Gramarye ([info]gramarye1971) wrote in [info]academics_anon,
@ 2004-11-19 13:16:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Current mood:hungry

Academic Writing: What Words/Phrases Really Annoy You?
Taking a break from working on an essay, I have an idle question for all of you:

Are there any words or turns of phrase that you refuse to use in your academic writing? Or for that matter, words or turns of phrase that really upset you when you see them used in academic writing?

Apart from the usual cliches and passive voice usage, I had it drilled into my head early on as an undergraduate that 'however' was an absolutely unacceptable way to start a sentence -- primarily because it's a cheap way of making a transition in your thoughts. I've rewritten entire paragraphs in order to avoid using that word, and I've never regretted it.

But more specifically, as a historian I really can't stand the word 'inevitable'. If you learn anything in history, it's that NOTHING is truly inevitable, except that people will die eventually (and even then they don't always die when you want/expect them to). I personally prefer to use 'unavoidable' or 'inescapable', rather than 'inevitable'. Perhaps it's just a matter of semantics with me. *shrugs*

So what of it? Do you have a particular bete noir in academic writing?

(crossposted to [info]academics_uk)




Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

(Post a new comment)


[info]warhol
2004-11-19 05:52 am UTC (link)
Well, you mentioned it, but I'll second the motion: passive voice. It indicates academic cowardice, or it masks ignorance.

The paper says: ...the specimens were examined...

The paper means: Maybe I did it, maybe my coauthor did it, maybe a grad student did it? I'm being vague about it, because I don't want to take responsibility for an errors.

The paper says: ...it is widely known that X...

The paper means: Well, I know that X, and I know that some other people know X, but I don't really have a source on that.

It irks me to no end. There's never a reason to use the passive voice unless you need the reader to focus on the object. If the subject is known, identify it; if the subject is unknown, state that.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]holyschist
2004-11-21 04:14 pm UTC (link)
This confuses me. My understanding is that standard, professional scientific writing DOES NOT ALLOW the first person, so I cannot write "I examined the thin sections" without being unprofessional.

It's annoying, and IMO not good writing, but isn't it sort of the professional standard?

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]drenilop
2004-11-19 06:03 am UTC (link)
I agree with the 'however' line - I was taught that it, and similar words like thus, therefore, whereas, meanwhile, subsequently, etc., are conjunctions. Just like their colleagues and, so, or, & but, they should never be used to start sentences. I lump all of these into a large category called Nerd Words, things students use at a rate several times that of most published work, just because they think it makes them sound more 'academic.' The worst abusers usually get a quota of Nerd Words for major assignments.

I'm also not too fond of things that "impact" other things. I always get mental images of things slamming into one another - often a funny image given the usual essay content.

Final one: things that hold or prove true. Can you hold a true for me, please? Just put it down right over here on the desk....

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]writingprof
2004-11-19 06:11 am UTC (link)
I agree about "impact" - fine noun but a soul-less verb, and in general I object when words mutate. I've heard "impactful" lately. Ugh.
"Journaling" is a word from my discipline that makes me wince. Why take a perfectly good noun and make a mealy-mouthed verb from it?

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]etinterrapax, 2004-11-19 08:55 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]gramarye1971, 2004-11-19 06:20 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]drenilop, 2004-11-19 08:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]solri, 2004-11-19 11:27 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]caernarvon, 2004-11-19 01:38 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]fallenarches, 2004-11-19 10:38 pm UTC

[info]etinterrapax
2004-11-19 06:03 am UTC (link)
ITA about "It is widely known that..." I'm one of those annoying profs who insists on an actual subject in every sentence, not a wuss-out like, "It is known." I've also had to mention class-wide that the phrase, "Since the beginning of time..." is a bad way to start a sentence, especially in an introduction. Unless they know that racial issues have existed since the beginning of time, they shouldn't be trying to assert this. Plus, it sounds horrendous. As bad as when sex is described as "a dance as old as time" in romance novels. Not that I'd have read enough of them to know about this. No, no.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]jeejeen
2004-11-19 06:08 am UTC (link)
HA HA! A dance as old as time, indeed.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]moireach, 2004-11-19 08:41 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]etinterrapax, 2004-11-19 08:50 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]solri, 2004-11-19 11:32 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]fonnerberry, 2004-11-25 10:52 pm UTC

[info]okokdomodomo
2004-11-19 06:17 am UTC (link)
Any essay entitled "[verb]ing the Postmodern Body: . . . " or "The End of . . . " just strikes me as trite - in fact, use of the "the body" as a theoretical catchall might be the most annoying abuse of language (imho) in the theory/crit I read.

