I was browsing Passive-Aggressive notes today and saw this:
http://www.passiveaggressivenotes.com/2010/03/26/there-are-crazy-people-out-there-you-know/I work in public facilities with children in the city where I live, and photography policy has varied. When I was a kid (in the early 1990s) you could videotape in public buildings. When I started working, there was a strict no photography policy. I had to hunt down people with cameras and cell phones. Nowadays you can apply for a permit, and take pictures as long as no one but your child is in them. (And of course, though, absolutely no pictures in public changerooms!)
Having been in a few confrontations where people ask me why such a policy is in place, I explain that paedophiles could take pictures of the children, but many people think that this is an overreaction. It's difficult to explain as well, I find, because naturally people think you're accusing them of being a paedophile. And it's true, 99% of the people who come in the building aren't - they probably just want a snapshot for the family album.
What do you think? Is this an overreaction? Should we prevent other people obtaining pictures of other (or your; I don't have any) children at all costs? Even when they are clothed and engaged in activities? Where do we draw the line? How do we determine when it's okay or not okay?