I am convinced of something that many Westerners would consider heresy. I am convinced that men and women are unequal. But before you burn me at the stake, hear me out.
I have spent countless hours attempting to explain to others why I have decided that I cannot be a feminist in the modern sense of the word, and since the modern sense is the qualifier for what is real, I cannot accept that terminology in reference to itself. I do not believe in what the average feminist believes. I have also traditionally refused many of the feminist ideals because of the innate anger and backlash in feminist systemic thinking, and utopian or dystopian ideas which are unhelpful to the actual cause. Besides, the idea of feminism operates on what I consider to be a fundamental fallacy, so how can I adopt such a label? I would say my beliefs are closer to original feminism from the time of the suffragettes, but still I cannot adopt the term in good conscience. Humans are stereotypists. No matter how hard anyone tries to convince me that applying the term "feminist" to myself is better, I still find reason to disagree because it is not a label I can accept because of the common understanding.
To judge men and women equal flies in the face of common observation. To consider that they should be treated equally is inhibiting to the freed mind. Simple facts support this. Unless twisted science interferes with the process, women will always be the ones with the choice of childbearing. A majority of men will see the world as something to be conquered, and a majority of women will see it as something to be nutured. Those who do not fit this mold often still retain something of the hallmarks of their sex at least in physicality, no matter their attempt to deny it. Scientific reasons support these things as well, a necessity for the survival of the species.
Instead of feminist I would prefer the term humanist, though it comes with baggage as well, and is a horribly imperfect term. The only part of it that I ascribe to is the part that sees the dignity of humanity. And thus I tell you, I am not a feminist, but I am all for human rights. If I am an activist in anything, it is for the rights and identities of men and women and children in every country.
Equal treatment is, in fact, unethical. Such an equal world is the epitome of the Science Fiction dystopia – the equal treatment of all humanity always becomes standardization, a non-recognition of the individual abilities and personalities of each member of humankind.
I propose that equal treatment is not what women ever wanted. They wanted to be recognized as women with all that they could add to the human race if they were properly valued and seen with open eyes. All the individual and collective attributes that womankind adds to the human equation – this is the recognition they desired and still desire. All human beings want to be seen for what they have to offer as a person first, a gendered being second, and an individual third.
None of them desire to be the caption of a man on a washroom door, equal but indistinguishable. And that is, unfortunately, what the word equality has come to mean.
<><><><><><><><><><><>
Blogathon 2008About Twyla's Blogathon
My Sponsors have donated:
$55How to
Donate to
Not For Sale Hello to all my visitors! Please comment to let me know you were here.
If you enjoyed this post, consider helping to stop slavery in our lifetime.
Because nobody should be for sale.
<><><><><><><><><><><>
(
1) - [The Beginning, the Story of Doubleslash] (
2) - [The Dream] (
3) - [Non-Existence] (
4) - [Heterodox] (
5) - [Forgotten] (
6) - [Know Your Enemy] (
7) - [Junkies] (
8) - [Descent into Blindness] (
9) - [Speaker for the Dead] (
10) - [The System is Down] (11) - [Inequality]