I'm totally cool with the use of passive voice, tho. Or, at least, I have been.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]gramarye1971
2004-11-19 06:23 am UTC (link)
Or, at least, I have been.

OMGIKILLYOUNOW. *smites*

^_^ I can tolerate it on very, very rare occasions when the active voice sounds overly stilted or inaccurate. But I'd rather rewrite the sentence entirely than put myself in that position.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]hkmercredi
2004-11-19 07:13 am UTC (link)
Absurd amounts of prepositional phrases drive me nuts, but that relates to passive voice as well (yes, I know there were phrases there and yes, I ended a sentence with one, but sometimes they're unavoidable and grammar rules are sometimes stupid). Still, my poor freshman tutees had to deal with my agonizing over the dozens of prepositional phrases they had within each sentence when I probably should have ignored the details and focused on the content so that going over a simple 2-3 page paper didn't take a half hour.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]fallenarches
2004-11-19 10:41 pm UTC (link)
Bet Henry James drives you crazy. He does me, yet I'm oddly attracted......

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]hkmercredi, 2004-11-19 11:29 pm UTC
Comments on today's discussion - [info]fallenarches, 2004-11-20 12:24 am UTC

[info]sevenwhispers
2004-11-19 08:30 am UTC (link)
I really cannot tolerate people who end sentences with verbs, start sentences with conjunctions or use commas in places where there should be a colon or semicolon. I know it sounds 'elementary school' to complain about this but I have experienced it in many essays I've read.

(Reply to this)


[info]moireach
2004-11-19 08:39 am UTC (link)
I know this is totally subjective and ridiculous but I can't stand the use of first person in academic writing. It's not about, you, it's about the text! Drives me mad.

Though I fear I've been a pretty bad "however" offender.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]shamebear
2004-11-19 11:14 am UTC (link)
Good to meet a fellow "however"-offender. I hope we get to serve community service in the same library :-)

I'm also a repeat "though" violator.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]venetia, 2004-11-22 11:10 pm UTC

[info]tacitrainbow
2004-11-19 10:29 am UTC (link)
The use of "as we know it" drives me insane! "The world as we know it will..." I mean how I know the world and how you know the world is purly subjective. How can we have the same perception of the world? Of course another pet peeve is the good old "irregardless" that pops up now and then in poorly penned essays.

(Reply to this)


[info]livingfossil
2004-11-19 10:57 am UTC (link)
I dislike overblown diction. Bombast!

Also (while this isn't exactly on topic), I've been recently annoyed by the flurry of the phrase "an historic" which they've (Cheney/Bush/Major News Anchors) taken to pronouncing with an unaspirated H. That prods my eyes with salty fingers.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]verrucaria
2004-11-19 11:15 am UTC (link)
I think that pronounciation is pretty standard in British English, so my level of annoyance depends on who's using the phrase. In my opinion, it sounds too self-important when it's coming from most Americans, though a few can get get away with it. To me, it depends on your speech tendencies in general (it sounds really bad if it's a particular individual's only attempt at eloquence).

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]livingfossil, 2004-11-19 11:19 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]jeanpaulsatre, 2004-11-19 10:06 pm UTC
Comments on today's discussion - [info]fallenarches, 2004-11-19 10:46 pm UTC
Re: Comments on today's discussion - [info]livingfossil, 2004-11-20 04:19 pm UTC
Re: Comments on today's discussion - [info]fallenarches, 2004-11-20 05:29 pm UTC

[info]epithalamium
2004-11-19 11:07 am UTC (link)
Any variation of "the textualization of" really bugs me. I can see how it might be occasionally useful, but I think it mostly operates as a catch-all for "what I think the book is saying is . . ."

