chris_acheson ([info]chris_acheson) wrote in [info]anarchists,
@ 2007-11-23 21:35:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Buy Something (if you want to) Day:
First of all, there is nothing inherently wrong with consumption. Shopping and consuming are enjoyable human activities and the marketplace has been a center of social life for thousands of years.

The locus of the oppression resides in the production function: people have no control over which commodities are produced (or services performed), in what amounts, under what conditions, or how these commodities are distributed. Corporations make these decisions and base them solely on profit potential.

As it is, the profusion of commodities is a genuine and powerful compensation for oppression. It is a bribe, but like all bribes it offers concrete benefits—in the average American’s case, a degree of physical comfort unparalleled in history. Under present conditions, people are preoccupied with consumer goods not because they are brainwashed but because buying is the one pleasurable activity not only permitted buy actively encouraged by our rulers. The pleasure of eating an ice cream cone may be minor compared to the pleasure of meaningful, autonomous work, but the former is easily available and the latter is not. A poor family would undoubtedly rather have a decent apartment than a new TV, but since they are unlikely to get the apartment, what is to be gained by not buying the TV?
I didn't buy anything today, because I'm broke. We should have a holiday for that: "don't buy anything (because you can't!) day". It would be glorious.



(Post a new comment)


[info]runrevolt
2007-11-24 03:28 am UTC (link)
this is rad. thanks.

(Reply to this)


[info]soviet_onionn
2007-11-24 04:25 am UTC (link)
Radgeek the redeemer saves the market from capitalism!

I only bought razor blades today, because I've been out for a while and this mountain man look isn't gonna cut it with the boss.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]chris_acheson
2007-11-24 06:22 am UTC (link)
Shaving is totally not anarchy.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]soviet_onionn
2007-11-24 10:41 am UTC (link)
You're tellin' me.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]crybetty
2007-11-24 04:50 am UTC (link)
I bought some bubble bath today with my food money. So it doesn't count. And it felt good.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]chris_acheson
2007-11-24 06:17 am UTC (link)
But did it taste good?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]crybetty
2007-11-24 11:45 pm UTC (link)
Actually, it IS called "candy cane. :o

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]chris_acheson
2007-11-24 06:58 am UTC (link)
"Porcelina Of The Vast Oceans (crybetty) replied to your LiveJournal post..."

I <3 that song.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]crybetty
2007-11-24 11:42 pm UTC (link)
Yes me too. :)

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]anunreallife
2007-11-24 10:01 am UTC (link)
I bought some bell peppers today, because I forgot to buy some on Wednesday, and rice is boring without things in it. Guess I'm a bad anarchist, haha.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]crybetty
2007-11-25 12:13 am UTC (link)
I don't think you're a bad anarchist for not participating into "buy nothing day".

To me it seems like an excuse for the upper class yuppies to feel better about themselves. It's very hypocritical, like the abdusters peeps.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]mungojelly
2007-11-24 01:10 pm UTC (link)
How about buy something from someone other than a corporation day?!?! If all of us anarchists bought shit from each other then we wouldn't have to work for the man.

There's nothing wrong with bell peppers, above poster, but you bought them from a corporation, didn't you? Are you quite sure there aren't any real farmers trying to sell you peppers? There's nothing wrong with bubble bath, above poster, but you bought it from a corporation, now didn't you? Are you sure there aren't any anarchists out there who might like to make an autonomous, healthy living making you bubble bath? There are.

So let's not pretend it's a choice between absolute submission to an inhuman corporate machine and having anything for breakfast. BUY IT FROM A REAL PERSON!

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]chris_acheson
2007-11-24 02:20 pm UTC (link)
This is my ideal interpretation of Buy Nothing Day. Buy nothing (on the white market) day. Engage only in illegal trade with people you trust! Remember kids, gifts are taxable, so all you gift economy types can participate too!

