Home
Anti Feminazi Thoughts [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]
people against feminazis

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]

a rant [Jun. 16th, 2006|01:35 am]

aloverstale
I hate those anti-girly girls. What's wrong with being girly sometimes? What if I like to wear makeup on occassion and shave my legs? I'm not a ditz, but I like to dress up and be pretty sometimes, and I can be smart and girly at the same time and f*** anyone who thinks otherwise!!! Grrrrrrr...
Link1 comment|Leave a comment

I found this interesting. [Sep. 14th, 2005|08:08 pm]

fish_pony
[Current Mood | tired]

I don't really know what else to think.  I guess I need to do more research before I form an opinion, but I thought I'd share it with y'all to see what you think.

An article about Ectogenesis
By Wendy Mcelroy
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,169295,00.html

LinkLeave a comment

Feminist or feminazi? [Sep. 6th, 2005|11:45 pm]

eaquaelegit
Prostitution and Male Superiority

The assumptions of academia can barely begin to imagine the reality of life for women in prostitution. Academic life is premised on the notion that there is a tomorrow and a next day and a next day; or that someone can come inside from the cold for time to study; or that there is some kind of discourse of ideas and a year of freedom in which you can have disagreements that will not cost you your life. These are premises that those who are students here or who teach here act on every day. They are antithetical to the lives of women who are in prostitution or who have been in prostitution.

If you have been in prostitution, you do not have tomorrow in your mind, because tomorrow is a very long time away. You cannot assume that you will live from minute to minute. You cannot and you do not. If you do, then you are stupid, and to be stupid in the world of prostitution is to be hurt, is to be dead. No woman who is prostituted can afford to be that stupid, such that she would actually believe that tomorrow will come.

I cannot reconcile these different premises. I can only say that the premises of the prostituted woman are my premises. They are the ones that I act from. They are the ones that my work has been based on all of these years. I cannot accept--because I cannot believe--the premises of the feminism that comes out of the academy: the feminism that says we will hear all these sides year after year, and then, someday, in the future, by some process that we have not yet found, we will decide what is right and what is true. That does not make sense to me. I understand that to many of you it does make sense. I am talking across the biggest cultural divide in my own life. I have been trying to talk across it for twenty years with what I would consider marginal success.

I want to bring us back to basics. Prostitution: what is it? It is the use of a woman's body for sex by a man, he pays money, he does what he wants. The minute you move away from what it really is, you move away from prostitution into the world of ideas. You will feel better; you will have a better time; it is more fun; there is plenty to discuss, but you will be discussing ideas, not prostitution. Prostitution is not an idea. It is the mouth, the vagina, the rectum, penetrated usually by a penis, sometimes hands, sometimes objects, by one man and then another and then another and then another and then another. That's what it is.

I ask you to think about your own bodies--if you can do so outside the world that the pornographers have created in your minds, the flat, dead, floating mouths and vaginas and anuses of women. I ask you to think concretely about your own bodies used that way. How sexy is it? Is it fun? The people who defend prostitution and pornography want you to feel a kinky little thrill every time you think of something being stuck in a woman. I want you to feel the delicate tissues in her body that are being misused. I want you to feel what it feels like when it happens over and over and over and over and over and over and over again: because that is what prostitution is.
(continued on the link...)

So what do you think? Some of her generalizations border on the feminazi, but if she is speaking from the perspective of a woman forced into prostitution, it becomes less of a generalization and more of an involuntary worldview. Also, the article doesn't seem to account for countries with legalized and regulated prostitution.

What do you think? Read the article, even if you disagree at the end, it's still a thoughtful read. Feminist passion or feminazi polemic? I'm sitting on the fence right now, still thinking it over.
Link6 comments|Leave a comment

