__o__o__ @ 9:35am: word
word.
a member.
hello.
okay... where to begin...
well, let's start with my favorite "adbusters" related topic: the "un-swoosher"(tm)blackspot(tm) shoe(tm).(tm)
okay.. for people who didn't see the problem with a seven dollar anti-consumerism magazine in the first place, here comes a storm of yellow shit: the "un-swoosher"(tm). this makes no sence whatsoever, and for people to buy into it and think it's cool that they are doing something so "subversive" just reaffirms my contention that people are ridiculous.
if you think it's cool that they are doing this, you should know that your beloved adbusters(tm)...
IS USING ADVERTISING TECHNIQUES TO GET YOU TO THINK IT IS COOL. therein lies the rub. you read a magazine that spits at consumerism and advertising... and tells you to do so as well, and then they begin this whole sneaker buisness and anti-corporation coroporation silliness, and they excpect the legion of people who are rapt in the whole "lawlessness" of disobeying advertisers to follow thier lead. and, from what i've seen so far... most of the people that read this magazine think it's a good thing. what? did i miss something here? repeat the question please, i think i was on drugs when you asked the class the first time, ma'am.
these people, who obviously don't see that there is "uncool" marketing afoot, are probably the same people who think Starbucks(tm) is okay because they pay fair-trade prices for their coffee and that almost totally exonerates them from the overt super-saturation of our towns and cities with thier coffeeshops. placing them right across the street from a privately-owned coffeeshop, or as is the case of my city, you don't need to know which one, placing over 8 stores and 3 small satelites in a 6 block radius. but enough about Starbucks(tm)... the real problem to adress here is with adbusters(tm).
adbusters(tm) markets (that word again) themselves to the "ad-savvy," this person, because of one belief or another, wouldn't be caught dead in a McDonalds(tm) and can rattle off a hundred or more reasons why they wouldn't be caught dead in a McDonald's(tm), but will wave around a copy of adbusters just to show how anti-consumerism they are. this marketing aproach is marketing ot the Uncool crowd. companies do this because they know that you're on to them and thier techniques. adbusters(tm) uses this stragedy in an even more devious manner: they market to the to-smart-for-marketing-crowd.
::NEWSFLASH:: you can't market to someone who is too smart for advertising.
so what does this prove?
... hmmm.
Current Mood: 
cynical