(Reply to this)


[info]shamebear
2004-11-19 11:09 am UTC (link)
"Proved". In physics it's very true that things arn't proved, only falsified. Also, it's easy to overuse its mathematical meaning. "shows that", "we see here that" is a less pompous way to declare a simple half-page result.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]livingfossil
2004-11-19 11:24 am UTC (link)
Ack! That's another: I can't stand 'proved'. I always use 'proven'. But I guess that's idiosyncratic or just plain idiotic.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]absolution
2004-11-19 11:09 am UTC (link)
one time i started one of my body paragraphs for a critique of an article with "interestingly, ..." my prof wrote in gigantic caps "UGH!!!!" next to it. and yeah, he had a point. :)

(Reply to this)


[info]wring
2004-11-19 11:10 am UTC (link)
omg it's the nerd parade...

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]shamebear
2004-11-19 11:15 am UTC (link)
She used the n word! Ready your whiteoutbottles! Aim! Shoot!
*SPLOOSH!*

:-D

(Reply to this) (Parent)

(no subject) - [info]gramarye1971, 2004-11-20 08:58 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]etinterrapax, 2004-11-20 05:18 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]wring, 2004-11-20 11:55 pm UTC

[info]solri
2004-11-19 11:41 am UTC (link)
Two things I dislike are empty subjects used to avoid the passive voice ("People think that ...") and clumsy passive structures to avoid using the first person ("It will be argued that ..."). \begin{rant} There again, with all the contradictory advice students are given, I'm not surprised they end up mangling their language in order to conform to some dictum passed on unthinkingly by a composition teacher who has never picked up an academic journal, let alone contributed to one. \end{rant}

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]latvianchick
2004-11-19 04:36 pm UTC (link)
Yes. I completely agree with you. My other pet peeve is people who avoid using the verb "to be" at all costs, substituting words like "constitute" in its place. It still means IS. Sometimes things just ARE.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]sarahthegeek
2004-11-19 11:50 am UTC (link)
I can't stand the word "obviously." If something is obvious, you shouldn't have had to tell me about it. Obviously is just code for "Now I shall patronize you pleebs who have not spent the last X months studying this topic with me." Stupid "obviously."

Oh, and the misuse of semicolons bothers me as well. I love semicolons. Do not abuse the semicolons.

(Reply to this)


[info]greyarea24
2004-11-19 12:15 pm UTC (link)
This is more for speaking than writing, but the phrase as it were makes me grind my teeth. A superpompous kid in a philosophy class a couple years ago used it as a comma when he was talking and I've had an adverse reaction to the phrase ever since.

(Reply to this)


[info]lostreality
2004-11-19 12:41 pm UTC (link)
i hate the word "salience", every freakin professor and lecturer i see uses this word over and over again to the point where it's lost all meaning.

(Reply to this)


[info]conrad_zaar
2004-11-19 01:24 pm UTC (link)
I agree with the others here who rail against use of the passive voice. While it is not grammatically wrong, it is almost always stylistically undesirable. It is particularly offensive when a writer uses it to avoid responsibility. My favourite example of this comes from my first-year English professor: "We regret to inform you that your file has been lost." Wait a minute... WHO lost the file now?

"As such" is a phrase that I have no objection to when it is properly used. Some writers however, (particularly Philosophy undergrads) tend to toss it into sentences where it serves no function.

I detest the word "utilize" with a vehemence totally out of proportion to its offences. If you mean "use," just say "use."

I don't like it when people use the verb "to be" unnecessarily. Just a few moments ago, I read the phrase, "it is centered on the notion." Why not just write "it centers on the notion"?

I hate reading the word "society" in undergraduate English papers. I want to tell my classmates: "You are not writing an essay about 'society' (whatever that even means). You are writing an essay about literature."

Bah. There are others, but I've spread enough bad vibes for today.

(Reply to this)


[info]micat
2004-11-19 01:56 pm UTC (link)
As a non-native speaker and a physicist, I'd appreciate suggestion on how to avoid the "passive voice". I tend to use it in my papers, and I wonder how else I should word my sentences.

Example: " Three crystals were characterized using PICTS."
or
For the following rocking curves, the energy was set to 12 keV.
Alternatively, I could write " The following rocking curves were measured at 12 keV". But then it is still passive.

I don't consider it good style to write "We/the experimentators/..." did... in a publication.

In my native language, german, the passive voice is very popular in scientific writing. I was not aware of the fact that this is different in English.

Suggestions are warmly welcome!

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]tempter
2004-11-19 03:29 pm UTC (link)
Speaking as a native speaker and as a theoretical mathematician and scientist, the passive voice is preferred in scientific writing, even in the US.

