts, there's nothing wrong with that. But the point remains that there is no requirement to do so. Thus if you're browsing this community at work, even through your friends' page, you do so at your own risk.
[info]naughty_fairy wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2007 07:38 am (UTC)
This arguement has been made so many times it's old. The mod has also addressed it already a heap of times. If you still have a problem with it
perhaps you should contact her after all that's what mods are for...(sorry Kittydoom!)
[info]amenthea wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2007 02:18 pm (UTC)
If it makes you feel any better, I know precisely what you meant by your comment and we all know its not a requirement to put them behind cuts but that wasn't the point being made. The whole thing seems to have become very overblown by people being overly defensive over something as simple as a polite request which equated to none other then the poster to have a consideration for other users that may not be reading/looking in a completely safe area. It only takes a few extra moments to do so and a lot of posters do it anyway.

[info]ducttapeavenger wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2007 10:36 am (UTC)
~boggles~ If you are subscribed to the community on your friends page, and you are reading your friends page, then you are darn sure reading the community at work. And if you are in a workplace (or any situation) where this image is not safe, then you shouldn't be on the internet at all, especially on any site with user-created content. It's a jungle in these tubes.
[info]electriclime wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2007 09:24 pm (UTC)
So wrong.
So WIN!
[info]middlerelief wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2007 09:24 pm (UTC)
bahahahaha SO WRONG. i love it.
[info]pikapika217 wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2007 09:27 pm (UTC)
no words
[info]spiritosa wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2007 09:55 pm (UTC)
Love it!
[info]sheila_peitra wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2007 10:10 pm (UTC)
I love it.

Pls not to be cutting, kthx. :-)
[info]flannelgnome wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2007 10:27 pm (UTC)
I lol'd. Twice!
[info]mrmikeyman wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2007 10:49 pm (UTC)
Pahahahahahah! Pure fucking winnanation.

Oh, and plz 2 not b cutting. If you're reading LJ at work, maybe you should be...oh, I dunno, working? And if somebody sees that over your shoulder and has issue with it, they're too damn uptight anyway.
[info]spiritosa wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2007 11:25 pm (UTC)
Or maybe some people have smaller kids or something like that? It's not always about work. Why is it such a hardship for you to have to make an extra little click?

I maintain that yes, it should be cut. Just because a few people personally would not want an lj cut and cannot consider that other people live differently doesn't mean that a cut isn't a good idea. Even as someone who loved the macro and doesn't live with smaller children, I have to consider that other people live differently from myself and might prefer a cut.
[info]ebneter wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2007 02:10 am (UTC)
Thank you.

I think the macro is hilarious. I just think it should be behind an lj-cut. Why is that so difficult for some people?? It doesn't offend me, and almost certainly wouldn't offend most of my co-workers, but why should someone have to take the chance of something offensive turning up on their friends page? That's the whole point behind cuts!
[info]cjkline83 wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2007 03:19 pm (UTC)
Because maybe the rest of us who read this community don't want to have to fucking click on a million "read more" links. We'd rather just scroll down the fucking page.

Stop being so inconsiderate to the majority.
[info]jira_rd wrote:
Jul. 22nd, 2007 04:02 pm (UTC)
Stop being lazy. :P
[info]obeytheturtle wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2007 06:07 am (UTC)
<3
[info]naughty_fairy wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2007 07:39 am (UTC)
Re: <3
hahahhahahah! gold

[info]cjkline83 wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2007 03:19 pm (UTC)
Re: <3
I'mma cut a bitch, since they want one so fucking badly.
[info]obeytheturtle wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2007 11:49 pm (UTC)
Re: <3
Dammit, that just inspired me to name a new macro.

[info]ducttapeavenger wrote:
Jul. 22nd, 2007 05:12 am (UTC)
Re: <3
Wunderbar!
[info]attilatehbun wrote:
Jul. 23rd, 2007 07:33 pm (UTC)
Re: <3


[info]ablemagawitch wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2007 06:12 pm (UTC)
Re: <3
Thank you I was getting ready to post it
[info]call_me_robert wrote:
Jul. 24th, 2007 03:35 pm (UTC)
Re: <3
YAY!! One of mine finally gets used!!
[info]pixienymph wrote:
Jul. 20th, 2007 11:32 pm (UTC)
I love it, but I can't stop staring at the woman's toes. They're all squished into that shoe and don't look right!!!!!!
[info]polylizzy wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2007 01:10 am (UTC)
all that and you notice WEIRD TOES???
[info]pixienymph wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2007 02:26 am (UTC)
It's how I roll.
[info]megacatz wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2007 01:58 am (UTC)
nasty and nice! FTW!
[info]commie_mania wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2007 02:39 am (UTC)
Made of win.
[info]amenthea wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2007 02:19 pm (UTC)
lol, by the way!
[info]ladylynx wrote:
Jul. 21st, 2007 08:36 pm (UTC)
I hate NWS whiners. Unless people are fucking, it's appropriate for everyone. GTFO.
[info]dementedjen wrote:
Aug. 10th, 2007 10:33 am (UTC)
Wankalicious.

Profile

[info]cat_macros
Cat Macros

Latest Month

July 2009
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 
Powered by LiveJournal.com