You are the man. [Aug. 29th, 2005|07:57 am]

disconscious
You are the man. You are the man, in the paper, who killed his wife, she wouldn’t behave, you are the man, the head of the Church, who says men don’t need condoms, you are the man, the abuser, who raped his own daughter, beat his son blue, and senseless, you are the man, in vain pursuit, who bankrupted Enron, Worldcom and is so the US right now, you are the man, you call yourself a father but you don’t pay alimony, you are the man, Supreme Court Judge, who rules on women’s bodies, you are the man, his hair short cut, no social grace and his voice a monotone, you are the man, in Jerusalem, denied his own mother and started a thousand wars, you are the man, the quick fucker, who doesn’t care for us to come, you are the man, messianic leader, who brought to Egypt the seven plagues, you are the man, the hooligan, who drinks to pass and bawls into the streets, you are the man whose balls blew up so desperate he was for a quick shag, you are the man, the turgid dick you use to rape, you are the man, ugly duckling with no ass and a chest hard, you are the man, crazed warrior who kills for fun ‘but those are my orders’, you are the man, who wrote up the Bible and made it a sick pack of lies, you are the man, putrid asshole, who checks the Playboy centerfold, you are the man, in Amsterdam, in the red light district, you are the man, who ate the apple and got us all kicked out of Eden, you are the man, spreader of shame, who can’t accept any challenge, you are the man, infertile moron, who milks the earth and drives it to doom, you are the man, the death maker, who calls himself the destroyer of worlds, you are the man, and you invented the gas chambers.
Link16 comments|Leave a comment

[Aug. 16th, 2005|06:09 pm]

space_monkey340
Hello. I just joined this community. My name is Rachel and I am a housewife. I'm pregnant with my first child (a boy to be named Benjamin) and the first of my many life goals is to be a good wife and mother and make my family happy. But this is not my identity, I am also a musician and a student and am on a nonstop journey to find spiritual balance (among many other things). One of my pet peeves is feminazis. I think that, baring genetic differences, all humans are alike. Unfortunately, not everyone feels the same way so this is a great place to rant and rave about it.
Link20 comments|Leave a comment

[Jul. 27th, 2005|10:59 am]
pussincute
Image hosted by Photobucket.com
Link3 comments|Leave a comment

[Jul. 10th, 2005|12:22 am]
pussincute
Dear anti-feminist males,

Insulting the extreme feminists only makes them worse.

Calling them bitches and stuff like that won't make them change their minds and start thinking "Oh my! I was wrong! Not all men are dicks!"

You have to explain to them why they're wrong calmly and nicely.

You're probably thinking of answering with "I'm only nice to people who deserve it!"

Well, you're right. They don't deserve it. But they do think that they deserve it, so be nice to them anyway.

They are evil bitches, but if you keep telling them why they're wrong in a rude way you're just going to make it worse.
Link4 comments|Leave a comment

[Jul. 8th, 2005|01:15 am]
pussincute
Some feminists seem to have a speech impediment that causes them to stop talking one sentence early. Here are some examples. The missing sentences are in bold.

A womon doesn't need a man to be happy. She needs another womon.

Womyn should have the right to be whatever they want. Except the ones that want to be a housewife or a stripper or a model or...
Link7 comments|Leave a comment

[Jul. 5th, 2005|12:31 am]
pussincute
I just thought of something... Some feminists claim to be against fixed gender roles, but they label all men as abusers and all women as victims. Stupid hypocrites.
Link1 comment|Leave a comment

The NYT Lauding Motherhood?! (crossposted to [info]therightfangirl) [May. 8th, 2005|11:28 pm]

maidenjedi
[Current Mood | grateful]
[Current Music |ESPN, Baseball Tonight]

May 8, 2005
This Is Your Brain on Motherhood
By KATHERINE ELLISON - San Francisco

ANYONE shopping for a Mother's Day card today might reasonably linger in the Sympathy section. We can't seem to stop mourning the state of modern motherhood. "Madness" is our new metaphor. "Desperate Housewives" are our new cultural icons. And a mother's brain, as commonly envisioned, is impaired by a supposed full-scale assault on sanity and smarts.

So strong is this last stereotype that when a satirical Web site posted a "study" saying that parents lose an average of 20 I.Q. points on the birth of their first child, MSNBC broadcast it as if it were true. The danger of this perception is clearest for working mothers, who besides bearing children spend more time with them, or doing things for them, than fathers, according to a recent Department of Labor survey.

Read more... )
LinkLeave a comment

navigation
[ viewing | most recent entries ]
[ go | earlier ]