I suspect that most of the sentiments above come from humanities folk and are more in reference to literary critiques and the like than from lab researchers dealing with experimental data. (Which is fine -- it's entirely possible that passive voice is overused in that style of writing.) For scientific writing, though, especially for publication, passive voice is the correct style.

I think it may reflect an underlying difference in mentality. In the humanities, you're essentially trying to add your voice to an ongoing conversation. In science, you're trying to remove your influence from your writing and let the data speak for itself.

(Reply to this) (Parent)(Thread)

(no subject) - [info]micat, 2004-11-19 11:09 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]gramarye1971, 2004-11-20 09:01 am UTC
(no subject) - [info]holyschist, 2004-11-21 04:21 pm UTC
(no subject) - [info]anemone, 2004-11-20 08:48 am UTC
troubling words
[info]uncleosap
2004-11-19 03:46 pm UTC (link)
Hi.
Oh, there are a few words that i will type miles to avoid. Ever notice how a professor will drop a word into discussion and then within a day or so everyone uses that word? I know this is how we learn, but it's excruciating during the process.
Here are words that pain me:
-conflation
-agency
-hegemony
-simulacrum
And the names of some writers of whom, although i like some of their stuff, i've grown tired :
-Foucault
-Butler
-Freud, Freud, and Freud
Well, good topic. Cheers

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: troubling words
[info]etinterrapax
2004-11-20 05:22 pm UTC (link)
Oh, "hegemony" and "hermeneutics" are both words that I think people use to prove command of a field, especially when they think they've finally gotten a handle on literary theory. If you had a nickel for every instance of them in first-year graduate English papers, you could fund NASA.

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]napoleon_jones
2004-11-19 04:14 pm UTC (link)
ditto uncleosap

(Reply to this)


[info]lleullaw
2004-11-19 04:35 pm UTC (link)
well these are pretty basic, but i HATE when students or whoever for that matter, feel the need to make sure that i don't miss the point, with phrases like "in conclusion" or "secondly, etc" UGH!

(Reply to this)


[info]constructingme
2004-11-19 10:42 pm UTC (link)
hmmmm. i'm annoyed that students aren't taught how to write properly in high school, i guess. i'm a ta in a remedial english class and whenever i take a step back from my excitement that my students are learning how to organize their papers and realize that i haven't written as they do since 6th grade, i want to cry.

and you know, i love passive voice. i don't know why- i don't think i misuse or overuse it, but i get in fights all the time with microsoft word abour it.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Comments on today's discussion
[info]fallenarches
2004-11-19 10:50 pm UTC (link)
Indeed, all of these petty complaints don't even begin to address the true horrors of truly horrific writing.

(Reply to this) (Parent)

student essays - [info]uncleosap, 2004-11-20 11:16 am UTC
Comments on today's discussion
[info]fallenarches
2004-11-19 10:56 pm UTC (link)
Bad Words: ameliorate and a priori.

I can't really tell you why I hate them, but they provoke a visceral reaction. I must associate them with distasteful individuals.

(Reply to this) (Thread)

Re: Comments on today's discussion
[info]gramarye1971
2004-11-20 09:03 am UTC (link)
A priori is indeed teeth-grating. *nods*

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]micat
2004-11-19 11:38 pm UTC (link)
My basic rule is to avoid all the sentences starring in in this old but very funny internet page: ( I had to cut a lot to post, so go and visit!)
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jcdverha/scijokes/8_2.html#subindex


A brief guide to Scientific literature
======================================

The following phrases, frequently found in technical writings, are defined
below for your enlightenment.

Phrase Translation
------------------------------------------------

It has been long known...............I haven't bothered to check the references
It is known..........................I believe
It is believed.......................I think
It is generally believed.............My collegues and I think
There has been some discussion.......Nobody agrees with me
It can be shown......................Take my word for it
It is proven.........................It agrees with something mathematical
Of great theoretical importance......I find it interesting
Of great practical importance........This justifies my employment
Of great historical importance.......This ought to make me famous
Some samples were chosen for study...The others didn't make sense
Typical results are shown............The best results are shown
Correct within order of magnitude....Wrong
The values were obtained empirically.The values were obtained by accident
The results are inconclusive.........The results seem to disprove my hypothesis
Additional work is required..........Someone else can work out the details
It might be argued that..............I have a good answer to this objection
The investigations proved rewarding..My grant has been renewed

(Reply to this)


Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…