intelligent discussion

Recently there's been a few global stories in the news, George Zimmerman (a Mexican), and these two AmerIndians in Tulsa, Oklahoma that went on a killing spree.

Both of these stories were blamed on white people, even though none of the people that committed the crimes were white. Whites were blamed by the media even before the perpetrators were even caught, and are still being blamed after it's known they are non-white (all by the Liberal/Jew owned media outlets). Mind you, black people commit ten times the hate crimes whites do, and in much more brutal ways, yet not one story is ever reported (see my previous thread).

Every time you turn on the TV you see whites represented as racist, or being stupid rednecks. Every time I try and watch a movie there's an underlying theme of whites being bad or guilty of something -- 95% of the time these films are financed by Hollywood Jews.

This is all set up to promote hate against white people by other groups and to instill white guilt and inferiority so that it will keep multiculturalism and miscegenation growing. This is done by Liberals and Zionists to further a plan of genocide against the European genotype. There's no conspiracy here either, the evidence is there for all to see. This is a Holocaust, and it's happening right now! Open your eyes!

Poor Trayvon

http://www.newnation.org/NNN-Black-on-White.html

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVW9CyDT2GM&feature=related

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-TJPh26ONA

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYgmTX77oAg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwSolQx9Ysg&feature=results_video&playnext=1&list=PLA74D89818407ABB3

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8bEX-y1nr8&feature=related

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRhaoWWKE-k&feature=related

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x017zexYdVA&feature=related

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hda5SfD214c&feature=related

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iF0N1QoRjlA&feature=related

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-R-lOGx3Mc&feature=related

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hs8vDnnJ0F0

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYZFdctB4XA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twyVJJZ_A3c

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1DiIhg3kwc

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aTdaiVLxxb4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=snohG1L_XF4&feature=relmfu

Now explain why some black kid who got shot by a Mexican -- in what appears to be self defense -- is in the news everyday but none of these stories are? These stories don't make the news because the Zionist/Liberal media is trying to instill white inferiority and guilt so it will contribute to the extermination of the European genotype. This is genocide!!

About 6 years years ago I use to talk to this girl online. We met electronically through Myspace, however, we never met in person for a date. She was coming out of a breakup, and refused my date requests. She was a stunningly beautiful Russian girl that was studying Science at the time, and she was extremely bright. She had a peculiar sense of culture and intellectual curiosity in a way that someone that immigrated to a country when they were young and had to adapt gains. We spoke for a few months online, and that was it!

I read through her old Livejournal entries from an account that's been abandoned for about 6 years now, and it evokes a longing, a sort of reminiscence of my youth. I go to her journal quite often to feel this.

I did see her in person twice, and I believe she saw me both times, but I guess we were too shy or surprised to say anything. One time about 4 years ago i was sitting in a doctors office and she went into the store next to it and I believe she saw me in the window. She looked better looking in person, and I'll never forget her appearance: she had dyed her hair black and was wearing this shiny hipster/mod style outfit. Another time we briefly made eye contact whilst walking by each other in a busy city crowd.

But that's it. We spoke for a month on an instant messaging service, six years ago! I've had many girlfriends since, including a long-term one I'm in now, but I am still wondering what could have been with this girl, and I still go to her livejoural once a week to read her entries.

Is this strange?

Is beauty a privilege?

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/11/big-banks-plead-with-customers-not-to-move-their-money.html

Banks sucking it hard and long.

It's November: the protests are heating up for a long, cold winter. It's not so cold in a crowd, though.

In my home town there is a small group of activists that have been trying to get people to boycott Israel. They have set up protests outside of grocery stores that cary Israeli made products. They have also protested outside of synagogues. 

Recently a former member of this group (former because the other members consider his messages to be too extreme and detrimental to the goals of their cause) attempted to pay for a boycott Israel advertisement to be displayed on the side of city buses. This is a link to the advertisement:

http://annarborchronicle.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/ProposedAATAAdTextImage.pdf

The proposed add says: "Boycott Israel, Boycott Apartheid"
There is also a poorly drawn cartoonish image of a spider with a skull for its head, holding in its hands bones.

The ad was rejected by the government body that oversees the public buses. They justified banning the ad because they have a policy against accepting adds that "Defames or is likely to hold up to scorn or ridicule a person or group of persons."

I guess in a certain light its pretty obvious to see that this ad defames Israel, and by extension Israelis, by the very fact that it calls for a boycott against Israel. But perhaps you could go a step further and argue that the image is not dissimilar to images that were used by Nazis to drive public opinion against Jews in 1930s Germany, and thus constitutes defamation of Jews in general.

Seeing the arguments that people have been getting into over this incident, typical pro and anti Israel propaganda notwithstanding, I got to thinking about what kinds of speech are acceptable in the public sphere and in the advertising sphere as well. When should speech be curtailed? Is defamation enough of a reason to prevent someone from saying something? At what point is it OK to censor speech? Should there be different standards for printed media and spoken media? Is it OK to have special rules for advertisements that are different for speech in other media? Should government entities be given discretion to decide when a particular image or phrase amounts to defamation given that politics can heavily influence someone's opinion, and that such authority could potentially be used to stifle political speech of political opponents?

Are you following the Occupy Movement(s) presently? Do you know what their stated goals are?

Have your opinions about the occupy movement changed since they've begun? How so?

For myself, I've been in awe over just how far things have gone and impressed with the resolve of people and the resiliency of the movement keeping itself non-violent and coherent. The longer this goes on, the more solidarity people seem to be building over differences like race, age, religion, and the like.

I'm holding on to my hope that this ends well, though the government agencies opposing these movements are beginning to get a bit more violent. Unfortunately (for the goals of disrupting the movement) this will only foster more sympathy and support for the movement.

Winter is coming, yes. But winter coming will likely be a bigger problem for the police officers than the protesters: they get paid the same in rain or snow and, from what I've seen in the myriad of videos I've been watching, they've already begun showing signs of stress at their role in the matter.

I vote the changes requested by protesters will be met. I vote, change will come.

What say you?

"To Serve and Protect", a familiar phrase in the English-speaking world.

The practice of this phrase is debatable.

On the topic of police officers returning to the "serving" side of their stated-purpose, in hopes that it will amplify the "protect" side: I've got some minor solutions I'd like to ask you to comment on.

(1) Make cops carry out monthly non-police tasks in plain-clothes or a non-police uniform (no badge, no gun, no ability to claim being a cop in any way) as part of required salaried labor.
-Some examples of what I mean:picking up trash at parks, helping kids cross the street during school-hours, coaching teams, volunteering more generally, being parking-meter faeries (saving people from paying for over-due parking situations).

(2) Install speed-recorders in police cars. Ever seen a cop speeding? Ya, me too.

These videos are all from a Youtube Channel called TheYoungTurks (http://www.youtube.com/user/TheYoungTurks), which is a great source of news. Of course, take from this humble poster's opinion, what you will.



THE "Free Market" in action.



THE "Free Media" in action.



THE "Free Speech' in action.



THE "Free World" in action.