|
[21 Sep 2005|09:31pm] |
Hay ghostlight
We like you a lot. You still got us.
Love your retarded bitch whores.
 
|
|
|
[14 Sep 2005|08:32pm] |
|
What the fuck Mike?
|
|
| End Times |
[14 Sep 2005|01:55pm] |
|
And lo, didst the seventh seal break, and there I saw the prophet Michael delete his online journal, and then all was a blackness, amen.
|
|
| haha mike this is you |
[24 Aug 2005|10:51am] |
except you're not normal
|
|
|
[22 Aug 2005|01:39pm] |
¿Who wants replies to a nearly year-old thread?
¡ME!
In other news, this thread is open for the discussion of my favourite picture of myself:
|
|
|
[18 Aug 2005|06:03am] |
discephaloid: In spirit I'm always looking up your skirt
CaseyasaurusRex: at my big dick
discephaloid: God yes
discephaloid: I want to just suck on it and roll my tongue over the head
discephaloid: Slap it around my gums to make sure I don't waste any of that milk
discephaloid: God I'm hard
|
|
| Attention whores get attention! |
[04 Aug 2005|05:44pm] |
¡![[info]](http://p-stat.livejournal.com/img/userinfo.gif) ghostlight is a debate loser!
I'm now forwarded these links by those circling his journal like vultures, waiting for him to spout yet another retarded essay on why people he thinks are dumber than him are such jerks to him. ¿Is his sense of worth truly so low that he needs to rationalize why people on the internet are bullying him?
I am bored at work - ¡let's enjoy some Mystery Gumbo Theatre!
( Read more... )
|
|
| Today, on a very special Ghostlight |
[29 Jul 2005|10:19am] |
¡That's right! I have not forgotten you, ¡loyal followers of this dead community!
I bring good news. I am soon to be renewing my extended user pictures and will be returning to the old icons you once knew and humped in the secret hours of the night in the absence of your special pillow 'Spanky'.
I also have a treat for you - in this brief thread here my old friend cabrutus is caught with his pants down. [Note that he admits to being frightened, ostensibly because I am really incredibly powerful in the brains.]
Naturally this results in the only thing that ever results from him talking to me - he posts a passive-aggressive flame in his livejournal.
But hey, that's just every-day stuff until he turns up in someone else's livejournal jumping on the hater-train with a powerfully eloquent speech [likely fuelled entirely by his linguistic prowess. With him is guest star avez_kuleshov, who you might remember was on my friendslist for a month or two before not being. I honestly can't remember why, but I bet she does.
cabrutus is a professional philosopher, which means that his placement of me in the Omega tier of philosophication is based on expert testiony, but unfortunately has not stopped him from being a homophobe, a sexist, and overall rather ignorant.
Permit me to indulge myself in feeling justified that a Grade-A dickhole who spends his days furiously masturbating to himself, however intelligent he may be, thinks I'm below him.
|
|
|
[04 Jul 2005|07:44am] |
Banned yet again, this time because someone forms the ridiculous theory that since I can respond to comments in a thread I must be the person who posted them.
Just FYI, the best way to prove you don't care about a troll is to screen a portion of a thread, delete the rest, then make a new post announcing that you did so. This is what is called, in the business, "feeding the troll".
How "feeding the troll" works IRL:
Troll makes a post, possibly only one word large.
Prima responds to post with more than one word.
Secundus responds to Prima telling Prima not to feed the troll.
Prima and Secundus have a large discussion that consists either of disagreeing whether or not they fed the troll, or justifying why they fed the troll just that one time.
Troll's word-to-response ratio becomes incredibly large and Community is disrupted.
Troll's ego subsequently increases as discussions break out that center around suggesting ways in which Community can get rid of the troll by ignoring them.
It is decided that the troll 'has no life', despite the fact that the number of words they've typed are invariably a factor of ten small than the ones they have received in response.
Troll wins like a terrorist.
|
|
|
[31 May 2005|09:00pm] |
WHAT.
|
|
|
[06 May 2005|01:49pm] |
Hi guys.
Today I was banned from nonuglyassholes.
This is now a thread open for discussion.
|
|
|
[25 Mar 2005|11:23pm] |
Women are funny creatures. They lick themselves to keep clean, and they always shit on the carpet no matter how clean you keep their underwear.
In a recent thread in ![[info]](http://p-stat.livejournal.com/img/community.gif) feminist, I boldly announced my love of Cunt. Naturally I was warned, because in a community filled with females you are not allowed to even be suspected of objectifying their bodies.
Despite the fact that bodies are objects in the first place.
Now, I knew this would be a completely boring story if I didn't make an effort to blow it up into something more, so I emailed the moderator,Regarding this thread,
http://www.livejournal.com/community/feminist/1771217.html?thread=42382289#t42382289,
I wonder what exactly about my tone was suspect.
Thank you. -...You're kidding me, right?
You don't see how that comment could be interpreted to be trollish and/or
creepy?
If you want me to spell it out:
-Your lack of capitalization and/or a supporting opinion led me to believe
that you weren't talking about the book.
-In which case, your statement can be interpreted as either a) a piss-poor
attempt at a joke, or b) a statement about your sexual preference. As a
joke, it sucked. Third-grade humor. As a statement about your sexual
preference? You're a straight man. Watch me throw you a party. Either
way, the comment was pointless and has disturbed other members of the
community.
Watch your tone, think through your words. Whatever you want to call it.
Thanks. -
I'm sorry I don't have a magnificent command of the English language.
Sometimes I make mistakes while typing. I apologise. I also do not
think that of itself should lead to the conclusion that I was speaking
off topic.
The fact that I did not support my opinion was because opinions don't
need support. I mean, did you freeze this thread -
http://www.livejournal.com/community/feminist/1771217.html?thread=42336209#t42336209 ?
What about this one
http://www.livejournal.com/community/feminist/1771217.html?thread=42342353#t42342353 ?
This http://www.livejournal.com/community/feminist/1771217.html?thread=42345425#t42345425 ?
From your statement "You're a straight man. Watch me throw you a
party. " I can see exactly why I was warned. I am sorry - I will take
especial care in the future not to say things that might be offensive
when one ignores their context and assumes I'm a man.
Sensing that she had been completely defeated by my implication that I was a gay woman, the moderator ceased replying. For a brief moment I considered that she might be checking with her associates to see if I was, in fact, a straight man - I did not hear back from her.
Oh, and I was banned for calling someone a bigot because they said they were anti-theist.
Women are funny creatures. They'll warn you for liking a book, but they'll ban you for telling someone that their blind hatred of others is bigotry.
|
|