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]crybetty
2007-11-25 12:06 am UTC (link)
I bought my bubble bath from lush if you must know. They're one of the 2 companies in my area that sell locally handmade/eco-friendly/cruelty free cosmetics. I'm not saying they're perfect but they're not as bad as the other options I have. I could always make my own bubble bath too, but I'd have to make sure the ingredients I buy are also locally handmade/eco-friendly/cruelty free. I don't know anyone who make those at the moment, so I try and choose the best option that is available within my current means.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]mungojelly
2007-11-25 12:27 am UTC (link)
Oh yeah, Lush is pretty cool. Sorry, no offense intended. :)

It's not really an individual problem. We rarely have any good options. These days you're lucky if you can even buy imported overpackaged goods from a locally owned store & not just a Walmart. But we have to try. Maybe some sort of cooperative online underground marketplace?? Hmm...

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]crybetty
2007-11-25 01:01 am UTC (link)
No offense taken, no worries!
I was just pointing out that we do have better options sometimes and that we should choose those until we can have a stronger, larger independent market like the one you described in your first comment.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]igivesafuck
2007-11-24 05:06 pm UTC (link)
i'm gonna have to disagree. black friday isnt about buying necessities. the vast majority of the time it's about buying shit you don't need. regardless of if the problem is production or not, the world, mostly americans, have a problem with mass consumption.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]chris_acheson
2007-11-24 07:54 pm UTC (link)
Do you disagree with the whole article, or just the excerpt that I quoted?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]igivesafuck
2007-11-24 07:59 pm UTC (link)
i disagree with the whole article, it's an argument for capitalism and consumerism.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]chris_acheson
2007-11-24 08:18 pm UTC (link)
It seems pretty anti-capitalist to me. But regardless, I find it strange that you disagree completely with all of it. The sexist implications of anti-consumerist theory is a pretty solid point, for example. Do you disagree with that as well? If so, why?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]igivesafuck
2007-11-24 08:41 pm UTC (link)
unless i am understanding it wrong, it seems like a cop out to me. saying that women use "tools" such as make up to further themselves in the business world or "surivive the best they can" sounds like that is what is ACTUALLY sexist. i certainly do think that the media encourages negative stereotypes to both men and women, putting social pressures on them to conform by buying certain products. honestly it is moreso forced upon women than men and to deny this is counter productive to breaking down such stereotypes and false ideals what what a woman "should" be. last time i checked anti-consumerism movements never claim that consumerism is the sole reason for the oppression of women liberation.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)


[info]chris_acheson
2007-11-24 10:15 pm UTC (link)
The author of the article and the author being quoted are arguing that men require women to make themselves into sex objects, as well as saddling them with the responsibility for domestic duties and the purchasing that each entails.

As a result, we end up with the "empty-headed shopaholic" stereotype, directed primarily (exclusively?) at women, drawing the ire of AdBuster lifestylist types. Just because none of them directly state that "consumerism is the sole reason for the oppression of women" doesn't mean it's not an issue.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

Necessities
[info]radgeek
2007-11-25 03:49 am UTC (link)
I don't see anything wrong with buying "shit you don't need." There are lots of things that I don't need, but which I choose to buy anyway because it makes my life better to have them. E.g., books, music, tasty food, computer equipment, furniture, hot running water, trips to visit my family and friends, etc. etc. etc. Of course, I could choose to abstain from these and limit my spending only to necessities. But why should I?

Of course, there are also many activities that make your life worthwhile that do not require a purchase. To the extent that corporatism cuts people off from these forms of enjoyment, corporate capitalism should be undermined and resisted. But whether or not one chooses to personally abstain from spending on non-necessities does just about nothing to address these issues. The power of corporate capitalism to restrict alternative forms of enjoyment has very little to do with individual decisions about consumption and a lot to do with the monopolistic privileges granted by State power at the points of production and acquisition of land and resources. These are better resisted through labor organizing, targeted strikes and boycotts, resistance to State coercion, etc., rather than doing what "anti-consumerist" groups typically do, i.e. adopting an ascetic lifestyle and chiding, ridiculing or harassing those who aren't as personally hardcore as you are.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…